2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
19 päivää sitten
‧33 min
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
4,13%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·6 t sittenSolution-focused approach (LØFT) is a method borrowed from therapy within the health sector that is based on the idea that language creates reality. For mental health, wishful thinking can be good, and we have probably all felt it well the moment we post it. Within psychology, it can be a solution to obscure realities; in the stock market, it can be a trap. Just saying it as food for thought.
·6 t sitten · MuokattuAs true as it is said. But not only can it be a trap, it is a trap. In the market, wishful thinking is always caught up by realities, and it shows directly on the account. Language does not create reality, it creates an illusion of reality. It is the opposite of speaking the truth.
·10 t sittenI actually think this looks very strong strong for oil. The agreement is supposed to be finalized and everyone has become friends again, which again barely gets oil to dip below 100$. We'll see what time will bring.
·5 t sittenWhere can I see that an agreement has been finalized?
1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenBuy the dip
·1 päivä sittenWill there be a stock plunge on EQNR on Tuesday?
·4 t sittenThey say iran is open for a deal.. but they don't say iran wants 12 trillion dollars just to look at a deal. 🤣🤣 Am I wrong?
1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenTrump’s own framing holds. He called it a “solid 50/50” whether he lands a “good” deal or “blows them to kingdom come” This weekend hands the market one of the cleanest binary risk events of the entire conflict. In a phone interview with Axios on Saturday, Donald Trump put the odds on the outcome himself: a “solid 50/50” between a good deal and what he described as hitting Iran harder than they have ever been hit. The President was due to meet his negotiators later the same day — Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, with JD Vance expected in the room — to review Tehran’s latest response, and a decision could come as early as Sunday. In other words, the market risks opening Monday into a materially different landscape than the one we left on Friday. At the same time, the diplomatic track looks more concrete than it has in a while. The Financial Times reports that the parties are closing in on a 60-day extension of the ceasefire, tied to a framework for further negotiations. The outlined content includes a phased reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, discussions over Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, sanctions relief, and a gradual unfreezing of frozen Iranian assets. Pakistan’s army chief Asim Munir described his visit to Tehran as “highly productive,” and Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed “some progress,” hinting that there could be news in the coming days. Iran, for its part, says it is “putting the finishing touches on a memorandum of understanding,” while stressing that the nuclear question is not part of the initial framework. For those of us trading energy exposure, it is worth noting how oil has already positioned itself. Brent settled Friday at around $103.5 a barrel, after touching $106 early in the session, and fell more than 5% on the week. The market is therefore increasingly pricing in that a deal actually gets done. That cuts two ways: a confirmed outcome with a phased Hormuz reopening probably leaves limited downside from here, since much has already been taken out, while a breakdown where “the bombs fall” could trigger a sharp repricing precisely because that scenario is no longer fully discounted. The risk asymmetry therefore points upward in the near term, even if the underlying direction on a deal is lower. There is also reason to temper any expectation that a signature solves everything. Positions on both the nuclear question and control of Hormuz itself are still described as diametrically opposed, and several core disputes will likely persist even if a memorandum of understanding is signed. The question of permanent “tolls” for tankers transiting the strait — which Iran is reportedly coordinating with Oman, and which Trump has rejected outright, insisting the waterway stay open and toll-free — is exactly the kind of detail that could topple the whole framework. Rubio has previously called a deal “unfeasible” if Iran seeks lasting control over shipping traffic. My own approach into the weekend is to treat this as pure event risk rather than a directional trade. When the President himself calls it 50/50, that is not a level where I want large directional exposure without being comfortable with both outcomes simultaneously. Anyone sitting heavy in energy should be aware that the Monday open can move violently in either direction, and anyone considering taking a position should do so with eyes open to the fact that this is, in practice, a coin flip governed by one man’s decision over the span of a single day. Sources • Axios — “Trump says he’s ‘50/50’ on Iran deal or bombs, will meet envoys to decide” (23 May 2026): https://www.axios.com/2026/05/23/trump-iran-deal-resume-war-interview • Financial Times via CNBC — “U.S. and Iran are closing in on a 60-day ceasefire extension” (23 May 2026): https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/23/us-iran-war-talks.html • CNBC — “Oil prices post weekly loss as U.S. and Iran signal progress toward a deal” (22 May 2026): https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/22/oil-prices-today-trump-iran-strait-of-hormuz-uranium-.html • Trading Economics — Brent crude oil price data (22 May 2026): https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/brent-crude-oil • Iran International — Live blog on Iran talks (23 May 2026): https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/202605238115
1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenGood post, however given how many times Demented Tacoman has lied before, I doubt this is going to end in peace. Especially believing Axios is like believing a traitor. They did and will manipulate the markets how they wish. Gullible investors are their bi***es and they will have their way with them in whatever way they please. Traders fall again and again in believing Demented man in what he says. And as another great user here said by the name S00, I don't think he even asked advice from anyone. This is just another "gigantic Saturday TACO" - I'll use this, thanks S00.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
19 päivää sitten
‧33 min
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
4,13%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·6 t sittenSolution-focused approach (LØFT) is a method borrowed from therapy within the health sector that is based on the idea that language creates reality. For mental health, wishful thinking can be good, and we have probably all felt it well the moment we post it. Within psychology, it can be a solution to obscure realities; in the stock market, it can be a trap. Just saying it as food for thought.·6 t sitten · MuokattuAs true as it is said. But not only can it be a trap, it is a trap. In the market, wishful thinking is always caught up by realities, and it shows directly on the account. Language does not create reality, it creates an illusion of reality. It is the opposite of speaking the truth.
- ·10 t sittenI actually think this looks very strong strong for oil. The agreement is supposed to be finalized and everyone has become friends again, which again barely gets oil to dip below 100$. We'll see what time will bring.·5 t sittenWhere can I see that an agreement has been finalized?
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenBuy the dip
- ·1 päivä sittenWill there be a stock plunge on EQNR on Tuesday?·4 t sittenThey say iran is open for a deal.. but they don't say iran wants 12 trillion dollars just to look at a deal. 🤣🤣 Am I wrong?
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenTrump’s own framing holds. He called it a “solid 50/50” whether he lands a “good” deal or “blows them to kingdom come” This weekend hands the market one of the cleanest binary risk events of the entire conflict. In a phone interview with Axios on Saturday, Donald Trump put the odds on the outcome himself: a “solid 50/50” between a good deal and what he described as hitting Iran harder than they have ever been hit. The President was due to meet his negotiators later the same day — Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, with JD Vance expected in the room — to review Tehran’s latest response, and a decision could come as early as Sunday. In other words, the market risks opening Monday into a materially different landscape than the one we left on Friday. At the same time, the diplomatic track looks more concrete than it has in a while. The Financial Times reports that the parties are closing in on a 60-day extension of the ceasefire, tied to a framework for further negotiations. The outlined content includes a phased reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, discussions over Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, sanctions relief, and a gradual unfreezing of frozen Iranian assets. Pakistan’s army chief Asim Munir described his visit to Tehran as “highly productive,” and Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed “some progress,” hinting that there could be news in the coming days. Iran, for its part, says it is “putting the finishing touches on a memorandum of understanding,” while stressing that the nuclear question is not part of the initial framework. For those of us trading energy exposure, it is worth noting how oil has already positioned itself. Brent settled Friday at around $103.5 a barrel, after touching $106 early in the session, and fell more than 5% on the week. The market is therefore increasingly pricing in that a deal actually gets done. That cuts two ways: a confirmed outcome with a phased Hormuz reopening probably leaves limited downside from here, since much has already been taken out, while a breakdown where “the bombs fall” could trigger a sharp repricing precisely because that scenario is no longer fully discounted. The risk asymmetry therefore points upward in the near term, even if the underlying direction on a deal is lower. There is also reason to temper any expectation that a signature solves everything. Positions on both the nuclear question and control of Hormuz itself are still described as diametrically opposed, and several core disputes will likely persist even if a memorandum of understanding is signed. The question of permanent “tolls” for tankers transiting the strait — which Iran is reportedly coordinating with Oman, and which Trump has rejected outright, insisting the waterway stay open and toll-free — is exactly the kind of detail that could topple the whole framework. Rubio has previously called a deal “unfeasible” if Iran seeks lasting control over shipping traffic. My own approach into the weekend is to treat this as pure event risk rather than a directional trade. When the President himself calls it 50/50, that is not a level where I want large directional exposure without being comfortable with both outcomes simultaneously. Anyone sitting heavy in energy should be aware that the Monday open can move violently in either direction, and anyone considering taking a position should do so with eyes open to the fact that this is, in practice, a coin flip governed by one man’s decision over the span of a single day. Sources • Axios — “Trump says he’s ‘50/50’ on Iran deal or bombs, will meet envoys to decide” (23 May 2026): https://www.axios.com/2026/05/23/trump-iran-deal-resume-war-interview • Financial Times via CNBC — “U.S. and Iran are closing in on a 60-day ceasefire extension” (23 May 2026): https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/23/us-iran-war-talks.html • CNBC — “Oil prices post weekly loss as U.S. and Iran signal progress toward a deal” (22 May 2026): https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/22/oil-prices-today-trump-iran-strait-of-hormuz-uranium-.html • Trading Economics — Brent crude oil price data (22 May 2026): https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/brent-crude-oil • Iran International — Live blog on Iran talks (23 May 2026): https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/2026052381151 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenGood post, however given how many times Demented Tacoman has lied before, I doubt this is going to end in peace. Especially believing Axios is like believing a traitor. They did and will manipulate the markets how they wish. Gullible investors are their bi***es and they will have their way with them in whatever way they please. Traders fall again and again in believing Demented man in what he says. And as another great user here said by the name S00, I don't think he even asked advice from anyone. This is just another "gigantic Saturday TACO" - I'll use this, thanks S00.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
19 päivää sitten
‧33 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 |
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
4,13%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·6 t sittenSolution-focused approach (LØFT) is a method borrowed from therapy within the health sector that is based on the idea that language creates reality. For mental health, wishful thinking can be good, and we have probably all felt it well the moment we post it. Within psychology, it can be a solution to obscure realities; in the stock market, it can be a trap. Just saying it as food for thought.·6 t sitten · MuokattuAs true as it is said. But not only can it be a trap, it is a trap. In the market, wishful thinking is always caught up by realities, and it shows directly on the account. Language does not create reality, it creates an illusion of reality. It is the opposite of speaking the truth.
- ·10 t sittenI actually think this looks very strong strong for oil. The agreement is supposed to be finalized and everyone has become friends again, which again barely gets oil to dip below 100$. We'll see what time will bring.·5 t sittenWhere can I see that an agreement has been finalized?
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenBuy the dip
- ·1 päivä sittenWill there be a stock plunge on EQNR on Tuesday?·4 t sittenThey say iran is open for a deal.. but they don't say iran wants 12 trillion dollars just to look at a deal. 🤣🤣 Am I wrong?
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenTrump’s own framing holds. He called it a “solid 50/50” whether he lands a “good” deal or “blows them to kingdom come” This weekend hands the market one of the cleanest binary risk events of the entire conflict. In a phone interview with Axios on Saturday, Donald Trump put the odds on the outcome himself: a “solid 50/50” between a good deal and what he described as hitting Iran harder than they have ever been hit. The President was due to meet his negotiators later the same day — Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, with JD Vance expected in the room — to review Tehran’s latest response, and a decision could come as early as Sunday. In other words, the market risks opening Monday into a materially different landscape than the one we left on Friday. At the same time, the diplomatic track looks more concrete than it has in a while. The Financial Times reports that the parties are closing in on a 60-day extension of the ceasefire, tied to a framework for further negotiations. The outlined content includes a phased reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, discussions over Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, sanctions relief, and a gradual unfreezing of frozen Iranian assets. Pakistan’s army chief Asim Munir described his visit to Tehran as “highly productive,” and Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed “some progress,” hinting that there could be news in the coming days. Iran, for its part, says it is “putting the finishing touches on a memorandum of understanding,” while stressing that the nuclear question is not part of the initial framework. For those of us trading energy exposure, it is worth noting how oil has already positioned itself. Brent settled Friday at around $103.5 a barrel, after touching $106 early in the session, and fell more than 5% on the week. The market is therefore increasingly pricing in that a deal actually gets done. That cuts two ways: a confirmed outcome with a phased Hormuz reopening probably leaves limited downside from here, since much has already been taken out, while a breakdown where “the bombs fall” could trigger a sharp repricing precisely because that scenario is no longer fully discounted. The risk asymmetry therefore points upward in the near term, even if the underlying direction on a deal is lower. There is also reason to temper any expectation that a signature solves everything. Positions on both the nuclear question and control of Hormuz itself are still described as diametrically opposed, and several core disputes will likely persist even if a memorandum of understanding is signed. The question of permanent “tolls” for tankers transiting the strait — which Iran is reportedly coordinating with Oman, and which Trump has rejected outright, insisting the waterway stay open and toll-free — is exactly the kind of detail that could topple the whole framework. Rubio has previously called a deal “unfeasible” if Iran seeks lasting control over shipping traffic. My own approach into the weekend is to treat this as pure event risk rather than a directional trade. When the President himself calls it 50/50, that is not a level where I want large directional exposure without being comfortable with both outcomes simultaneously. Anyone sitting heavy in energy should be aware that the Monday open can move violently in either direction, and anyone considering taking a position should do so with eyes open to the fact that this is, in practice, a coin flip governed by one man’s decision over the span of a single day. Sources • Axios — “Trump says he’s ‘50/50’ on Iran deal or bombs, will meet envoys to decide” (23 May 2026): https://www.axios.com/2026/05/23/trump-iran-deal-resume-war-interview • Financial Times via CNBC — “U.S. and Iran are closing in on a 60-day ceasefire extension” (23 May 2026): https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/23/us-iran-war-talks.html • CNBC — “Oil prices post weekly loss as U.S. and Iran signal progress toward a deal” (22 May 2026): https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/22/oil-prices-today-trump-iran-strait-of-hormuz-uranium-.html • Trading Economics — Brent crude oil price data (22 May 2026): https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/brent-crude-oil • Iran International — Live blog on Iran talks (23 May 2026): https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/2026052381151 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenGood post, however given how many times Demented Tacoman has lied before, I doubt this is going to end in peace. Especially believing Axios is like believing a traitor. They did and will manipulate the markets how they wish. Gullible investors are their bi***es and they will have their way with them in whatever way they please. Traders fall again and again in believing Demented man in what he says. And as another great user here said by the name S00, I don't think he even asked advice from anyone. This is just another "gigantic Saturday TACO" - I'll use this, thanks S00.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt