2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
71 päivää sitten
‧33 min
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
4,17%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. | 6 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
5 t sittenIran’s Proxy Strategy Pushes Oil Into a Geopolitical Risk Regime Geopolitical risk is again setting the tone in the oil market as the United States continues airstrikes on Iranian-linked targets, and Iran responds by engaging the Houthi movement in Yemen to prepare potential disruption of the Bab el-Mandeb strait. Together with ongoing tension in the Strait of Hormuz, this places two of the world’s most critical oil corridors at risk, representing roughly 7% of global energy flows. The market is pricing in a clear risk premium, driven not by actual supply losses but by the rising probability of logistical disruption. At the same time, macroeconomic conditions work in the opposite direction: central banks remain restrictive, with the Bank of Korea raising rates and the ECB signaling a possible hike in September, while the Federal Reserve’s Beige Book points to weak-to-moderate growth and persistent inflation pressures. This combination keeps Brent in a tug-of-war between geopolitical upside and macro downside. Base case remains a stable range around 82–88 USD as long as shipping lanes stay open, while any material disruption in either Hormuz or Bab el-Mandeb could push prices toward 95–100 USD. Sources: Reuters – US strikes and Iran–Houthi coordination: https://www.reuters.com Bloomberg – Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb risk assessment: https://www.bloomberg.com Federal Reserve Beige Book – US economic conditions: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/beigebookdefault.htm ECB rate expectations – Financial Times: https://www.ft.com
·11 t sittenIncredible that the market is falling on this: «Norway's trade surplus increased by 32,1 % year-on-year to 61,9 billion kroner in June, driven by an increase of 26,9 % in natural gas exports and a rise of 4,9 % in crude oil exports.» We are raking in money and much of this is through equinor. The algos, then.
- 12 t sittenWhen Does the Market Start Pricing In That the SPR Isn't Enough? The Iran war just re-escalated. The US-Iran ceasefire broke down in late June, and overnight on July 14–15 US forces struck targets along the Iranian coast while reinstating the naval blockade of Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz. Brent has risen for three straight sessions to around $85–86/bbl, up from roughly $68 just two weeks earlier — a move of over 25%. Meanwhile the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve keeps draining. DOE data put the SPR at 319.5 million barrels for the week ending July 3, the lowest level since April 1983 — over four decades. Total US inventories, commercial crude plus SPR combined, fell to 734 million barrels as of June 26, the lowest since 1984. What matters most here is timing: the spring buffer is largely spent right as this new escalation hits. The IEA's coordinated 400-million-barrel release was scheduled to land over four months from late March, and the US's 172-million-barrel SPR share was slated for delivery over roughly 120 days from mid-March — both windows are closing right now. The reserve can't physically empty overnight regardless, since max SPR withdrawal capacity is about 2.7 million bbl/day, so full depletion would take well over 100 days — but that's rarely what markets actually price. What tends to move first is backwardation in the futures curve, widening crack spreads as specific crude grades get scarce, refinery utilization pinned near capacity, and commercial stocks slipping further below their five-year seasonal average, all of which have historically surfaced one to three months into a sustained disruption, well before the headline reserve number hits any critical threshold. Discussion: has the market already started pricing in a thinner buffer, or does the real risk premium only show up if Hormuz stays closed through August? Sources: Al Jazeera (July 9, 2026), TankTransport (July 2026), CNBC (July 15, 2026), oilprice.com, Wikipedia — Strategic Petroleum Reserve (United States) Not investment advice. I hold Nordnet Norge Indeks and am therefore not an objective voice on this.
- ·12 t sittenOSEBX – inverse head and shoulders in the making? Agree? I've been looking a bit closer at the 1-month chart for OSEBX now, and I think the bottom structure from mid-June until today is starting to look suspiciously like a classic inverse head and shoulders formation. As I read it: - Left shoulder: bottom around the 1 900-level just before 29. June - Head: the deepest point of the correction, down towards ~1 895–1 900, shortly after - Right shoulder: a shallower bottom around 1 905–1 920 in the days after the head – exactly as the pattern should look, with less decline than in the head - Neckline: drawn through the two local peaks between the shoulders and the head, somewhere in the 1 935–1 945-area. Not perfectly horizontal, but that is normal - Breakout: the price broke up through the neckline around the start of July, and continued on to a new peak near 1 965–1 970 around 6.–8. July What makes this extra interesting right now: today's fall of −1,10 % has taken the index (1 941,05) right back down to the old neckline-level. This is a classic retest of the breakout – if the level holds as support from here, it significantly strengthens the formation. If it breaks down convincingly, however, the entire interpretation is weakened, and we could be back in the broad consolidation box from June. Target price with standard head and shoulders methodology (neckline + head depth, i.e., approx. 1 940 + 45 points) lands around 1 985. The price has touched ~1 965 at its highest, so we are not quite there yet. A couple of caveats I want to be honest about: the shoulders are not perfectly symmetrical in depth, and the movement between the head and the right shoulder is a bit noisy with several micro-bottoms along the way. This means the pattern can also be interpreted as a rounded bottom or a double bottom variant instead. In other words, the formation is not textbook-perfect, but the structure is there. Discussion: Do others see the same pattern, or do you read this bottom structure differently? And how do you assess the probability that the neckline holds as support in today's retest? Disclaimer: This is my own technical assessment and not investment advice.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
71 päivää sitten
‧33 min
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
4,17%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 5 t sittenIran’s Proxy Strategy Pushes Oil Into a Geopolitical Risk Regime Geopolitical risk is again setting the tone in the oil market as the United States continues airstrikes on Iranian-linked targets, and Iran responds by engaging the Houthi movement in Yemen to prepare potential disruption of the Bab el-Mandeb strait. Together with ongoing tension in the Strait of Hormuz, this places two of the world’s most critical oil corridors at risk, representing roughly 7% of global energy flows. The market is pricing in a clear risk premium, driven not by actual supply losses but by the rising probability of logistical disruption. At the same time, macroeconomic conditions work in the opposite direction: central banks remain restrictive, with the Bank of Korea raising rates and the ECB signaling a possible hike in September, while the Federal Reserve’s Beige Book points to weak-to-moderate growth and persistent inflation pressures. This combination keeps Brent in a tug-of-war between geopolitical upside and macro downside. Base case remains a stable range around 82–88 USD as long as shipping lanes stay open, while any material disruption in either Hormuz or Bab el-Mandeb could push prices toward 95–100 USD. Sources: Reuters – US strikes and Iran–Houthi coordination: https://www.reuters.com Bloomberg – Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb risk assessment: https://www.bloomberg.com Federal Reserve Beige Book – US economic conditions: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/beigebookdefault.htm ECB rate expectations – Financial Times: https://www.ft.com
- ·11 t sittenIncredible that the market is falling on this: «Norway's trade surplus increased by 32,1 % year-on-year to 61,9 billion kroner in June, driven by an increase of 26,9 % in natural gas exports and a rise of 4,9 % in crude oil exports.» We are raking in money and much of this is through equinor. The algos, then.
- 12 t sittenWhen Does the Market Start Pricing In That the SPR Isn't Enough? The Iran war just re-escalated. The US-Iran ceasefire broke down in late June, and overnight on July 14–15 US forces struck targets along the Iranian coast while reinstating the naval blockade of Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz. Brent has risen for three straight sessions to around $85–86/bbl, up from roughly $68 just two weeks earlier — a move of over 25%. Meanwhile the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve keeps draining. DOE data put the SPR at 319.5 million barrels for the week ending July 3, the lowest level since April 1983 — over four decades. Total US inventories, commercial crude plus SPR combined, fell to 734 million barrels as of June 26, the lowest since 1984. What matters most here is timing: the spring buffer is largely spent right as this new escalation hits. The IEA's coordinated 400-million-barrel release was scheduled to land over four months from late March, and the US's 172-million-barrel SPR share was slated for delivery over roughly 120 days from mid-March — both windows are closing right now. The reserve can't physically empty overnight regardless, since max SPR withdrawal capacity is about 2.7 million bbl/day, so full depletion would take well over 100 days — but that's rarely what markets actually price. What tends to move first is backwardation in the futures curve, widening crack spreads as specific crude grades get scarce, refinery utilization pinned near capacity, and commercial stocks slipping further below their five-year seasonal average, all of which have historically surfaced one to three months into a sustained disruption, well before the headline reserve number hits any critical threshold. Discussion: has the market already started pricing in a thinner buffer, or does the real risk premium only show up if Hormuz stays closed through August? Sources: Al Jazeera (July 9, 2026), TankTransport (July 2026), CNBC (July 15, 2026), oilprice.com, Wikipedia — Strategic Petroleum Reserve (United States) Not investment advice. I hold Nordnet Norge Indeks and am therefore not an objective voice on this.
- ·12 t sittenOSEBX – inverse head and shoulders in the making? Agree? I've been looking a bit closer at the 1-month chart for OSEBX now, and I think the bottom structure from mid-June until today is starting to look suspiciously like a classic inverse head and shoulders formation. As I read it: - Left shoulder: bottom around the 1 900-level just before 29. June - Head: the deepest point of the correction, down towards ~1 895–1 900, shortly after - Right shoulder: a shallower bottom around 1 905–1 920 in the days after the head – exactly as the pattern should look, with less decline than in the head - Neckline: drawn through the two local peaks between the shoulders and the head, somewhere in the 1 935–1 945-area. Not perfectly horizontal, but that is normal - Breakout: the price broke up through the neckline around the start of July, and continued on to a new peak near 1 965–1 970 around 6.–8. July What makes this extra interesting right now: today's fall of −1,10 % has taken the index (1 941,05) right back down to the old neckline-level. This is a classic retest of the breakout – if the level holds as support from here, it significantly strengthens the formation. If it breaks down convincingly, however, the entire interpretation is weakened, and we could be back in the broad consolidation box from June. Target price with standard head and shoulders methodology (neckline + head depth, i.e., approx. 1 940 + 45 points) lands around 1 985. The price has touched ~1 965 at its highest, so we are not quite there yet. A couple of caveats I want to be honest about: the shoulders are not perfectly symmetrical in depth, and the movement between the head and the right shoulder is a bit noisy with several micro-bottoms along the way. This means the pattern can also be interpreted as a rounded bottom or a double bottom variant instead. In other words, the formation is not textbook-perfect, but the structure is there. Discussion: Do others see the same pattern, or do you read this bottom structure differently? And how do you assess the probability that the neckline holds as support in today's retest? Disclaimer: This is my own technical assessment and not investment advice.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. | 6 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
71 päivää sitten
‧33 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. | 6 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 |
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
4,17%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 5 t sittenIran’s Proxy Strategy Pushes Oil Into a Geopolitical Risk Regime Geopolitical risk is again setting the tone in the oil market as the United States continues airstrikes on Iranian-linked targets, and Iran responds by engaging the Houthi movement in Yemen to prepare potential disruption of the Bab el-Mandeb strait. Together with ongoing tension in the Strait of Hormuz, this places two of the world’s most critical oil corridors at risk, representing roughly 7% of global energy flows. The market is pricing in a clear risk premium, driven not by actual supply losses but by the rising probability of logistical disruption. At the same time, macroeconomic conditions work in the opposite direction: central banks remain restrictive, with the Bank of Korea raising rates and the ECB signaling a possible hike in September, while the Federal Reserve’s Beige Book points to weak-to-moderate growth and persistent inflation pressures. This combination keeps Brent in a tug-of-war between geopolitical upside and macro downside. Base case remains a stable range around 82–88 USD as long as shipping lanes stay open, while any material disruption in either Hormuz or Bab el-Mandeb could push prices toward 95–100 USD. Sources: Reuters – US strikes and Iran–Houthi coordination: https://www.reuters.com Bloomberg – Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb risk assessment: https://www.bloomberg.com Federal Reserve Beige Book – US economic conditions: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/beigebookdefault.htm ECB rate expectations – Financial Times: https://www.ft.com
- ·11 t sittenIncredible that the market is falling on this: «Norway's trade surplus increased by 32,1 % year-on-year to 61,9 billion kroner in June, driven by an increase of 26,9 % in natural gas exports and a rise of 4,9 % in crude oil exports.» We are raking in money and much of this is through equinor. The algos, then.
- 12 t sittenWhen Does the Market Start Pricing In That the SPR Isn't Enough? The Iran war just re-escalated. The US-Iran ceasefire broke down in late June, and overnight on July 14–15 US forces struck targets along the Iranian coast while reinstating the naval blockade of Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz. Brent has risen for three straight sessions to around $85–86/bbl, up from roughly $68 just two weeks earlier — a move of over 25%. Meanwhile the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve keeps draining. DOE data put the SPR at 319.5 million barrels for the week ending July 3, the lowest level since April 1983 — over four decades. Total US inventories, commercial crude plus SPR combined, fell to 734 million barrels as of June 26, the lowest since 1984. What matters most here is timing: the spring buffer is largely spent right as this new escalation hits. The IEA's coordinated 400-million-barrel release was scheduled to land over four months from late March, and the US's 172-million-barrel SPR share was slated for delivery over roughly 120 days from mid-March — both windows are closing right now. The reserve can't physically empty overnight regardless, since max SPR withdrawal capacity is about 2.7 million bbl/day, so full depletion would take well over 100 days — but that's rarely what markets actually price. What tends to move first is backwardation in the futures curve, widening crack spreads as specific crude grades get scarce, refinery utilization pinned near capacity, and commercial stocks slipping further below their five-year seasonal average, all of which have historically surfaced one to three months into a sustained disruption, well before the headline reserve number hits any critical threshold. Discussion: has the market already started pricing in a thinner buffer, or does the real risk premium only show up if Hormuz stays closed through August? Sources: Al Jazeera (July 9, 2026), TankTransport (July 2026), CNBC (July 15, 2026), oilprice.com, Wikipedia — Strategic Petroleum Reserve (United States) Not investment advice. I hold Nordnet Norge Indeks and am therefore not an objective voice on this.
- ·12 t sittenOSEBX – inverse head and shoulders in the making? Agree? I've been looking a bit closer at the 1-month chart for OSEBX now, and I think the bottom structure from mid-June until today is starting to look suspiciously like a classic inverse head and shoulders formation. As I read it: - Left shoulder: bottom around the 1 900-level just before 29. June - Head: the deepest point of the correction, down towards ~1 895–1 900, shortly after - Right shoulder: a shallower bottom around 1 905–1 920 in the days after the head – exactly as the pattern should look, with less decline than in the head - Neckline: drawn through the two local peaks between the shoulders and the head, somewhere in the 1 935–1 945-area. Not perfectly horizontal, but that is normal - Breakout: the price broke up through the neckline around the start of July, and continued on to a new peak near 1 965–1 970 around 6.–8. July What makes this extra interesting right now: today's fall of −1,10 % has taken the index (1 941,05) right back down to the old neckline-level. This is a classic retest of the breakout – if the level holds as support from here, it significantly strengthens the formation. If it breaks down convincingly, however, the entire interpretation is weakened, and we could be back in the broad consolidation box from June. Target price with standard head and shoulders methodology (neckline + head depth, i.e., approx. 1 940 + 45 points) lands around 1 985. The price has touched ~1 965 at its highest, so we are not quite there yet. A couple of caveats I want to be honest about: the shoulders are not perfectly symmetrical in depth, and the movement between the head and the right shoulder is a bit noisy with several micro-bottoms along the way. This means the pattern can also be interpreted as a rounded bottom or a double bottom variant instead. In other words, the formation is not textbook-perfect, but the structure is there. Discussion: Do others see the same pattern, or do you read this bottom structure differently? And how do you assess the probability that the neckline holds as support in today's retest? Disclaimer: This is my own technical assessment and not investment advice.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt