2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
70 päivää sitten1 t 24 min
20,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,50%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
191 374
Myynti
Määrä
196 443
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - |
Ylin
570VWAP
Alin
551VaihtoMäärä
270,3 484 318
VWAP
Ylin
570Alin
551VaihtoMäärä
270,3 484 318
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 484 318 | 484 318 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 484 318 | 484 318 | 0 | 0 |
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 15.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 7.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 12.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 t sittenThis year, the number of Pandora owners in Nordnet has increased by 21.8%. That could indicate that institutional owners are selling off Pandora. The question is how much the 21.8% constitutes of Pandora's total shareholding.
·2 t sittenNew to Pandora. Bought at 600, thought it was cheap, and bought again at 555. My next buying level is 480. Hopefully it stays at a low price for some time, so buybacks can really have a big effect. Then EPS can easily grow to 70-75 without revenue growth, and if PE again becomes 10-12, the price will hit 700-800.·59 min sitten · MuokattuLuckyLuke. The debt has steadily grown during the buyback program, most recently by approx 2 billion per year. Pandora has on Jan 9 indicated that 2025 EBIT will be lower than 2024 EBIT, therefore probably also lower EBITDA. If 2025 NIBD ends at 15.1 billion and EBITDA has fallen to 10 billion, then NIBD/EBITDA will be above 1.5 Company policy is to keep the ratio between 0.5 - 1.5. Then one might stop dividend payments, but they probably won't. So we probably need to be quite lucky, LuckyLuke if we are to see more buybacks. But buybacks do raise Pandora management's bonus, so you never know!
·3 t sittenI'm annoyed myself about being down by 10%. So I asked AI about some silver price levels and their immediate impact. It calmed me down a bit. Try reading along. 1️⃣ Starting point: Silver price 50 USD/oz Historical “normal”: 20–25 USD/oz 50 USD is approx. 2.0–2.5× normal level (i.e. significant, but not extreme) 2️⃣ Effect on Pandora's costs Same assumptions as before: Silver ≈ 10–15 % of total production costs Silver price × 2–2.5 → Total effect: COGS increases approx. 10–18 % (depends on how silver-heavy the product is). 3️⃣ Necessary price increase Pandora will typically: absorb some via margin, hedging and design pass the rest on in the price Realistic scenarios: 🔹 Low price adjustment (very likely) Price increase: +5–7 % Pandora absorbs the majority 🔹 Standard scenario (most realistic) Price increase: +7–10 % 🔹 Aggressive (lower volume) Price increase: +12 % 4️⃣ Concrete examples Current price +7 % +10 % 349 kr. 373 kr. 384 kr. 699 kr. 748 kr. 769 kr. 999 kr. 1.069 kr. 1.099 kr. 5️⃣ Strategic assessment At 50 USD/oz Pandora can: Avoid violent shocks for customers Make incremental price increases Use: slightly less silver per unit more plated metal efficiency in production 👉 It is a level where the brand can bear the price increase without a major drop in demand. ✅ Conclusion (short) If the silver price is around 50 USD/oz, Pandora typically needs to: Increase sales prices by approx. 7–10 % to maintain margins. If you want, I can: compare 50 vs. 90 USD directly in one model or create a sensitivity graph showing price vs. silver price. what about 75 dollars Let's place 75 USD/oz precisely between 50 and 90 and calculate it consistently, so you can see the clear correlation. 1️⃣ Starting point: Silver price 75 USD/oz Historical “normal”: 20–25 USD/oz 75 USD = approx. 3.0–3.75× normal level 2️⃣ Effect on Pandora's costs Same basic assumptions: Silver ≈ 10–15 % of total production costs Silver price × 3.0–3.75 → Total effect: COGS increases approx. 18–30 % 3️⃣ Necessary price increase Pandora will almost always: absorb some via margin adjust design/materials pass the rest on in prices Realistic scenarios: 🔹 Conservative (greater margin pressure) Price increase: +8–10 % 🔹 Base scenario (most realistic) Price increase: +12–15 % 🔹 Aggressive (lower volume) Price increase: +18 % 4️⃣ Concrete examples Current price +10 % +15 % 349 kr. 384 kr. 401 kr. 699 kr. 769 kr. 804 kr. 999 kr. 1.099 kr. 1.149 kr. 5️⃣ Strategic assessment At 75 USD/oz: Small price adjustments are not enough Pandora will typically: make stepwise price increases (e.g. 2×6–7 %) push more towards plated alloys differentiate prices more between silver-heavy and light products Charms and solid rings will be hit hardest. ✅ Conclusion (short) If the silver price is around 75 USD/oz, Pandora will probably need to: Increase sales prices by approx. 12–15 % to maintain their normal margin structure.
·2 t sittenA quick search shows that 70 pct of their expected consumption is hedged at 31 USD for 2026. No hedge for 2027. 2027 could really be a bad year.
·3 t sitten · MuokattuIf it didn't fall so much day by day, I would personally repurchase. Fortunately, I sold out at 727, albeit at a loss. Here is a summary from chat-gpt: Overall assessment Yes – the stock may very well be oversold, especially for the following reasons: The silver risk is real but greatly exaggerated The sales disappointment is cyclical, not structural The market has used the silver price as an anchor explanation for everything Brand value and pricing power are ignored in the valuation Multiple contraction has been extreme Pandora is not a commodity stock disguised as a jewelry company – it is a brand company with commodity input. If we are realistic: Pandora: Continues to be extremely cash flow-strong Has a high gross margin Has pricing power Has no balance-sheet stress Is massively buying back its own shares A fall of 50 %+ implies either: Permanent margin erosion Or structural demand decline Or lasting damage to the brand None of these are documented. What we are seeing rather resembles: A classic overreaction, amplified by commodity narrative and previous hype.·2 t sittenMrFalk I asked Chatgpt: is Pandora's sales disappointment November December 2025 cyclical or structural? GPT answer: In short: Pandora's sales disappointment in November and December 2025 appears both cyclical and structural — but with a clear structural component, which indicates that the problems are not solely due to seasonal variations. My comment: I lean most towards structural challenges - mainly changed consumer desire due to economy. Also declining management confidence and changing consumer trends can play a role.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
70 päivää sitten1 t 24 min
20,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,50%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 t sittenThis year, the number of Pandora owners in Nordnet has increased by 21.8%. That could indicate that institutional owners are selling off Pandora. The question is how much the 21.8% constitutes of Pandora's total shareholding.
- ·2 t sittenNew to Pandora. Bought at 600, thought it was cheap, and bought again at 555. My next buying level is 480. Hopefully it stays at a low price for some time, so buybacks can really have a big effect. Then EPS can easily grow to 70-75 without revenue growth, and if PE again becomes 10-12, the price will hit 700-800.·59 min sitten · MuokattuLuckyLuke. The debt has steadily grown during the buyback program, most recently by approx 2 billion per year. Pandora has on Jan 9 indicated that 2025 EBIT will be lower than 2024 EBIT, therefore probably also lower EBITDA. If 2025 NIBD ends at 15.1 billion and EBITDA has fallen to 10 billion, then NIBD/EBITDA will be above 1.5 Company policy is to keep the ratio between 0.5 - 1.5. Then one might stop dividend payments, but they probably won't. So we probably need to be quite lucky, LuckyLuke if we are to see more buybacks. But buybacks do raise Pandora management's bonus, so you never know!
- ·3 t sittenI'm annoyed myself about being down by 10%. So I asked AI about some silver price levels and their immediate impact. It calmed me down a bit. Try reading along. 1️⃣ Starting point: Silver price 50 USD/oz Historical “normal”: 20–25 USD/oz 50 USD is approx. 2.0–2.5× normal level (i.e. significant, but not extreme) 2️⃣ Effect on Pandora's costs Same assumptions as before: Silver ≈ 10–15 % of total production costs Silver price × 2–2.5 → Total effect: COGS increases approx. 10–18 % (depends on how silver-heavy the product is). 3️⃣ Necessary price increase Pandora will typically: absorb some via margin, hedging and design pass the rest on in the price Realistic scenarios: 🔹 Low price adjustment (very likely) Price increase: +5–7 % Pandora absorbs the majority 🔹 Standard scenario (most realistic) Price increase: +7–10 % 🔹 Aggressive (lower volume) Price increase: +12 % 4️⃣ Concrete examples Current price +7 % +10 % 349 kr. 373 kr. 384 kr. 699 kr. 748 kr. 769 kr. 999 kr. 1.069 kr. 1.099 kr. 5️⃣ Strategic assessment At 50 USD/oz Pandora can: Avoid violent shocks for customers Make incremental price increases Use: slightly less silver per unit more plated metal efficiency in production 👉 It is a level where the brand can bear the price increase without a major drop in demand. ✅ Conclusion (short) If the silver price is around 50 USD/oz, Pandora typically needs to: Increase sales prices by approx. 7–10 % to maintain margins. If you want, I can: compare 50 vs. 90 USD directly in one model or create a sensitivity graph showing price vs. silver price. what about 75 dollars Let's place 75 USD/oz precisely between 50 and 90 and calculate it consistently, so you can see the clear correlation. 1️⃣ Starting point: Silver price 75 USD/oz Historical “normal”: 20–25 USD/oz 75 USD = approx. 3.0–3.75× normal level 2️⃣ Effect on Pandora's costs Same basic assumptions: Silver ≈ 10–15 % of total production costs Silver price × 3.0–3.75 → Total effect: COGS increases approx. 18–30 % 3️⃣ Necessary price increase Pandora will almost always: absorb some via margin adjust design/materials pass the rest on in prices Realistic scenarios: 🔹 Conservative (greater margin pressure) Price increase: +8–10 % 🔹 Base scenario (most realistic) Price increase: +12–15 % 🔹 Aggressive (lower volume) Price increase: +18 % 4️⃣ Concrete examples Current price +10 % +15 % 349 kr. 384 kr. 401 kr. 699 kr. 769 kr. 804 kr. 999 kr. 1.099 kr. 1.149 kr. 5️⃣ Strategic assessment At 75 USD/oz: Small price adjustments are not enough Pandora will typically: make stepwise price increases (e.g. 2×6–7 %) push more towards plated alloys differentiate prices more between silver-heavy and light products Charms and solid rings will be hit hardest. ✅ Conclusion (short) If the silver price is around 75 USD/oz, Pandora will probably need to: Increase sales prices by approx. 12–15 % to maintain their normal margin structure.·2 t sittenA quick search shows that 70 pct of their expected consumption is hedged at 31 USD for 2026. No hedge for 2027. 2027 could really be a bad year.
- ·3 t sitten · MuokattuIf it didn't fall so much day by day, I would personally repurchase. Fortunately, I sold out at 727, albeit at a loss. Here is a summary from chat-gpt: Overall assessment Yes – the stock may very well be oversold, especially for the following reasons: The silver risk is real but greatly exaggerated The sales disappointment is cyclical, not structural The market has used the silver price as an anchor explanation for everything Brand value and pricing power are ignored in the valuation Multiple contraction has been extreme Pandora is not a commodity stock disguised as a jewelry company – it is a brand company with commodity input. If we are realistic: Pandora: Continues to be extremely cash flow-strong Has a high gross margin Has pricing power Has no balance-sheet stress Is massively buying back its own shares A fall of 50 %+ implies either: Permanent margin erosion Or structural demand decline Or lasting damage to the brand None of these are documented. What we are seeing rather resembles: A classic overreaction, amplified by commodity narrative and previous hype.·2 t sittenMrFalk I asked Chatgpt: is Pandora's sales disappointment November December 2025 cyclical or structural? GPT answer: In short: Pandora's sales disappointment in November and December 2025 appears both cyclical and structural — but with a clear structural component, which indicates that the problems are not solely due to seasonal variations. My comment: I lean most towards structural challenges - mainly changed consumer desire due to economy. Also declining management confidence and changing consumer trends can play a role.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
191 374
Myynti
Määrä
196 443
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - |
Ylin
570VWAP
Alin
551VaihtoMäärä
270,3 484 318
VWAP
Ylin
570Alin
551VaihtoMäärä
270,3 484 318
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 484 318 | 484 318 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 484 318 | 484 318 | 0 | 0 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 15.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 7.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 12.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2.2025 |
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
70 päivää sitten1 t 24 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 15.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 7.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 12.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2.2025 |
20,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,50%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 t sittenThis year, the number of Pandora owners in Nordnet has increased by 21.8%. That could indicate that institutional owners are selling off Pandora. The question is how much the 21.8% constitutes of Pandora's total shareholding.
- ·2 t sittenNew to Pandora. Bought at 600, thought it was cheap, and bought again at 555. My next buying level is 480. Hopefully it stays at a low price for some time, so buybacks can really have a big effect. Then EPS can easily grow to 70-75 without revenue growth, and if PE again becomes 10-12, the price will hit 700-800.·59 min sitten · MuokattuLuckyLuke. The debt has steadily grown during the buyback program, most recently by approx 2 billion per year. Pandora has on Jan 9 indicated that 2025 EBIT will be lower than 2024 EBIT, therefore probably also lower EBITDA. If 2025 NIBD ends at 15.1 billion and EBITDA has fallen to 10 billion, then NIBD/EBITDA will be above 1.5 Company policy is to keep the ratio between 0.5 - 1.5. Then one might stop dividend payments, but they probably won't. So we probably need to be quite lucky, LuckyLuke if we are to see more buybacks. But buybacks do raise Pandora management's bonus, so you never know!
- ·3 t sittenI'm annoyed myself about being down by 10%. So I asked AI about some silver price levels and their immediate impact. It calmed me down a bit. Try reading along. 1️⃣ Starting point: Silver price 50 USD/oz Historical “normal”: 20–25 USD/oz 50 USD is approx. 2.0–2.5× normal level (i.e. significant, but not extreme) 2️⃣ Effect on Pandora's costs Same assumptions as before: Silver ≈ 10–15 % of total production costs Silver price × 2–2.5 → Total effect: COGS increases approx. 10–18 % (depends on how silver-heavy the product is). 3️⃣ Necessary price increase Pandora will typically: absorb some via margin, hedging and design pass the rest on in the price Realistic scenarios: 🔹 Low price adjustment (very likely) Price increase: +5–7 % Pandora absorbs the majority 🔹 Standard scenario (most realistic) Price increase: +7–10 % 🔹 Aggressive (lower volume) Price increase: +12 % 4️⃣ Concrete examples Current price +7 % +10 % 349 kr. 373 kr. 384 kr. 699 kr. 748 kr. 769 kr. 999 kr. 1.069 kr. 1.099 kr. 5️⃣ Strategic assessment At 50 USD/oz Pandora can: Avoid violent shocks for customers Make incremental price increases Use: slightly less silver per unit more plated metal efficiency in production 👉 It is a level where the brand can bear the price increase without a major drop in demand. ✅ Conclusion (short) If the silver price is around 50 USD/oz, Pandora typically needs to: Increase sales prices by approx. 7–10 % to maintain margins. If you want, I can: compare 50 vs. 90 USD directly in one model or create a sensitivity graph showing price vs. silver price. what about 75 dollars Let's place 75 USD/oz precisely between 50 and 90 and calculate it consistently, so you can see the clear correlation. 1️⃣ Starting point: Silver price 75 USD/oz Historical “normal”: 20–25 USD/oz 75 USD = approx. 3.0–3.75× normal level 2️⃣ Effect on Pandora's costs Same basic assumptions: Silver ≈ 10–15 % of total production costs Silver price × 3.0–3.75 → Total effect: COGS increases approx. 18–30 % 3️⃣ Necessary price increase Pandora will almost always: absorb some via margin adjust design/materials pass the rest on in prices Realistic scenarios: 🔹 Conservative (greater margin pressure) Price increase: +8–10 % 🔹 Base scenario (most realistic) Price increase: +12–15 % 🔹 Aggressive (lower volume) Price increase: +18 % 4️⃣ Concrete examples Current price +10 % +15 % 349 kr. 384 kr. 401 kr. 699 kr. 769 kr. 804 kr. 999 kr. 1.099 kr. 1.149 kr. 5️⃣ Strategic assessment At 75 USD/oz: Small price adjustments are not enough Pandora will typically: make stepwise price increases (e.g. 2×6–7 %) push more towards plated alloys differentiate prices more between silver-heavy and light products Charms and solid rings will be hit hardest. ✅ Conclusion (short) If the silver price is around 75 USD/oz, Pandora will probably need to: Increase sales prices by approx. 12–15 % to maintain their normal margin structure.·2 t sittenA quick search shows that 70 pct of their expected consumption is hedged at 31 USD for 2026. No hedge for 2027. 2027 could really be a bad year.
- ·3 t sitten · MuokattuIf it didn't fall so much day by day, I would personally repurchase. Fortunately, I sold out at 727, albeit at a loss. Here is a summary from chat-gpt: Overall assessment Yes – the stock may very well be oversold, especially for the following reasons: The silver risk is real but greatly exaggerated The sales disappointment is cyclical, not structural The market has used the silver price as an anchor explanation for everything Brand value and pricing power are ignored in the valuation Multiple contraction has been extreme Pandora is not a commodity stock disguised as a jewelry company – it is a brand company with commodity input. If we are realistic: Pandora: Continues to be extremely cash flow-strong Has a high gross margin Has pricing power Has no balance-sheet stress Is massively buying back its own shares A fall of 50 %+ implies either: Permanent margin erosion Or structural demand decline Or lasting damage to the brand None of these are documented. What we are seeing rather resembles: A classic overreaction, amplified by commodity narrative and previous hype.·2 t sittenMrFalk I asked Chatgpt: is Pandora's sales disappointment November December 2025 cyclical or structural? GPT answer: In short: Pandora's sales disappointment in November and December 2025 appears both cyclical and structural — but with a clear structural component, which indicates that the problems are not solely due to seasonal variations. My comment: I lean most towards structural challenges - mainly changed consumer desire due to economy. Also declining management confidence and changing consumer trends can play a role.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
191 374
Myynti
Määrä
196 443
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - | ||
| 134 | - | - |
Ylin
570VWAP
Alin
551VaihtoMäärä
270,3 484 318
VWAP
Ylin
570Alin
551VaihtoMäärä
270,3 484 318
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 484 318 | 484 318 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 484 318 | 484 318 | 0 | 0 |