2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
11 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 23.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·2 t sitten · MuokattuThere has been much discussion about the so-called "24-trader" and whether it was a regular Iceberg order or price manipulation. Let's look at the actual numbers instead of just guessing: Volume Logistics: During the 3 days the robot was running, a total of approx. 1–1.2 million shares were sold through this pattern. Given that Dicot's daily turnover is stably between 6 and 8.5 million shares, a volume of 1 million shares is relatively small. If a real seller had wanted to sell 1 million shares at once, it would not have significantly affected the price, thanks to the high liquidity. Economic Logic: Instead, splitting the order into thousands of micro-orders of exactly 24 shares per second creates a constant, unnatural selling pressure throughout the trading days. No real seller wants to deliberately push down the price of their own assets for several days – that lacks economic logic, unless the purpose is to block uptrends and shake out small investors. Today's Result: We have the clearest evidence on the screen today. As soon as the 24-robot was turned off last Friday, the artificial pressure disappeared, and from that moment until today, the price rose by almost 10% under free trading. The numbers and today's price movement speak for themselves. It's good to see that trading is finally normal and healthy again!
All legal and permitted trading should be available to everyone. I have not been informed or allowed to trade with my investments. It can't be that hard to put a stop to this, can it? Set a minimum price on buy and sell orders Or a time interval between orders. Hope there are others who agree with me 🤞
·22 t sitten"Our goal is for LIB-01 to represent a paradigm shift in the field, and these results support our objective," says CEO, Elin T.
·1 päivä sittenTo everyone reacting to 24 tradern and writing about market manipulation... this has been the most stable week in a long time. The week before, the Friday closing was at 21.00 öre and this week it closed at 21.20 öre. The daily closing was Mon 20.60 - Tue 21.40 - Wed 21.59 - Thu 21.10 and Friday 21.20. And this during a "weak" week with a daily turnover of between 6 and 8.5 million shares. So the procedure can hardly be classified as market manipulation, sensational yes very unusual yes, but market manipulation no.To convict someone for e.g. market manipulation, there must be intent or effect. So please explain what the intent, effect or cause of the market manipulation in question was. Nordnet's customer service has explained to those who called them, including myself, that since each transaction is executed and completed, and that it is up to the person placing the order to determine the size of the order, it is legal. You say market manipulation not because you can point out what the manipulation consists of or what its effect was, but because you think it's wrong for someone to place 18000 sell orders of 24 shares each.
·3 päivää sittenIt's absolutely crazy that it's still going on… Why doesn't FI do anything?The seller managed to offload 440,000 shares in one day on a weak market without significantly dumping the price. The order depth on buy orders during the day was weak, so a large sell order of 400.000 shares would have triggered a much larger crash than what actually happened. Now, the sell order was spread over 6 - 7 hours per day while new buy orders were placed by buyers/the market during the day. So it was definitely not wash trading as normally done by pump and dump actors. And pinging is when you place small, individual orders to see if a hidden actor bites. Iceberg? Maybe, but it is used to hide a large buy or sell by splitting it into smaller pieces. But in this case, it was actually no hidden procedure as it was completely open, but yes, the actor managed to sell a couple of million shares over several days with moderate price dampening as a result. Compare this with when short sellers affect the price by dumping a couple of million shares to later buy back much cheaper. So rather than manipulating the market, Pump and Dump or just Dump, someone managed to sell a couple of million shares without triggering a huge crash. During the entire time this was ongoing, the price stayed in the range of 20 - 22 öre with the week's closing price just over 21 öre. So where was the market manipulation? The week before, the price closed at 21,00 and this week 21,20, so it was a very stable week... I must admit, I also called Nordnet at the beginning of the week, but then I sat and analyzed what was actually going on...
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
11 päivää sitten
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sitten · MuokattuThere has been much discussion about the so-called "24-trader" and whether it was a regular Iceberg order or price manipulation. Let's look at the actual numbers instead of just guessing: Volume Logistics: During the 3 days the robot was running, a total of approx. 1–1.2 million shares were sold through this pattern. Given that Dicot's daily turnover is stably between 6 and 8.5 million shares, a volume of 1 million shares is relatively small. If a real seller had wanted to sell 1 million shares at once, it would not have significantly affected the price, thanks to the high liquidity. Economic Logic: Instead, splitting the order into thousands of micro-orders of exactly 24 shares per second creates a constant, unnatural selling pressure throughout the trading days. No real seller wants to deliberately push down the price of their own assets for several days – that lacks economic logic, unless the purpose is to block uptrends and shake out small investors. Today's Result: We have the clearest evidence on the screen today. As soon as the 24-robot was turned off last Friday, the artificial pressure disappeared, and from that moment until today, the price rose by almost 10% under free trading. The numbers and today's price movement speak for themselves. It's good to see that trading is finally normal and healthy again!All legal and permitted trading should be available to everyone. I have not been informed or allowed to trade with my investments. It can't be that hard to put a stop to this, can it? Set a minimum price on buy and sell orders Or a time interval between orders. Hope there are others who agree with me 🤞
- ·22 t sitten"Our goal is for LIB-01 to represent a paradigm shift in the field, and these results support our objective," says CEO, Elin T.
- ·1 päivä sittenTo everyone reacting to 24 tradern and writing about market manipulation... this has been the most stable week in a long time. The week before, the Friday closing was at 21.00 öre and this week it closed at 21.20 öre. The daily closing was Mon 20.60 - Tue 21.40 - Wed 21.59 - Thu 21.10 and Friday 21.20. And this during a "weak" week with a daily turnover of between 6 and 8.5 million shares. So the procedure can hardly be classified as market manipulation, sensational yes very unusual yes, but market manipulation no.To convict someone for e.g. market manipulation, there must be intent or effect. So please explain what the intent, effect or cause of the market manipulation in question was. Nordnet's customer service has explained to those who called them, including myself, that since each transaction is executed and completed, and that it is up to the person placing the order to determine the size of the order, it is legal. You say market manipulation not because you can point out what the manipulation consists of or what its effect was, but because you think it's wrong for someone to place 18000 sell orders of 24 shares each.
- ·3 päivää sittenIt's absolutely crazy that it's still going on… Why doesn't FI do anything?The seller managed to offload 440,000 shares in one day on a weak market without significantly dumping the price. The order depth on buy orders during the day was weak, so a large sell order of 400.000 shares would have triggered a much larger crash than what actually happened. Now, the sell order was spread over 6 - 7 hours per day while new buy orders were placed by buyers/the market during the day. So it was definitely not wash trading as normally done by pump and dump actors. And pinging is when you place small, individual orders to see if a hidden actor bites. Iceberg? Maybe, but it is used to hide a large buy or sell by splitting it into smaller pieces. But in this case, it was actually no hidden procedure as it was completely open, but yes, the actor managed to sell a couple of million shares over several days with moderate price dampening as a result. Compare this with when short sellers affect the price by dumping a couple of million shares to later buy back much cheaper. So rather than manipulating the market, Pump and Dump or just Dump, someone managed to sell a couple of million shares without triggering a huge crash. During the entire time this was ongoing, the price stayed in the range of 20 - 22 öre with the week's closing price just over 21 öre. So where was the market manipulation? The week before, the price closed at 21,00 and this week 21,20, so it was a very stable week... I must admit, I also called Nordnet at the beginning of the week, but then I sat and analyzed what was actually going on...
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 23.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
11 päivää sitten
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 23.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sitten · MuokattuThere has been much discussion about the so-called "24-trader" and whether it was a regular Iceberg order or price manipulation. Let's look at the actual numbers instead of just guessing: Volume Logistics: During the 3 days the robot was running, a total of approx. 1–1.2 million shares were sold through this pattern. Given that Dicot's daily turnover is stably between 6 and 8.5 million shares, a volume of 1 million shares is relatively small. If a real seller had wanted to sell 1 million shares at once, it would not have significantly affected the price, thanks to the high liquidity. Economic Logic: Instead, splitting the order into thousands of micro-orders of exactly 24 shares per second creates a constant, unnatural selling pressure throughout the trading days. No real seller wants to deliberately push down the price of their own assets for several days – that lacks economic logic, unless the purpose is to block uptrends and shake out small investors. Today's Result: We have the clearest evidence on the screen today. As soon as the 24-robot was turned off last Friday, the artificial pressure disappeared, and from that moment until today, the price rose by almost 10% under free trading. The numbers and today's price movement speak for themselves. It's good to see that trading is finally normal and healthy again!All legal and permitted trading should be available to everyone. I have not been informed or allowed to trade with my investments. It can't be that hard to put a stop to this, can it? Set a minimum price on buy and sell orders Or a time interval between orders. Hope there are others who agree with me 🤞
- ·22 t sitten"Our goal is for LIB-01 to represent a paradigm shift in the field, and these results support our objective," says CEO, Elin T.
- ·1 päivä sittenTo everyone reacting to 24 tradern and writing about market manipulation... this has been the most stable week in a long time. The week before, the Friday closing was at 21.00 öre and this week it closed at 21.20 öre. The daily closing was Mon 20.60 - Tue 21.40 - Wed 21.59 - Thu 21.10 and Friday 21.20. And this during a "weak" week with a daily turnover of between 6 and 8.5 million shares. So the procedure can hardly be classified as market manipulation, sensational yes very unusual yes, but market manipulation no.To convict someone for e.g. market manipulation, there must be intent or effect. So please explain what the intent, effect or cause of the market manipulation in question was. Nordnet's customer service has explained to those who called them, including myself, that since each transaction is executed and completed, and that it is up to the person placing the order to determine the size of the order, it is legal. You say market manipulation not because you can point out what the manipulation consists of or what its effect was, but because you think it's wrong for someone to place 18000 sell orders of 24 shares each.
- ·3 päivää sittenIt's absolutely crazy that it's still going on… Why doesn't FI do anything?The seller managed to offload 440,000 shares in one day on a weak market without significantly dumping the price. The order depth on buy orders during the day was weak, so a large sell order of 400.000 shares would have triggered a much larger crash than what actually happened. Now, the sell order was spread over 6 - 7 hours per day while new buy orders were placed by buyers/the market during the day. So it was definitely not wash trading as normally done by pump and dump actors. And pinging is when you place small, individual orders to see if a hidden actor bites. Iceberg? Maybe, but it is used to hide a large buy or sell by splitting it into smaller pieces. But in this case, it was actually no hidden procedure as it was completely open, but yes, the actor managed to sell a couple of million shares over several days with moderate price dampening as a result. Compare this with when short sellers affect the price by dumping a couple of million shares to later buy back much cheaper. So rather than manipulating the market, Pump and Dump or just Dump, someone managed to sell a couple of million shares without triggering a huge crash. During the entire time this was ongoing, the price stayed in the range of 20 - 22 öre with the week's closing price just over 21 öre. So where was the market manipulation? The week before, the price closed at 21,00 and this week 21,20, so it was a very stable week... I must admit, I also called Nordnet at the beginning of the week, but then I sat and analyzed what was actually going on...
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt