2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
23 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 27.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 27.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuSeriously, I said it on the way up a few days ago too... Can we try to have a sensible debate here instead of throwing insults and making nasty comments to each other? This applies to both those of us who think the price should be higher and those who think it should be lower. I asked a few days ago and I'm asking again. Can we agree that rNPV is a sensible model for clarifying what the company should be worth? If not, what alternative model do you suggest? If we agree on that, what assumptions do you think one should / should not take into account? As I wrote below, I have made a proposal for an rNPV calculator that is based on Edison's valuation. (disclaimer, I don't know their model and have used AI to create my model, it's probably not 100%, but let's discuss it so it gets better) Link to the calculator is here: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/cdcb9883-3342-4f6e-a1e5-51f3ef25fd1a If we can discuss the different variables in such a valuation together, we should be able to get closer to an understanding of what we think the company should be worth and why we might disagree with the valuation. I believe it will give us all greater understanding, and better patience with others' viewpoints. Those who talk the price up or down without contributing to this can go take a hike for all I care. Then you are here to pump or dump and your opinion means absolutely nothing to me. Looking forward to responses, let the debate begin!
·1 päivä sittenYou are naive if you think that people like fjellexpression, gaziemille, or investorareboss use anything other than their gut feeling to ragebait full-time·1 päivä sittenLet's try to maintain a constructive tone. I might be naive, but it doesn't work to stand on our respective hills and shout at each other, so let's rather try to figure out where we disagree. As I understand Sörmland, the argument is that he/she doesn't think the presented results inspire confidence that there's a particularly high chance the company will succeed with its candidates. Also, that the risk is still too great as the company is very vulnerable to the slightest misstep. (Please correct me if I misunderstand you, Sörmland) I understand the arguments, but I believe it's still possible to assign a value to the company adjusted for the risks. And that value, as I see the risks, does not align with a valuation of 1/3/4kr that has been communicated here. Therefore, I (naive as I am) am trying to get those who believe the company is still overvalued to explain why, so that I can capture and adjust for the risks they highlight. Then we can all have different assessments of risk, but at least then we all have an understanding of why we value it differently.
15.6.15.6.So, how is the price development holding up guys?·6 t sittenI'm not in CRNO yet (don't shoot me), watching the development. Just want to contribute to the discussion with a point of view. I'll start with a question I read on a financial forum in 2006: "Can someone recommend which data tool is best for price analysis?" I replied: "I don't use data tools to describe/analyze something based on human nature. I use a transparent ruler. Then I draw lines further into the future, based on historical turning points between tops and bottoms. These lines are almost never horizontal." My fundamental belief is that the future price reflects human speculation. And human nature is the same now as hundreds of years ago. Artificial intelligence cannot replicate the human component through modeling. Artificial intelligence is and remains what it is: Artificial. To believe that one can model the future is to believe that computers are spiritual beings. They are not. I could elaborate on this further, but it would go too far and ganskee rasskt burst the topic of this thread. If anyone wants to ask something, in this perspective mind you, I will try to answer. Just remember that I won't answer if you think you achieve something by attacking what you *BELIEVE* I stand for.- ·12.6.the skeptics are quiet, I thought the price would hit 1 before it came up again ?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
23 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuSeriously, I said it on the way up a few days ago too... Can we try to have a sensible debate here instead of throwing insults and making nasty comments to each other? This applies to both those of us who think the price should be higher and those who think it should be lower. I asked a few days ago and I'm asking again. Can we agree that rNPV is a sensible model for clarifying what the company should be worth? If not, what alternative model do you suggest? If we agree on that, what assumptions do you think one should / should not take into account? As I wrote below, I have made a proposal for an rNPV calculator that is based on Edison's valuation. (disclaimer, I don't know their model and have used AI to create my model, it's probably not 100%, but let's discuss it so it gets better) Link to the calculator is here: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/cdcb9883-3342-4f6e-a1e5-51f3ef25fd1a If we can discuss the different variables in such a valuation together, we should be able to get closer to an understanding of what we think the company should be worth and why we might disagree with the valuation. I believe it will give us all greater understanding, and better patience with others' viewpoints. Those who talk the price up or down without contributing to this can go take a hike for all I care. Then you are here to pump or dump and your opinion means absolutely nothing to me. Looking forward to responses, let the debate begin!·1 päivä sittenYou are naive if you think that people like fjellexpression, gaziemille, or investorareboss use anything other than their gut feeling to ragebait full-time·1 päivä sittenLet's try to maintain a constructive tone. I might be naive, but it doesn't work to stand on our respective hills and shout at each other, so let's rather try to figure out where we disagree. As I understand Sörmland, the argument is that he/she doesn't think the presented results inspire confidence that there's a particularly high chance the company will succeed with its candidates. Also, that the risk is still too great as the company is very vulnerable to the slightest misstep. (Please correct me if I misunderstand you, Sörmland) I understand the arguments, but I believe it's still possible to assign a value to the company adjusted for the risks. And that value, as I see the risks, does not align with a valuation of 1/3/4kr that has been communicated here. Therefore, I (naive as I am) am trying to get those who believe the company is still overvalued to explain why, so that I can capture and adjust for the risks they highlight. Then we can all have different assessments of risk, but at least then we all have an understanding of why we value it differently.
- 15.6.15.6.So, how is the price development holding up guys?·6 t sittenI'm not in CRNO yet (don't shoot me), watching the development. Just want to contribute to the discussion with a point of view. I'll start with a question I read on a financial forum in 2006: "Can someone recommend which data tool is best for price analysis?" I replied: "I don't use data tools to describe/analyze something based on human nature. I use a transparent ruler. Then I draw lines further into the future, based on historical turning points between tops and bottoms. These lines are almost never horizontal." My fundamental belief is that the future price reflects human speculation. And human nature is the same now as hundreds of years ago. Artificial intelligence cannot replicate the human component through modeling. Artificial intelligence is and remains what it is: Artificial. To believe that one can model the future is to believe that computers are spiritual beings. They are not. I could elaborate on this further, but it would go too far and ganskee rasskt burst the topic of this thread. If anyone wants to ask something, in this perspective mind you, I will try to answer. Just remember that I won't answer if you think you achieve something by attacking what you *BELIEVE* I stand for.
- ·12.6.the skeptics are quiet, I thought the price would hit 1 before it came up again ?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 27.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 27.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
23 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 27.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 27.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuSeriously, I said it on the way up a few days ago too... Can we try to have a sensible debate here instead of throwing insults and making nasty comments to each other? This applies to both those of us who think the price should be higher and those who think it should be lower. I asked a few days ago and I'm asking again. Can we agree that rNPV is a sensible model for clarifying what the company should be worth? If not, what alternative model do you suggest? If we agree on that, what assumptions do you think one should / should not take into account? As I wrote below, I have made a proposal for an rNPV calculator that is based on Edison's valuation. (disclaimer, I don't know their model and have used AI to create my model, it's probably not 100%, but let's discuss it so it gets better) Link to the calculator is here: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/cdcb9883-3342-4f6e-a1e5-51f3ef25fd1a If we can discuss the different variables in such a valuation together, we should be able to get closer to an understanding of what we think the company should be worth and why we might disagree with the valuation. I believe it will give us all greater understanding, and better patience with others' viewpoints. Those who talk the price up or down without contributing to this can go take a hike for all I care. Then you are here to pump or dump and your opinion means absolutely nothing to me. Looking forward to responses, let the debate begin!·1 päivä sittenYou are naive if you think that people like fjellexpression, gaziemille, or investorareboss use anything other than their gut feeling to ragebait full-time·1 päivä sittenLet's try to maintain a constructive tone. I might be naive, but it doesn't work to stand on our respective hills and shout at each other, so let's rather try to figure out where we disagree. As I understand Sörmland, the argument is that he/she doesn't think the presented results inspire confidence that there's a particularly high chance the company will succeed with its candidates. Also, that the risk is still too great as the company is very vulnerable to the slightest misstep. (Please correct me if I misunderstand you, Sörmland) I understand the arguments, but I believe it's still possible to assign a value to the company adjusted for the risks. And that value, as I see the risks, does not align with a valuation of 1/3/4kr that has been communicated here. Therefore, I (naive as I am) am trying to get those who believe the company is still overvalued to explain why, so that I can capture and adjust for the risks they highlight. Then we can all have different assessments of risk, but at least then we all have an understanding of why we value it differently.
- 15.6.15.6.So, how is the price development holding up guys?·6 t sittenI'm not in CRNO yet (don't shoot me), watching the development. Just want to contribute to the discussion with a point of view. I'll start with a question I read on a financial forum in 2006: "Can someone recommend which data tool is best for price analysis?" I replied: "I don't use data tools to describe/analyze something based on human nature. I use a transparent ruler. Then I draw lines further into the future, based on historical turning points between tops and bottoms. These lines are almost never horizontal." My fundamental belief is that the future price reflects human speculation. And human nature is the same now as hundreds of years ago. Artificial intelligence cannot replicate the human component through modeling. Artificial intelligence is and remains what it is: Artificial. To believe that one can model the future is to believe that computers are spiritual beings. They are not. I could elaborate on this further, but it would go too far and ganskee rasskt burst the topic of this thread. If anyone wants to ask something, in this perspective mind you, I will try to answer. Just remember that I won't answer if you think you achieve something by attacking what you *BELIEVE* I stand for.
- ·12.6.the skeptics are quiet, I thought the price would hit 1 before it came up again ?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt