2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
20 päivää sitten
‧28 min
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
3,81%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·1 t sittenVG: Nicolai Tangen warns that the Oil Fund could run out My assessment after the Tangen interview: I would not interpret this as a signal that one should sell tech and go "all in" on silver. But it makes the argument for having silver as a significant diversification against a possible AI/stock market bubble stronger than it was just a few weeks ago. https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/9prRGp/nicolai-tangen-oljefondet-kan-forsvinne
·4 t sittenI can't see that it has appeared in Norwegian media yet. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/11/huge-fire-breaks-out-at-libyas-zawiya-refinery-after-drone-attack
·8 t sittenFact sheet (AUG 26): i) Iran can stop traffic until 2029. ii) Iran has MILCAP from China/Rus. iii) US cost of 1.5 trillion kr. iv) US must withdraw from stationed bases. v) US has lost allies (NATO/Arab/EU) vi) Iran's demand is 300 billion kr.
China is NOT interested in Hormuz being blocked for years. Iran will feel that sooner or later. Perhaps by Xi stepping in and 'solving' the situation (at least for Chinese oil imports) - and thereby making Trump look foolish.- ·22 t sittenUSA attempts to win the Iran conflict through economic attrition Donald Trump is now signaling a clear change in strategy towards Iran. Instead of directly entering a new major military offensive, Trump says that the USA is now «low-keying» the conflict and letting economic pressure against Iran do more of the work. Trump believes Iran's economic problems could force the country to give in. (Reuters) This could be an important strategic shift. The USA already has several powerful tools available through sanctions, blockade, and pressure on Iran's oil revenues. The idea seems to be that if Iran is pressured economically long enough, the regime could be forced to enter an agreement without the USA needing to escalate militarily further. For Trump, this is probably also economically and politically more attractive than a new military offensive. A prolonged war involves high costs and significant risk, while economic pressure can be maintained over time. The problem is Hormuz. Iran still says that a full reopening of Hormuz requires American concessions. Among the demands are the lifting of sanctions and the American blockade, the release of frozen Iranian assets, and compensation for war damages. At the same time, Iran and Oman are nearing an agreement on new shipping routes through Hormuz. (Reuters) Thus, we are in a very interesting situation for the energy market. If Trump's economic strategy succeeds and Iran eventually accepts an agreement that opens Hormuz, the oil price could fall significantly because the geopolitical risk premium disappears. But if Iran refuses to give in, the probability increases that the USA will again have to consider military means. That is why today's development is so important for oil investors. Trump is apparently trying to achieve through economic attrition what he previously could have tried to achieve through military escalation: to force Iran to the negotiating table without starting a new major war. For the oil price, this becomes a potentially binary scenario. An agreement on Hormuz could lead to a sharp drop in the risk premium. A breakdown in negotiations could have the opposite effect. If the conflict escalates militarily again, the oil price could see another sharp jump. The Iran conflict thus enters a new phase: less focus on bombing and more focus on economic warfare. The question is whether Iran's economy collapses before the USA's political and economic costs become too great. Sources: Reuters: Trump says U.S. is «low-keying it» with Iran, stresses economic pain https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-us-is-low-keying-it-with-iran-stresses-economic-pain-according-axios-2026-08-09/ Axios: Trump to Axios: «We are low-keying it» with Iran https://www.axios.com/2026/08/09/trump-iran-interview Reuters: Iran ties Hormuz reopening to U.S. concessions https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-ties-hormuz-reopening-us-concessions-several-demands-2026-08-09/ Reuters: Proposed Hormuz deal would give Iran control of inbound traffic https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-iran-having-very-good-discussions-trump-says-2026-08-05/
Speculation, but ok, there's something historical in it. Precious metals have moved in a northerly direction in turbulent times before. US government bonds have been considered a safe haven, but is it still one? Several nations are choosing gold and selling off their government bonds. Today's market, i.e. the last year and especially recently, is very strange. Everything is rising! With the exception of interest rates that fell on US job numbers. Along with strategic oil reserves in the USA and European gas reserves. They are low. It's an optimism I don't understand. Look at major US data center developers recently. Space X is perhaps the strongest PE and PB-valuation I have seen as long as I have been following. It's absurd when so much is priced so high. When everything everything rises, it tells something about leverage and risk. It goes well as long as it goes well, then everyone listens to bellwethers who have taken sky-high risk and been rewarded over time. If, however, a chair leg breaks, everything collapses. Then prominent investors often disappear in the wake. After that, people talk about clear risk profile, analysis, and diversification. Lower risk profile -> lower return requirements -> portfolios that can withstand rough weather. I don't think gold or silver will break, the preceding rise is healthier now than earlier in the year. Read risk and leverage, I believe many portfolios were force-sold during this year's downturn. The oil price is being artificially kept down by trump. Every Monday for a long time, new "peace talks" came. I don't believe in peace before the midterm elections are over. Actually not even after. I, however, do not believe today's pricing on the stock market, especially American popular stocks, will hold. Stock market development is linked to the price of precious metals. So people can think for themselves and invest in what they want. I have spread it out, but have a lot of cash nowZ I even have rabble on the wall. Not because I believe it will increase much more in value, but it was a gift after "hard work." Happy investment autumn everyone. It's raining hard and brutally in Bergen. - ·23 t sittenWinter is coming. Regards, Reuters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFpoq6zqx1w
Energy prices are one of the main reasons for the price growth we have seen recently....Sooner or later, I would assume that these extra costs are reflected as extra income on the other side of the accounts?... """
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
20 päivää sitten
‧28 min
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
3,81%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·1 t sittenVG: Nicolai Tangen warns that the Oil Fund could run out My assessment after the Tangen interview: I would not interpret this as a signal that one should sell tech and go "all in" on silver. But it makes the argument for having silver as a significant diversification against a possible AI/stock market bubble stronger than it was just a few weeks ago. https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/9prRGp/nicolai-tangen-oljefondet-kan-forsvinne
- ·4 t sittenI can't see that it has appeared in Norwegian media yet. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/11/huge-fire-breaks-out-at-libyas-zawiya-refinery-after-drone-attack
- ·8 t sittenFact sheet (AUG 26): i) Iran can stop traffic until 2029. ii) Iran has MILCAP from China/Rus. iii) US cost of 1.5 trillion kr. iv) US must withdraw from stationed bases. v) US has lost allies (NATO/Arab/EU) vi) Iran's demand is 300 billion kr.China is NOT interested in Hormuz being blocked for years. Iran will feel that sooner or later. Perhaps by Xi stepping in and 'solving' the situation (at least for Chinese oil imports) - and thereby making Trump look foolish.
- ·22 t sittenUSA attempts to win the Iran conflict through economic attrition Donald Trump is now signaling a clear change in strategy towards Iran. Instead of directly entering a new major military offensive, Trump says that the USA is now «low-keying» the conflict and letting economic pressure against Iran do more of the work. Trump believes Iran's economic problems could force the country to give in. (Reuters) This could be an important strategic shift. The USA already has several powerful tools available through sanctions, blockade, and pressure on Iran's oil revenues. The idea seems to be that if Iran is pressured economically long enough, the regime could be forced to enter an agreement without the USA needing to escalate militarily further. For Trump, this is probably also economically and politically more attractive than a new military offensive. A prolonged war involves high costs and significant risk, while economic pressure can be maintained over time. The problem is Hormuz. Iran still says that a full reopening of Hormuz requires American concessions. Among the demands are the lifting of sanctions and the American blockade, the release of frozen Iranian assets, and compensation for war damages. At the same time, Iran and Oman are nearing an agreement on new shipping routes through Hormuz. (Reuters) Thus, we are in a very interesting situation for the energy market. If Trump's economic strategy succeeds and Iran eventually accepts an agreement that opens Hormuz, the oil price could fall significantly because the geopolitical risk premium disappears. But if Iran refuses to give in, the probability increases that the USA will again have to consider military means. That is why today's development is so important for oil investors. Trump is apparently trying to achieve through economic attrition what he previously could have tried to achieve through military escalation: to force Iran to the negotiating table without starting a new major war. For the oil price, this becomes a potentially binary scenario. An agreement on Hormuz could lead to a sharp drop in the risk premium. A breakdown in negotiations could have the opposite effect. If the conflict escalates militarily again, the oil price could see another sharp jump. The Iran conflict thus enters a new phase: less focus on bombing and more focus on economic warfare. The question is whether Iran's economy collapses before the USA's political and economic costs become too great. Sources: Reuters: Trump says U.S. is «low-keying it» with Iran, stresses economic pain https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-us-is-low-keying-it-with-iran-stresses-economic-pain-according-axios-2026-08-09/ Axios: Trump to Axios: «We are low-keying it» with Iran https://www.axios.com/2026/08/09/trump-iran-interview Reuters: Iran ties Hormuz reopening to U.S. concessions https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-ties-hormuz-reopening-us-concessions-several-demands-2026-08-09/ Reuters: Proposed Hormuz deal would give Iran control of inbound traffic https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-iran-having-very-good-discussions-trump-says-2026-08-05/Speculation, but ok, there's something historical in it. Precious metals have moved in a northerly direction in turbulent times before. US government bonds have been considered a safe haven, but is it still one? Several nations are choosing gold and selling off their government bonds. Today's market, i.e. the last year and especially recently, is very strange. Everything is rising! With the exception of interest rates that fell on US job numbers. Along with strategic oil reserves in the USA and European gas reserves. They are low. It's an optimism I don't understand. Look at major US data center developers recently. Space X is perhaps the strongest PE and PB-valuation I have seen as long as I have been following. It's absurd when so much is priced so high. When everything everything rises, it tells something about leverage and risk. It goes well as long as it goes well, then everyone listens to bellwethers who have taken sky-high risk and been rewarded over time. If, however, a chair leg breaks, everything collapses. Then prominent investors often disappear in the wake. After that, people talk about clear risk profile, analysis, and diversification. Lower risk profile -> lower return requirements -> portfolios that can withstand rough weather. I don't think gold or silver will break, the preceding rise is healthier now than earlier in the year. Read risk and leverage, I believe many portfolios were force-sold during this year's downturn. The oil price is being artificially kept down by trump. Every Monday for a long time, new "peace talks" came. I don't believe in peace before the midterm elections are over. Actually not even after. I, however, do not believe today's pricing on the stock market, especially American popular stocks, will hold. Stock market development is linked to the price of precious metals. So people can think for themselves and invest in what they want. I have spread it out, but have a lot of cash nowZ I even have rabble on the wall. Not because I believe it will increase much more in value, but it was a gift after "hard work." Happy investment autumn everyone. It's raining hard and brutally in Bergen.
- ·23 t sittenWinter is coming. Regards, Reuters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFpoq6zqx1wEnergy prices are one of the main reasons for the price growth we have seen recently....Sooner or later, I would assume that these extra costs are reflected as extra income on the other side of the accounts?... """
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
20 päivää sitten
‧28 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 |
0,39 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.8.
3,81%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·1 t sittenVG: Nicolai Tangen warns that the Oil Fund could run out My assessment after the Tangen interview: I would not interpret this as a signal that one should sell tech and go "all in" on silver. But it makes the argument for having silver as a significant diversification against a possible AI/stock market bubble stronger than it was just a few weeks ago. https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/9prRGp/nicolai-tangen-oljefondet-kan-forsvinne
- ·4 t sittenI can't see that it has appeared in Norwegian media yet. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/11/huge-fire-breaks-out-at-libyas-zawiya-refinery-after-drone-attack
- ·8 t sittenFact sheet (AUG 26): i) Iran can stop traffic until 2029. ii) Iran has MILCAP from China/Rus. iii) US cost of 1.5 trillion kr. iv) US must withdraw from stationed bases. v) US has lost allies (NATO/Arab/EU) vi) Iran's demand is 300 billion kr.China is NOT interested in Hormuz being blocked for years. Iran will feel that sooner or later. Perhaps by Xi stepping in and 'solving' the situation (at least for Chinese oil imports) - and thereby making Trump look foolish.
- ·22 t sittenUSA attempts to win the Iran conflict through economic attrition Donald Trump is now signaling a clear change in strategy towards Iran. Instead of directly entering a new major military offensive, Trump says that the USA is now «low-keying» the conflict and letting economic pressure against Iran do more of the work. Trump believes Iran's economic problems could force the country to give in. (Reuters) This could be an important strategic shift. The USA already has several powerful tools available through sanctions, blockade, and pressure on Iran's oil revenues. The idea seems to be that if Iran is pressured economically long enough, the regime could be forced to enter an agreement without the USA needing to escalate militarily further. For Trump, this is probably also economically and politically more attractive than a new military offensive. A prolonged war involves high costs and significant risk, while economic pressure can be maintained over time. The problem is Hormuz. Iran still says that a full reopening of Hormuz requires American concessions. Among the demands are the lifting of sanctions and the American blockade, the release of frozen Iranian assets, and compensation for war damages. At the same time, Iran and Oman are nearing an agreement on new shipping routes through Hormuz. (Reuters) Thus, we are in a very interesting situation for the energy market. If Trump's economic strategy succeeds and Iran eventually accepts an agreement that opens Hormuz, the oil price could fall significantly because the geopolitical risk premium disappears. But if Iran refuses to give in, the probability increases that the USA will again have to consider military means. That is why today's development is so important for oil investors. Trump is apparently trying to achieve through economic attrition what he previously could have tried to achieve through military escalation: to force Iran to the negotiating table without starting a new major war. For the oil price, this becomes a potentially binary scenario. An agreement on Hormuz could lead to a sharp drop in the risk premium. A breakdown in negotiations could have the opposite effect. If the conflict escalates militarily again, the oil price could see another sharp jump. The Iran conflict thus enters a new phase: less focus on bombing and more focus on economic warfare. The question is whether Iran's economy collapses before the USA's political and economic costs become too great. Sources: Reuters: Trump says U.S. is «low-keying it» with Iran, stresses economic pain https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-us-is-low-keying-it-with-iran-stresses-economic-pain-according-axios-2026-08-09/ Axios: Trump to Axios: «We are low-keying it» with Iran https://www.axios.com/2026/08/09/trump-iran-interview Reuters: Iran ties Hormuz reopening to U.S. concessions https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-ties-hormuz-reopening-us-concessions-several-demands-2026-08-09/ Reuters: Proposed Hormuz deal would give Iran control of inbound traffic https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-iran-having-very-good-discussions-trump-says-2026-08-05/Speculation, but ok, there's something historical in it. Precious metals have moved in a northerly direction in turbulent times before. US government bonds have been considered a safe haven, but is it still one? Several nations are choosing gold and selling off their government bonds. Today's market, i.e. the last year and especially recently, is very strange. Everything is rising! With the exception of interest rates that fell on US job numbers. Along with strategic oil reserves in the USA and European gas reserves. They are low. It's an optimism I don't understand. Look at major US data center developers recently. Space X is perhaps the strongest PE and PB-valuation I have seen as long as I have been following. It's absurd when so much is priced so high. When everything everything rises, it tells something about leverage and risk. It goes well as long as it goes well, then everyone listens to bellwethers who have taken sky-high risk and been rewarded over time. If, however, a chair leg breaks, everything collapses. Then prominent investors often disappear in the wake. After that, people talk about clear risk profile, analysis, and diversification. Lower risk profile -> lower return requirements -> portfolios that can withstand rough weather. I don't think gold or silver will break, the preceding rise is healthier now than earlier in the year. Read risk and leverage, I believe many portfolios were force-sold during this year's downturn. The oil price is being artificially kept down by trump. Every Monday for a long time, new "peace talks" came. I don't believe in peace before the midterm elections are over. Actually not even after. I, however, do not believe today's pricing on the stock market, especially American popular stocks, will hold. Stock market development is linked to the price of precious metals. So people can think for themselves and invest in what they want. I have spread it out, but have a lot of cash nowZ I even have rabble on the wall. Not because I believe it will increase much more in value, but it was a gift after "hard work." Happy investment autumn everyone. It's raining hard and brutally in Bergen.
- ·23 t sittenWinter is coming. Regards, Reuters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFpoq6zqx1wEnergy prices are one of the main reasons for the price growth we have seen recently....Sooner or later, I would assume that these extra costs are reflected as extra income on the other side of the accounts?... """
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt