2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧39 min
0,8535 SEK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 23.2.
6,58%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Stockholm
Määrä
Osto
52 499
Myynti
Määrä
53 114
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 359 | - | - | ||
| 325 | - | - | ||
| 468 | - | - | ||
| 212 | - | - | ||
| 165 | - | - |
Ylin
155,7VWAP
Alin
151,4VaihtoMäärä
89,9 582 718
VWAP
Ylin
155,7Alin
151,4VaihtoMäärä
89,9 582 718
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuCibus has all the prerequisites to go up in price, as I see it. The overall interest rate environment can then affect it more or less. But otherwise: The real estate segment (grocery retail) is probably the safest play in the industry. Their contracts will increase in value over time. It's more of a financial play as I see it. Their loan mix will be very important, but on that front, they are already very skilled, also if you look at their previous presentations. They naturally cannot dictate the loan market, but there is no doubt that they get the best possible terms in the market. Now the question is how much they should grow and how. Any real estate company, if they don't think carefully, will over time buy properties that are poor measured by either location, condition, or customer base etc., but in short, become blinded by the cash-flow at the time of purchase or pursue an accumulation strategy on the property portfolio side. Regardless.... Look at the big Realty Income(O) from the USA, they are skilled in portfolio planning, but have many terrible properties because they have convinced themselves and the market that they must grow the number of properties at any cost. Also through acquisitions of competitors. It must be done long-term and cautiously - from my perspective. This is not the segment where "quick deals" are the smartest move. If Cibus chooses to focus on consolidation for a while, they will achieve very, very good operations, and that will be better for the share price than any "exciting" acquisitions in distant countries. I would rather not see too many acquisitions in "main land" Europe, as things stand. Of course, a so-called "cream cake property" might come along that they should buy, but they should keep their pistols holstered for a while longer, I think. We'll see what happens. Cibus clearly has the prerequisites to become a cash engine, if they don't do anything rash.... I am long in the stock but not in this account.
1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenThe report is boring, with nothing new, and all figures are as expected. What matters is the presentation and the plans from the new CEO. She performed terribly in the presentation, together with the CFO. They seemed very insecure, and I was not impressed. What I didn’t like about the previous CEO was the very confusing strategy. Is Cibus a growth or a dividend company? I was never sure. They are trying to be both, which is not possible with yields in the 5–6% range. I am glad the dividend wasn’t increased because I think it is not sustainable, and that it would be in the best interest of shareholders to cut it. Of course, management would never do that because it would have a negative effect on the share price. That’s why I hope keeping the dividend at the same level is a message from the CEO that she intends to be more conservative. Why is the dividend a problem? A quick calculation shows that next year 44% of income will be used for dividends, 40% for interest, 9% for administrative expenses, and 6% for investments in existing buildings. There is no cash left for growth. If the company wants to grow, there is no room for such a high payout ratio. Because of this, there is a high probability of a new issue. One big red flag for me is Finland, where exposure is very high. As a result, profit from the like-for-like portfolio (excluding acquisitions) is actually declining, meaning there is no organic growth. I have faith in the new CEO (definitely not because of the presentation), but because she did not increase the dividend, which I believe is her first major decision. Things can go both ways, but I don’t think the price is expensive, so I am staying long in Cibus, with the flexibility to buy or sell depending on price movements. Any thoughts on Cibus going forward?
·2 päivää sittenThis dreadful stock. CAN'T this crap rise????????
1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenRising well today. Stay positive, we have a Great stock here😊
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧39 min
0,8535 SEK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 23.2.
6,58%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuCibus has all the prerequisites to go up in price, as I see it. The overall interest rate environment can then affect it more or less. But otherwise: The real estate segment (grocery retail) is probably the safest play in the industry. Their contracts will increase in value over time. It's more of a financial play as I see it. Their loan mix will be very important, but on that front, they are already very skilled, also if you look at their previous presentations. They naturally cannot dictate the loan market, but there is no doubt that they get the best possible terms in the market. Now the question is how much they should grow and how. Any real estate company, if they don't think carefully, will over time buy properties that are poor measured by either location, condition, or customer base etc., but in short, become blinded by the cash-flow at the time of purchase or pursue an accumulation strategy on the property portfolio side. Regardless.... Look at the big Realty Income(O) from the USA, they are skilled in portfolio planning, but have many terrible properties because they have convinced themselves and the market that they must grow the number of properties at any cost. Also through acquisitions of competitors. It must be done long-term and cautiously - from my perspective. This is not the segment where "quick deals" are the smartest move. If Cibus chooses to focus on consolidation for a while, they will achieve very, very good operations, and that will be better for the share price than any "exciting" acquisitions in distant countries. I would rather not see too many acquisitions in "main land" Europe, as things stand. Of course, a so-called "cream cake property" might come along that they should buy, but they should keep their pistols holstered for a while longer, I think. We'll see what happens. Cibus clearly has the prerequisites to become a cash engine, if they don't do anything rash.... I am long in the stock but not in this account.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenThe report is boring, with nothing new, and all figures are as expected. What matters is the presentation and the plans from the new CEO. She performed terribly in the presentation, together with the CFO. They seemed very insecure, and I was not impressed. What I didn’t like about the previous CEO was the very confusing strategy. Is Cibus a growth or a dividend company? I was never sure. They are trying to be both, which is not possible with yields in the 5–6% range. I am glad the dividend wasn’t increased because I think it is not sustainable, and that it would be in the best interest of shareholders to cut it. Of course, management would never do that because it would have a negative effect on the share price. That’s why I hope keeping the dividend at the same level is a message from the CEO that she intends to be more conservative. Why is the dividend a problem? A quick calculation shows that next year 44% of income will be used for dividends, 40% for interest, 9% for administrative expenses, and 6% for investments in existing buildings. There is no cash left for growth. If the company wants to grow, there is no room for such a high payout ratio. Because of this, there is a high probability of a new issue. One big red flag for me is Finland, where exposure is very high. As a result, profit from the like-for-like portfolio (excluding acquisitions) is actually declining, meaning there is no organic growth. I have faith in the new CEO (definitely not because of the presentation), but because she did not increase the dividend, which I believe is her first major decision. Things can go both ways, but I don’t think the price is expensive, so I am staying long in Cibus, with the flexibility to buy or sell depending on price movements. Any thoughts on Cibus going forward?
- ·2 päivää sittenThis dreadful stock. CAN'T this crap rise????????1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenRising well today. Stay positive, we have a Great stock here😊
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Stockholm
Määrä
Osto
52 499
Myynti
Määrä
53 114
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 359 | - | - | ||
| 325 | - | - | ||
| 468 | - | - | ||
| 212 | - | - | ||
| 165 | - | - |
Ylin
155,7VWAP
Alin
151,4VaihtoMäärä
89,9 582 718
VWAP
Ylin
155,7Alin
151,4VaihtoMäärä
89,9 582 718
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧39 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.2.2025 |
0,8535 SEK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 23.2.
6,58%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuCibus has all the prerequisites to go up in price, as I see it. The overall interest rate environment can then affect it more or less. But otherwise: The real estate segment (grocery retail) is probably the safest play in the industry. Their contracts will increase in value over time. It's more of a financial play as I see it. Their loan mix will be very important, but on that front, they are already very skilled, also if you look at their previous presentations. They naturally cannot dictate the loan market, but there is no doubt that they get the best possible terms in the market. Now the question is how much they should grow and how. Any real estate company, if they don't think carefully, will over time buy properties that are poor measured by either location, condition, or customer base etc., but in short, become blinded by the cash-flow at the time of purchase or pursue an accumulation strategy on the property portfolio side. Regardless.... Look at the big Realty Income(O) from the USA, they are skilled in portfolio planning, but have many terrible properties because they have convinced themselves and the market that they must grow the number of properties at any cost. Also through acquisitions of competitors. It must be done long-term and cautiously - from my perspective. This is not the segment where "quick deals" are the smartest move. If Cibus chooses to focus on consolidation for a while, they will achieve very, very good operations, and that will be better for the share price than any "exciting" acquisitions in distant countries. I would rather not see too many acquisitions in "main land" Europe, as things stand. Of course, a so-called "cream cake property" might come along that they should buy, but they should keep their pistols holstered for a while longer, I think. We'll see what happens. Cibus clearly has the prerequisites to become a cash engine, if they don't do anything rash.... I am long in the stock but not in this account.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenThe report is boring, with nothing new, and all figures are as expected. What matters is the presentation and the plans from the new CEO. She performed terribly in the presentation, together with the CFO. They seemed very insecure, and I was not impressed. What I didn’t like about the previous CEO was the very confusing strategy. Is Cibus a growth or a dividend company? I was never sure. They are trying to be both, which is not possible with yields in the 5–6% range. I am glad the dividend wasn’t increased because I think it is not sustainable, and that it would be in the best interest of shareholders to cut it. Of course, management would never do that because it would have a negative effect on the share price. That’s why I hope keeping the dividend at the same level is a message from the CEO that she intends to be more conservative. Why is the dividend a problem? A quick calculation shows that next year 44% of income will be used for dividends, 40% for interest, 9% for administrative expenses, and 6% for investments in existing buildings. There is no cash left for growth. If the company wants to grow, there is no room for such a high payout ratio. Because of this, there is a high probability of a new issue. One big red flag for me is Finland, where exposure is very high. As a result, profit from the like-for-like portfolio (excluding acquisitions) is actually declining, meaning there is no organic growth. I have faith in the new CEO (definitely not because of the presentation), but because she did not increase the dividend, which I believe is her first major decision. Things can go both ways, but I don’t think the price is expensive, so I am staying long in Cibus, with the flexibility to buy or sell depending on price movements. Any thoughts on Cibus going forward?
- ·2 päivää sittenThis dreadful stock. CAN'T this crap rise????????1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenRising well today. Stay positive, we have a Great stock here😊
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Stockholm
Määrä
Osto
52 499
Myynti
Määrä
53 114
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 359 | - | - | ||
| 325 | - | - | ||
| 468 | - | - | ||
| 212 | - | - | ||
| 165 | - | - |
Ylin
155,7VWAP
Alin
151,4VaihtoMäärä
89,9 582 718
VWAP
Ylin
155,7Alin
151,4VaihtoMäärä
89,9 582 718
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt