Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.

Equinor

Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
18 päivää sitten
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
3,93%Tuotto/v

Tarjoustasot

Ei dataa

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti
28.10.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
22.7.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
6.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
4.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
29.10.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
23.7.2025

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    Trump, Iran and Hormuz: The conflict that could determine the oil price The conflict between the USA and Iran has developed into a strategic dilemma for Donald Trump. The USA has military superiority, but lacks a political exit. Iran uses the Strait of Hormuz as leverage, and the conflict now directly affects oil price, inflation and global markets. Reuters describes the situation as a point where all options are bad, and where Trump must find a way out that does not appear as a defeat. The most likely outcome is a form of agreement. Iran and Oman are said to be close to a solution that could ensure safer passages in Hormuz. An American official says the USA expects an agreement soon, and that the blockade of Iranian ports could be lifted if commercial shipping can again pass unhindered. At the same time, Iran demands significant concessions. Tehran links the full reopening of Hormuz to American actions, sanctions relief and a de-escalation of hostilities. Trump must therefore sell an agreement as an American victory, while Iran receives economic relief. Another option is escalation. The USA can increase military pressure, but Iran has shown that the country can hit energy infrastructure, shipping and supply lines. Reuters describes this as Iran's strategy: to make the conflict economically painful enough for the USA to give in. An escalation could raise the oil price, increase inflation, create unrest in financial markets and hit American consumers through higher gasoline prices. Politically, this is a risky path for Trump. The third option is to continue the current situation. A prolonged conflict without clear victory involves high military costs, persistent risk for American forces and uncertain energy flow globally. Reuters refers to this as a strategic limbo where Trump is stuck between three unattractive choices. For investors, Hormuz is more important than the question of who wins the military conflict. An agreement will reduce supply risk, dampen the oil price and ease inflationary pressure, which is normally positive for the broad stock market. An escalation will keep the oil price high and inflation up, which could pressure technology and growth stocks. A prolonged conflict will maintain a geopolitical risk premium and give the energy sector a relative advantage. The most interesting thing now is that Iran and Oman are actually approaching an agreement, but shipping analysts Reuters has spoken with believe some of the proposals could be difficult to implement in practice. This underlines how fragile the situation is, and how quickly market expectations can change. My assessment is that diplomacy appears more likely than an American ground invasion. Trump needs a way out. Iran needs economic relief. Europe needs energy flow. Asia needs oil. The global economy needs Hormuz open. Therefore, it could be diplomacy, not military power, that ultimately determines the oil price. For investors, this means that developments around Iran and Hormuz remain a key variable. This is not a buy or sell recommendation. Sources VG: https://www.vg.no Reuters (general news feed): https://www.reuters.com Reuters – Iran/Oman/Hormuz-related articles: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-easthttps://www.reuters.com/world/ushttps://www.reuters.com/business/energy
  • 20 t sitten
    ·
    Hormuz deal may be near The US says a deal is expected between Iran and Oman to reopen the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping. According to Reuters, the US could simultaneously lift the blockade of Iranian ports once free shipping is secured. This could be an important turning point for the energy market. Hormuz normally handles about a fifth of the world's oil trade, and a lasting reopening could reduce the risk premium in oil prices and ease pressure on energy and transport costs. The market is already pricing in a solution. Brent has fallen towards 80 dollars on expectations of a deal. For oil producers, this could mean lower oil prices, while transport, industry, and energy-intensive companies could see a positive effect. The big question is whether the deal actually provides lasting and secure free shipping, or just a temporary solution. Sources: Reuters August 7 and 6, 2026. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2026/08/us-expects-deal-soon-strait-hormuz-sunni-powers-unite-defense-pacthttps://www.middle-east-online.com/en/oil-traders-double-down-iran-deal-bet-odds-worsen
    11 t sitten
    ·
    That's exactly what's so great about trading Equinor and oil with small positions where one can quickly turn around. A fund manager who believes in the oil price with a larger position struggles to get out during larger corrections if they were wrong.
  • 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Trump said in a recent interview that AI could become "bigger than oil". It is a remarkable statement from a president who has traditionally been very concerned with American oil and gas production. The market is already seeing the signs. Hyperscalers are investing hundreds of billions of dollars in data centers, power generation, and AI infrastructure. The demand for electricity, semiconductors, cooling, and network capacity is growing at a pace we have hardly seen before. This does not mean that oil is finished. On the contrary, the construction of AI infrastructure will require enormous amounts of energy for many years to come. But capital flows may increasingly shift towards companies that supply AI, data centers, power grids, and advanced chips. The coming years may therefore be about owning both the "old" energy that keeps things running and the new AI infrastructure that drives the next technology wave. Source: https://www.finansavisen.no/politikk/2026/08/07/8371233/trump-i-ferskt-intervju-kan-bli-storre-enn-olje
    13 t sitten
    ·
    He has probably thrown money into ai.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    Is it a bird? No. Is it a plane? No. Is it the ongoing buyback program? No. Is it the cash dividend getting closer?! YES it is :)
  • 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Now US job numbers are coming, the most important of the month! US key figure disappoints: 23,000 jobs were «lost» in July. Economists had expected 80,000 new jobs to be created. The US two-year yield immediately fell from 4.23 to 4.17 percent when the figures were published. The dollar also weakens. https://www.dn.no/makrookonomi/amerikansk-nokkeltall-skuffer-det-gikk-tapt-23000-jobber-i-juli/2-1-2026379
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    I own this tech fund, sold out of energy..
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
18 päivää sitten
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
3,93%Tuotto/v

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    Trump, Iran and Hormuz: The conflict that could determine the oil price The conflict between the USA and Iran has developed into a strategic dilemma for Donald Trump. The USA has military superiority, but lacks a political exit. Iran uses the Strait of Hormuz as leverage, and the conflict now directly affects oil price, inflation and global markets. Reuters describes the situation as a point where all options are bad, and where Trump must find a way out that does not appear as a defeat. The most likely outcome is a form of agreement. Iran and Oman are said to be close to a solution that could ensure safer passages in Hormuz. An American official says the USA expects an agreement soon, and that the blockade of Iranian ports could be lifted if commercial shipping can again pass unhindered. At the same time, Iran demands significant concessions. Tehran links the full reopening of Hormuz to American actions, sanctions relief and a de-escalation of hostilities. Trump must therefore sell an agreement as an American victory, while Iran receives economic relief. Another option is escalation. The USA can increase military pressure, but Iran has shown that the country can hit energy infrastructure, shipping and supply lines. Reuters describes this as Iran's strategy: to make the conflict economically painful enough for the USA to give in. An escalation could raise the oil price, increase inflation, create unrest in financial markets and hit American consumers through higher gasoline prices. Politically, this is a risky path for Trump. The third option is to continue the current situation. A prolonged conflict without clear victory involves high military costs, persistent risk for American forces and uncertain energy flow globally. Reuters refers to this as a strategic limbo where Trump is stuck between three unattractive choices. For investors, Hormuz is more important than the question of who wins the military conflict. An agreement will reduce supply risk, dampen the oil price and ease inflationary pressure, which is normally positive for the broad stock market. An escalation will keep the oil price high and inflation up, which could pressure technology and growth stocks. A prolonged conflict will maintain a geopolitical risk premium and give the energy sector a relative advantage. The most interesting thing now is that Iran and Oman are actually approaching an agreement, but shipping analysts Reuters has spoken with believe some of the proposals could be difficult to implement in practice. This underlines how fragile the situation is, and how quickly market expectations can change. My assessment is that diplomacy appears more likely than an American ground invasion. Trump needs a way out. Iran needs economic relief. Europe needs energy flow. Asia needs oil. The global economy needs Hormuz open. Therefore, it could be diplomacy, not military power, that ultimately determines the oil price. For investors, this means that developments around Iran and Hormuz remain a key variable. This is not a buy or sell recommendation. Sources VG: https://www.vg.no Reuters (general news feed): https://www.reuters.com Reuters – Iran/Oman/Hormuz-related articles: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-easthttps://www.reuters.com/world/ushttps://www.reuters.com/business/energy
  • 20 t sitten
    ·
    Hormuz deal may be near The US says a deal is expected between Iran and Oman to reopen the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping. According to Reuters, the US could simultaneously lift the blockade of Iranian ports once free shipping is secured. This could be an important turning point for the energy market. Hormuz normally handles about a fifth of the world's oil trade, and a lasting reopening could reduce the risk premium in oil prices and ease pressure on energy and transport costs. The market is already pricing in a solution. Brent has fallen towards 80 dollars on expectations of a deal. For oil producers, this could mean lower oil prices, while transport, industry, and energy-intensive companies could see a positive effect. The big question is whether the deal actually provides lasting and secure free shipping, or just a temporary solution. Sources: Reuters August 7 and 6, 2026. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2026/08/us-expects-deal-soon-strait-hormuz-sunni-powers-unite-defense-pacthttps://www.middle-east-online.com/en/oil-traders-double-down-iran-deal-bet-odds-worsen
    11 t sitten
    ·
    That's exactly what's so great about trading Equinor and oil with small positions where one can quickly turn around. A fund manager who believes in the oil price with a larger position struggles to get out during larger corrections if they were wrong.
  • 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Trump said in a recent interview that AI could become "bigger than oil". It is a remarkable statement from a president who has traditionally been very concerned with American oil and gas production. The market is already seeing the signs. Hyperscalers are investing hundreds of billions of dollars in data centers, power generation, and AI infrastructure. The demand for electricity, semiconductors, cooling, and network capacity is growing at a pace we have hardly seen before. This does not mean that oil is finished. On the contrary, the construction of AI infrastructure will require enormous amounts of energy for many years to come. But capital flows may increasingly shift towards companies that supply AI, data centers, power grids, and advanced chips. The coming years may therefore be about owning both the "old" energy that keeps things running and the new AI infrastructure that drives the next technology wave. Source: https://www.finansavisen.no/politikk/2026/08/07/8371233/trump-i-ferskt-intervju-kan-bli-storre-enn-olje
    13 t sitten
    ·
    He has probably thrown money into ai.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    Is it a bird? No. Is it a plane? No. Is it the ongoing buyback program? No. Is it the cash dividend getting closer?! YES it is :)
  • 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Now US job numbers are coming, the most important of the month! US key figure disappoints: 23,000 jobs were «lost» in July. Economists had expected 80,000 new jobs to be created. The US two-year yield immediately fell from 4.23 to 4.17 percent when the figures were published. The dollar also weakens. https://www.dn.no/makrookonomi/amerikansk-nokkeltall-skuffer-det-gikk-tapt-23000-jobber-i-juli/2-1-2026379
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    I own this tech fund, sold out of energy..
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Ei dataa

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti
28.10.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
22.7.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
6.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
4.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
29.10.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
23.7.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
18 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti
28.10.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
22.7.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
6.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
4.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
29.10.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
23.7.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
3,93%Tuotto/v

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    Trump, Iran and Hormuz: The conflict that could determine the oil price The conflict between the USA and Iran has developed into a strategic dilemma for Donald Trump. The USA has military superiority, but lacks a political exit. Iran uses the Strait of Hormuz as leverage, and the conflict now directly affects oil price, inflation and global markets. Reuters describes the situation as a point where all options are bad, and where Trump must find a way out that does not appear as a defeat. The most likely outcome is a form of agreement. Iran and Oman are said to be close to a solution that could ensure safer passages in Hormuz. An American official says the USA expects an agreement soon, and that the blockade of Iranian ports could be lifted if commercial shipping can again pass unhindered. At the same time, Iran demands significant concessions. Tehran links the full reopening of Hormuz to American actions, sanctions relief and a de-escalation of hostilities. Trump must therefore sell an agreement as an American victory, while Iran receives economic relief. Another option is escalation. The USA can increase military pressure, but Iran has shown that the country can hit energy infrastructure, shipping and supply lines. Reuters describes this as Iran's strategy: to make the conflict economically painful enough for the USA to give in. An escalation could raise the oil price, increase inflation, create unrest in financial markets and hit American consumers through higher gasoline prices. Politically, this is a risky path for Trump. The third option is to continue the current situation. A prolonged conflict without clear victory involves high military costs, persistent risk for American forces and uncertain energy flow globally. Reuters refers to this as a strategic limbo where Trump is stuck between three unattractive choices. For investors, Hormuz is more important than the question of who wins the military conflict. An agreement will reduce supply risk, dampen the oil price and ease inflationary pressure, which is normally positive for the broad stock market. An escalation will keep the oil price high and inflation up, which could pressure technology and growth stocks. A prolonged conflict will maintain a geopolitical risk premium and give the energy sector a relative advantage. The most interesting thing now is that Iran and Oman are actually approaching an agreement, but shipping analysts Reuters has spoken with believe some of the proposals could be difficult to implement in practice. This underlines how fragile the situation is, and how quickly market expectations can change. My assessment is that diplomacy appears more likely than an American ground invasion. Trump needs a way out. Iran needs economic relief. Europe needs energy flow. Asia needs oil. The global economy needs Hormuz open. Therefore, it could be diplomacy, not military power, that ultimately determines the oil price. For investors, this means that developments around Iran and Hormuz remain a key variable. This is not a buy or sell recommendation. Sources VG: https://www.vg.no Reuters (general news feed): https://www.reuters.com Reuters – Iran/Oman/Hormuz-related articles: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-easthttps://www.reuters.com/world/ushttps://www.reuters.com/business/energy
  • 20 t sitten
    ·
    Hormuz deal may be near The US says a deal is expected between Iran and Oman to reopen the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping. According to Reuters, the US could simultaneously lift the blockade of Iranian ports once free shipping is secured. This could be an important turning point for the energy market. Hormuz normally handles about a fifth of the world's oil trade, and a lasting reopening could reduce the risk premium in oil prices and ease pressure on energy and transport costs. The market is already pricing in a solution. Brent has fallen towards 80 dollars on expectations of a deal. For oil producers, this could mean lower oil prices, while transport, industry, and energy-intensive companies could see a positive effect. The big question is whether the deal actually provides lasting and secure free shipping, or just a temporary solution. Sources: Reuters August 7 and 6, 2026. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2026/08/us-expects-deal-soon-strait-hormuz-sunni-powers-unite-defense-pacthttps://www.middle-east-online.com/en/oil-traders-double-down-iran-deal-bet-odds-worsen
    11 t sitten
    ·
    That's exactly what's so great about trading Equinor and oil with small positions where one can quickly turn around. A fund manager who believes in the oil price with a larger position struggles to get out during larger corrections if they were wrong.
  • 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Trump said in a recent interview that AI could become "bigger than oil". It is a remarkable statement from a president who has traditionally been very concerned with American oil and gas production. The market is already seeing the signs. Hyperscalers are investing hundreds of billions of dollars in data centers, power generation, and AI infrastructure. The demand for electricity, semiconductors, cooling, and network capacity is growing at a pace we have hardly seen before. This does not mean that oil is finished. On the contrary, the construction of AI infrastructure will require enormous amounts of energy for many years to come. But capital flows may increasingly shift towards companies that supply AI, data centers, power grids, and advanced chips. The coming years may therefore be about owning both the "old" energy that keeps things running and the new AI infrastructure that drives the next technology wave. Source: https://www.finansavisen.no/politikk/2026/08/07/8371233/trump-i-ferskt-intervju-kan-bli-storre-enn-olje
    13 t sitten
    ·
    He has probably thrown money into ai.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    Is it a bird? No. Is it a plane? No. Is it the ongoing buyback program? No. Is it the cash dividend getting closer?! YES it is :)
  • 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Now US job numbers are coming, the most important of the month! US key figure disappoints: 23,000 jobs were «lost» in July. Economists had expected 80,000 new jobs to be created. The US two-year yield immediately fell from 4.23 to 4.17 percent when the figures were published. The dollar also weakens. https://www.dn.no/makrookonomi/amerikansk-nokkeltall-skuffer-det-gikk-tapt-23000-jobber-i-juli/2-1-2026379
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    I own this tech fund, sold out of energy..
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Ei dataa

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt