2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
83 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
7,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,61%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 617 | - | - | ||
| 16 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 233 | - | - | ||
| 233 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 21.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 22.7. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 29.4. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 19.3. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 23.10.2025 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·7 t sittenHave DSV's (CPSE:DSV) new low-emission logistics agreements quietly redefined its competitive moat? https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/did-dsv-cpse-dsv-low-210958477.html
No. It is purely a matter of a hard calculation. DSV is getting a taste of the transition just as e.g. Maersk is getting a taste of alternatives by spending billions on buying methanol or ammonia technology. This is purely an extension of DSV's experiment with around 2,000 electric trucks over a number of years. It is equivalent to spitting in a swimming pool but might provide some learning in the longer term. Their primary competitive advantage is and will still be network density, and economies of scale for their hauliers.
·8 t sittenWhy is DSV trading so cheap? I remember once grabbing it at 1000 kr and thinking it was Denmark's best company back thenIt has become a question of 3 things as I take it: 1. Rate impact and energy = way way larger outlays and wc = way way lower CR 2. The belief in the Schenker integration = way way more complex than assumed which costs incredibly much on their integrity and thus the multiples one is willing to pay for an earnings krone in the company ö 3. Poorer integration gives fewer customers (losing customers) more than counted on which gives poorer network advantages which gives poorer density which lessens synergies if gives poorer CR and ultimately a risk of the 9 promised billion - which right now is up for debate whether they are delayed. Or whether they are actually partially lost. So: DSV must disprove the market: the customers are coming back, their CR is rising, the promised synergies they can still figure out. Right now. They have this against them at least for a quarter or two still also because of their seasonal fluctuations in the EU in the upcoming quarterly report - INCL the rising rates and fuel prices which make ships sail slower which makes rates rise and the time until DSV can invoice their customers rises. You can probably hear there are a couple of quarters yet before we get proof of the matter - until then it is probably a bit of a trek through the desert 🙃
·14 t sitten · MuokattuSelling 50% days before the report. Time to take the loss and rather win it back somewhere else @
jdjddjdhe! It is fair to sell 50 percent , if you want to reduce the risk. But after your previous confident doomsday prophecies about DSV/NKT I no longer take your recommendations as the absolute truth. Maybe it is rather you, who should exchange DSV/NKT with Norwegian shares like Norsk Hydro
·15 t sittenThose analysts, how are they compensated and how much do they make? I think that if they in some way were compensated according to the evidence and reality of their predictions, then they must go to bed hungry (if they even have a bed)
They are rewarded by those who use their knowledge. When you pay, you get recommendations before others. So indirectly we all pay the economists, some pay through losses others through a percentage of the gain.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
83 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
7,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,61%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·7 t sittenHave DSV's (CPSE:DSV) new low-emission logistics agreements quietly redefined its competitive moat? https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/did-dsv-cpse-dsv-low-210958477.htmlNo. It is purely a matter of a hard calculation. DSV is getting a taste of the transition just as e.g. Maersk is getting a taste of alternatives by spending billions on buying methanol or ammonia technology. This is purely an extension of DSV's experiment with around 2,000 electric trucks over a number of years. It is equivalent to spitting in a swimming pool but might provide some learning in the longer term. Their primary competitive advantage is and will still be network density, and economies of scale for their hauliers.
- ·8 t sittenWhy is DSV trading so cheap? I remember once grabbing it at 1000 kr and thinking it was Denmark's best company back thenIt has become a question of 3 things as I take it: 1. Rate impact and energy = way way larger outlays and wc = way way lower CR 2. The belief in the Schenker integration = way way more complex than assumed which costs incredibly much on their integrity and thus the multiples one is willing to pay for an earnings krone in the company ö 3. Poorer integration gives fewer customers (losing customers) more than counted on which gives poorer network advantages which gives poorer density which lessens synergies if gives poorer CR and ultimately a risk of the 9 promised billion - which right now is up for debate whether they are delayed. Or whether they are actually partially lost. So: DSV must disprove the market: the customers are coming back, their CR is rising, the promised synergies they can still figure out. Right now. They have this against them at least for a quarter or two still also because of their seasonal fluctuations in the EU in the upcoming quarterly report - INCL the rising rates and fuel prices which make ships sail slower which makes rates rise and the time until DSV can invoice their customers rises. You can probably hear there are a couple of quarters yet before we get proof of the matter - until then it is probably a bit of a trek through the desert 🙃
- ·14 t sitten · MuokattuSelling 50% days before the report. Time to take the loss and rather win it back somewhere else @jdjddjdhe! It is fair to sell 50 percent , if you want to reduce the risk. But after your previous confident doomsday prophecies about DSV/NKT I no longer take your recommendations as the absolute truth. Maybe it is rather you, who should exchange DSV/NKT with Norwegian shares like Norsk Hydro
- ·15 t sittenThose analysts, how are they compensated and how much do they make? I think that if they in some way were compensated according to the evidence and reality of their predictions, then they must go to bed hungry (if they even have a bed)They are rewarded by those who use their knowledge. When you pay, you get recommendations before others. So indirectly we all pay the economists, some pay through losses others through a percentage of the gain.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 617 | - | - | ||
| 16 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 233 | - | - | ||
| 233 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 21.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 22.7. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 29.4. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 19.3. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 23.10.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
83 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 21.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 22.7. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 29.4. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 19.3. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 23.10.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
7,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,61%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·7 t sittenHave DSV's (CPSE:DSV) new low-emission logistics agreements quietly redefined its competitive moat? https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/did-dsv-cpse-dsv-low-210958477.htmlNo. It is purely a matter of a hard calculation. DSV is getting a taste of the transition just as e.g. Maersk is getting a taste of alternatives by spending billions on buying methanol or ammonia technology. This is purely an extension of DSV's experiment with around 2,000 electric trucks over a number of years. It is equivalent to spitting in a swimming pool but might provide some learning in the longer term. Their primary competitive advantage is and will still be network density, and economies of scale for their hauliers.
- ·8 t sittenWhy is DSV trading so cheap? I remember once grabbing it at 1000 kr and thinking it was Denmark's best company back thenIt has become a question of 3 things as I take it: 1. Rate impact and energy = way way larger outlays and wc = way way lower CR 2. The belief in the Schenker integration = way way more complex than assumed which costs incredibly much on their integrity and thus the multiples one is willing to pay for an earnings krone in the company ö 3. Poorer integration gives fewer customers (losing customers) more than counted on which gives poorer network advantages which gives poorer density which lessens synergies if gives poorer CR and ultimately a risk of the 9 promised billion - which right now is up for debate whether they are delayed. Or whether they are actually partially lost. So: DSV must disprove the market: the customers are coming back, their CR is rising, the promised synergies they can still figure out. Right now. They have this against them at least for a quarter or two still also because of their seasonal fluctuations in the EU in the upcoming quarterly report - INCL the rising rates and fuel prices which make ships sail slower which makes rates rise and the time until DSV can invoice their customers rises. You can probably hear there are a couple of quarters yet before we get proof of the matter - until then it is probably a bit of a trek through the desert 🙃
- ·14 t sitten · MuokattuSelling 50% days before the report. Time to take the loss and rather win it back somewhere else @jdjddjdhe! It is fair to sell 50 percent , if you want to reduce the risk. But after your previous confident doomsday prophecies about DSV/NKT I no longer take your recommendations as the absolute truth. Maybe it is rather you, who should exchange DSV/NKT with Norwegian shares like Norsk Hydro
- ·15 t sittenThose analysts, how are they compensated and how much do they make? I think that if they in some way were compensated according to the evidence and reality of their predictions, then they must go to bed hungry (if they even have a bed)They are rewarded by those who use their knowledge. When you pay, you get recommendations before others. So indirectly we all pay the economists, some pay through losses others through a percentage of the gain.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 617 | - | - | ||
| 16 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 233 | - | - | ||
| 233 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt