2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
21 päivää sitten
‧45 min
0,58 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 708 | - | - | ||
| 9 997 | - | - | ||
| 12 939 | - | - | ||
| 1 819 | - | - | ||
| 2 393 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·2 t sittenThere are now articles online discussing Israel's attack on the Iranian gas field South Pars and Iran's response, including the bombing of Ras Laffan in Quatar. It is claimed that the war, with the bombing of such facilities, will guaranteed affect energy prices over time. Probably for years. Facilities will probably take years to rebuild. I therefore asked AI (Gemini+Chatgpt) what this would mean for the production of green hydrogen. ChatGPT says, among other things, that gas prices will remain high and thus very likely also increased electricity prices in Norway, even though we have our hydropower (because natural gas is often used as a reference for electricity prices). Strange if you ask me, but apparently that's how it is because Norway, with its power cables to Europe, is part of the European power market/ACER. The production of green hydrogen requires electrolysis, which uses electricity. If the electricity price generally rises due to more expensive fossil fuels and limited energy access, the cost of green hydrogen may temporarily increase. Import of parts and equipment for solar and wind power may also become more expensive if transport costs and oil prices increase. Consequence: Even if green energy is “free” in the form of sun and wind, infrastructure costs can increase in the short term. Long-term effect: increased investment in green energy. Over time, the lack of fossil energy will make green energy more strategically important. Countries that want to secure energy and hydrogen supply will likely increase subsidies and investments in solar, wind, and hydropower. This can eventually lower the costs for green hydrogen, because economies of scale and technological improvements take over. Consequence: Short term → higher costs for the production of green hydrogen. Long term → cheaper green energy due to increased development and technological advancement. Geopolitical risk and energy prices: Conflicts in the Persian Gulf can make the energy market unstable for years. This provides an incentive for nations to develop local, renewable energy and green hydrogen to reduce dependence on fossil imports. Gemini says: Increased competitiveness: When natural gas prices skyrocket (and remain high), the most important economic argument against green hydrogen disappears. "Blue" hydrogen (made from gas with carbon capture) suddenly becomes more expensive than green hydrogen produced with electrolysis. This makes green projects profitable without the need for large subsidies. Higher capital costs (CAPEX): Because energy prices affect everything from steel production to transport, the cost of building new solar parks, wind turbines, and electrolysis plants will rise. The investment itself becomes more expensive, even if the ongoing operating cost (wind and sun) remains free. Enormous demand growth: Industries dependent on gas (such as fertilizer and steel producers) will desperately look for alternatives. This will drive up the price of green energy in the short term because demand is far greater than supply. Energy security trumps price: In a world where the Middle East is unstable, nations will be willing to pay a "security premium" for locally produced energy from water, wind, and sun. This means that the market price of green power will be close to the record-high fossil prices. In summary: The price of green hydrogen will likely rise nominally due to more expensive equipment and raw materials, but it will become relatively cheaper and far more attractive compared to the sky-high prices of fossil energy. -------------- The war in the Persian Gulf, with the bombing of important facilities, which will likely lead to more expensive gas prices for a long time to come, therefore probably means that many actors dependent on energy will look at alternatives other than fossil energy. Then green hydrogen can hopefully be a good alternative, we hope.- ·12 t sittenIt is clear that NEL is very proud of what they have achieved with regard to next generation pressurised technology, and that they are looking forward to launching this on May 6th. Several in management are pushing this on linkedin now. As they themselves say, it's not small improvements they have achieved, but a product that sets a new global standard for technology for the production of renewable hydrogen.
·7 t sittenStrange company. Management promotes new technology on various platforms but none of them buy shares in the company. A company where management does not own shares, bought with their own money, but wants others to invest, is strange. For me, personally, this is a big, red, flag. "Come, invest in our new product, which we don't dare to invest in with our own money." 
·12 t sittenI'm not giving up on this. Isn't anyone wondering if a share issue or capital raising is underlying for the next GF? Danske Bank has put the company on its «funding candidates»-list, which may imply a possibility for a share issue – without that in itself being either positive or negative.
·1 päivä sittenWhen NEL starts to rise? Then another damn brokerage firm comes with a new shameful price target. That's how they've been doing it for years. Looking forward to a new product in MAY and NEL will probably benefit a lot from that article about the 30 billion Hydrogen agreement in India with Reliance and Samsung partners with NEL. I bet they will go in with NEL's new product there. Because it is NEL that delivers the products.
·1 päivä sittenYears and years. When the price went above 30, the DNB analyst who had 5kr was removed from the desk, and so-called major banks like BAC et al. competed to have higher price targets from 35-45. It's worth keeping in mind that of 10 who follow it now, 5 have hold and 5 have sell. In addition, it has risen 20% recently. It should stay above 2.38 not to indicate a bull-trap. Latest on tradergate now 2.36- ·1 päivä sittenWhat do you other shareholders think about the proposals for the general meeting? I see that the board is asking for quite broad authorizations – both to issue new shares, waive pre-emptive rights, and change the LTI‑program for management. At the same time, the company has not performed particularly strongly recently. The share price has nevertheless been positive in recent days. Is this just a market effect, or do you interpret the proposals as something more? How do you assess the risk of dilution vs. the need for flexibility?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
21 päivää sitten
‧45 min
0,58 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sittenThere are now articles online discussing Israel's attack on the Iranian gas field South Pars and Iran's response, including the bombing of Ras Laffan in Quatar. It is claimed that the war, with the bombing of such facilities, will guaranteed affect energy prices over time. Probably for years. Facilities will probably take years to rebuild. I therefore asked AI (Gemini+Chatgpt) what this would mean for the production of green hydrogen. ChatGPT says, among other things, that gas prices will remain high and thus very likely also increased electricity prices in Norway, even though we have our hydropower (because natural gas is often used as a reference for electricity prices). Strange if you ask me, but apparently that's how it is because Norway, with its power cables to Europe, is part of the European power market/ACER. The production of green hydrogen requires electrolysis, which uses electricity. If the electricity price generally rises due to more expensive fossil fuels and limited energy access, the cost of green hydrogen may temporarily increase. Import of parts and equipment for solar and wind power may also become more expensive if transport costs and oil prices increase. Consequence: Even if green energy is “free” in the form of sun and wind, infrastructure costs can increase in the short term. Long-term effect: increased investment in green energy. Over time, the lack of fossil energy will make green energy more strategically important. Countries that want to secure energy and hydrogen supply will likely increase subsidies and investments in solar, wind, and hydropower. This can eventually lower the costs for green hydrogen, because economies of scale and technological improvements take over. Consequence: Short term → higher costs for the production of green hydrogen. Long term → cheaper green energy due to increased development and technological advancement. Geopolitical risk and energy prices: Conflicts in the Persian Gulf can make the energy market unstable for years. This provides an incentive for nations to develop local, renewable energy and green hydrogen to reduce dependence on fossil imports. Gemini says: Increased competitiveness: When natural gas prices skyrocket (and remain high), the most important economic argument against green hydrogen disappears. "Blue" hydrogen (made from gas with carbon capture) suddenly becomes more expensive than green hydrogen produced with electrolysis. This makes green projects profitable without the need for large subsidies. Higher capital costs (CAPEX): Because energy prices affect everything from steel production to transport, the cost of building new solar parks, wind turbines, and electrolysis plants will rise. The investment itself becomes more expensive, even if the ongoing operating cost (wind and sun) remains free. Enormous demand growth: Industries dependent on gas (such as fertilizer and steel producers) will desperately look for alternatives. This will drive up the price of green energy in the short term because demand is far greater than supply. Energy security trumps price: In a world where the Middle East is unstable, nations will be willing to pay a "security premium" for locally produced energy from water, wind, and sun. This means that the market price of green power will be close to the record-high fossil prices. In summary: The price of green hydrogen will likely rise nominally due to more expensive equipment and raw materials, but it will become relatively cheaper and far more attractive compared to the sky-high prices of fossil energy. -------------- The war in the Persian Gulf, with the bombing of important facilities, which will likely lead to more expensive gas prices for a long time to come, therefore probably means that many actors dependent on energy will look at alternatives other than fossil energy. Then green hydrogen can hopefully be a good alternative, we hope.
- ·12 t sittenIt is clear that NEL is very proud of what they have achieved with regard to next generation pressurised technology, and that they are looking forward to launching this on May 6th. Several in management are pushing this on linkedin now. As they themselves say, it's not small improvements they have achieved, but a product that sets a new global standard for technology for the production of renewable hydrogen.·7 t sittenStrange company. Management promotes new technology on various platforms but none of them buy shares in the company. A company where management does not own shares, bought with their own money, but wants others to invest, is strange. For me, personally, this is a big, red, flag. "Come, invest in our new product, which we don't dare to invest in with our own money."
- ·12 t sittenI'm not giving up on this. Isn't anyone wondering if a share issue or capital raising is underlying for the next GF? Danske Bank has put the company on its «funding candidates»-list, which may imply a possibility for a share issue – without that in itself being either positive or negative.
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen NEL starts to rise? Then another damn brokerage firm comes with a new shameful price target. That's how they've been doing it for years. Looking forward to a new product in MAY and NEL will probably benefit a lot from that article about the 30 billion Hydrogen agreement in India with Reliance and Samsung partners with NEL. I bet they will go in with NEL's new product there. Because it is NEL that delivers the products.·1 päivä sittenYears and years. When the price went above 30, the DNB analyst who had 5kr was removed from the desk, and so-called major banks like BAC et al. competed to have higher price targets from 35-45. It's worth keeping in mind that of 10 who follow it now, 5 have hold and 5 have sell. In addition, it has risen 20% recently. It should stay above 2.38 not to indicate a bull-trap. Latest on tradergate now 2.36
- ·1 päivä sittenWhat do you other shareholders think about the proposals for the general meeting? I see that the board is asking for quite broad authorizations – both to issue new shares, waive pre-emptive rights, and change the LTI‑program for management. At the same time, the company has not performed particularly strongly recently. The share price has nevertheless been positive in recent days. Is this just a market effect, or do you interpret the proposals as something more? How do you assess the risk of dilution vs. the need for flexibility?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 708 | - | - | ||
| 9 997 | - | - | ||
| 12 939 | - | - | ||
| 1 819 | - | - | ||
| 2 393 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
21 päivää sitten
‧45 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2.2025 |
0,58 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sittenThere are now articles online discussing Israel's attack on the Iranian gas field South Pars and Iran's response, including the bombing of Ras Laffan in Quatar. It is claimed that the war, with the bombing of such facilities, will guaranteed affect energy prices over time. Probably for years. Facilities will probably take years to rebuild. I therefore asked AI (Gemini+Chatgpt) what this would mean for the production of green hydrogen. ChatGPT says, among other things, that gas prices will remain high and thus very likely also increased electricity prices in Norway, even though we have our hydropower (because natural gas is often used as a reference for electricity prices). Strange if you ask me, but apparently that's how it is because Norway, with its power cables to Europe, is part of the European power market/ACER. The production of green hydrogen requires electrolysis, which uses electricity. If the electricity price generally rises due to more expensive fossil fuels and limited energy access, the cost of green hydrogen may temporarily increase. Import of parts and equipment for solar and wind power may also become more expensive if transport costs and oil prices increase. Consequence: Even if green energy is “free” in the form of sun and wind, infrastructure costs can increase in the short term. Long-term effect: increased investment in green energy. Over time, the lack of fossil energy will make green energy more strategically important. Countries that want to secure energy and hydrogen supply will likely increase subsidies and investments in solar, wind, and hydropower. This can eventually lower the costs for green hydrogen, because economies of scale and technological improvements take over. Consequence: Short term → higher costs for the production of green hydrogen. Long term → cheaper green energy due to increased development and technological advancement. Geopolitical risk and energy prices: Conflicts in the Persian Gulf can make the energy market unstable for years. This provides an incentive for nations to develop local, renewable energy and green hydrogen to reduce dependence on fossil imports. Gemini says: Increased competitiveness: When natural gas prices skyrocket (and remain high), the most important economic argument against green hydrogen disappears. "Blue" hydrogen (made from gas with carbon capture) suddenly becomes more expensive than green hydrogen produced with electrolysis. This makes green projects profitable without the need for large subsidies. Higher capital costs (CAPEX): Because energy prices affect everything from steel production to transport, the cost of building new solar parks, wind turbines, and electrolysis plants will rise. The investment itself becomes more expensive, even if the ongoing operating cost (wind and sun) remains free. Enormous demand growth: Industries dependent on gas (such as fertilizer and steel producers) will desperately look for alternatives. This will drive up the price of green energy in the short term because demand is far greater than supply. Energy security trumps price: In a world where the Middle East is unstable, nations will be willing to pay a "security premium" for locally produced energy from water, wind, and sun. This means that the market price of green power will be close to the record-high fossil prices. In summary: The price of green hydrogen will likely rise nominally due to more expensive equipment and raw materials, but it will become relatively cheaper and far more attractive compared to the sky-high prices of fossil energy. -------------- The war in the Persian Gulf, with the bombing of important facilities, which will likely lead to more expensive gas prices for a long time to come, therefore probably means that many actors dependent on energy will look at alternatives other than fossil energy. Then green hydrogen can hopefully be a good alternative, we hope.
- ·12 t sittenIt is clear that NEL is very proud of what they have achieved with regard to next generation pressurised technology, and that they are looking forward to launching this on May 6th. Several in management are pushing this on linkedin now. As they themselves say, it's not small improvements they have achieved, but a product that sets a new global standard for technology for the production of renewable hydrogen.·7 t sittenStrange company. Management promotes new technology on various platforms but none of them buy shares in the company. A company where management does not own shares, bought with their own money, but wants others to invest, is strange. For me, personally, this is a big, red, flag. "Come, invest in our new product, which we don't dare to invest in with our own money."
- ·12 t sittenI'm not giving up on this. Isn't anyone wondering if a share issue or capital raising is underlying for the next GF? Danske Bank has put the company on its «funding candidates»-list, which may imply a possibility for a share issue – without that in itself being either positive or negative.
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen NEL starts to rise? Then another damn brokerage firm comes with a new shameful price target. That's how they've been doing it for years. Looking forward to a new product in MAY and NEL will probably benefit a lot from that article about the 30 billion Hydrogen agreement in India with Reliance and Samsung partners with NEL. I bet they will go in with NEL's new product there. Because it is NEL that delivers the products.·1 päivä sittenYears and years. When the price went above 30, the DNB analyst who had 5kr was removed from the desk, and so-called major banks like BAC et al. competed to have higher price targets from 35-45. It's worth keeping in mind that of 10 who follow it now, 5 have hold and 5 have sell. In addition, it has risen 20% recently. It should stay above 2.38 not to indicate a bull-trap. Latest on tradergate now 2.36
- ·1 päivä sittenWhat do you other shareholders think about the proposals for the general meeting? I see that the board is asking for quite broad authorizations – both to issue new shares, waive pre-emptive rights, and change the LTI‑program for management. At the same time, the company has not performed particularly strongly recently. The share price has nevertheless been positive in recent days. Is this just a market effect, or do you interpret the proposals as something more? How do you assess the risk of dilution vs. the need for flexibility?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 708 | - | - | ||
| 9 997 | - | - | ||
| 12 939 | - | - | ||
| 1 819 | - | - | ||
| 2 393 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt