2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
59 päivää sitten
‧34 min
0,08 EUR/osake
Irtoamispäivä 30.6.
6,71%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·2 päivää sittenWhen we only 150 and REMAIN above this level, then CAN we move on! Real estate stocks still depressed!
18.6.Ostopäivä! 🥳Oh really? For me, it's no buying opportunity for a loooong, loooong time! Don't sell due to large losses either. We are now in a so-called bind with many stocks; the market is what it is! Summer is almost always ABOMINABLY down. Summer is not shareholders' favorite season nowadays!
·17.6.Aspects regarding potential new acquisitions in connection with the press release on June 11 concerning the increase of share capital to 15 mill. Euro. Cibus took approx. 14.18 mill. euro from the free reserves and moved them to the account for restricted company capital/share capital. The number of shares is the same, but the accounting "value" per share increased. The reason Cibus wants to reach the 15 mill. is probably not accidental. It is a minimum requirement to achieve REIT status in e.g. France and Germany. Other countries in Europe have either larger or smaller requirements. They are probably not immediately in play. So I expect we are talking about one of these two countries in addition to continued expansion in existing markets, perhaps primarily in Benelux, if we are talking about mainland Europe? France does not set legal requirements for the loan-to-value ratio (ltv). (Germany does, as far as I know, at 55% ltv max. If we are talking about REITs.) Since Cibus normally has a slightly aggressive, but disciplined and reasonably conservative financial structure regarding debt ratios/targets, they can expand in France without having to raise millions/billions in new share capital to reduce debt. I immediately see that as a plus. By paying out 95% of rental income as dividends, Cibus completely avoids French corporate tax. That helps with the monthly dividend, BUT it can cause problems with sufficient liquidity for renewals etc. when almost everything has to be paid out. Naturally, all depending on specific lease agreements and the property portfolio one acquires. It is difficult to assess before concrete news about potential portfolios comes to light. I expect we are talking about Northern France, now that a functioning operation has been established in Benelux. Germany shares the same capital requirement of 15 mill. Euro under their G-REIT law, which means that Cibus has now, in a way, opened the door. But in practice, Germany is probably secondary, if I have to assess something. The G-REIT law requires a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 55%. Cibus is currently around 57-58%. Germany is therefore effectively uninteresting as a REIT, unless they carry out a new share issue to reduce debt? Otherwise, one can easily establish a completely ordinary property company in Germany, then one just has to pay the usual corporate tax (perhaps even a reduced corporate tax in certain cases), but then, in return, has free rein regarding debt issues. Otherwise, I would not be surprised if Cibus succeeds in buying some smaller portfolios of supermarket properties located in Germany, but owned by Danish K/S companies which were popular in the 00s and 2010s. These properties are running out of lease agreements and can easily encounter problems with German tenants/operators e.g. REWE, Edeka, Aldi etc. in renegotiation situations plus there are ongoing new environmental and zoning requirements for the classic box properties where these supermarkets are usually located. There's plenty to deal with, but I hope Cibus keeps it large-scale and concentrated to avoid too much micro-management. We'll see. As Cibus mentioned in the press release, there is no rush. NB: I am long in the stock. Assess for yourself what the situation is for Cibus.
·15.6.DOES anyone BELIEVE in 200 this year? Looks unbelievable, seems to be grinding at max 150 kr and then it rolls downwards again ....
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
59 päivää sitten
‧34 min
0,08 EUR/osake
Irtoamispäivä 30.6.
6,71%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2 päivää sittenWhen we only 150 and REMAIN above this level, then CAN we move on! Real estate stocks still depressed!
- 18.6.Ostopäivä! 🥳Oh really? For me, it's no buying opportunity for a loooong, loooong time! Don't sell due to large losses either. We are now in a so-called bind with many stocks; the market is what it is! Summer is almost always ABOMINABLY down. Summer is not shareholders' favorite season nowadays!
- ·17.6.Aspects regarding potential new acquisitions in connection with the press release on June 11 concerning the increase of share capital to 15 mill. Euro. Cibus took approx. 14.18 mill. euro from the free reserves and moved them to the account for restricted company capital/share capital. The number of shares is the same, but the accounting "value" per share increased. The reason Cibus wants to reach the 15 mill. is probably not accidental. It is a minimum requirement to achieve REIT status in e.g. France and Germany. Other countries in Europe have either larger or smaller requirements. They are probably not immediately in play. So I expect we are talking about one of these two countries in addition to continued expansion in existing markets, perhaps primarily in Benelux, if we are talking about mainland Europe? France does not set legal requirements for the loan-to-value ratio (ltv). (Germany does, as far as I know, at 55% ltv max. If we are talking about REITs.) Since Cibus normally has a slightly aggressive, but disciplined and reasonably conservative financial structure regarding debt ratios/targets, they can expand in France without having to raise millions/billions in new share capital to reduce debt. I immediately see that as a plus. By paying out 95% of rental income as dividends, Cibus completely avoids French corporate tax. That helps with the monthly dividend, BUT it can cause problems with sufficient liquidity for renewals etc. when almost everything has to be paid out. Naturally, all depending on specific lease agreements and the property portfolio one acquires. It is difficult to assess before concrete news about potential portfolios comes to light. I expect we are talking about Northern France, now that a functioning operation has been established in Benelux. Germany shares the same capital requirement of 15 mill. Euro under their G-REIT law, which means that Cibus has now, in a way, opened the door. But in practice, Germany is probably secondary, if I have to assess something. The G-REIT law requires a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 55%. Cibus is currently around 57-58%. Germany is therefore effectively uninteresting as a REIT, unless they carry out a new share issue to reduce debt? Otherwise, one can easily establish a completely ordinary property company in Germany, then one just has to pay the usual corporate tax (perhaps even a reduced corporate tax in certain cases), but then, in return, has free rein regarding debt issues. Otherwise, I would not be surprised if Cibus succeeds in buying some smaller portfolios of supermarket properties located in Germany, but owned by Danish K/S companies which were popular in the 00s and 2010s. These properties are running out of lease agreements and can easily encounter problems with German tenants/operators e.g. REWE, Edeka, Aldi etc. in renegotiation situations plus there are ongoing new environmental and zoning requirements for the classic box properties where these supermarkets are usually located. There's plenty to deal with, but I hope Cibus keeps it large-scale and concentrated to avoid too much micro-management. We'll see. As Cibus mentioned in the press release, there is no rush. NB: I am long in the stock. Assess for yourself what the situation is for Cibus.
- ·15.6.DOES anyone BELIEVE in 200 this year? Looks unbelievable, seems to be grinding at max 150 kr and then it rolls downwards again ....
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
59 päivää sitten
‧34 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4.2025 |
0,08 EUR/osake
Irtoamispäivä 30.6.
6,71%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2 päivää sittenWhen we only 150 and REMAIN above this level, then CAN we move on! Real estate stocks still depressed!
- 18.6.Ostopäivä! 🥳Oh really? For me, it's no buying opportunity for a loooong, loooong time! Don't sell due to large losses either. We are now in a so-called bind with many stocks; the market is what it is! Summer is almost always ABOMINABLY down. Summer is not shareholders' favorite season nowadays!
- ·17.6.Aspects regarding potential new acquisitions in connection with the press release on June 11 concerning the increase of share capital to 15 mill. Euro. Cibus took approx. 14.18 mill. euro from the free reserves and moved them to the account for restricted company capital/share capital. The number of shares is the same, but the accounting "value" per share increased. The reason Cibus wants to reach the 15 mill. is probably not accidental. It is a minimum requirement to achieve REIT status in e.g. France and Germany. Other countries in Europe have either larger or smaller requirements. They are probably not immediately in play. So I expect we are talking about one of these two countries in addition to continued expansion in existing markets, perhaps primarily in Benelux, if we are talking about mainland Europe? France does not set legal requirements for the loan-to-value ratio (ltv). (Germany does, as far as I know, at 55% ltv max. If we are talking about REITs.) Since Cibus normally has a slightly aggressive, but disciplined and reasonably conservative financial structure regarding debt ratios/targets, they can expand in France without having to raise millions/billions in new share capital to reduce debt. I immediately see that as a plus. By paying out 95% of rental income as dividends, Cibus completely avoids French corporate tax. That helps with the monthly dividend, BUT it can cause problems with sufficient liquidity for renewals etc. when almost everything has to be paid out. Naturally, all depending on specific lease agreements and the property portfolio one acquires. It is difficult to assess before concrete news about potential portfolios comes to light. I expect we are talking about Northern France, now that a functioning operation has been established in Benelux. Germany shares the same capital requirement of 15 mill. Euro under their G-REIT law, which means that Cibus has now, in a way, opened the door. But in practice, Germany is probably secondary, if I have to assess something. The G-REIT law requires a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 55%. Cibus is currently around 57-58%. Germany is therefore effectively uninteresting as a REIT, unless they carry out a new share issue to reduce debt? Otherwise, one can easily establish a completely ordinary property company in Germany, then one just has to pay the usual corporate tax (perhaps even a reduced corporate tax in certain cases), but then, in return, has free rein regarding debt issues. Otherwise, I would not be surprised if Cibus succeeds in buying some smaller portfolios of supermarket properties located in Germany, but owned by Danish K/S companies which were popular in the 00s and 2010s. These properties are running out of lease agreements and can easily encounter problems with German tenants/operators e.g. REWE, Edeka, Aldi etc. in renegotiation situations plus there are ongoing new environmental and zoning requirements for the classic box properties where these supermarkets are usually located. There's plenty to deal with, but I hope Cibus keeps it large-scale and concentrated to avoid too much micro-management. We'll see. As Cibus mentioned in the press release, there is no rush. NB: I am long in the stock. Assess for yourself what the situation is for Cibus.
- ·15.6.DOES anyone BELIEVE in 200 this year? Looks unbelievable, seems to be grinding at max 150 kr and then it rolls downwards again ....
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt