Xetra
15.38.25
Riskitaso
6/7
Morningstar rating
3 stars
Vastuullisuus (SFDR)
6
Global X Silver Miners ETF USD Acc
Global X Silver Miners ETF USD Acc
(SLVR)34,750 EUR−3,06%(−1,10)
Osta34,750
Myy34,810
Spreadi %0,17%
Vaihto (EUR)11 168 943
Juoksevat kulut0,70%
Tarjoustasot
Xetra
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Korkea: 6 / 7
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,70%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori arvometallit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index(the “Index”).
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Omistukset
Päivitetty 24.3.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet99,7%
- Lyhyt korko0,3%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
54 min sitten54 min sittenGood info I think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkolED63RA0 Analysis: Main takeaways: Felix Prehn's rational silver framework The core message: The silver market is stressed, not broken. Legitimate fundamentals exist, but most influencer narratives are exaggerated or factually wrong. 🔬 The 7 myths debunked (signal vs. noise) Claim (noise) Reality (signal) "COMEX is almost out of silver!" Only registered silver is low (~79M oz). Eligible silver adds ~253M oz. Total: ~332M oz. Low registered = high demand stress, not default "350:1 paper-to-silver ratio = fraud!" That number includes ALL derivatives (mostly cash-settled). True physical leverage is ~7.6x. Still elevated, but not the apocalyptic figure "Shanghai premiums prove Western manipulation" Real premiums (~19%) exist due to capital controls + import restrictions in China - not Western fraud. But DO confirm strong physical demand "Jane Street buying SLV = smart money going long!" Jane Street is a market maker. They hedge everything. Net silver exposure is near zero. Their SLV holdings = liquidity provision, not a bull bet "COMEX can't stop the squeeze this time!" COMEX has 5 tools: raise margins, impose position limits, force cash settlement, halt trading, change the rules. They've used all of them. They stopped it in 1980 (Hunt Bros) and 2011 "Industrial demand will blow up COMEX!" Industrial users buy via long-term supply contracts with miners - not through COMEX. This supports gradual price appreciation, not an immediate delivery crisis "This time is different!" The four most expensive words in investing. Every silver run (1980, 2011, 2021) had the same narrative ✅ What IS legitimate (the real bull case) Industrial demand is real and growing — solar, EVs, AI, 5G, medical. Silver is consumed, not stored Physical markets are genuinely tight — Shanghai premiums are a real signal Long-term supply deficit — mines can't scale overnight; new supply takes years This supports gradual appreciation over years, not a sudden explosion 📊 His probability-weighted price scenarios Scenario Price range Probability COMEX delivery failure $150–$200+ 5–10% (he personally says ~0%) Managed squeeze $80–$120 30–40% (most likely stress outcome) Status quo / gradual rise $50–$80 35–40% (current base case) Deflationary shock / liquidation Sub-$50 10–15% ⚠️ Key risks he highlights COMEX can and will intervene — it's a private company (CME Group), rules can change mid-squeeze Higher prices trigger substitution — at $200/oz, industry researches alternatives (copper, graphene, etc.) Volatility cuts both ways — margin hikes in 2011 crashed silver from $50 → $33 in days "Follow the money" — always ask who benefits from the narrative being pushed
·5 t sittenIt was indeed quick that we fell back into the same trend: it rises when the East is open, and starts to fall sharply when the West begins to open up.- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuAgain a very atypical price behavior, totally algorithm-driven, to keep the price in a certain range for over 1 hour, until NYC opens, it is so obvious. Be careful, and have capital ready for dips, follow the money.
·1 päivä sittenInteresting observation RustyAce - I also looked in my Tradingview and yes, it's a bit striking with the XNAS opening dip for gold, silver and rare metals (e.g. RARE). I will keep an eye on that today. Follow the money 
·2 päivää sittenInteresting conversation with First Majestic Silver. It appears, among other things, that three major silver-consuming items are not included in the demand and supply calculations; new type of solid state batteries, data centers (6.6 tons) and nuclear power plants (15 tons). https://youtu.be/1VN-6a9AJ2U?t=5m05s·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuCorrection, it should apparently be 141 tons (!) per nuclear power plant (larger model then, presumably); seems to be completely insane amounts, but on the other hand, extremely robust and reliable components and systems are required for that type of application, so why not (?). Discussed from approx. 13:50 min into the clip, where "5 million ounces" is mentioned.
·3 päivää sittenSilver down 9 % just close your eyes
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Korkea: 6 / 7
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,70%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori arvometallit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index(the “Index”).
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tarjoustasot
Xetra
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Omistukset
Päivitetty 24.3.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet99,7%
- Lyhyt korko0,3%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 54 min sitten54 min sittenGood info I think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkolED63RA0 Analysis: Main takeaways: Felix Prehn's rational silver framework The core message: The silver market is stressed, not broken. Legitimate fundamentals exist, but most influencer narratives are exaggerated or factually wrong. 🔬 The 7 myths debunked (signal vs. noise) Claim (noise) Reality (signal) "COMEX is almost out of silver!" Only registered silver is low (~79M oz). Eligible silver adds ~253M oz. Total: ~332M oz. Low registered = high demand stress, not default "350:1 paper-to-silver ratio = fraud!" That number includes ALL derivatives (mostly cash-settled). True physical leverage is ~7.6x. Still elevated, but not the apocalyptic figure "Shanghai premiums prove Western manipulation" Real premiums (~19%) exist due to capital controls + import restrictions in China - not Western fraud. But DO confirm strong physical demand "Jane Street buying SLV = smart money going long!" Jane Street is a market maker. They hedge everything. Net silver exposure is near zero. Their SLV holdings = liquidity provision, not a bull bet "COMEX can't stop the squeeze this time!" COMEX has 5 tools: raise margins, impose position limits, force cash settlement, halt trading, change the rules. They've used all of them. They stopped it in 1980 (Hunt Bros) and 2011 "Industrial demand will blow up COMEX!" Industrial users buy via long-term supply contracts with miners - not through COMEX. This supports gradual price appreciation, not an immediate delivery crisis "This time is different!" The four most expensive words in investing. Every silver run (1980, 2011, 2021) had the same narrative ✅ What IS legitimate (the real bull case) Industrial demand is real and growing — solar, EVs, AI, 5G, medical. Silver is consumed, not stored Physical markets are genuinely tight — Shanghai premiums are a real signal Long-term supply deficit — mines can't scale overnight; new supply takes years This supports gradual appreciation over years, not a sudden explosion 📊 His probability-weighted price scenarios Scenario Price range Probability COMEX delivery failure $150–$200+ 5–10% (he personally says ~0%) Managed squeeze $80–$120 30–40% (most likely stress outcome) Status quo / gradual rise $50–$80 35–40% (current base case) Deflationary shock / liquidation Sub-$50 10–15% ⚠️ Key risks he highlights COMEX can and will intervene — it's a private company (CME Group), rules can change mid-squeeze Higher prices trigger substitution — at $200/oz, industry researches alternatives (copper, graphene, etc.) Volatility cuts both ways — margin hikes in 2011 crashed silver from $50 → $33 in days "Follow the money" — always ask who benefits from the narrative being pushed
- ·5 t sittenIt was indeed quick that we fell back into the same trend: it rises when the East is open, and starts to fall sharply when the West begins to open up.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuAgain a very atypical price behavior, totally algorithm-driven, to keep the price in a certain range for over 1 hour, until NYC opens, it is so obvious. Be careful, and have capital ready for dips, follow the money.·1 päivä sittenInteresting observation RustyAce - I also looked in my Tradingview and yes, it's a bit striking with the XNAS opening dip for gold, silver and rare metals (e.g. RARE). I will keep an eye on that today. Follow the money
- ·2 päivää sittenInteresting conversation with First Majestic Silver. It appears, among other things, that three major silver-consuming items are not included in the demand and supply calculations; new type of solid state batteries, data centers (6.6 tons) and nuclear power plants (15 tons). https://youtu.be/1VN-6a9AJ2U?t=5m05s·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuCorrection, it should apparently be 141 tons (!) per nuclear power plant (larger model then, presumably); seems to be completely insane amounts, but on the other hand, extremely robust and reliable components and systems are required for that type of application, so why not (?). Discussed from approx. 13:50 min into the clip, where "5 million ounces" is mentioned.
- ·3 päivää sittenSilver down 9 % just close your eyes
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Korkea: 6 / 7
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,70%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori arvometallit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index(the “Index”).
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 54 min sitten54 min sittenGood info I think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkolED63RA0 Analysis: Main takeaways: Felix Prehn's rational silver framework The core message: The silver market is stressed, not broken. Legitimate fundamentals exist, but most influencer narratives are exaggerated or factually wrong. 🔬 The 7 myths debunked (signal vs. noise) Claim (noise) Reality (signal) "COMEX is almost out of silver!" Only registered silver is low (~79M oz). Eligible silver adds ~253M oz. Total: ~332M oz. Low registered = high demand stress, not default "350:1 paper-to-silver ratio = fraud!" That number includes ALL derivatives (mostly cash-settled). True physical leverage is ~7.6x. Still elevated, but not the apocalyptic figure "Shanghai premiums prove Western manipulation" Real premiums (~19%) exist due to capital controls + import restrictions in China - not Western fraud. But DO confirm strong physical demand "Jane Street buying SLV = smart money going long!" Jane Street is a market maker. They hedge everything. Net silver exposure is near zero. Their SLV holdings = liquidity provision, not a bull bet "COMEX can't stop the squeeze this time!" COMEX has 5 tools: raise margins, impose position limits, force cash settlement, halt trading, change the rules. They've used all of them. They stopped it in 1980 (Hunt Bros) and 2011 "Industrial demand will blow up COMEX!" Industrial users buy via long-term supply contracts with miners - not through COMEX. This supports gradual price appreciation, not an immediate delivery crisis "This time is different!" The four most expensive words in investing. Every silver run (1980, 2011, 2021) had the same narrative ✅ What IS legitimate (the real bull case) Industrial demand is real and growing — solar, EVs, AI, 5G, medical. Silver is consumed, not stored Physical markets are genuinely tight — Shanghai premiums are a real signal Long-term supply deficit — mines can't scale overnight; new supply takes years This supports gradual appreciation over years, not a sudden explosion 📊 His probability-weighted price scenarios Scenario Price range Probability COMEX delivery failure $150–$200+ 5–10% (he personally says ~0%) Managed squeeze $80–$120 30–40% (most likely stress outcome) Status quo / gradual rise $50–$80 35–40% (current base case) Deflationary shock / liquidation Sub-$50 10–15% ⚠️ Key risks he highlights COMEX can and will intervene — it's a private company (CME Group), rules can change mid-squeeze Higher prices trigger substitution — at $200/oz, industry researches alternatives (copper, graphene, etc.) Volatility cuts both ways — margin hikes in 2011 crashed silver from $50 → $33 in days "Follow the money" — always ask who benefits from the narrative being pushed
- ·5 t sittenIt was indeed quick that we fell back into the same trend: it rises when the East is open, and starts to fall sharply when the West begins to open up.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuAgain a very atypical price behavior, totally algorithm-driven, to keep the price in a certain range for over 1 hour, until NYC opens, it is so obvious. Be careful, and have capital ready for dips, follow the money.·1 päivä sittenInteresting observation RustyAce - I also looked in my Tradingview and yes, it's a bit striking with the XNAS opening dip for gold, silver and rare metals (e.g. RARE). I will keep an eye on that today. Follow the money
- ·2 päivää sittenInteresting conversation with First Majestic Silver. It appears, among other things, that three major silver-consuming items are not included in the demand and supply calculations; new type of solid state batteries, data centers (6.6 tons) and nuclear power plants (15 tons). https://youtu.be/1VN-6a9AJ2U?t=5m05s·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuCorrection, it should apparently be 141 tons (!) per nuclear power plant (larger model then, presumably); seems to be completely insane amounts, but on the other hand, extremely robust and reliable components and systems are required for that type of application, so why not (?). Discussed from approx. 13:50 min into the clip, where "5 million ounces" is mentioned.
- ·3 päivää sittenSilver down 9 % just close your eyes
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Xetra
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Omistukset
Päivitetty 24.3.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet99,7%
- Lyhyt korko0,3%