2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
59 päivää sitten43 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
7,15VWAP
Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
49,5 14 101 864
VWAP
Ylin
7,15Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
49,5 14 101 864
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 20.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 15.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 17.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 6.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·9 t sittenNew week...where will the T1 price go this week. I must say that I am very uncertain about how this will perform short-term, at least until the Q4 release late in February. There are so many macro events that overshadow most other things, but the market in the US is currently holding its ground. This with Trump tariffs will likely give short-term shocks also for T1 and PV sol in the US. But as discussed, the large heavy tariffs are on other categories...and here there are also opportunities to increase if Trump IEEPA is rejected....But, it is probably not unlikely that in the short term the solar industry will take a hit...if that were to happen..quoted......"Options if IEEPA is overturned Should the Supreme Court strike down the use of IEEPA for tariff imposition, the administration has several alternative statutory tools at its disposal: Section 232 (Trade Expansion Act 1962): Allows the President to impose tariffs on imports that threaten national security, following an investigation by the Department of Commerce. While effective for sector-specific actions, it cannot easily support broad, across-the-board tariffs. Section 301 (Trade Act 1974): Empowers the US Trade Representative to investigate and remedy unfair trade practices, including through tariffs. These actions are country-specific where there is evidence of trade violations, offering flexibility but not universal coverage. Section 338 (Tariff Act 1930): Enables the President to impose additional tariffs on imports from countries that discriminate against US commerce. Its lack of precedent makes it a risky but potentially powerful tool. Section 122 (Trade Act 1974): Allows for the imposition of temporary import surcharges or quotas to address serious trade deficits, subject to caps of 15% and 150 days. It could serve as an interim measure while longer investigations are conducted. Together, these authorities form a “plan B” for maintaining tariff leverage. The administration could deploy Section 232 for strategic sectors, use Section 301 to target specific countries and practices, explore Section 338 for counter-discrimination, and activate Section 122 for short-term coverage. However, none of these statutes permit the kind of sweeping, universal tariffs attempted under IEEPA.
·2 päivää sitten
·3 päivää sittenThere is a gap to close at $6.68 so I have placed an order there. However, there is also a gap at $5.42 so it's a bit tricky.- ·3 päivää sitten · Muokattu6.94..Anyone dare to invest a bit today, or can the decline continue further? Maybe I'll wait until tomorrow myself, have often had bad experiences on Fridays.....
- 7.1.7.1.First Solar The brokerage cut its rating to hold and set a $260 price target, saying the stock trades near peak multiples at about 8.8x 2026 EV to EBITDA, leaving limited upside given the policy and volume risks it sees ahead. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/first-solar-slides-10-jefferies-164340110.html·3 päivää sittenWasn't it that there were some cancellations behind First Solar's downgrade? Couldn't one see it as thin film losing ground?·2 päivää sittenwill spend the weekend reading up a bit on thin-film, am quite rusty on where silicon vs thin-film stands in 2025, especially regarding efficiency, price KW and LCOE. Thin-film is indeed cheaper per KW purchase, but has significantly lower efficiency and THEREFORE needs a much larger area to produce equivalent KWh...In addition, I believe thin-film has a significantly lower proven lifespan. But as many are probably aware, there are applications where thin-film is popular..large buildings...facades etc...thin-film can be bent and has geometric advantages....But as mentioned, I believe for solar parks on a WW basis, the score is approx 90% vs 10% for thin-film...
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
59 päivää sitten43 min
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenNew week...where will the T1 price go this week. I must say that I am very uncertain about how this will perform short-term, at least until the Q4 release late in February. There are so many macro events that overshadow most other things, but the market in the US is currently holding its ground. This with Trump tariffs will likely give short-term shocks also for T1 and PV sol in the US. But as discussed, the large heavy tariffs are on other categories...and here there are also opportunities to increase if Trump IEEPA is rejected....But, it is probably not unlikely that in the short term the solar industry will take a hit...if that were to happen..quoted......"Options if IEEPA is overturned Should the Supreme Court strike down the use of IEEPA for tariff imposition, the administration has several alternative statutory tools at its disposal: Section 232 (Trade Expansion Act 1962): Allows the President to impose tariffs on imports that threaten national security, following an investigation by the Department of Commerce. While effective for sector-specific actions, it cannot easily support broad, across-the-board tariffs. Section 301 (Trade Act 1974): Empowers the US Trade Representative to investigate and remedy unfair trade practices, including through tariffs. These actions are country-specific where there is evidence of trade violations, offering flexibility but not universal coverage. Section 338 (Tariff Act 1930): Enables the President to impose additional tariffs on imports from countries that discriminate against US commerce. Its lack of precedent makes it a risky but potentially powerful tool. Section 122 (Trade Act 1974): Allows for the imposition of temporary import surcharges or quotas to address serious trade deficits, subject to caps of 15% and 150 days. It could serve as an interim measure while longer investigations are conducted. Together, these authorities form a “plan B” for maintaining tariff leverage. The administration could deploy Section 232 for strategic sectors, use Section 301 to target specific countries and practices, explore Section 338 for counter-discrimination, and activate Section 122 for short-term coverage. However, none of these statutes permit the kind of sweeping, universal tariffs attempted under IEEPA.
- ·2 päivää sitten
- ·3 päivää sittenThere is a gap to close at $6.68 so I have placed an order there. However, there is also a gap at $5.42 so it's a bit tricky.
- ·3 päivää sitten · Muokattu6.94..Anyone dare to invest a bit today, or can the decline continue further? Maybe I'll wait until tomorrow myself, have often had bad experiences on Fridays.....
- 7.1.7.1.First Solar The brokerage cut its rating to hold and set a $260 price target, saying the stock trades near peak multiples at about 8.8x 2026 EV to EBITDA, leaving limited upside given the policy and volume risks it sees ahead. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/first-solar-slides-10-jefferies-164340110.html·3 päivää sittenWasn't it that there were some cancellations behind First Solar's downgrade? Couldn't one see it as thin film losing ground?·2 päivää sittenwill spend the weekend reading up a bit on thin-film, am quite rusty on where silicon vs thin-film stands in 2025, especially regarding efficiency, price KW and LCOE. Thin-film is indeed cheaper per KW purchase, but has significantly lower efficiency and THEREFORE needs a much larger area to produce equivalent KWh...In addition, I believe thin-film has a significantly lower proven lifespan. But as many are probably aware, there are applications where thin-film is popular..large buildings...facades etc...thin-film can be bent and has geometric advantages....But as mentioned, I believe for solar parks on a WW basis, the score is approx 90% vs 10% for thin-film...
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
7,15VWAP
Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
49,5 14 101 864
VWAP
Ylin
7,15Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
49,5 14 101 864
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 20.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 15.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 17.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 6.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
59 päivää sitten43 min
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 20.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 15.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 17.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 6.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenNew week...where will the T1 price go this week. I must say that I am very uncertain about how this will perform short-term, at least until the Q4 release late in February. There are so many macro events that overshadow most other things, but the market in the US is currently holding its ground. This with Trump tariffs will likely give short-term shocks also for T1 and PV sol in the US. But as discussed, the large heavy tariffs are on other categories...and here there are also opportunities to increase if Trump IEEPA is rejected....But, it is probably not unlikely that in the short term the solar industry will take a hit...if that were to happen..quoted......"Options if IEEPA is overturned Should the Supreme Court strike down the use of IEEPA for tariff imposition, the administration has several alternative statutory tools at its disposal: Section 232 (Trade Expansion Act 1962): Allows the President to impose tariffs on imports that threaten national security, following an investigation by the Department of Commerce. While effective for sector-specific actions, it cannot easily support broad, across-the-board tariffs. Section 301 (Trade Act 1974): Empowers the US Trade Representative to investigate and remedy unfair trade practices, including through tariffs. These actions are country-specific where there is evidence of trade violations, offering flexibility but not universal coverage. Section 338 (Tariff Act 1930): Enables the President to impose additional tariffs on imports from countries that discriminate against US commerce. Its lack of precedent makes it a risky but potentially powerful tool. Section 122 (Trade Act 1974): Allows for the imposition of temporary import surcharges or quotas to address serious trade deficits, subject to caps of 15% and 150 days. It could serve as an interim measure while longer investigations are conducted. Together, these authorities form a “plan B” for maintaining tariff leverage. The administration could deploy Section 232 for strategic sectors, use Section 301 to target specific countries and practices, explore Section 338 for counter-discrimination, and activate Section 122 for short-term coverage. However, none of these statutes permit the kind of sweeping, universal tariffs attempted under IEEPA.
- ·2 päivää sitten
- ·3 päivää sittenThere is a gap to close at $6.68 so I have placed an order there. However, there is also a gap at $5.42 so it's a bit tricky.
- ·3 päivää sitten · Muokattu6.94..Anyone dare to invest a bit today, or can the decline continue further? Maybe I'll wait until tomorrow myself, have often had bad experiences on Fridays.....
- 7.1.7.1.First Solar The brokerage cut its rating to hold and set a $260 price target, saying the stock trades near peak multiples at about 8.8x 2026 EV to EBITDA, leaving limited upside given the policy and volume risks it sees ahead. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/first-solar-slides-10-jefferies-164340110.html·3 päivää sittenWasn't it that there were some cancellations behind First Solar's downgrade? Couldn't one see it as thin film losing ground?·2 päivää sittenwill spend the weekend reading up a bit on thin-film, am quite rusty on where silicon vs thin-film stands in 2025, especially regarding efficiency, price KW and LCOE. Thin-film is indeed cheaper per KW purchase, but has significantly lower efficiency and THEREFORE needs a much larger area to produce equivalent KWh...In addition, I believe thin-film has a significantly lower proven lifespan. But as many are probably aware, there are applications where thin-film is popular..large buildings...facades etc...thin-film can be bent and has geometric advantages....But as mentioned, I believe for solar parks on a WW basis, the score is approx 90% vs 10% for thin-film...
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
7,15VWAP
Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
49,5 14 101 864
VWAP
Ylin
7,15Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
49,5 14 101 864
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt