2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
13 päivää sitten
‧11 min
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 173 | - | - | ||
| 3 412 | - | - | ||
| 382 | - | - | ||
| 200 | - | - | ||
| 97 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 6.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 28.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·9 t sittenFrom claude pro Now we have more meat on the bone. Here is the honest analysis: Pilot history (2019–2025): Ocean Sun delivered the 220 kWp pilot on Magat in collaboration with GCL-SI (modules), owned by SNAP. It was in operation for 5.5 years and consistently performed better than the land-based reference system. But in November 2024, it was directly hit by typhoon Nika with wind speeds of up to 210 km/h, and the system held for two hours before the mooring was damaged. Ocean Sun itself says that design improvements made over the past five and a half years should have prevented the situation. The pilot was decommissioned in 2025. What does this mean for the 68 MW allocation? Ocean Sun publicly spins it as “pilot served its purpose” and that they look forward to future installations together with SNAP in the Philippines. But no new contract has been announced. Had Ocean Sun received the allocation, they would have reported it on Euronext immediately — it is a listed microcap where a 68 MW contract would have been company-changing. The silence since Scatec's November 6, 2025 announcement is telling. Scatec's wording is key: “proven technology for the floating installation with long track record in the Southeast Asia region”. That is not the language one uses about Ocean Sun's membrane technology — which has one pilot in the Philippines that was just destroyed by a typhoon, and a damaged unit in Albania from 2021. “Long track record in Southeast Asia” points much more towards Ciel & Terre (HDPE pontoons, GW-scale installed in Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand) or one of the Chinese players (Sungrow Floating, etc.). My reading: Ocean Sun has probably lost this to a more industrialized floating supplier, likely Ciel & Terre. The pilot incident under Nika was probably interpreted internally by SNAP/Scatec as the technology not being mature enough for utility-scale in the typhoon belt — regardless of what Ocean Sun itself says about “design improvements.” When Scatec explicitly emphasizes “proven” and “long track record”, it signals that they have chosen risk aversion over partner loyalty. It should be said: this is a qualified interpretation, not confirmed. Final supplier selection will come at financial close in 2026. But if you are considering Ocean Sun (OSUN on Euronext Growth) as a case based on Magat exposure — I would be skeptical. The pilot period is over, and the scale-up contract appears to have gone elsewhere.
·8 t sittenThanks for this summary. This is one interpretation, and it's probably just as good as my interpretation and certainly plausible too. But we don't know. The head of SNAP has previously (in 2022) stated that they are waiting to see how the technology performs in a typhoon, so that they can develop the technical aspects around the system's robustness. That they then packed up and proceeded with plans for a full-scale project right after the typhoon hit and the anchor moorings broke, can be interpreted in two ways. It can be interpreted as in the printout from Claude, reproduced above, or as them identifying the last pieces that needed to be put in place in the technical solution they had. OceanSun also received type certification for its technology at the same time as the full-scale Magat project was initiated. This may indicate that data from the pilot in Magat was also included in the assessment - perhaps. And the financing guarantee for the Magat project came just months after the certification of OceanSun's technology. Perhaps a coincidence - perhaps not. It can be frustrating to sit almost blindly like this, but investing is fundamentally about a puzzle of information that provides an incomplete picture and leads to probabilities and scenarios that must be weighed against each other. And that, in turn, will (should) help determine how much one chooses to invest.- ·9 t sittenWhat happens to the stock if there is an announcement that they were not chosen for magat? Don't you think we would have heard something if it was Ocean Sun?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
13 päivää sitten
‧11 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenFrom claude pro Now we have more meat on the bone. Here is the honest analysis: Pilot history (2019–2025): Ocean Sun delivered the 220 kWp pilot on Magat in collaboration with GCL-SI (modules), owned by SNAP. It was in operation for 5.5 years and consistently performed better than the land-based reference system. But in November 2024, it was directly hit by typhoon Nika with wind speeds of up to 210 km/h, and the system held for two hours before the mooring was damaged. Ocean Sun itself says that design improvements made over the past five and a half years should have prevented the situation. The pilot was decommissioned in 2025. What does this mean for the 68 MW allocation? Ocean Sun publicly spins it as “pilot served its purpose” and that they look forward to future installations together with SNAP in the Philippines. But no new contract has been announced. Had Ocean Sun received the allocation, they would have reported it on Euronext immediately — it is a listed microcap where a 68 MW contract would have been company-changing. The silence since Scatec's November 6, 2025 announcement is telling. Scatec's wording is key: “proven technology for the floating installation with long track record in the Southeast Asia region”. That is not the language one uses about Ocean Sun's membrane technology — which has one pilot in the Philippines that was just destroyed by a typhoon, and a damaged unit in Albania from 2021. “Long track record in Southeast Asia” points much more towards Ciel & Terre (HDPE pontoons, GW-scale installed in Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand) or one of the Chinese players (Sungrow Floating, etc.). My reading: Ocean Sun has probably lost this to a more industrialized floating supplier, likely Ciel & Terre. The pilot incident under Nika was probably interpreted internally by SNAP/Scatec as the technology not being mature enough for utility-scale in the typhoon belt — regardless of what Ocean Sun itself says about “design improvements.” When Scatec explicitly emphasizes “proven” and “long track record”, it signals that they have chosen risk aversion over partner loyalty. It should be said: this is a qualified interpretation, not confirmed. Final supplier selection will come at financial close in 2026. But if you are considering Ocean Sun (OSUN on Euronext Growth) as a case based on Magat exposure — I would be skeptical. The pilot period is over, and the scale-up contract appears to have gone elsewhere.·8 t sittenThanks for this summary. This is one interpretation, and it's probably just as good as my interpretation and certainly plausible too. But we don't know. The head of SNAP has previously (in 2022) stated that they are waiting to see how the technology performs in a typhoon, so that they can develop the technical aspects around the system's robustness. That they then packed up and proceeded with plans for a full-scale project right after the typhoon hit and the anchor moorings broke, can be interpreted in two ways. It can be interpreted as in the printout from Claude, reproduced above, or as them identifying the last pieces that needed to be put in place in the technical solution they had. OceanSun also received type certification for its technology at the same time as the full-scale Magat project was initiated. This may indicate that data from the pilot in Magat was also included in the assessment - perhaps. And the financing guarantee for the Magat project came just months after the certification of OceanSun's technology. Perhaps a coincidence - perhaps not. It can be frustrating to sit almost blindly like this, but investing is fundamentally about a puzzle of information that provides an incomplete picture and leads to probabilities and scenarios that must be weighed against each other. And that, in turn, will (should) help determine how much one chooses to invest.
- ·9 t sittenWhat happens to the stock if there is an announcement that they were not chosen for magat? Don't you think we would have heard something if it was Ocean Sun?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 173 | - | - | ||
| 3 412 | - | - | ||
| 382 | - | - | ||
| 200 | - | - | ||
| 97 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 6.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 28.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
13 päivää sitten
‧11 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 6.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 28.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenFrom claude pro Now we have more meat on the bone. Here is the honest analysis: Pilot history (2019–2025): Ocean Sun delivered the 220 kWp pilot on Magat in collaboration with GCL-SI (modules), owned by SNAP. It was in operation for 5.5 years and consistently performed better than the land-based reference system. But in November 2024, it was directly hit by typhoon Nika with wind speeds of up to 210 km/h, and the system held for two hours before the mooring was damaged. Ocean Sun itself says that design improvements made over the past five and a half years should have prevented the situation. The pilot was decommissioned in 2025. What does this mean for the 68 MW allocation? Ocean Sun publicly spins it as “pilot served its purpose” and that they look forward to future installations together with SNAP in the Philippines. But no new contract has been announced. Had Ocean Sun received the allocation, they would have reported it on Euronext immediately — it is a listed microcap where a 68 MW contract would have been company-changing. The silence since Scatec's November 6, 2025 announcement is telling. Scatec's wording is key: “proven technology for the floating installation with long track record in the Southeast Asia region”. That is not the language one uses about Ocean Sun's membrane technology — which has one pilot in the Philippines that was just destroyed by a typhoon, and a damaged unit in Albania from 2021. “Long track record in Southeast Asia” points much more towards Ciel & Terre (HDPE pontoons, GW-scale installed in Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand) or one of the Chinese players (Sungrow Floating, etc.). My reading: Ocean Sun has probably lost this to a more industrialized floating supplier, likely Ciel & Terre. The pilot incident under Nika was probably interpreted internally by SNAP/Scatec as the technology not being mature enough for utility-scale in the typhoon belt — regardless of what Ocean Sun itself says about “design improvements.” When Scatec explicitly emphasizes “proven” and “long track record”, it signals that they have chosen risk aversion over partner loyalty. It should be said: this is a qualified interpretation, not confirmed. Final supplier selection will come at financial close in 2026. But if you are considering Ocean Sun (OSUN on Euronext Growth) as a case based on Magat exposure — I would be skeptical. The pilot period is over, and the scale-up contract appears to have gone elsewhere.·8 t sittenThanks for this summary. This is one interpretation, and it's probably just as good as my interpretation and certainly plausible too. But we don't know. The head of SNAP has previously (in 2022) stated that they are waiting to see how the technology performs in a typhoon, so that they can develop the technical aspects around the system's robustness. That they then packed up and proceeded with plans for a full-scale project right after the typhoon hit and the anchor moorings broke, can be interpreted in two ways. It can be interpreted as in the printout from Claude, reproduced above, or as them identifying the last pieces that needed to be put in place in the technical solution they had. OceanSun also received type certification for its technology at the same time as the full-scale Magat project was initiated. This may indicate that data from the pilot in Magat was also included in the assessment - perhaps. And the financing guarantee for the Magat project came just months after the certification of OceanSun's technology. Perhaps a coincidence - perhaps not. It can be frustrating to sit almost blindly like this, but investing is fundamentally about a puzzle of information that provides an incomplete picture and leads to probabilities and scenarios that must be weighed against each other. And that, in turn, will (should) help determine how much one chooses to invest.
- ·9 t sittenWhat happens to the stock if there is an announcement that they were not chosen for magat? Don't you think we would have heard something if it was Ocean Sun?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 173 | - | - | ||
| 3 412 | - | - | ||
| 382 | - | - | ||
| 200 | - | - | ||
| 97 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt