Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.

BONESUPPORT

Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
60 päivää sitten

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
109--
212--
171--
59--
26--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti
22.10.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
16.7.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
22.4.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
24.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
23.10.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
15.7.2025

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 6 t sitten
    ·
    Bonesupport and Stryker - Acquisition in the LONG TERM Perhaps far-fetched but... Why is Bonesupport allying itself with Stryker? Stryker is, in some respects, a competitor. At my previous employer, I came into contact with equity analysts and asked if they thought any larger company might be interested in Bonesupport, and Stryker came up several times. Stryker could buy all of Bonesupport for one year's profit, that's how big the company is, and they have historically done this type of deal. I ran the case through chat GPT and got this 1. Background and investment idea BONESUPPORT has established a strong position in synthetic bone substitute materials through the CERAMENT platform. The company's growth is primarily driven by the USA, where CERAMENT G has gained increasing commercial importance. At the same time, the company has a high gross margin, improved profitability, and a strong net cash position. A particularly interesting development is that Stryker has entered into a distribution collaboration with BONESUPPORT in Australia and New Zealand. This can be seen as a possible first practical contact between two companies where Stryker is simultaneously a potential strategic buyer. Important: there is no public information indicating that Stryker plans an acquisition of BONESUPPORT. This is therefore a hypothetical scenario and not a claim that a deal is underway. 2. Why Stryker is an interesting potential buyer · Stryker is a global medical technology group with much larger financial resources than BONESUPPORT. · BONESUPPORT's CERAMENT technology can complement Stryker's existing orthopedics business. · Through the distribution, Stryker gets the opportunity to see how CERAMENT performs commercially and how surgeons and hospitals react. · A distribution collaboration can therefore serve as a practical test of the strategic potential before a possible acquisition. · If BONESUPPORT continues to gain market share, the value of owning the technology could become greater for a global player than for the market as a standalone company. 3. The size difference between the companies 2025 Stryker BONESUPPORT Revenue approx. USD 25.1 bn SEK 1.175 bn Reported operating profit approx. USD 4.9 bn SEK 232 m Net profit approx. USD 3.2 bn approx. SEK 140 m Market capitalization (Sept. 2026) approx. USD 105.7 bn approx. SEK 15 bn The figures illustrate the very large difference in size. Stryker simultaneously has the capacity to carry out significant corporate acquisitions; for example, the company acquired Inari Medical for approximately USD 4.9 billion. 4. Why the distribution collaboration can be important The most interesting aspect of the case is not solely the distribution agreement but what Stryker can learn through the collaboration. A possible development is: 1. Q4 2026: Stryker begins distributing BONESUPPORT's products in Australia and New Zealand. 2. 2027: Stryker monitors sales, usage, clinical response, and customer relationships. 3. If the results are strong, the collaboration can be expanded to more markets or products. 4. Stryker then gets significantly better decision-making basis to assess the long-term strategic benefit of CERAMENT. 5. If BONESUPPORT simultaneously continues to grow rapidly in the USA and Europe, an acquisition could become attractive. 6. Stryker can then choose to buy the entire company before BONESUPPORT becomes even larger and thus more expensive. 5. Possible valuation in case of a bid With approximately 65.44 million outstanding shares and a share price around 218–230 SEK, today's market capitalization corresponds to approximately 14–15 billion SEK. Illustrative bid levels are shown below. These are scenarios, not target prices. Bid/share Share value Premium vs 218 SEK Approximate EV* 300 SEK 19632.6 bn SEK 38 % 19632.1 bn SEK 350 SEK 22904.7 bn SEK 61 % 22904.2 bn SEK 400 SEK 26176.8 bn SEK 83 % 26176.3 bn SEK 450 SEK 29448.8 bn SEK 106 % 29448.4 bn SEK * Simplified EV = share value minus approximately 0.42 bn SEK net cash. Transaction adjustments are not included. 6. How big is such a purchase for Stryker? With a USD/SEK exchange rate around 9.2–9.3, a purchase for 30 billion SEK implies approximately USD 3.2 billion. This corresponds to only about 3 percent of Stryker's market capitalization of approximately USD 105.7 billion. This does not mean that the price is unimportant for Stryker, but the size is manageable for a group of Stryker's size. Furthermore, an acquisition of BONESUPPORT would be significantly smaller than Stryker's Inari deal.
  • Yhtiö ostaa markkinoilta n. 440.000 kpl omia osakkeitaan ja mitätöi ne. Pitäisihän tämänkin parantaa osakekohtaisia lukuja. Tämä on paljon parempi tapa, kuin osinkojen maksaminen. Ei tarvitse maksaa veroja.
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    Furthermore, one does not need to worry about a new issue.
  • 4.9.
    ·
    Bonex has grown every quarter since 2021. They now expect 33-36% growth. Multiple expansion comes with increased revenue and thus further profits, and the P/E ratio quickly falls from the current 70 to an expected 47 during Q3. This shows how fast things move when earnings per share more than double. Insider purchases strengthen my view that the stock is reasonably priced, along with all analysts' target prices.
  • 3.9.
    ·
    100 MSEK is better than nothing and a signal that the company has enough cash for daily operations in the foreseeable future. But the amount probably doesn't provide significant volumes? (don't see the average daily volume right now)
    3.9.
    ·
    awesome
  • 1.9.
    ·
    Would it be an illegal act to encourage small investors to collectively piggyback on BONEX's buyback program and thereby smoke out the short sellers in this stock? 😅
    2.9. · Muokattu
    Buybacks rarely move stocks. They are only allowed to buy a small amount every day
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
60 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 6 t sitten
    ·
    Bonesupport and Stryker - Acquisition in the LONG TERM Perhaps far-fetched but... Why is Bonesupport allying itself with Stryker? Stryker is, in some respects, a competitor. At my previous employer, I came into contact with equity analysts and asked if they thought any larger company might be interested in Bonesupport, and Stryker came up several times. Stryker could buy all of Bonesupport for one year's profit, that's how big the company is, and they have historically done this type of deal. I ran the case through chat GPT and got this 1. Background and investment idea BONESUPPORT has established a strong position in synthetic bone substitute materials through the CERAMENT platform. The company's growth is primarily driven by the USA, where CERAMENT G has gained increasing commercial importance. At the same time, the company has a high gross margin, improved profitability, and a strong net cash position. A particularly interesting development is that Stryker has entered into a distribution collaboration with BONESUPPORT in Australia and New Zealand. This can be seen as a possible first practical contact between two companies where Stryker is simultaneously a potential strategic buyer. Important: there is no public information indicating that Stryker plans an acquisition of BONESUPPORT. This is therefore a hypothetical scenario and not a claim that a deal is underway. 2. Why Stryker is an interesting potential buyer · Stryker is a global medical technology group with much larger financial resources than BONESUPPORT. · BONESUPPORT's CERAMENT technology can complement Stryker's existing orthopedics business. · Through the distribution, Stryker gets the opportunity to see how CERAMENT performs commercially and how surgeons and hospitals react. · A distribution collaboration can therefore serve as a practical test of the strategic potential before a possible acquisition. · If BONESUPPORT continues to gain market share, the value of owning the technology could become greater for a global player than for the market as a standalone company. 3. The size difference between the companies 2025 Stryker BONESUPPORT Revenue approx. USD 25.1 bn SEK 1.175 bn Reported operating profit approx. USD 4.9 bn SEK 232 m Net profit approx. USD 3.2 bn approx. SEK 140 m Market capitalization (Sept. 2026) approx. USD 105.7 bn approx. SEK 15 bn The figures illustrate the very large difference in size. Stryker simultaneously has the capacity to carry out significant corporate acquisitions; for example, the company acquired Inari Medical for approximately USD 4.9 billion. 4. Why the distribution collaboration can be important The most interesting aspect of the case is not solely the distribution agreement but what Stryker can learn through the collaboration. A possible development is: 1. Q4 2026: Stryker begins distributing BONESUPPORT's products in Australia and New Zealand. 2. 2027: Stryker monitors sales, usage, clinical response, and customer relationships. 3. If the results are strong, the collaboration can be expanded to more markets or products. 4. Stryker then gets significantly better decision-making basis to assess the long-term strategic benefit of CERAMENT. 5. If BONESUPPORT simultaneously continues to grow rapidly in the USA and Europe, an acquisition could become attractive. 6. Stryker can then choose to buy the entire company before BONESUPPORT becomes even larger and thus more expensive. 5. Possible valuation in case of a bid With approximately 65.44 million outstanding shares and a share price around 218–230 SEK, today's market capitalization corresponds to approximately 14–15 billion SEK. Illustrative bid levels are shown below. These are scenarios, not target prices. Bid/share Share value Premium vs 218 SEK Approximate EV* 300 SEK 19632.6 bn SEK 38 % 19632.1 bn SEK 350 SEK 22904.7 bn SEK 61 % 22904.2 bn SEK 400 SEK 26176.8 bn SEK 83 % 26176.3 bn SEK 450 SEK 29448.8 bn SEK 106 % 29448.4 bn SEK * Simplified EV = share value minus approximately 0.42 bn SEK net cash. Transaction adjustments are not included. 6. How big is such a purchase for Stryker? With a USD/SEK exchange rate around 9.2–9.3, a purchase for 30 billion SEK implies approximately USD 3.2 billion. This corresponds to only about 3 percent of Stryker's market capitalization of approximately USD 105.7 billion. This does not mean that the price is unimportant for Stryker, but the size is manageable for a group of Stryker's size. Furthermore, an acquisition of BONESUPPORT would be significantly smaller than Stryker's Inari deal.
  • Yhtiö ostaa markkinoilta n. 440.000 kpl omia osakkeitaan ja mitätöi ne. Pitäisihän tämänkin parantaa osakekohtaisia lukuja. Tämä on paljon parempi tapa, kuin osinkojen maksaminen. Ei tarvitse maksaa veroja.
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    Furthermore, one does not need to worry about a new issue.
  • 4.9.
    ·
    Bonex has grown every quarter since 2021. They now expect 33-36% growth. Multiple expansion comes with increased revenue and thus further profits, and the P/E ratio quickly falls from the current 70 to an expected 47 during Q3. This shows how fast things move when earnings per share more than double. Insider purchases strengthen my view that the stock is reasonably priced, along with all analysts' target prices.
  • 3.9.
    ·
    100 MSEK is better than nothing and a signal that the company has enough cash for daily operations in the foreseeable future. But the amount probably doesn't provide significant volumes? (don't see the average daily volume right now)
    3.9.
    ·
    awesome
  • 1.9.
    ·
    Would it be an illegal act to encourage small investors to collectively piggyback on BONEX's buyback program and thereby smoke out the short sellers in this stock? 😅
    2.9. · Muokattu
    Buybacks rarely move stocks. They are only allowed to buy a small amount every day
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
109--
212--
171--
59--
26--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti
22.10.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
16.7.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
22.4.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
24.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
23.10.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
15.7.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
60 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti
22.10.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
16.7.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
22.4.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
24.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
23.10.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
15.7.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 6 t sitten
    ·
    Bonesupport and Stryker - Acquisition in the LONG TERM Perhaps far-fetched but... Why is Bonesupport allying itself with Stryker? Stryker is, in some respects, a competitor. At my previous employer, I came into contact with equity analysts and asked if they thought any larger company might be interested in Bonesupport, and Stryker came up several times. Stryker could buy all of Bonesupport for one year's profit, that's how big the company is, and they have historically done this type of deal. I ran the case through chat GPT and got this 1. Background and investment idea BONESUPPORT has established a strong position in synthetic bone substitute materials through the CERAMENT platform. The company's growth is primarily driven by the USA, where CERAMENT G has gained increasing commercial importance. At the same time, the company has a high gross margin, improved profitability, and a strong net cash position. A particularly interesting development is that Stryker has entered into a distribution collaboration with BONESUPPORT in Australia and New Zealand. This can be seen as a possible first practical contact between two companies where Stryker is simultaneously a potential strategic buyer. Important: there is no public information indicating that Stryker plans an acquisition of BONESUPPORT. This is therefore a hypothetical scenario and not a claim that a deal is underway. 2. Why Stryker is an interesting potential buyer · Stryker is a global medical technology group with much larger financial resources than BONESUPPORT. · BONESUPPORT's CERAMENT technology can complement Stryker's existing orthopedics business. · Through the distribution, Stryker gets the opportunity to see how CERAMENT performs commercially and how surgeons and hospitals react. · A distribution collaboration can therefore serve as a practical test of the strategic potential before a possible acquisition. · If BONESUPPORT continues to gain market share, the value of owning the technology could become greater for a global player than for the market as a standalone company. 3. The size difference between the companies 2025 Stryker BONESUPPORT Revenue approx. USD 25.1 bn SEK 1.175 bn Reported operating profit approx. USD 4.9 bn SEK 232 m Net profit approx. USD 3.2 bn approx. SEK 140 m Market capitalization (Sept. 2026) approx. USD 105.7 bn approx. SEK 15 bn The figures illustrate the very large difference in size. Stryker simultaneously has the capacity to carry out significant corporate acquisitions; for example, the company acquired Inari Medical for approximately USD 4.9 billion. 4. Why the distribution collaboration can be important The most interesting aspect of the case is not solely the distribution agreement but what Stryker can learn through the collaboration. A possible development is: 1. Q4 2026: Stryker begins distributing BONESUPPORT's products in Australia and New Zealand. 2. 2027: Stryker monitors sales, usage, clinical response, and customer relationships. 3. If the results are strong, the collaboration can be expanded to more markets or products. 4. Stryker then gets significantly better decision-making basis to assess the long-term strategic benefit of CERAMENT. 5. If BONESUPPORT simultaneously continues to grow rapidly in the USA and Europe, an acquisition could become attractive. 6. Stryker can then choose to buy the entire company before BONESUPPORT becomes even larger and thus more expensive. 5. Possible valuation in case of a bid With approximately 65.44 million outstanding shares and a share price around 218–230 SEK, today's market capitalization corresponds to approximately 14–15 billion SEK. Illustrative bid levels are shown below. These are scenarios, not target prices. Bid/share Share value Premium vs 218 SEK Approximate EV* 300 SEK 19632.6 bn SEK 38 % 19632.1 bn SEK 350 SEK 22904.7 bn SEK 61 % 22904.2 bn SEK 400 SEK 26176.8 bn SEK 83 % 26176.3 bn SEK 450 SEK 29448.8 bn SEK 106 % 29448.4 bn SEK * Simplified EV = share value minus approximately 0.42 bn SEK net cash. Transaction adjustments are not included. 6. How big is such a purchase for Stryker? With a USD/SEK exchange rate around 9.2–9.3, a purchase for 30 billion SEK implies approximately USD 3.2 billion. This corresponds to only about 3 percent of Stryker's market capitalization of approximately USD 105.7 billion. This does not mean that the price is unimportant for Stryker, but the size is manageable for a group of Stryker's size. Furthermore, an acquisition of BONESUPPORT would be significantly smaller than Stryker's Inari deal.
  • Yhtiö ostaa markkinoilta n. 440.000 kpl omia osakkeitaan ja mitätöi ne. Pitäisihän tämänkin parantaa osakekohtaisia lukuja. Tämä on paljon parempi tapa, kuin osinkojen maksaminen. Ei tarvitse maksaa veroja.
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    Furthermore, one does not need to worry about a new issue.
  • 4.9.
    ·
    Bonex has grown every quarter since 2021. They now expect 33-36% growth. Multiple expansion comes with increased revenue and thus further profits, and the P/E ratio quickly falls from the current 70 to an expected 47 during Q3. This shows how fast things move when earnings per share more than double. Insider purchases strengthen my view that the stock is reasonably priced, along with all analysts' target prices.
  • 3.9.
    ·
    100 MSEK is better than nothing and a signal that the company has enough cash for daily operations in the foreseeable future. But the amount probably doesn't provide significant volumes? (don't see the average daily volume right now)
    3.9.
    ·
    awesome
  • 1.9.
    ·
    Would it be an illegal act to encourage small investors to collectively piggyback on BONEX's buyback program and thereby smoke out the short sellers in this stock? 😅
    2.9. · Muokattu
    Buybacks rarely move stocks. They are only allowed to buy a small amount every day
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
109--
212--
171--
59--
26--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt