2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
49 päivää sitten
‧34 min
0,08 EUR/osake
Irtoamispäivä 30.6.
6,62%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 171 | - | - | ||
| 225 | - | - | ||
| 260 | - | - | ||
| 55 | - | - | ||
| 37 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 177 657 | 177 657 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 177 657 | 177 657 | 0 | 0 |
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·2 päivää sitten
·13.6.Apropos shorting of Cibus. Cibus' business model is built on, I think, quite predictable cash flows. Their tenants are large, solid supermarket chains on long-term lease agreements. Supermarket chains rarely miss rent - even in times of crisis. (NB: I'm not saying it can't happen in certain cases – but consider the probability against the risk of a bad scenario purely tenant-operationally) To my knowledge, after a Google search, there are no official statements or declarations from short sellers about why they are shorting Cibus. We are now at 7,10% according to Nordnet's page. If you want to see developments, there's a good page here that gives a good historical overview: https://shortregister.com/se/cibus-nordic-real-estate-cibus Take for example Arrowstreet Capital, which historically has had larger short positions in Cibus and other Scandinavian real estate stocks and currently holds 1,89% in Cibus. Officially, they never comment on their motive. Although Cibus has a stable business model, there is also a "certain" debt burden and an expectation of dividends. BUT, it is completely natural for larger real estate companies to have and use debt in operations, and it is not necessarily a problem. Whether the debt burden Cibus has is, or will become, a problem now or later, depends on several interacting factors that are not necessarily purely technical or even scientific. •When bond loans and bank debt, swap agreements and interest rate caps continuously need to be rolled over to current market rates or potentially future higher (or lower) rates/margins, financing costs naturally rise/fall. One cannot determine the total effect regarding shorting from a helicopter. It requires continuous monitoring in detail, closer to the company's affairs. •It has also been observed that equity investors/the market to some extent ignore certain conditions with an eye to the future, just as they overreact in other situations. Both are equally good/bad...if you will. •Short sellers often speculate that the increased interest rate pressure (when operations are now so stable) will eat into revenues and reduce free cash flow, which is so crucial for us dividend investors. •But not all short positions indicate that short interest, for example, "hates or is critical of" Cibus. Funds, such as Arrowstreet, often use short positions as part of, for example, a pairs trade or broader hedging. •If a fund wants to be "long" in another Nordic real estate stock that they believe in more (none mentioned, none forgotten!), they might choose to short Cibus simultaneously to neutralize the general market risk within Scandinavian real estate, all else being equal, as Cibus has relatively high liquidity, which makes Cibus easier to cycle in and out of regarding shorting. •So I would not assess the short-% level to be a problem, at these levels, or to be solely a kind of criticism of the operations and the stock's price, but rather a consequence of the fact that it is used as a basis for hedging. What do I know? Of course, all of this must be seen in light of whether one considers Cibus an obvious shorting case or not, and within what time horizon. I don't really see the shorting case for Cibus, as things stand now, and I am long the stock myself. But judge for yourself what the outlook is.
·2 päivää sittenYes, 100 is not impossible with this development. It REFUSES to stay above the 150-mark more than often a few hours. Something PULLS the damn thing down below 150 relentlessly!
·1 päivä sittenProbably needs significant cuts in dividend, for 100kr/share. Price-yield is perfectly fine where it is now for a real estate stock.
·12.6.Now I see that short selling has gone up, which I agree with the short sellers about, that Cibus is overvalued Look at substansrabbat.se The company is almost as heavily indebted as SBB But there is no risk the stock will go down as the funds are holding up the price I gave up on the decline a long time ago.
·22 t sitten · MuokattuThe difference with SBB was that they had short-term financing that had to be refinanced when interest rates rose. It cannot be compared and not the same risk. It can be important to write if one likes to compare with a crisis company. SSB also had critical cash flow. The interest-bearing debts ( Cibus) I have read were interest-rate hedged last year. But it should be checked.- ·3.6.Consistently below the critical 150 again, again, again..........DISGUSTING stock to be so disappointing!·1 päivä sittenThommy, you should probably think about what risk and valuation mean in investing. Just because something goes up quickly in a certain climate (negative interest rates) doesn't mean that Cibus should always be valued according to negative interest rate conditions.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
49 päivää sitten
‧34 min
0,08 EUR/osake
Irtoamispäivä 30.6.
6,62%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·2 päivää sitten
- ·13.6.Apropos shorting of Cibus. Cibus' business model is built on, I think, quite predictable cash flows. Their tenants are large, solid supermarket chains on long-term lease agreements. Supermarket chains rarely miss rent - even in times of crisis. (NB: I'm not saying it can't happen in certain cases – but consider the probability against the risk of a bad scenario purely tenant-operationally) To my knowledge, after a Google search, there are no official statements or declarations from short sellers about why they are shorting Cibus. We are now at 7,10% according to Nordnet's page. If you want to see developments, there's a good page here that gives a good historical overview: https://shortregister.com/se/cibus-nordic-real-estate-cibus Take for example Arrowstreet Capital, which historically has had larger short positions in Cibus and other Scandinavian real estate stocks and currently holds 1,89% in Cibus. Officially, they never comment on their motive. Although Cibus has a stable business model, there is also a "certain" debt burden and an expectation of dividends. BUT, it is completely natural for larger real estate companies to have and use debt in operations, and it is not necessarily a problem. Whether the debt burden Cibus has is, or will become, a problem now or later, depends on several interacting factors that are not necessarily purely technical or even scientific. •When bond loans and bank debt, swap agreements and interest rate caps continuously need to be rolled over to current market rates or potentially future higher (or lower) rates/margins, financing costs naturally rise/fall. One cannot determine the total effect regarding shorting from a helicopter. It requires continuous monitoring in detail, closer to the company's affairs. •It has also been observed that equity investors/the market to some extent ignore certain conditions with an eye to the future, just as they overreact in other situations. Both are equally good/bad...if you will. •Short sellers often speculate that the increased interest rate pressure (when operations are now so stable) will eat into revenues and reduce free cash flow, which is so crucial for us dividend investors. •But not all short positions indicate that short interest, for example, "hates or is critical of" Cibus. Funds, such as Arrowstreet, often use short positions as part of, for example, a pairs trade or broader hedging. •If a fund wants to be "long" in another Nordic real estate stock that they believe in more (none mentioned, none forgotten!), they might choose to short Cibus simultaneously to neutralize the general market risk within Scandinavian real estate, all else being equal, as Cibus has relatively high liquidity, which makes Cibus easier to cycle in and out of regarding shorting. •So I would not assess the short-% level to be a problem, at these levels, or to be solely a kind of criticism of the operations and the stock's price, but rather a consequence of the fact that it is used as a basis for hedging. What do I know? Of course, all of this must be seen in light of whether one considers Cibus an obvious shorting case or not, and within what time horizon. I don't really see the shorting case for Cibus, as things stand now, and I am long the stock myself. But judge for yourself what the outlook is.·2 päivää sittenYes, 100 is not impossible with this development. It REFUSES to stay above the 150-mark more than often a few hours. Something PULLS the damn thing down below 150 relentlessly!·1 päivä sittenProbably needs significant cuts in dividend, for 100kr/share. Price-yield is perfectly fine where it is now for a real estate stock.
- ·12.6.Now I see that short selling has gone up, which I agree with the short sellers about, that Cibus is overvalued Look at substansrabbat.se The company is almost as heavily indebted as SBB But there is no risk the stock will go down as the funds are holding up the price I gave up on the decline a long time ago.·22 t sitten · MuokattuThe difference with SBB was that they had short-term financing that had to be refinanced when interest rates rose. It cannot be compared and not the same risk. It can be important to write if one likes to compare with a crisis company. SSB also had critical cash flow. The interest-bearing debts ( Cibus) I have read were interest-rate hedged last year. But it should be checked.
- ·3.6.Consistently below the critical 150 again, again, again..........DISGUSTING stock to be so disappointing!·1 päivä sittenThommy, you should probably think about what risk and valuation mean in investing. Just because something goes up quickly in a certain climate (negative interest rates) doesn't mean that Cibus should always be valued according to negative interest rate conditions.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 171 | - | - | ||
| 225 | - | - | ||
| 260 | - | - | ||
| 55 | - | - | ||
| 37 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 177 657 | 177 657 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 177 657 | 177 657 | 0 | 0 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
49 päivää sitten
‧34 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 |
0,08 EUR/osake
Irtoamispäivä 30.6.
6,62%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·2 päivää sitten
- ·13.6.Apropos shorting of Cibus. Cibus' business model is built on, I think, quite predictable cash flows. Their tenants are large, solid supermarket chains on long-term lease agreements. Supermarket chains rarely miss rent - even in times of crisis. (NB: I'm not saying it can't happen in certain cases – but consider the probability against the risk of a bad scenario purely tenant-operationally) To my knowledge, after a Google search, there are no official statements or declarations from short sellers about why they are shorting Cibus. We are now at 7,10% according to Nordnet's page. If you want to see developments, there's a good page here that gives a good historical overview: https://shortregister.com/se/cibus-nordic-real-estate-cibus Take for example Arrowstreet Capital, which historically has had larger short positions in Cibus and other Scandinavian real estate stocks and currently holds 1,89% in Cibus. Officially, they never comment on their motive. Although Cibus has a stable business model, there is also a "certain" debt burden and an expectation of dividends. BUT, it is completely natural for larger real estate companies to have and use debt in operations, and it is not necessarily a problem. Whether the debt burden Cibus has is, or will become, a problem now or later, depends on several interacting factors that are not necessarily purely technical or even scientific. •When bond loans and bank debt, swap agreements and interest rate caps continuously need to be rolled over to current market rates or potentially future higher (or lower) rates/margins, financing costs naturally rise/fall. One cannot determine the total effect regarding shorting from a helicopter. It requires continuous monitoring in detail, closer to the company's affairs. •It has also been observed that equity investors/the market to some extent ignore certain conditions with an eye to the future, just as they overreact in other situations. Both are equally good/bad...if you will. •Short sellers often speculate that the increased interest rate pressure (when operations are now so stable) will eat into revenues and reduce free cash flow, which is so crucial for us dividend investors. •But not all short positions indicate that short interest, for example, "hates or is critical of" Cibus. Funds, such as Arrowstreet, often use short positions as part of, for example, a pairs trade or broader hedging. •If a fund wants to be "long" in another Nordic real estate stock that they believe in more (none mentioned, none forgotten!), they might choose to short Cibus simultaneously to neutralize the general market risk within Scandinavian real estate, all else being equal, as Cibus has relatively high liquidity, which makes Cibus easier to cycle in and out of regarding shorting. •So I would not assess the short-% level to be a problem, at these levels, or to be solely a kind of criticism of the operations and the stock's price, but rather a consequence of the fact that it is used as a basis for hedging. What do I know? Of course, all of this must be seen in light of whether one considers Cibus an obvious shorting case or not, and within what time horizon. I don't really see the shorting case for Cibus, as things stand now, and I am long the stock myself. But judge for yourself what the outlook is.·2 päivää sittenYes, 100 is not impossible with this development. It REFUSES to stay above the 150-mark more than often a few hours. Something PULLS the damn thing down below 150 relentlessly!·1 päivä sittenProbably needs significant cuts in dividend, for 100kr/share. Price-yield is perfectly fine where it is now for a real estate stock.
- ·12.6.Now I see that short selling has gone up, which I agree with the short sellers about, that Cibus is overvalued Look at substansrabbat.se The company is almost as heavily indebted as SBB But there is no risk the stock will go down as the funds are holding up the price I gave up on the decline a long time ago.·22 t sitten · MuokattuThe difference with SBB was that they had short-term financing that had to be refinanced when interest rates rose. It cannot be compared and not the same risk. It can be important to write if one likes to compare with a crisis company. SSB also had critical cash flow. The interest-bearing debts ( Cibus) I have read were interest-rate hedged last year. But it should be checked.
- ·3.6.Consistently below the critical 150 again, again, again..........DISGUSTING stock to be so disappointing!·1 päivä sittenThommy, you should probably think about what risk and valuation mean in investing. Just because something goes up quickly in a certain climate (negative interest rates) doesn't mean that Cibus should always be valued according to negative interest rate conditions.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 171 | - | - | ||
| 225 | - | - | ||
| 260 | - | - | ||
| 55 | - | - | ||
| 37 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 177 657 | 177 657 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 177 657 | 177 657 | 0 | 0 |