2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
8 päivää sitten
‧31 min
0,67 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
432
Myynti
Määrä
230
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 949 | - | - | ||
| 748 | - | - | ||
| 1 384 | - | - | ||
| 4 349 | - | - | ||
| 1 405 | - | - |
Ylin
22,5VWAP
Alin
21,45VaihtoMäärä
4,7 215 047
VWAP
Ylin
22,5Alin
21,45VaihtoMäärä
4,7 215 047
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 24.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 7.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sitten
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuDoes it strengthen the case that GD short-term increases leverage and dampens emission risk? CEO talks about best case outcome. Base case and worst case assessments are necessary, due to unfortunate circumstances and factors beyond the company's control. Don't ask which ones. We have fresh statements from two paper CEOs, they diverge. Which case assessment that "wins" is a bet, that's not something experts can tell you (but some help can be gained from "pattern recognition" and "same as ever"). E.g. the loan terms can be handled by changing them, or that EBITDA continuously is over 400M. It is highly probable with loan covenant breach (we don't see 243M in Q1-EBITDA). Then it is irresponsible not to base it on other assessments, than best case. During 2026 we will see who has to eat their socks. Answer: Borrowing gets the head above water, but does not strengthen the case, is my assessment.
·1 päivä sittenBorrowing alone does not prevent a breach of loan covenants; it's not that simple. I don't have an overview of all covenants in the agreement, but it's normal to set minimum requirements for both earnings, liquidity, and equity. As I mentioned earlier, a broker pointed out that NS might breach the interest coverage ratio requirement.
·2 päivää sittenI'm puzzled that there is no insider buying at these prices. If the board and management know that a covenant breach will be avoided and believe that Golbey will actually be what turns the ship around here, then the prices here are very attractive. I never quite understand insider buying.
·2 päivää sittenI think they cannot trade when they are confident that they «in one way or another» resolve breaches of the loan covenants. What I think is they possess inside information which means they cannot trade. E.g. sale of land or units.
·8 t sittenPersonally, I don't think GD is trying to trick anyone, his arguments seem good enough. But it must be said that he has a million incentives to paint a good picture of the company, perhaps a picture that is better than it should be in reality? If Norske Skog goes bankrupt or has to restructure one more time, Drangsland loses his entire fortune. The potential downside is great, so we can at least trust that he does everything he can to keep the company afloat.
·3 päivää sittenGreat rise today, hope the bottom has been reached🙏🙏😊😊- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuMany have lost or have paper losses in Norske Skog. I have an acquaintance with long stock experience who bought shares for 8M kr (price 41 kr). During one of the meetings, he promoted that NS was OB's best case. My answer was no, and that I had several better ones on the block and that I would not buy NS until it was down to 30 kr. I have a smaller position than that person and both failed (it was a mistake to take an initial position at 32 kr, because I didn't like the gap at 24 kr). Am I emotionally affected? No, making mistakes is part of the game and what one learns most from. It's about failing in moderation, not overdoing it...:-)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
8 päivää sitten
‧31 min
0,67 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sitten
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuDoes it strengthen the case that GD short-term increases leverage and dampens emission risk? CEO talks about best case outcome. Base case and worst case assessments are necessary, due to unfortunate circumstances and factors beyond the company's control. Don't ask which ones. We have fresh statements from two paper CEOs, they diverge. Which case assessment that "wins" is a bet, that's not something experts can tell you (but some help can be gained from "pattern recognition" and "same as ever"). E.g. the loan terms can be handled by changing them, or that EBITDA continuously is over 400M. It is highly probable with loan covenant breach (we don't see 243M in Q1-EBITDA). Then it is irresponsible not to base it on other assessments, than best case. During 2026 we will see who has to eat their socks. Answer: Borrowing gets the head above water, but does not strengthen the case, is my assessment.·1 päivä sittenBorrowing alone does not prevent a breach of loan covenants; it's not that simple. I don't have an overview of all covenants in the agreement, but it's normal to set minimum requirements for both earnings, liquidity, and equity. As I mentioned earlier, a broker pointed out that NS might breach the interest coverage ratio requirement.
- ·2 päivää sittenI'm puzzled that there is no insider buying at these prices. If the board and management know that a covenant breach will be avoided and believe that Golbey will actually be what turns the ship around here, then the prices here are very attractive. I never quite understand insider buying.·2 päivää sittenI think they cannot trade when they are confident that they «in one way or another» resolve breaches of the loan covenants. What I think is they possess inside information which means they cannot trade. E.g. sale of land or units.·8 t sittenPersonally, I don't think GD is trying to trick anyone, his arguments seem good enough. But it must be said that he has a million incentives to paint a good picture of the company, perhaps a picture that is better than it should be in reality? If Norske Skog goes bankrupt or has to restructure one more time, Drangsland loses his entire fortune. The potential downside is great, so we can at least trust that he does everything he can to keep the company afloat.
- ·3 päivää sittenGreat rise today, hope the bottom has been reached🙏🙏😊😊
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuMany have lost or have paper losses in Norske Skog. I have an acquaintance with long stock experience who bought shares for 8M kr (price 41 kr). During one of the meetings, he promoted that NS was OB's best case. My answer was no, and that I had several better ones on the block and that I would not buy NS until it was down to 30 kr. I have a smaller position than that person and both failed (it was a mistake to take an initial position at 32 kr, because I didn't like the gap at 24 kr). Am I emotionally affected? No, making mistakes is part of the game and what one learns most from. It's about failing in moderation, not overdoing it...:-)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
432
Myynti
Määrä
230
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 949 | - | - | ||
| 748 | - | - | ||
| 1 384 | - | - | ||
| 4 349 | - | - | ||
| 1 405 | - | - |
Ylin
22,5VWAP
Alin
21,45VaihtoMäärä
4,7 215 047
VWAP
Ylin
22,5Alin
21,45VaihtoMäärä
4,7 215 047
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 24.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 7.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
8 päivää sitten
‧31 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 24.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 7.2.2025 |
0,67 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sitten
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuDoes it strengthen the case that GD short-term increases leverage and dampens emission risk? CEO talks about best case outcome. Base case and worst case assessments are necessary, due to unfortunate circumstances and factors beyond the company's control. Don't ask which ones. We have fresh statements from two paper CEOs, they diverge. Which case assessment that "wins" is a bet, that's not something experts can tell you (but some help can be gained from "pattern recognition" and "same as ever"). E.g. the loan terms can be handled by changing them, or that EBITDA continuously is over 400M. It is highly probable with loan covenant breach (we don't see 243M in Q1-EBITDA). Then it is irresponsible not to base it on other assessments, than best case. During 2026 we will see who has to eat their socks. Answer: Borrowing gets the head above water, but does not strengthen the case, is my assessment.·1 päivä sittenBorrowing alone does not prevent a breach of loan covenants; it's not that simple. I don't have an overview of all covenants in the agreement, but it's normal to set minimum requirements for both earnings, liquidity, and equity. As I mentioned earlier, a broker pointed out that NS might breach the interest coverage ratio requirement.
- ·2 päivää sittenI'm puzzled that there is no insider buying at these prices. If the board and management know that a covenant breach will be avoided and believe that Golbey will actually be what turns the ship around here, then the prices here are very attractive. I never quite understand insider buying.·2 päivää sittenI think they cannot trade when they are confident that they «in one way or another» resolve breaches of the loan covenants. What I think is they possess inside information which means they cannot trade. E.g. sale of land or units.·8 t sittenPersonally, I don't think GD is trying to trick anyone, his arguments seem good enough. But it must be said that he has a million incentives to paint a good picture of the company, perhaps a picture that is better than it should be in reality? If Norske Skog goes bankrupt or has to restructure one more time, Drangsland loses his entire fortune. The potential downside is great, so we can at least trust that he does everything he can to keep the company afloat.
- ·3 päivää sittenGreat rise today, hope the bottom has been reached🙏🙏😊😊
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuMany have lost or have paper losses in Norske Skog. I have an acquaintance with long stock experience who bought shares for 8M kr (price 41 kr). During one of the meetings, he promoted that NS was OB's best case. My answer was no, and that I had several better ones on the block and that I would not buy NS until it was down to 30 kr. I have a smaller position than that person and both failed (it was a mistake to take an initial position at 32 kr, because I didn't like the gap at 24 kr). Am I emotionally affected? No, making mistakes is part of the game and what one learns most from. It's about failing in moderation, not overdoing it...:-)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
432
Myynti
Määrä
230
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 949 | - | - | ||
| 748 | - | - | ||
| 1 384 | - | - | ||
| 4 349 | - | - | ||
| 1 405 | - | - |
Ylin
22,5VWAP
Alin
21,45VaihtoMäärä
4,7 215 047
VWAP
Ylin
22,5Alin
21,45VaihtoMäärä
4,7 215 047
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt