2026 H1 -tulosraportti
Äänite tulossa
2 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 000 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 7 000 | - | - | ||
| 5 000 | - | - | ||
| 3 000 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H2 -tulosraportti 15.4.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 31.8. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 26.3. | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 29.8.2025 | ||
2024 H2 -tulosraportti 31.3.2025 | ||
2024 H1 -tulosraportti 30.8.2024 |
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·8 min sittenIt's nice to be anonymous, then you can do as you please. I see no reason why one should spend their time on a stock, where one neither owns shares nor has an intention. That only tells one thing, they are not doing well with themselves. When looking at a company, some factors come first. Debt and costs. Loko is the company on the stock exchange with the least debt and payroll. Any objections? The company is valued at 400 mil with no debt and payroll costs under 5 mil. They have 99 mil paid in advance for mass production, which is in the final phase. Loko is one of the few companies on the stock exchange that has gone up since its IPO. With 50% after the IPO price, while 90% of companies deliver losses or are delisted. Since the IPO, Loko has been valued 50% higher with the Lokotech ecosystem since 2021. Since then, a lot has happened, including Powerpool and Asic development. Now the cryptographer has changed tactics and we are entering bull run times, so this helps. The company has confirmed that there will be no capital raising in the foreseeable future. Everything is set for the harvest of the ages, and for those who wish to be in early, today's price is a fair value for risk. In a few months, you will understand why I am saying this 👍
·2 t sittenThe LOKO-case could look completely different in 2–4 months There is much discussion about whether Lokotech will need more capital. I absolutely do not rule out that they might do so, but I think an important perspective is missing in the discussion: What does the company actually look like if a capital raise becomes relevant? Imagine a positive, but not particularly unlikely scenario during the autumn: 1. First physical silicon arrives. 2. The tests confirm that the ASIC functions as expected. 3. Efficiency is around or better than what Lokotech has communicated. 4. One of the biggest remaining technical risks in the case is significantly reduced. 5. Existing preorders become much more tangible, and presale of the next batch can be opened. 6. The AI capabilities can be tested on physical silicon. 7. LOI negotiations with the American and Canadian parties can develop towards an actual JV agreement. That would be a fundamentally different LOKO-case than today's. Today, the market still prices significant risk around the question: Does the physical chip actually work as the simulations indicate? After a successful physical validation, the question will largely become: How much can they sell, and how quickly can they scale? There is a significant difference if the company is to raise capital. Let's take a purely illustrative example. Say that LOKO in a few months has delivered very good physical results, gained increased order interest and made the AI collaboration more concrete. If the share, as a result of this, for example, stands at 1,50–2,00 kroner, and the company wishes to raise 75 mill. to increase production volume and finance further commercialization, it is a completely different situation than raising 75 mill. because the cash is about to run out. Both are called an emission, but economically they are quite different. One can be growth capital after significant de-risking, the other capital that is necessary to keep the business running. Therefore, I believe the timing and reason for a potential capital raise are far more important than the word "emission" itself. Lokotech had 31,4 mill. in cash at the half-year mark, an equity ratio of 96,3 %, and nearly 100 mill. was already prepaid for mask sets and production-related equipment. That does not mean they necessarily have enough capital for the entire way forward. But it can give them something very valuable: time to reach the next major milestone before they eventually finance further growth. And if additional capital becomes necessary, there are also more possibilities than an ordinary emission. For me, therefore, the results from physical silicon are far more important right now than the question of whether Lokotech might raise more capital later. :)
It might be that they run a combo solution.. successful testing and everything looks bright.. and then they run a good share issue with good sentiment.. that will be win-win.. of course everything depends on positive tests and gateway going forward..!! Good post by the way, thorough analysis!!
·2 t sittenSharing a post from discord. It is speculated about the number of chips (ASICs) that are in production. According to the CEO, Batch 1 consists of 50 wafers with 1,500 chips on each. So, a total of 75,000 chips. Some on edges/corners must be discarded. Some may have reduced performance. Many of these can be used by Powerpool in its production. With a fault-tolerant design and very thorough tests/simulations in the Cadence tool, the design team expects at least 50% of the chips in Batch 1 to be salable. Remember that the design team is very experienced, with 15 completed tapeouts, all without the need for a respin. A first respin for eventual fine-tuning/optimizations and adjustments in the mask set before Batch 2 is otherwise included in the agreed fixed-price contract.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 H1 -tulosraportti
Äänite tulossa
2 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·8 min sittenIt's nice to be anonymous, then you can do as you please. I see no reason why one should spend their time on a stock, where one neither owns shares nor has an intention. That only tells one thing, they are not doing well with themselves. When looking at a company, some factors come first. Debt and costs. Loko is the company on the stock exchange with the least debt and payroll. Any objections? The company is valued at 400 mil with no debt and payroll costs under 5 mil. They have 99 mil paid in advance for mass production, which is in the final phase. Loko is one of the few companies on the stock exchange that has gone up since its IPO. With 50% after the IPO price, while 90% of companies deliver losses or are delisted. Since the IPO, Loko has been valued 50% higher with the Lokotech ecosystem since 2021. Since then, a lot has happened, including Powerpool and Asic development. Now the cryptographer has changed tactics and we are entering bull run times, so this helps. The company has confirmed that there will be no capital raising in the foreseeable future. Everything is set for the harvest of the ages, and for those who wish to be in early, today's price is a fair value for risk. In a few months, you will understand why I am saying this 👍
- ·2 t sittenThe LOKO-case could look completely different in 2–4 months There is much discussion about whether Lokotech will need more capital. I absolutely do not rule out that they might do so, but I think an important perspective is missing in the discussion: What does the company actually look like if a capital raise becomes relevant? Imagine a positive, but not particularly unlikely scenario during the autumn: 1. First physical silicon arrives. 2. The tests confirm that the ASIC functions as expected. 3. Efficiency is around or better than what Lokotech has communicated. 4. One of the biggest remaining technical risks in the case is significantly reduced. 5. Existing preorders become much more tangible, and presale of the next batch can be opened. 6. The AI capabilities can be tested on physical silicon. 7. LOI negotiations with the American and Canadian parties can develop towards an actual JV agreement. That would be a fundamentally different LOKO-case than today's. Today, the market still prices significant risk around the question: Does the physical chip actually work as the simulations indicate? After a successful physical validation, the question will largely become: How much can they sell, and how quickly can they scale? There is a significant difference if the company is to raise capital. Let's take a purely illustrative example. Say that LOKO in a few months has delivered very good physical results, gained increased order interest and made the AI collaboration more concrete. If the share, as a result of this, for example, stands at 1,50–2,00 kroner, and the company wishes to raise 75 mill. to increase production volume and finance further commercialization, it is a completely different situation than raising 75 mill. because the cash is about to run out. Both are called an emission, but economically they are quite different. One can be growth capital after significant de-risking, the other capital that is necessary to keep the business running. Therefore, I believe the timing and reason for a potential capital raise are far more important than the word "emission" itself. Lokotech had 31,4 mill. in cash at the half-year mark, an equity ratio of 96,3 %, and nearly 100 mill. was already prepaid for mask sets and production-related equipment. That does not mean they necessarily have enough capital for the entire way forward. But it can give them something very valuable: time to reach the next major milestone before they eventually finance further growth. And if additional capital becomes necessary, there are also more possibilities than an ordinary emission. For me, therefore, the results from physical silicon are far more important right now than the question of whether Lokotech might raise more capital later. :)It might be that they run a combo solution.. successful testing and everything looks bright.. and then they run a good share issue with good sentiment.. that will be win-win.. of course everything depends on positive tests and gateway going forward..!! Good post by the way, thorough analysis!!
- ·2 t sittenSharing a post from discord. It is speculated about the number of chips (ASICs) that are in production. According to the CEO, Batch 1 consists of 50 wafers with 1,500 chips on each. So, a total of 75,000 chips. Some on edges/corners must be discarded. Some may have reduced performance. Many of these can be used by Powerpool in its production. With a fault-tolerant design and very thorough tests/simulations in the Cadence tool, the design team expects at least 50% of the chips in Batch 1 to be salable. Remember that the design team is very experienced, with 15 completed tapeouts, all without the need for a respin. A first respin for eventual fine-tuning/optimizations and adjustments in the mask set before Batch 2 is otherwise included in the agreed fixed-price contract.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 000 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 7 000 | - | - | ||
| 5 000 | - | - | ||
| 3 000 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H2 -tulosraportti 15.4.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 31.8. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 26.3. | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 29.8.2025 | ||
2024 H2 -tulosraportti 31.3.2025 | ||
2024 H1 -tulosraportti 30.8.2024 |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 H1 -tulosraportti
Äänite tulossa
2 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H2 -tulosraportti 15.4.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 31.8. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 26.3. | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 29.8.2025 | ||
2024 H2 -tulosraportti 31.3.2025 | ||
2024 H1 -tulosraportti 30.8.2024 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·8 min sittenIt's nice to be anonymous, then you can do as you please. I see no reason why one should spend their time on a stock, where one neither owns shares nor has an intention. That only tells one thing, they are not doing well with themselves. When looking at a company, some factors come first. Debt and costs. Loko is the company on the stock exchange with the least debt and payroll. Any objections? The company is valued at 400 mil with no debt and payroll costs under 5 mil. They have 99 mil paid in advance for mass production, which is in the final phase. Loko is one of the few companies on the stock exchange that has gone up since its IPO. With 50% after the IPO price, while 90% of companies deliver losses or are delisted. Since the IPO, Loko has been valued 50% higher with the Lokotech ecosystem since 2021. Since then, a lot has happened, including Powerpool and Asic development. Now the cryptographer has changed tactics and we are entering bull run times, so this helps. The company has confirmed that there will be no capital raising in the foreseeable future. Everything is set for the harvest of the ages, and for those who wish to be in early, today's price is a fair value for risk. In a few months, you will understand why I am saying this 👍
- ·2 t sittenThe LOKO-case could look completely different in 2–4 months There is much discussion about whether Lokotech will need more capital. I absolutely do not rule out that they might do so, but I think an important perspective is missing in the discussion: What does the company actually look like if a capital raise becomes relevant? Imagine a positive, but not particularly unlikely scenario during the autumn: 1. First physical silicon arrives. 2. The tests confirm that the ASIC functions as expected. 3. Efficiency is around or better than what Lokotech has communicated. 4. One of the biggest remaining technical risks in the case is significantly reduced. 5. Existing preorders become much more tangible, and presale of the next batch can be opened. 6. The AI capabilities can be tested on physical silicon. 7. LOI negotiations with the American and Canadian parties can develop towards an actual JV agreement. That would be a fundamentally different LOKO-case than today's. Today, the market still prices significant risk around the question: Does the physical chip actually work as the simulations indicate? After a successful physical validation, the question will largely become: How much can they sell, and how quickly can they scale? There is a significant difference if the company is to raise capital. Let's take a purely illustrative example. Say that LOKO in a few months has delivered very good physical results, gained increased order interest and made the AI collaboration more concrete. If the share, as a result of this, for example, stands at 1,50–2,00 kroner, and the company wishes to raise 75 mill. to increase production volume and finance further commercialization, it is a completely different situation than raising 75 mill. because the cash is about to run out. Both are called an emission, but economically they are quite different. One can be growth capital after significant de-risking, the other capital that is necessary to keep the business running. Therefore, I believe the timing and reason for a potential capital raise are far more important than the word "emission" itself. Lokotech had 31,4 mill. in cash at the half-year mark, an equity ratio of 96,3 %, and nearly 100 mill. was already prepaid for mask sets and production-related equipment. That does not mean they necessarily have enough capital for the entire way forward. But it can give them something very valuable: time to reach the next major milestone before they eventually finance further growth. And if additional capital becomes necessary, there are also more possibilities than an ordinary emission. For me, therefore, the results from physical silicon are far more important right now than the question of whether Lokotech might raise more capital later. :)It might be that they run a combo solution.. successful testing and everything looks bright.. and then they run a good share issue with good sentiment.. that will be win-win.. of course everything depends on positive tests and gateway going forward..!! Good post by the way, thorough analysis!!
- ·2 t sittenSharing a post from discord. It is speculated about the number of chips (ASICs) that are in production. According to the CEO, Batch 1 consists of 50 wafers with 1,500 chips on each. So, a total of 75,000 chips. Some on edges/corners must be discarded. Some may have reduced performance. Many of these can be used by Powerpool in its production. With a fault-tolerant design and very thorough tests/simulations in the Cadence tool, the design team expects at least 50% of the chips in Batch 1 to be salable. Remember that the design team is very experienced, with 15 completed tapeouts, all without the need for a respin. A first respin for eventual fine-tuning/optimizations and adjustments in the mask set before Batch 2 is otherwise included in the agreed fixed-price contract.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 000 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 7 000 | - | - | ||
| 5 000 | - | - | ||
| 3 000 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt