2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
21 päivää sitten
‧28 min
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
3,75%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·14 min sitten · MuokattuIs the Norway price for electricity now applicable to Eastern and Western Norway? Europe's rivers are drying up combined with low water reservoirs in Norway. https://e24.no/energi-og-klima/i/k0BM6j/europas-elver-toerker-inn-sender-stroemprisen-rett-opphttps://www.nettavisen.no/okonomi/nye-ekstrempriser-pa-strom-arsakene-er-mange/s/5-95-3193199- ·4 t sittenIEA has once again downgraded its forecast for global oil demand in 2026. In its fresh August oil market report, the agency now expects demand to fall by approximately 1.56 million barrels per day this year, roughly 500,000 barrels more than in the previous report, to a level of 103.29 million barrels per day. Demand fell by almost 4.9 million barrels per day in the second quarter, and the IEA expects the decline to slow to 2.8 million barrels per day in the current quarter before turning to growth of around 580,000 barrels per day in the fourth quarter. For 2027, the agency assumes a gradual normalization through the Strait of Hormuz and a return to growth of 2.4 million barrels per day, to 105.7 million barrels per day. The downgrade confirms that the strong demand comeback is still pending. For oil investors, this is negative in the short term, as weaker demand provides less support for the price, while the market must handle significant uncertainty regarding both supply and geopolitics in the Middle East. At the same time, the picture is not necessarily bearish. The IEA still expects growth towards the end of the year and into 2027, and points out that supply disruptions, particularly related to the Strait of Hormuz, could have a far greater impact on price formation than the demand revision itself. Should a normalization of exports from the Gulf fail to materialize, the supply deficit the IEA now estimates for 2026 could prove more lasting than expected. My assessment is that the downgrade primarily weakens the fundamentals for a lasting oil price comeback in the short term. For the oil price to establish itself significantly higher over time, either demand must pick up faster than the IEA now assumes, or the supply side must be tightened further, for example through new disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. For oil stocks like Equinor and energy funds, this means that geopolitics is probably still the most important short-term driver, rather than the monthly demand revisions themselves. What do you think, will it be the Strait of Hormuz or global demand that determines the oil price going forward? Sources: https://www.dn.no/olje/iea/olje-og-gass/ny-nedjustering-fra-iea-peker-pa-hindring-for-comeback/2-1-2027874https://www.iea.org/reports/oil-market-report-august-2026
From Gemini: This is typically how it's structured when an AI is asked to create a forum post based on a news item: Paragraph 1 and 2 (Facts/summary): These contain concrete numbers and quotes from the news story/report. They are either copied directly from the article or summarized by an LLM. Paragraph 3 and 4 (Analysis/balancing): Typical AI structure where an argument is first given ("this is negative"), before being followed up with a counter-argument ("At the same time, the picture is not necessarily bearish"). LLMs often use transition words like "At the same time..." to appear nuanced. Paragraph 5 ("My assessment..."): Synthetic assessment written in "I"-form. This is a classic way LLMs solve instructions like "Give your assessment of what this means for Equinor and oil investors". Paragraph 6 (The question at the end): The post concludes with an engaging question ("What do you think..."), something AIs almost always add when asked to write posts intended for social media or stock forums. Conclusion: The entire text follows a classic AI recipe ("Summarize case + give assessment + conclude with a question for debate"). - ·22 t sittenVG: Nicolai Tangen warns that the Oil Fund could run out My assessment after the Tangen interview: I would not interpret this as a signal that one should sell tech and go "all in" on silver. But it makes the argument for having silver as a significant diversification against a possible AI/stock market bubble stronger than it was just a few weeks ago. https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/9prRGp/nicolai-tangen-oljefondet-kan-forsvinne
I think it's an advantage to diversify. Don't put all your eggs in one basket. .If oil revenues go down for AS Norge. Then it's an advantage to be exposed to other industries that might go up. But it's just a thought. 
·1 päivä sittenI can't see that it has appeared in Norwegian media yet. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/11/huge-fire-breaks-out-at-libyas-zawiya-refinery-after-drone-attack
it was apparently the classic "Pakistani official says peace is near" also
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
21 päivää sitten
‧28 min
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
3,75%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·14 min sitten · MuokattuIs the Norway price for electricity now applicable to Eastern and Western Norway? Europe's rivers are drying up combined with low water reservoirs in Norway. https://e24.no/energi-og-klima/i/k0BM6j/europas-elver-toerker-inn-sender-stroemprisen-rett-opphttps://www.nettavisen.no/okonomi/nye-ekstrempriser-pa-strom-arsakene-er-mange/s/5-95-3193199
- ·4 t sittenIEA has once again downgraded its forecast for global oil demand in 2026. In its fresh August oil market report, the agency now expects demand to fall by approximately 1.56 million barrels per day this year, roughly 500,000 barrels more than in the previous report, to a level of 103.29 million barrels per day. Demand fell by almost 4.9 million barrels per day in the second quarter, and the IEA expects the decline to slow to 2.8 million barrels per day in the current quarter before turning to growth of around 580,000 barrels per day in the fourth quarter. For 2027, the agency assumes a gradual normalization through the Strait of Hormuz and a return to growth of 2.4 million barrels per day, to 105.7 million barrels per day. The downgrade confirms that the strong demand comeback is still pending. For oil investors, this is negative in the short term, as weaker demand provides less support for the price, while the market must handle significant uncertainty regarding both supply and geopolitics in the Middle East. At the same time, the picture is not necessarily bearish. The IEA still expects growth towards the end of the year and into 2027, and points out that supply disruptions, particularly related to the Strait of Hormuz, could have a far greater impact on price formation than the demand revision itself. Should a normalization of exports from the Gulf fail to materialize, the supply deficit the IEA now estimates for 2026 could prove more lasting than expected. My assessment is that the downgrade primarily weakens the fundamentals for a lasting oil price comeback in the short term. For the oil price to establish itself significantly higher over time, either demand must pick up faster than the IEA now assumes, or the supply side must be tightened further, for example through new disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. For oil stocks like Equinor and energy funds, this means that geopolitics is probably still the most important short-term driver, rather than the monthly demand revisions themselves. What do you think, will it be the Strait of Hormuz or global demand that determines the oil price going forward? Sources: https://www.dn.no/olje/iea/olje-og-gass/ny-nedjustering-fra-iea-peker-pa-hindring-for-comeback/2-1-2027874https://www.iea.org/reports/oil-market-report-august-2026From Gemini: This is typically how it's structured when an AI is asked to create a forum post based on a news item: Paragraph 1 and 2 (Facts/summary): These contain concrete numbers and quotes from the news story/report. They are either copied directly from the article or summarized by an LLM. Paragraph 3 and 4 (Analysis/balancing): Typical AI structure where an argument is first given ("this is negative"), before being followed up with a counter-argument ("At the same time, the picture is not necessarily bearish"). LLMs often use transition words like "At the same time..." to appear nuanced. Paragraph 5 ("My assessment..."): Synthetic assessment written in "I"-form. This is a classic way LLMs solve instructions like "Give your assessment of what this means for Equinor and oil investors". Paragraph 6 (The question at the end): The post concludes with an engaging question ("What do you think..."), something AIs almost always add when asked to write posts intended for social media or stock forums. Conclusion: The entire text follows a classic AI recipe ("Summarize case + give assessment + conclude with a question for debate").
- ·22 t sittenVG: Nicolai Tangen warns that the Oil Fund could run out My assessment after the Tangen interview: I would not interpret this as a signal that one should sell tech and go "all in" on silver. But it makes the argument for having silver as a significant diversification against a possible AI/stock market bubble stronger than it was just a few weeks ago. https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/9prRGp/nicolai-tangen-oljefondet-kan-forsvinneI think it's an advantage to diversify. Don't put all your eggs in one basket. .If oil revenues go down for AS Norge. Then it's an advantage to be exposed to other industries that might go up. But it's just a thought.
- ·1 päivä sittenI can't see that it has appeared in Norwegian media yet. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/11/huge-fire-breaks-out-at-libyas-zawiya-refinery-after-drone-attackit was apparently the classic "Pakistani official says peace is near" also
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
21 päivää sitten
‧28 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 |
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
3,75%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·14 min sitten · MuokattuIs the Norway price for electricity now applicable to Eastern and Western Norway? Europe's rivers are drying up combined with low water reservoirs in Norway. https://e24.no/energi-og-klima/i/k0BM6j/europas-elver-toerker-inn-sender-stroemprisen-rett-opphttps://www.nettavisen.no/okonomi/nye-ekstrempriser-pa-strom-arsakene-er-mange/s/5-95-3193199
- ·4 t sittenIEA has once again downgraded its forecast for global oil demand in 2026. In its fresh August oil market report, the agency now expects demand to fall by approximately 1.56 million barrels per day this year, roughly 500,000 barrels more than in the previous report, to a level of 103.29 million barrels per day. Demand fell by almost 4.9 million barrels per day in the second quarter, and the IEA expects the decline to slow to 2.8 million barrels per day in the current quarter before turning to growth of around 580,000 barrels per day in the fourth quarter. For 2027, the agency assumes a gradual normalization through the Strait of Hormuz and a return to growth of 2.4 million barrels per day, to 105.7 million barrels per day. The downgrade confirms that the strong demand comeback is still pending. For oil investors, this is negative in the short term, as weaker demand provides less support for the price, while the market must handle significant uncertainty regarding both supply and geopolitics in the Middle East. At the same time, the picture is not necessarily bearish. The IEA still expects growth towards the end of the year and into 2027, and points out that supply disruptions, particularly related to the Strait of Hormuz, could have a far greater impact on price formation than the demand revision itself. Should a normalization of exports from the Gulf fail to materialize, the supply deficit the IEA now estimates for 2026 could prove more lasting than expected. My assessment is that the downgrade primarily weakens the fundamentals for a lasting oil price comeback in the short term. For the oil price to establish itself significantly higher over time, either demand must pick up faster than the IEA now assumes, or the supply side must be tightened further, for example through new disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. For oil stocks like Equinor and energy funds, this means that geopolitics is probably still the most important short-term driver, rather than the monthly demand revisions themselves. What do you think, will it be the Strait of Hormuz or global demand that determines the oil price going forward? Sources: https://www.dn.no/olje/iea/olje-og-gass/ny-nedjustering-fra-iea-peker-pa-hindring-for-comeback/2-1-2027874https://www.iea.org/reports/oil-market-report-august-2026From Gemini: This is typically how it's structured when an AI is asked to create a forum post based on a news item: Paragraph 1 and 2 (Facts/summary): These contain concrete numbers and quotes from the news story/report. They are either copied directly from the article or summarized by an LLM. Paragraph 3 and 4 (Analysis/balancing): Typical AI structure where an argument is first given ("this is negative"), before being followed up with a counter-argument ("At the same time, the picture is not necessarily bearish"). LLMs often use transition words like "At the same time..." to appear nuanced. Paragraph 5 ("My assessment..."): Synthetic assessment written in "I"-form. This is a classic way LLMs solve instructions like "Give your assessment of what this means for Equinor and oil investors". Paragraph 6 (The question at the end): The post concludes with an engaging question ("What do you think..."), something AIs almost always add when asked to write posts intended for social media or stock forums. Conclusion: The entire text follows a classic AI recipe ("Summarize case + give assessment + conclude with a question for debate").
- ·22 t sittenVG: Nicolai Tangen warns that the Oil Fund could run out My assessment after the Tangen interview: I would not interpret this as a signal that one should sell tech and go "all in" on silver. But it makes the argument for having silver as a significant diversification against a possible AI/stock market bubble stronger than it was just a few weeks ago. https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/9prRGp/nicolai-tangen-oljefondet-kan-forsvinneI think it's an advantage to diversify. Don't put all your eggs in one basket. .If oil revenues go down for AS Norge. Then it's an advantage to be exposed to other industries that might go up. But it's just a thought.
- ·1 päivä sittenI can't see that it has appeared in Norwegian media yet. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/11/huge-fire-breaks-out-at-libyas-zawiya-refinery-after-drone-attackit was apparently the classic "Pakistani official says peace is near" also
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt