Xetra
23.00.45
Riskitaso
6/7
Morningstar rating
3 stars
Vastuullisuus (SFDR)
6
Global X Silver Miners ETF USD Acc
Global X Silver Miners ETF USD Acc
(SLVR)35,160 EUR+3,47%(+1,1800)
Osta0,00
Myy0,00
Spreadi %-
Vaihto (EUR)11 177 794
Juoksevat kulut0,70%
Tarjoustasot
Xetra
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Korkea: 6 / 7
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,70%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori arvometallit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index(the “Index”).
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Omistukset
Päivitetty 25.3.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet99,3%
- Lyhyt korko0,7%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·22 t sittenSomething absolutely doesn't make sense, metals are rising even though yield , oil and DXY are going up. I definitely expect one of the things must fall later when the USA opens, it is very Typical that these things rise together.- ·1 päivä sittenI must admit it is really a bit tiring to watch daily market manipulation from trump. Then the war is over, then it is not, then oil is free, then it is not, then there are negotiations, then there are not, then he wants an agreement, then he does not, it is simply so insane that people actually support that and that no institutions actually do anything about it.
·1 päivä sittenThe hawks over there support Trump because he listens to them so they can earn enormous amounts. It's all a bit too obvious. 
1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenGood info I think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkolED63RA0 Analysis: Main takeaways: Felix Prehn's rational silver framework The core message: The silver market is stressed, not broken. Legitimate fundamentals exist, but most influencer narratives are exaggerated or factually wrong. 🔬 The 7 myths debunked (signal vs. noise) Claim (noise) Reality (signal) "COMEX is almost out of silver!" Only registered silver is low (~79M oz). Eligible silver adds ~253M oz. Total: ~332M oz. Low registered = high demand stress, not default "350:1 paper-to-silver ratio = fraud!" That number includes ALL derivatives (mostly cash-settled). True physical leverage is ~7.6x. Still elevated, but not the apocalyptic figure "Shanghai premiums prove Western manipulation" Real premiums (~19%) exist due to capital controls + import restrictions in China - not Western fraud. But DO confirm strong physical demand "Jane Street buying SLV = smart money going long!" Jane Street is a market maker. They hedge everything. Net silver exposure is near zero. Their SLV holdings = liquidity provision, not a bull bet "COMEX can't stop the squeeze this time!" COMEX has 5 tools: raise margins, impose position limits, force cash settlement, halt trading, change the rules. They've used all of them. They stopped it in 1980 (Hunt Bros) and 2011 "Industrial demand will blow up COMEX!" Industrial users buy via long-term supply contracts with miners - not through COMEX. This supports gradual price appreciation, not an immediate delivery crisis "This time is different!" The four most expensive words in investing. Every silver run (1980, 2011, 2021) had the same narrative ✅ What IS legitimate (the real bull case) Industrial demand is real and growing — solar, EVs, AI, 5G, medical. Silver is consumed, not stored Physical markets are genuinely tight — Shanghai premiums are a real signal Long-term supply deficit — mines can't scale overnight; new supply takes years This supports gradual appreciation over years, not a sudden explosion 📊 His probability-weighted price scenarios Scenario Price range Probability COMEX delivery failure $150–$200+ 5–10% (he personally says ~0%) Managed squeeze $80–$120 30–40% (most likely stress outcome) Status quo / gradual rise $50–$80 35–40% (current base case) Deflationary shock / liquidation Sub-$50 10–15% ⚠️ Key risks he highlights COMEX can and will intervene — it's a private company (CME Group), rules can change mid-squeeze Higher prices trigger substitution — at $200/oz, industry researches alternatives (copper, graphene, etc.) Volatility cuts both ways — margin hikes in 2011 crashed silver from $50 → $33 in days "Follow the money" — always ask who benefits from the narrative being pushed- ·1 päivä sittenIt was indeed quick that we fell back into the same trend: it rises when the East is open, and starts to fall sharply when the West begins to open up.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Korkea: 6 / 7
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,70%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori arvometallit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index(the “Index”).
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tarjoustasot
Xetra
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Omistukset
Päivitetty 25.3.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet99,3%
- Lyhyt korko0,7%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·22 t sittenSomething absolutely doesn't make sense, metals are rising even though yield , oil and DXY are going up. I definitely expect one of the things must fall later when the USA opens, it is very Typical that these things rise together.
- ·1 päivä sittenI must admit it is really a bit tiring to watch daily market manipulation from trump. Then the war is over, then it is not, then oil is free, then it is not, then there are negotiations, then there are not, then he wants an agreement, then he does not, it is simply so insane that people actually support that and that no institutions actually do anything about it.·1 päivä sittenThe hawks over there support Trump because he listens to them so they can earn enormous amounts. It's all a bit too obvious.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenGood info I think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkolED63RA0 Analysis: Main takeaways: Felix Prehn's rational silver framework The core message: The silver market is stressed, not broken. Legitimate fundamentals exist, but most influencer narratives are exaggerated or factually wrong. 🔬 The 7 myths debunked (signal vs. noise) Claim (noise) Reality (signal) "COMEX is almost out of silver!" Only registered silver is low (~79M oz). Eligible silver adds ~253M oz. Total: ~332M oz. Low registered = high demand stress, not default "350:1 paper-to-silver ratio = fraud!" That number includes ALL derivatives (mostly cash-settled). True physical leverage is ~7.6x. Still elevated, but not the apocalyptic figure "Shanghai premiums prove Western manipulation" Real premiums (~19%) exist due to capital controls + import restrictions in China - not Western fraud. But DO confirm strong physical demand "Jane Street buying SLV = smart money going long!" Jane Street is a market maker. They hedge everything. Net silver exposure is near zero. Their SLV holdings = liquidity provision, not a bull bet "COMEX can't stop the squeeze this time!" COMEX has 5 tools: raise margins, impose position limits, force cash settlement, halt trading, change the rules. They've used all of them. They stopped it in 1980 (Hunt Bros) and 2011 "Industrial demand will blow up COMEX!" Industrial users buy via long-term supply contracts with miners - not through COMEX. This supports gradual price appreciation, not an immediate delivery crisis "This time is different!" The four most expensive words in investing. Every silver run (1980, 2011, 2021) had the same narrative ✅ What IS legitimate (the real bull case) Industrial demand is real and growing — solar, EVs, AI, 5G, medical. Silver is consumed, not stored Physical markets are genuinely tight — Shanghai premiums are a real signal Long-term supply deficit — mines can't scale overnight; new supply takes years This supports gradual appreciation over years, not a sudden explosion 📊 His probability-weighted price scenarios Scenario Price range Probability COMEX delivery failure $150–$200+ 5–10% (he personally says ~0%) Managed squeeze $80–$120 30–40% (most likely stress outcome) Status quo / gradual rise $50–$80 35–40% (current base case) Deflationary shock / liquidation Sub-$50 10–15% ⚠️ Key risks he highlights COMEX can and will intervene — it's a private company (CME Group), rules can change mid-squeeze Higher prices trigger substitution — at $200/oz, industry researches alternatives (copper, graphene, etc.) Volatility cuts both ways — margin hikes in 2011 crashed silver from $50 → $33 in days "Follow the money" — always ask who benefits from the narrative being pushed
- ·1 päivä sittenIt was indeed quick that we fell back into the same trend: it rises when the East is open, and starts to fall sharply when the West begins to open up.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Korkea: 6 / 7
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,70%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori arvometallit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index(the “Index”).
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·22 t sittenSomething absolutely doesn't make sense, metals are rising even though yield , oil and DXY are going up. I definitely expect one of the things must fall later when the USA opens, it is very Typical that these things rise together.
- ·1 päivä sittenI must admit it is really a bit tiring to watch daily market manipulation from trump. Then the war is over, then it is not, then oil is free, then it is not, then there are negotiations, then there are not, then he wants an agreement, then he does not, it is simply so insane that people actually support that and that no institutions actually do anything about it.·1 päivä sittenThe hawks over there support Trump because he listens to them so they can earn enormous amounts. It's all a bit too obvious.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenGood info I think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkolED63RA0 Analysis: Main takeaways: Felix Prehn's rational silver framework The core message: The silver market is stressed, not broken. Legitimate fundamentals exist, but most influencer narratives are exaggerated or factually wrong. 🔬 The 7 myths debunked (signal vs. noise) Claim (noise) Reality (signal) "COMEX is almost out of silver!" Only registered silver is low (~79M oz). Eligible silver adds ~253M oz. Total: ~332M oz. Low registered = high demand stress, not default "350:1 paper-to-silver ratio = fraud!" That number includes ALL derivatives (mostly cash-settled). True physical leverage is ~7.6x. Still elevated, but not the apocalyptic figure "Shanghai premiums prove Western manipulation" Real premiums (~19%) exist due to capital controls + import restrictions in China - not Western fraud. But DO confirm strong physical demand "Jane Street buying SLV = smart money going long!" Jane Street is a market maker. They hedge everything. Net silver exposure is near zero. Their SLV holdings = liquidity provision, not a bull bet "COMEX can't stop the squeeze this time!" COMEX has 5 tools: raise margins, impose position limits, force cash settlement, halt trading, change the rules. They've used all of them. They stopped it in 1980 (Hunt Bros) and 2011 "Industrial demand will blow up COMEX!" Industrial users buy via long-term supply contracts with miners - not through COMEX. This supports gradual price appreciation, not an immediate delivery crisis "This time is different!" The four most expensive words in investing. Every silver run (1980, 2011, 2021) had the same narrative ✅ What IS legitimate (the real bull case) Industrial demand is real and growing — solar, EVs, AI, 5G, medical. Silver is consumed, not stored Physical markets are genuinely tight — Shanghai premiums are a real signal Long-term supply deficit — mines can't scale overnight; new supply takes years This supports gradual appreciation over years, not a sudden explosion 📊 His probability-weighted price scenarios Scenario Price range Probability COMEX delivery failure $150–$200+ 5–10% (he personally says ~0%) Managed squeeze $80–$120 30–40% (most likely stress outcome) Status quo / gradual rise $50–$80 35–40% (current base case) Deflationary shock / liquidation Sub-$50 10–15% ⚠️ Key risks he highlights COMEX can and will intervene — it's a private company (CME Group), rules can change mid-squeeze Higher prices trigger substitution — at $200/oz, industry researches alternatives (copper, graphene, etc.) Volatility cuts both ways — margin hikes in 2011 crashed silver from $50 → $33 in days "Follow the money" — always ask who benefits from the narrative being pushed
- ·1 päivä sittenIt was indeed quick that we fell back into the same trend: it rises when the East is open, and starts to fall sharply when the West begins to open up.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Xetra
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Omistukset
Päivitetty 25.3.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet99,3%
- Lyhyt korko0,7%