2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
46 päivää sitten
‧46 min
0,80 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 7.5.
6,42%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 22.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·14 t sittenVisible short has increased further by 0.10 %·14 t sitten
·13 t sittenThe stock exchange sets a new all-time high daily. The great sentiment slowed the fall for Norwegian.
·14 t sittenPeople have good finances. Full planes. 25 kr here we come ✈️🌴☀️
·16 t sittenMissing that all those who condemn the stock to hell document their claims? Still haven't seen a negative post that is documentable, only assumptions? One assumes people stop traveling, but assumes people can't afford this and that, one assumes the world is heading into recession. There are seemingly no limits to what one assumes. At the same time, there is information from the company that they CAN secure fuel for the entire summer 30% higher than last year. There is information from the company that they have sold more tickets than last year when everything was calm. There is information that the company has added 120 extra flights (you don't do that if you're losing more than you did last year). There is seemingly no company-related information. The only thing written about are the headlines in VG. You should understand yourselves why people get fed up when you serve the same thing over and over again without any substance. Yes, fuel is more expensive this year. But NAS sells tickets like hotcakes at SIGNIFICANTLY higher ticket prices. NAS can secure fuel at a much lower price than market price but hasn't made the decision yet since they already have a lot of cheap fuel. Why is no one talking about the ETS prices that have plummeted since the peak in January? Probably because you don't even know what it is. NAS buys quotas for 3 billion a year after all. So if the price in 26 is 20% lower than first assumed, that's 600mnok there. But no, in here, the only thing people know is the oil price. It's just embarrassing when the same person has written a post about the oil price 17 times in the last week, and 24 others choose to post the same.
·14 t sittenI understand your point, but you are essentially doing the same thing you criticize others for; you assume that the positive factors will fully materialize, without accounting for the risks surrounding them. That NAS can secure fuel is good, but it doesn't necessarily apply to the entire consumption, and there is still uncertainty around both volume and timing. Therefore, the oil price is still relevant, especially for the unsecured portion and future contracts. At the same time, higher ticket prices do not automatically mean better profitability; the airline industry is known for costs often increasing just as much or more, and demand can be more price-sensitive than one might think. More departures and higher traffic can also cut both ways. Increased capacity increases the cost base, and if the market becomes slightly weaker than expected, margins can quickly come under pressure. Regarding ETS and currency, these are correct factors, but they are volatile and can turn quickly, just like other costs such as wages, leasing, and interest rates. The point is not that the company will necessarily perform poorly, but that this is an industry with historically low and unstable profitability, where small changes in assumptions can lead to large impacts on the result. Therefore, it is entirely legitimate to be critical, even if some key figures look strong right now.·12 t sittenYou make it a bit too simple when you equate "can hedge at 1000" with the actual cost level. For NAS, it's an option, not a realized average, and historically the hedge ratio is not 100 %. This means that a significant portion is still exposed to spot. In addition: 1000 vs 750 dollars is ~33 % higher fuel cost per unit. That alone quickly eats up much of the yield improvement you refer to. In an industry with such thin margins, you don't need large deviations before the entire improvement is gone. What is essentially the core here is sensitivity: small movements in fuel, currency, or load factor lead to disproportionately large impacts on the result. Therefore, it's not enough to refer to a stock exchange announcement and conclude..
·16 t sittenThere are cult-like conditions in here. If someone writes an "analysis" that this will go up to 20kr, and everything else is just prosperity, it's met with cheers and bleating. If someone writes something at the opposite end, that it might go down another krone or two, then it's met with disbelief and insults. Crazy, but very entertaining!
·14 t sittenIt probably has to do with the way it's written and what justifications or rather lack of arguments one uses? Some are very unreasonable and then they get told off. It's good to get opinions both ways but please justify with the thought behind the post so one avoids such things.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
46 päivää sitten
‧46 min
0,80 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 7.5.
6,42%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·14 t sittenVisible short has increased further by 0.10 %·14 t sitten·13 t sittenThe stock exchange sets a new all-time high daily. The great sentiment slowed the fall for Norwegian.
- ·14 t sittenPeople have good finances. Full planes. 25 kr here we come ✈️🌴☀️
- ·16 t sittenMissing that all those who condemn the stock to hell document their claims? Still haven't seen a negative post that is documentable, only assumptions? One assumes people stop traveling, but assumes people can't afford this and that, one assumes the world is heading into recession. There are seemingly no limits to what one assumes. At the same time, there is information from the company that they CAN secure fuel for the entire summer 30% higher than last year. There is information from the company that they have sold more tickets than last year when everything was calm. There is information that the company has added 120 extra flights (you don't do that if you're losing more than you did last year). There is seemingly no company-related information. The only thing written about are the headlines in VG. You should understand yourselves why people get fed up when you serve the same thing over and over again without any substance. Yes, fuel is more expensive this year. But NAS sells tickets like hotcakes at SIGNIFICANTLY higher ticket prices. NAS can secure fuel at a much lower price than market price but hasn't made the decision yet since they already have a lot of cheap fuel. Why is no one talking about the ETS prices that have plummeted since the peak in January? Probably because you don't even know what it is. NAS buys quotas for 3 billion a year after all. So if the price in 26 is 20% lower than first assumed, that's 600mnok there. But no, in here, the only thing people know is the oil price. It's just embarrassing when the same person has written a post about the oil price 17 times in the last week, and 24 others choose to post the same.·14 t sittenI understand your point, but you are essentially doing the same thing you criticize others for; you assume that the positive factors will fully materialize, without accounting for the risks surrounding them. That NAS can secure fuel is good, but it doesn't necessarily apply to the entire consumption, and there is still uncertainty around both volume and timing. Therefore, the oil price is still relevant, especially for the unsecured portion and future contracts. At the same time, higher ticket prices do not automatically mean better profitability; the airline industry is known for costs often increasing just as much or more, and demand can be more price-sensitive than one might think. More departures and higher traffic can also cut both ways. Increased capacity increases the cost base, and if the market becomes slightly weaker than expected, margins can quickly come under pressure. Regarding ETS and currency, these are correct factors, but they are volatile and can turn quickly, just like other costs such as wages, leasing, and interest rates. The point is not that the company will necessarily perform poorly, but that this is an industry with historically low and unstable profitability, where small changes in assumptions can lead to large impacts on the result. Therefore, it is entirely legitimate to be critical, even if some key figures look strong right now.·12 t sittenYou make it a bit too simple when you equate "can hedge at 1000" with the actual cost level. For NAS, it's an option, not a realized average, and historically the hedge ratio is not 100 %. This means that a significant portion is still exposed to spot. In addition: 1000 vs 750 dollars is ~33 % higher fuel cost per unit. That alone quickly eats up much of the yield improvement you refer to. In an industry with such thin margins, you don't need large deviations before the entire improvement is gone. What is essentially the core here is sensitivity: small movements in fuel, currency, or load factor lead to disproportionately large impacts on the result. Therefore, it's not enough to refer to a stock exchange announcement and conclude..
- ·16 t sittenThere are cult-like conditions in here. If someone writes an "analysis" that this will go up to 20kr, and everything else is just prosperity, it's met with cheers and bleating. If someone writes something at the opposite end, that it might go down another krone or two, then it's met with disbelief and insults. Crazy, but very entertaining!·14 t sittenIt probably has to do with the way it's written and what justifications or rather lack of arguments one uses? Some are very unreasonable and then they get told off. It's good to get opinions both ways but please justify with the thought behind the post so one avoids such things.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 22.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
46 päivää sitten
‧46 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 22.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2.2025 |
0,80 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 7.5.
6,42%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·14 t sittenVisible short has increased further by 0.10 %·14 t sitten·13 t sittenThe stock exchange sets a new all-time high daily. The great sentiment slowed the fall for Norwegian.
- ·14 t sittenPeople have good finances. Full planes. 25 kr here we come ✈️🌴☀️
- ·16 t sittenMissing that all those who condemn the stock to hell document their claims? Still haven't seen a negative post that is documentable, only assumptions? One assumes people stop traveling, but assumes people can't afford this and that, one assumes the world is heading into recession. There are seemingly no limits to what one assumes. At the same time, there is information from the company that they CAN secure fuel for the entire summer 30% higher than last year. There is information from the company that they have sold more tickets than last year when everything was calm. There is information that the company has added 120 extra flights (you don't do that if you're losing more than you did last year). There is seemingly no company-related information. The only thing written about are the headlines in VG. You should understand yourselves why people get fed up when you serve the same thing over and over again without any substance. Yes, fuel is more expensive this year. But NAS sells tickets like hotcakes at SIGNIFICANTLY higher ticket prices. NAS can secure fuel at a much lower price than market price but hasn't made the decision yet since they already have a lot of cheap fuel. Why is no one talking about the ETS prices that have plummeted since the peak in January? Probably because you don't even know what it is. NAS buys quotas for 3 billion a year after all. So if the price in 26 is 20% lower than first assumed, that's 600mnok there. But no, in here, the only thing people know is the oil price. It's just embarrassing when the same person has written a post about the oil price 17 times in the last week, and 24 others choose to post the same.·14 t sittenI understand your point, but you are essentially doing the same thing you criticize others for; you assume that the positive factors will fully materialize, without accounting for the risks surrounding them. That NAS can secure fuel is good, but it doesn't necessarily apply to the entire consumption, and there is still uncertainty around both volume and timing. Therefore, the oil price is still relevant, especially for the unsecured portion and future contracts. At the same time, higher ticket prices do not automatically mean better profitability; the airline industry is known for costs often increasing just as much or more, and demand can be more price-sensitive than one might think. More departures and higher traffic can also cut both ways. Increased capacity increases the cost base, and if the market becomes slightly weaker than expected, margins can quickly come under pressure. Regarding ETS and currency, these are correct factors, but they are volatile and can turn quickly, just like other costs such as wages, leasing, and interest rates. The point is not that the company will necessarily perform poorly, but that this is an industry with historically low and unstable profitability, where small changes in assumptions can lead to large impacts on the result. Therefore, it is entirely legitimate to be critical, even if some key figures look strong right now.·12 t sittenYou make it a bit too simple when you equate "can hedge at 1000" with the actual cost level. For NAS, it's an option, not a realized average, and historically the hedge ratio is not 100 %. This means that a significant portion is still exposed to spot. In addition: 1000 vs 750 dollars is ~33 % higher fuel cost per unit. That alone quickly eats up much of the yield improvement you refer to. In an industry with such thin margins, you don't need large deviations before the entire improvement is gone. What is essentially the core here is sensitivity: small movements in fuel, currency, or load factor lead to disproportionately large impacts on the result. Therefore, it's not enough to refer to a stock exchange announcement and conclude..
- ·16 t sittenThere are cult-like conditions in here. If someone writes an "analysis" that this will go up to 20kr, and everything else is just prosperity, it's met with cheers and bleating. If someone writes something at the opposite end, that it might go down another krone or two, then it's met with disbelief and insults. Crazy, but very entertaining!·14 t sittenIt probably has to do with the way it's written and what justifications or rather lack of arguments one uses? Some are very unreasonable and then they get told off. It's good to get opinions both ways but please justify with the thought behind the post so one avoids such things.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt