2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
86 päivää sitten52 min
1,55 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
229 449
Myynti
Määrä
231 884
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 723 | - | - | ||
| 2 164 | - | - | ||
| 199 | - | - | ||
| 1 488 | - | - | ||
| 60 | - | - |
Ylin
111,35VWAP
Alin
108,05VaihtoMäärä
79,5 720 565
VWAP
Ylin
111,35Alin
108,05VaihtoMäärä
79,5 720 565
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. 5 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 6.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 21.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 1.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 12.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenToday, 15.58 +0.10% 11.07% GN's market value is approx. 15.7 billion What is 11% of 15.7 billion? Short Squeeze is about not selling too cheaply. So nothing should be sold below price 140. It will require great patience from everyone who wants to be in.
·3 t sittenI'm not entirely sure how it's possible to get over 100% short interest ("as percentage of float"). It might be that they include indirect short positions or that they have incorrect data regarding the stock's float. The actual number of shorted shares comes from FINRA, which publishes short interest data every other week. Regardless, one can say it's an unusually high short interest in a company that appears to be on the right track after ch11 bankruptcy and the tax refund I can see they have received of 690 million dollars. But yes and no. I mean, I started this portfolio right before the original GameStop sneeze in 2021. Then I've been in some reeeally crappy stocks, e.g. AMC and BBBY. But since then I've spent too much time enjoying learning TA, and I've certainly done that the hard way, where you learn from your mistakes. However, I don't mind what I've lost, partly because most of it is unrealized... But I also just see it a bit as the price of learning something. I've also had a 3-star profile in here at times, when the GameStop stock has had a longer period of price increase. Regarding GameStop shares specifically, I do have significantly more of them in another brokerage account. I don't see that investment as a meme investment. I'm in it due to a mix of principled reasons and because I genuinely believe it could become the best investment I ever make in this life. But mostly I get my ideas by sitting on Finviz and using their screener. Reading about random stocks that pop up (about the company, superficially looking at recent financial statements, short interest, reading random stocktwits about the stock, latest news etc.). If it feels right, I might open a long position (typically stocks, possibly call options) - only very rarely do I buy put options, and that's mostly to minimize potential losses on stocks if the price were to fall. So, I think I'm on the right track, but I honestly don't know. I know there are several places where experts can give advice on this and that, but it's a bit of a hobby for me to spend my time believing that I might one day find a personal strategy that works. And not just long SPY/R2K/QQQ for 15 years. So I think what I'm getting at is that I get a kind of joy from experimenting, even if it costs money and time. It's enjoyable for me, and I feel like I'm learning something, and at the same time I rarely realize major losses (though I think I dumped AMC after Adam Enron diluted the stock as if it were a Fun light cordial).- ·1 päivä sittenCalculation Short has increased by approx 0.15% over two days in three rounds - as reported below in the thread. GN's market value is approx. 15.7 billion 0.15% corresponds to approx 40 million. If one compares with an average daily turnover of approx. 40 million, one gets, when adjusting for a little noise from other trades, that the shorters have been almost solely responsible for pushing the price down. Isn't that reasonably correct - or have I made a mistake in the calculation?
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuMakes partial sense, but there has already been a turnover of 48 M today, and there usually is a lot of turnover before closing. So I don't know if 40 M per day is correct. 
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWhy it can make sense to hold GN, even with significant short attacks, recently, and what is realistically needed for a short squeeze: 1) The turnaround is being “proven in the financial statements” (not just in PowerPoints) GN has delivered several data points that typically crush the classic short narrative (“weak cash flow + falling margin + no control”): Q3 2025: 1% organic growth, 11% EBITA margin, and DKK 410m cash flow. Q2 2025: EBITA +46% to DKK 546m (13% margin) + DKK 353m free cash flow (ex M&A), and leverage down to 4.0x from 4.9x the year before. It is these kinds of selective improvements I believe in, which make it more expensive and dangerous to be short, because the “fundamentals” are starting to support the share price. 2) Product news, market shares and pricing power Shorts love companies that “have nothing new” in a cycle. GN actually has a filled pipeline and has launched broadly: Major innovations in hearing + enterprise (e.g. ReSound Vivia and others). New hearing launches like ReSound Enzo IA (the super power segment). The D2C/OTC area is strengthened via Jabra Enhance launches. If the upcoming financial report shows that these launches lift the mix (better margin) or maintain volume, then it will be difficult to argue for “structural deterioration”. The financial report on Feb 5, 2026 is a classic catalyst The next financial report is stated for February 5, 2026. Shorts often play “catalyst roulette”: they push the price down/keep a lid on it leading up to the financial report, and hope for disappointment or caution in guidance. If GN delivers just one of these, the short side will have a problem: - Guidance up (or tighter range with better margin expectation) - Cash flow better than feared (working capital discipline) - Margin continues up (mix + cost program) Comments on market shares / order book in enterprise. _____________________ Short squeeze: What is needed (realistically)? - A squeeze normally requires 3 things simultaneously: - Upside surprise (numbers/guidance) - Volume (buyers who actually show up) - Shorts cannot/will not hold (risk limits, margin calls, or expensive to borrow the stock) With approx. 11% short, the “fuel” is there, but the match is the financial report + guidance. No match = no squeeze, just more noise. ______________________ Why the share price “is attacked” even when GN is doing well It is microstructure: - Shorts often exploit low liquidity in periods and technical levels. - “Good news” is sold if the market believes it is already priced in. If many are positioned similarly (longs and shorts), the share price becomes a battleground around catalysts. Therefore, I'm really looking forward to the financial report. :-) ______________________________ Furthermore, I would like to hear if GN continues the EBITA margin upwards? and do they deliver stable cash flow? Has GN become better at converting the product pipeline into commercial traction?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
86 päivää sitten52 min
1,55 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenToday, 15.58 +0.10% 11.07% GN's market value is approx. 15.7 billion What is 11% of 15.7 billion? Short Squeeze is about not selling too cheaply. So nothing should be sold below price 140. It will require great patience from everyone who wants to be in.·3 t sittenI'm not entirely sure how it's possible to get over 100% short interest ("as percentage of float"). It might be that they include indirect short positions or that they have incorrect data regarding the stock's float. The actual number of shorted shares comes from FINRA, which publishes short interest data every other week. Regardless, one can say it's an unusually high short interest in a company that appears to be on the right track after ch11 bankruptcy and the tax refund I can see they have received of 690 million dollars. But yes and no. I mean, I started this portfolio right before the original GameStop sneeze in 2021. Then I've been in some reeeally crappy stocks, e.g. AMC and BBBY. But since then I've spent too much time enjoying learning TA, and I've certainly done that the hard way, where you learn from your mistakes. However, I don't mind what I've lost, partly because most of it is unrealized... But I also just see it a bit as the price of learning something. I've also had a 3-star profile in here at times, when the GameStop stock has had a longer period of price increase. Regarding GameStop shares specifically, I do have significantly more of them in another brokerage account. I don't see that investment as a meme investment. I'm in it due to a mix of principled reasons and because I genuinely believe it could become the best investment I ever make in this life. But mostly I get my ideas by sitting on Finviz and using their screener. Reading about random stocks that pop up (about the company, superficially looking at recent financial statements, short interest, reading random stocktwits about the stock, latest news etc.). If it feels right, I might open a long position (typically stocks, possibly call options) - only very rarely do I buy put options, and that's mostly to minimize potential losses on stocks if the price were to fall. So, I think I'm on the right track, but I honestly don't know. I know there are several places where experts can give advice on this and that, but it's a bit of a hobby for me to spend my time believing that I might one day find a personal strategy that works. And not just long SPY/R2K/QQQ for 15 years. So I think what I'm getting at is that I get a kind of joy from experimenting, even if it costs money and time. It's enjoyable for me, and I feel like I'm learning something, and at the same time I rarely realize major losses (though I think I dumped AMC after Adam Enron diluted the stock as if it were a Fun light cordial).
- ·1 päivä sittenCalculation Short has increased by approx 0.15% over two days in three rounds - as reported below in the thread. GN's market value is approx. 15.7 billion 0.15% corresponds to approx 40 million. If one compares with an average daily turnover of approx. 40 million, one gets, when adjusting for a little noise from other trades, that the shorters have been almost solely responsible for pushing the price down. Isn't that reasonably correct - or have I made a mistake in the calculation?·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuMakes partial sense, but there has already been a turnover of 48 M today, and there usually is a lot of turnover before closing. So I don't know if 40 M per day is correct.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWhy it can make sense to hold GN, even with significant short attacks, recently, and what is realistically needed for a short squeeze: 1) The turnaround is being “proven in the financial statements” (not just in PowerPoints) GN has delivered several data points that typically crush the classic short narrative (“weak cash flow + falling margin + no control”): Q3 2025: 1% organic growth, 11% EBITA margin, and DKK 410m cash flow. Q2 2025: EBITA +46% to DKK 546m (13% margin) + DKK 353m free cash flow (ex M&A), and leverage down to 4.0x from 4.9x the year before. It is these kinds of selective improvements I believe in, which make it more expensive and dangerous to be short, because the “fundamentals” are starting to support the share price. 2) Product news, market shares and pricing power Shorts love companies that “have nothing new” in a cycle. GN actually has a filled pipeline and has launched broadly: Major innovations in hearing + enterprise (e.g. ReSound Vivia and others). New hearing launches like ReSound Enzo IA (the super power segment). The D2C/OTC area is strengthened via Jabra Enhance launches. If the upcoming financial report shows that these launches lift the mix (better margin) or maintain volume, then it will be difficult to argue for “structural deterioration”. The financial report on Feb 5, 2026 is a classic catalyst The next financial report is stated for February 5, 2026. Shorts often play “catalyst roulette”: they push the price down/keep a lid on it leading up to the financial report, and hope for disappointment or caution in guidance. If GN delivers just one of these, the short side will have a problem: - Guidance up (or tighter range with better margin expectation) - Cash flow better than feared (working capital discipline) - Margin continues up (mix + cost program) Comments on market shares / order book in enterprise. _____________________ Short squeeze: What is needed (realistically)? - A squeeze normally requires 3 things simultaneously: - Upside surprise (numbers/guidance) - Volume (buyers who actually show up) - Shorts cannot/will not hold (risk limits, margin calls, or expensive to borrow the stock) With approx. 11% short, the “fuel” is there, but the match is the financial report + guidance. No match = no squeeze, just more noise. ______________________ Why the share price “is attacked” even when GN is doing well It is microstructure: - Shorts often exploit low liquidity in periods and technical levels. - “Good news” is sold if the market believes it is already priced in. If many are positioned similarly (longs and shorts), the share price becomes a battleground around catalysts. Therefore, I'm really looking forward to the financial report. :-) ______________________________ Furthermore, I would like to hear if GN continues the EBITA margin upwards? and do they deliver stable cash flow? Has GN become better at converting the product pipeline into commercial traction?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
229 449
Myynti
Määrä
231 884
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 723 | - | - | ||
| 2 164 | - | - | ||
| 199 | - | - | ||
| 1 488 | - | - | ||
| 60 | - | - |
Ylin
111,35VWAP
Alin
108,05VaihtoMäärä
79,5 720 565
VWAP
Ylin
111,35Alin
108,05VaihtoMäärä
79,5 720 565
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. 5 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 6.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 21.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 1.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 12.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2.2025 |
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
86 päivää sitten52 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. 5 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 6.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 21.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 1.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 12.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2.2025 |
1,55 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenToday, 15.58 +0.10% 11.07% GN's market value is approx. 15.7 billion What is 11% of 15.7 billion? Short Squeeze is about not selling too cheaply. So nothing should be sold below price 140. It will require great patience from everyone who wants to be in.·3 t sittenI'm not entirely sure how it's possible to get over 100% short interest ("as percentage of float"). It might be that they include indirect short positions or that they have incorrect data regarding the stock's float. The actual number of shorted shares comes from FINRA, which publishes short interest data every other week. Regardless, one can say it's an unusually high short interest in a company that appears to be on the right track after ch11 bankruptcy and the tax refund I can see they have received of 690 million dollars. But yes and no. I mean, I started this portfolio right before the original GameStop sneeze in 2021. Then I've been in some reeeally crappy stocks, e.g. AMC and BBBY. But since then I've spent too much time enjoying learning TA, and I've certainly done that the hard way, where you learn from your mistakes. However, I don't mind what I've lost, partly because most of it is unrealized... But I also just see it a bit as the price of learning something. I've also had a 3-star profile in here at times, when the GameStop stock has had a longer period of price increase. Regarding GameStop shares specifically, I do have significantly more of them in another brokerage account. I don't see that investment as a meme investment. I'm in it due to a mix of principled reasons and because I genuinely believe it could become the best investment I ever make in this life. But mostly I get my ideas by sitting on Finviz and using their screener. Reading about random stocks that pop up (about the company, superficially looking at recent financial statements, short interest, reading random stocktwits about the stock, latest news etc.). If it feels right, I might open a long position (typically stocks, possibly call options) - only very rarely do I buy put options, and that's mostly to minimize potential losses on stocks if the price were to fall. So, I think I'm on the right track, but I honestly don't know. I know there are several places where experts can give advice on this and that, but it's a bit of a hobby for me to spend my time believing that I might one day find a personal strategy that works. And not just long SPY/R2K/QQQ for 15 years. So I think what I'm getting at is that I get a kind of joy from experimenting, even if it costs money and time. It's enjoyable for me, and I feel like I'm learning something, and at the same time I rarely realize major losses (though I think I dumped AMC after Adam Enron diluted the stock as if it were a Fun light cordial).
- ·1 päivä sittenCalculation Short has increased by approx 0.15% over two days in three rounds - as reported below in the thread. GN's market value is approx. 15.7 billion 0.15% corresponds to approx 40 million. If one compares with an average daily turnover of approx. 40 million, one gets, when adjusting for a little noise from other trades, that the shorters have been almost solely responsible for pushing the price down. Isn't that reasonably correct - or have I made a mistake in the calculation?·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuMakes partial sense, but there has already been a turnover of 48 M today, and there usually is a lot of turnover before closing. So I don't know if 40 M per day is correct.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWhy it can make sense to hold GN, even with significant short attacks, recently, and what is realistically needed for a short squeeze: 1) The turnaround is being “proven in the financial statements” (not just in PowerPoints) GN has delivered several data points that typically crush the classic short narrative (“weak cash flow + falling margin + no control”): Q3 2025: 1% organic growth, 11% EBITA margin, and DKK 410m cash flow. Q2 2025: EBITA +46% to DKK 546m (13% margin) + DKK 353m free cash flow (ex M&A), and leverage down to 4.0x from 4.9x the year before. It is these kinds of selective improvements I believe in, which make it more expensive and dangerous to be short, because the “fundamentals” are starting to support the share price. 2) Product news, market shares and pricing power Shorts love companies that “have nothing new” in a cycle. GN actually has a filled pipeline and has launched broadly: Major innovations in hearing + enterprise (e.g. ReSound Vivia and others). New hearing launches like ReSound Enzo IA (the super power segment). The D2C/OTC area is strengthened via Jabra Enhance launches. If the upcoming financial report shows that these launches lift the mix (better margin) or maintain volume, then it will be difficult to argue for “structural deterioration”. The financial report on Feb 5, 2026 is a classic catalyst The next financial report is stated for February 5, 2026. Shorts often play “catalyst roulette”: they push the price down/keep a lid on it leading up to the financial report, and hope for disappointment or caution in guidance. If GN delivers just one of these, the short side will have a problem: - Guidance up (or tighter range with better margin expectation) - Cash flow better than feared (working capital discipline) - Margin continues up (mix + cost program) Comments on market shares / order book in enterprise. _____________________ Short squeeze: What is needed (realistically)? - A squeeze normally requires 3 things simultaneously: - Upside surprise (numbers/guidance) - Volume (buyers who actually show up) - Shorts cannot/will not hold (risk limits, margin calls, or expensive to borrow the stock) With approx. 11% short, the “fuel” is there, but the match is the financial report + guidance. No match = no squeeze, just more noise. ______________________ Why the share price “is attacked” even when GN is doing well It is microstructure: - Shorts often exploit low liquidity in periods and technical levels. - “Good news” is sold if the market believes it is already priced in. If many are positioned similarly (longs and shorts), the share price becomes a battleground around catalysts. Therefore, I'm really looking forward to the financial report. :-) ______________________________ Furthermore, I would like to hear if GN continues the EBITA margin upwards? and do they deliver stable cash flow? Has GN become better at converting the product pipeline into commercial traction?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
229 449
Myynti
Määrä
231 884
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 723 | - | - | ||
| 2 164 | - | - | ||
| 199 | - | - | ||
| 1 488 | - | - | ||
| 60 | - | - |
Ylin
111,35VWAP
Alin
108,05VaihtoMäärä
79,5 720 565
VWAP
Ylin
111,35Alin
108,05VaihtoMäärä
79,5 720 565
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt