2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
4 päivää sitten58 min
1,20 SEK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
1,15%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nordic Growth Market
Määrä
Osto
370
Myynti
Määrä
2 657
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | NON | AVA | ||
| 38 | ENS | NON | ||
| 1 | ENS | NON | ||
| 147 | ENS | NON | ||
| 160 | ENS | NON |
Ylin
195VWAP
Alin
190,4VaihtoMäärä
7,8 40 473
VWAP
Ylin
195Alin
190,4VaihtoMäärä
7,8 40 473
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 -tulosraportti | 15.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 28.1. | |
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 15.10.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 11.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 11.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 24.1.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·9 t sittenThe major risk, which is repeatedly highlighted, that Paradox constitutes such a large part of the portfolio, is effectively eliminated. One gets Paradox quite free plus a good discount on top of the unlisted shares. I made the analysis below at a share price of 199. Since then, the share price has fallen and the net asset value discount has increased further, so in the near future I will have to adjust the discount further up, unless the share rises again. Valuation at share price 199: At a share price of 199 SEK, one gets either the unlisted share portfolio and Paradox with a very large discount, depending on which of the elements one chooses to “place” the discount on. The official net asset value discount is approx. 30 %, but the real net asset value discount is much higher. The discount is growing and own shares are being bought back, and the discount has never been higher according to ibindex. I calculate the real net asset value discount to be 65 %. For 44.50 SEK out of the payment per share of 199 SEK, according to my calculation, one gets: - either unlisted shares valued at 127 SEK. - or one gets Paradox shares corresponding to approx. 66 SEK quite free - as well as unlisted shares valued at 66 SEK free on top. The major risk, which is often highlighted, that Paradox constitutes such a large part of the portfolio, is thus effectively eliminated. One can get Paradox quite free plus a good discount on top of the unlisted shares. Calculation method: I calculate the real net asset value discount solely in relation to the unlisted shares, by first fully offsetting the value of the listed shares as well as positive capital including receivables (and offsetting any debt.) Thereafter, it is of course necessary to look at what unlisted shares are in the company's portfolio. Firstly, one must consider whether the value is correctly determined. I do not have the prerequisites to know this, and must therefore assess whether I find the management trustworthy and competent, including to what extent the management itself invests, and whether there are larger investors who sometimes supplement further. Secondly, one must consider the security in relation to how much individual shares account for in the portfolio. The share Paradox is discussed above, and there are no other individual shares that account for over 4 % and they therefore do not immediately constitute a problem in themselves due to the proportion of the net asset value. So even if Paradox, against all expectations, were to go bankrupt, the net asset value of the Spiltan share would still be intact in relation to the share price. Others may have greater abilities than I to assess the value of the underlying unlisted companies.
·1 päivä sittenThe last five years, the substance has grown approximately 2% per year on average, but decreased just over 2% in 2025. This can be compared with SIXRX which has returned just over 9% per year on average over the last five years and just over 12% in 2025.
·3 päivää sittenGood that Spiltan raises the dividend to a level close to many other investment companies. One of many necessary steps to increase interest in the share. Also hope for a change of listing and quarterly dividend in the future.·2 päivää sittenIt is capital destruction to distribute money. As someone living abroad, I can impossibly avoid 15% withholding tax. After that, it depends on the type of account if there will be an additional 23% tax to the Norwegian state. In total, therefore, 38% of the dividend can disappear. Money that would have been much better utilized in the company. Furthermore, I don't understand why one, as an owner, would want a dividend. If I invest in an investment company, I do so because I believe that those who run it are better at investing the money than I am. Then I want them to do exactly that. That is, invest the money – not pay it back. If I want the money back, I sell. Then I can also choose whether I want to pay tax or not. There is a reason why Birkshire Hathaway has never paid out dividends. Then it can become 5.5 million percent: https://www.di.se/analys/buffetts-magiska-facit-5-5-miljoner-procent/- ·9.1.In sparrebellen, Börjesson writes: "Warren Buffett recently spoke about how Trump in 72 hours had destroyed the conditions for American companies in the defense sector with his new doctrine in foreign policy." I have searched with AI (Börjesson recommends using AI) but find no evidence for this statement. Börjesson talks too much!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
4 päivää sitten58 min
1,20 SEK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
1,15%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenThe major risk, which is repeatedly highlighted, that Paradox constitutes such a large part of the portfolio, is effectively eliminated. One gets Paradox quite free plus a good discount on top of the unlisted shares. I made the analysis below at a share price of 199. Since then, the share price has fallen and the net asset value discount has increased further, so in the near future I will have to adjust the discount further up, unless the share rises again. Valuation at share price 199: At a share price of 199 SEK, one gets either the unlisted share portfolio and Paradox with a very large discount, depending on which of the elements one chooses to “place” the discount on. The official net asset value discount is approx. 30 %, but the real net asset value discount is much higher. The discount is growing and own shares are being bought back, and the discount has never been higher according to ibindex. I calculate the real net asset value discount to be 65 %. For 44.50 SEK out of the payment per share of 199 SEK, according to my calculation, one gets: - either unlisted shares valued at 127 SEK. - or one gets Paradox shares corresponding to approx. 66 SEK quite free - as well as unlisted shares valued at 66 SEK free on top. The major risk, which is often highlighted, that Paradox constitutes such a large part of the portfolio, is thus effectively eliminated. One can get Paradox quite free plus a good discount on top of the unlisted shares. Calculation method: I calculate the real net asset value discount solely in relation to the unlisted shares, by first fully offsetting the value of the listed shares as well as positive capital including receivables (and offsetting any debt.) Thereafter, it is of course necessary to look at what unlisted shares are in the company's portfolio. Firstly, one must consider whether the value is correctly determined. I do not have the prerequisites to know this, and must therefore assess whether I find the management trustworthy and competent, including to what extent the management itself invests, and whether there are larger investors who sometimes supplement further. Secondly, one must consider the security in relation to how much individual shares account for in the portfolio. The share Paradox is discussed above, and there are no other individual shares that account for over 4 % and they therefore do not immediately constitute a problem in themselves due to the proportion of the net asset value. So even if Paradox, against all expectations, were to go bankrupt, the net asset value of the Spiltan share would still be intact in relation to the share price. Others may have greater abilities than I to assess the value of the underlying unlisted companies.
- ·1 päivä sittenThe last five years, the substance has grown approximately 2% per year on average, but decreased just over 2% in 2025. This can be compared with SIXRX which has returned just over 9% per year on average over the last five years and just over 12% in 2025.
- ·3 päivää sittenGood that Spiltan raises the dividend to a level close to many other investment companies. One of many necessary steps to increase interest in the share. Also hope for a change of listing and quarterly dividend in the future.·2 päivää sittenIt is capital destruction to distribute money. As someone living abroad, I can impossibly avoid 15% withholding tax. After that, it depends on the type of account if there will be an additional 23% tax to the Norwegian state. In total, therefore, 38% of the dividend can disappear. Money that would have been much better utilized in the company. Furthermore, I don't understand why one, as an owner, would want a dividend. If I invest in an investment company, I do so because I believe that those who run it are better at investing the money than I am. Then I want them to do exactly that. That is, invest the money – not pay it back. If I want the money back, I sell. Then I can also choose whether I want to pay tax or not. There is a reason why Birkshire Hathaway has never paid out dividends. Then it can become 5.5 million percent: https://www.di.se/analys/buffetts-magiska-facit-5-5-miljoner-procent/
- ·9.1.In sparrebellen, Börjesson writes: "Warren Buffett recently spoke about how Trump in 72 hours had destroyed the conditions for American companies in the defense sector with his new doctrine in foreign policy." I have searched with AI (Börjesson recommends using AI) but find no evidence for this statement. Börjesson talks too much!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nordic Growth Market
Määrä
Osto
370
Myynti
Määrä
2 657
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | NON | AVA | ||
| 38 | ENS | NON | ||
| 1 | ENS | NON | ||
| 147 | ENS | NON | ||
| 160 | ENS | NON |
Ylin
195VWAP
Alin
190,4VaihtoMäärä
7,8 40 473
VWAP
Ylin
195Alin
190,4VaihtoMäärä
7,8 40 473
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 -tulosraportti | 15.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 28.1. | |
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 15.10.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 11.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 11.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 24.1.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
4 päivää sitten58 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 -tulosraportti | 15.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 28.1. | |
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 15.10.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 11.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 11.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 24.1.2025 |
1,20 SEK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
1,15%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenThe major risk, which is repeatedly highlighted, that Paradox constitutes such a large part of the portfolio, is effectively eliminated. One gets Paradox quite free plus a good discount on top of the unlisted shares. I made the analysis below at a share price of 199. Since then, the share price has fallen and the net asset value discount has increased further, so in the near future I will have to adjust the discount further up, unless the share rises again. Valuation at share price 199: At a share price of 199 SEK, one gets either the unlisted share portfolio and Paradox with a very large discount, depending on which of the elements one chooses to “place” the discount on. The official net asset value discount is approx. 30 %, but the real net asset value discount is much higher. The discount is growing and own shares are being bought back, and the discount has never been higher according to ibindex. I calculate the real net asset value discount to be 65 %. For 44.50 SEK out of the payment per share of 199 SEK, according to my calculation, one gets: - either unlisted shares valued at 127 SEK. - or one gets Paradox shares corresponding to approx. 66 SEK quite free - as well as unlisted shares valued at 66 SEK free on top. The major risk, which is often highlighted, that Paradox constitutes such a large part of the portfolio, is thus effectively eliminated. One can get Paradox quite free plus a good discount on top of the unlisted shares. Calculation method: I calculate the real net asset value discount solely in relation to the unlisted shares, by first fully offsetting the value of the listed shares as well as positive capital including receivables (and offsetting any debt.) Thereafter, it is of course necessary to look at what unlisted shares are in the company's portfolio. Firstly, one must consider whether the value is correctly determined. I do not have the prerequisites to know this, and must therefore assess whether I find the management trustworthy and competent, including to what extent the management itself invests, and whether there are larger investors who sometimes supplement further. Secondly, one must consider the security in relation to how much individual shares account for in the portfolio. The share Paradox is discussed above, and there are no other individual shares that account for over 4 % and they therefore do not immediately constitute a problem in themselves due to the proportion of the net asset value. So even if Paradox, against all expectations, were to go bankrupt, the net asset value of the Spiltan share would still be intact in relation to the share price. Others may have greater abilities than I to assess the value of the underlying unlisted companies.
- ·1 päivä sittenThe last five years, the substance has grown approximately 2% per year on average, but decreased just over 2% in 2025. This can be compared with SIXRX which has returned just over 9% per year on average over the last five years and just over 12% in 2025.
- ·3 päivää sittenGood that Spiltan raises the dividend to a level close to many other investment companies. One of many necessary steps to increase interest in the share. Also hope for a change of listing and quarterly dividend in the future.·2 päivää sittenIt is capital destruction to distribute money. As someone living abroad, I can impossibly avoid 15% withholding tax. After that, it depends on the type of account if there will be an additional 23% tax to the Norwegian state. In total, therefore, 38% of the dividend can disappear. Money that would have been much better utilized in the company. Furthermore, I don't understand why one, as an owner, would want a dividend. If I invest in an investment company, I do so because I believe that those who run it are better at investing the money than I am. Then I want them to do exactly that. That is, invest the money – not pay it back. If I want the money back, I sell. Then I can also choose whether I want to pay tax or not. There is a reason why Birkshire Hathaway has never paid out dividends. Then it can become 5.5 million percent: https://www.di.se/analys/buffetts-magiska-facit-5-5-miljoner-procent/
- ·9.1.In sparrebellen, Börjesson writes: "Warren Buffett recently spoke about how Trump in 72 hours had destroyed the conditions for American companies in the defense sector with his new doctrine in foreign policy." I have searched with AI (Börjesson recommends using AI) but find no evidence for this statement. Börjesson talks too much!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nordic Growth Market
Määrä
Osto
370
Myynti
Määrä
2 657
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | NON | AVA | ||
| 38 | ENS | NON | ||
| 1 | ENS | NON | ||
| 147 | ENS | NON | ||
| 160 | ENS | NON |
Ylin
195VWAP
Alin
190,4VaihtoMäärä
7,8 40 473
VWAP
Ylin
195Alin
190,4VaihtoMäärä
7,8 40 473
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt