2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
22 päivää sitten
‧37 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 852 | - | - | ||
| 168 | - | - | ||
| 1 353 | - | - | ||
| 2 227 | - | - | ||
| 4 003 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 8.1. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 6.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 8.7.2025 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·9 t sittenThere is no downward resistance on this stock now so 3,20 is well possible in the near future. Buying a falling knife often results in bloody fingers.
·12 t sittenI believe the board should consider whether Trond Håkon Schaug-Pettersen is still the right person to lead Salmon Evolution. It's not about me having lost faith in the company's technology or in the potential of phase 2. On the contrary. Precisely for this reason, I believe the management must be held accountable for the following: • Capital discipline: In recent years, the company has undergone several capital raises and increased debt to finance further expansion. In April 2026, a new directed issue and simultaneous refinancing were carried out. When the capital requirement continues to be significant, I believe it is legitimate to question how well the capital requirement has been planned and communicated. • Communication and expectation management: In my opinion, this is the most serious point. Over time, management has communicated very aggressively about phase 2, progress, production growth, and future earning capacity. In April 2026, it was communicated, among other things, that the company had "solid capital structure" after the issue and refinancing. At the same time, shareholders have been subjected to significant capital dilution. • Results must be commensurate with ambitions: Q2 2025 ended with Farming EBITDA of minus 13.2 million kroner and Group EBITDA of minus 25.6 million kroner. The company explained the results, among other things, with weak salmon prices and temporarily higher costs. These are understandable explanations, but it does not change the need to assess whether management is actually delivering on the financial targets communicated to the market. • Credibility towards shareholders: When management repeatedly communicates that phase 2 is "on track," while the company has to raise significant new capital, I believe shareholders are entitled to a much clearer explanation of capital requirements, risk, and what it will actually take before the company becomes a solid cash flow machine. The company itself has described phase 2 as the basis for a powerful transformation of earning capacity. • Shareholder value: A good CEO should not only get a project completed. He should also ensure that capital is used efficiently and that shareholders receive a reasonable return on the capital they make available. When financing involves repeated issues and dilution, I believe the board must question whether the current management is the best to take the company through the next phase. At the same time, I am fully aware that the picture is not only negative. Phase 2 is now in use, and the company reports that the ramp-up is proceeding as planned. Production is also expected to increase significantly going forward. But precisely for this reason, I believe this is the time to ask the question: Should the person who has been responsible for capital raising, communication, and strategic direction in recent years also be the one to lead the company through the next phase? My opinion is no!!! I believe the board should consider a change of leadership. Not because Salmon Evolution lacks potential, but because the company deserves a leadership that, in my opinion, has greater credibility when it comes to capital discipline, communication, and value creation for shareholders.Agree that the original plan (the concept) should be kept. But some more details (and I'm not saying he personally should know it but someone below him) and be honest about it. If you miss guided revenues by 40-50%, it has major consequences for access to investor funds, which is necessary to reach the goal.
·12 t sittenWe have a management that totally disregards the shareholders. It seems like it's play money they've been tasked with managing. It's high time the board finds another management that can inform the shareholders along the way. Current management has cost shareholders hundreds of millions and perhaps billions.I am somewhat surprised when several start to get worried now. Do you never look at the 1-, 3- and 5-year chart?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
22 päivää sitten
‧37 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenThere is no downward resistance on this stock now so 3,20 is well possible in the near future. Buying a falling knife often results in bloody fingers.
- ·12 t sittenI believe the board should consider whether Trond Håkon Schaug-Pettersen is still the right person to lead Salmon Evolution. It's not about me having lost faith in the company's technology or in the potential of phase 2. On the contrary. Precisely for this reason, I believe the management must be held accountable for the following: • Capital discipline: In recent years, the company has undergone several capital raises and increased debt to finance further expansion. In April 2026, a new directed issue and simultaneous refinancing were carried out. When the capital requirement continues to be significant, I believe it is legitimate to question how well the capital requirement has been planned and communicated. • Communication and expectation management: In my opinion, this is the most serious point. Over time, management has communicated very aggressively about phase 2, progress, production growth, and future earning capacity. In April 2026, it was communicated, among other things, that the company had "solid capital structure" after the issue and refinancing. At the same time, shareholders have been subjected to significant capital dilution. • Results must be commensurate with ambitions: Q2 2025 ended with Farming EBITDA of minus 13.2 million kroner and Group EBITDA of minus 25.6 million kroner. The company explained the results, among other things, with weak salmon prices and temporarily higher costs. These are understandable explanations, but it does not change the need to assess whether management is actually delivering on the financial targets communicated to the market. • Credibility towards shareholders: When management repeatedly communicates that phase 2 is "on track," while the company has to raise significant new capital, I believe shareholders are entitled to a much clearer explanation of capital requirements, risk, and what it will actually take before the company becomes a solid cash flow machine. The company itself has described phase 2 as the basis for a powerful transformation of earning capacity. • Shareholder value: A good CEO should not only get a project completed. He should also ensure that capital is used efficiently and that shareholders receive a reasonable return on the capital they make available. When financing involves repeated issues and dilution, I believe the board must question whether the current management is the best to take the company through the next phase. At the same time, I am fully aware that the picture is not only negative. Phase 2 is now in use, and the company reports that the ramp-up is proceeding as planned. Production is also expected to increase significantly going forward. But precisely for this reason, I believe this is the time to ask the question: Should the person who has been responsible for capital raising, communication, and strategic direction in recent years also be the one to lead the company through the next phase? My opinion is no!!! I believe the board should consider a change of leadership. Not because Salmon Evolution lacks potential, but because the company deserves a leadership that, in my opinion, has greater credibility when it comes to capital discipline, communication, and value creation for shareholders.Agree that the original plan (the concept) should be kept. But some more details (and I'm not saying he personally should know it but someone below him) and be honest about it. If you miss guided revenues by 40-50%, it has major consequences for access to investor funds, which is necessary to reach the goal.
- ·12 t sittenWe have a management that totally disregards the shareholders. It seems like it's play money they've been tasked with managing. It's high time the board finds another management that can inform the shareholders along the way. Current management has cost shareholders hundreds of millions and perhaps billions.I am somewhat surprised when several start to get worried now. Do you never look at the 1-, 3- and 5-year chart?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 852 | - | - | ||
| 168 | - | - | ||
| 1 353 | - | - | ||
| 2 227 | - | - | ||
| 4 003 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 8.1. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 6.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 8.7.2025 |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
22 päivää sitten
‧37 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 8.1. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 6.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 8.7.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenThere is no downward resistance on this stock now so 3,20 is well possible in the near future. Buying a falling knife often results in bloody fingers.
- ·12 t sittenI believe the board should consider whether Trond Håkon Schaug-Pettersen is still the right person to lead Salmon Evolution. It's not about me having lost faith in the company's technology or in the potential of phase 2. On the contrary. Precisely for this reason, I believe the management must be held accountable for the following: • Capital discipline: In recent years, the company has undergone several capital raises and increased debt to finance further expansion. In April 2026, a new directed issue and simultaneous refinancing were carried out. When the capital requirement continues to be significant, I believe it is legitimate to question how well the capital requirement has been planned and communicated. • Communication and expectation management: In my opinion, this is the most serious point. Over time, management has communicated very aggressively about phase 2, progress, production growth, and future earning capacity. In April 2026, it was communicated, among other things, that the company had "solid capital structure" after the issue and refinancing. At the same time, shareholders have been subjected to significant capital dilution. • Results must be commensurate with ambitions: Q2 2025 ended with Farming EBITDA of minus 13.2 million kroner and Group EBITDA of minus 25.6 million kroner. The company explained the results, among other things, with weak salmon prices and temporarily higher costs. These are understandable explanations, but it does not change the need to assess whether management is actually delivering on the financial targets communicated to the market. • Credibility towards shareholders: When management repeatedly communicates that phase 2 is "on track," while the company has to raise significant new capital, I believe shareholders are entitled to a much clearer explanation of capital requirements, risk, and what it will actually take before the company becomes a solid cash flow machine. The company itself has described phase 2 as the basis for a powerful transformation of earning capacity. • Shareholder value: A good CEO should not only get a project completed. He should also ensure that capital is used efficiently and that shareholders receive a reasonable return on the capital they make available. When financing involves repeated issues and dilution, I believe the board must question whether the current management is the best to take the company through the next phase. At the same time, I am fully aware that the picture is not only negative. Phase 2 is now in use, and the company reports that the ramp-up is proceeding as planned. Production is also expected to increase significantly going forward. But precisely for this reason, I believe this is the time to ask the question: Should the person who has been responsible for capital raising, communication, and strategic direction in recent years also be the one to lead the company through the next phase? My opinion is no!!! I believe the board should consider a change of leadership. Not because Salmon Evolution lacks potential, but because the company deserves a leadership that, in my opinion, has greater credibility when it comes to capital discipline, communication, and value creation for shareholders.Agree that the original plan (the concept) should be kept. But some more details (and I'm not saying he personally should know it but someone below him) and be honest about it. If you miss guided revenues by 40-50%, it has major consequences for access to investor funds, which is necessary to reach the goal.
- ·12 t sittenWe have a management that totally disregards the shareholders. It seems like it's play money they've been tasked with managing. It's high time the board finds another management that can inform the shareholders along the way. Current management has cost shareholders hundreds of millions and perhaps billions.I am somewhat surprised when several start to get worried now. Do you never look at the 1-, 3- and 5-year chart?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 852 | - | - | ||
| 168 | - | - | ||
| 1 353 | - | - | ||
| 2 227 | - | - | ||
| 4 003 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt