Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
52 päivää sitten

Tarjoustasot

NorwayEuronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
25--
6 567--
9 900--
108--
1 500--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
14.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
5.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
5.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
8.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
18.2.2025

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Investornytt's "stock of the week" down 6.77% last week. It did go up quite a bit and touched 1.80 one day, before it limped down again. I think it was proof that these bullish articles by Teigland incredibly enough have their audience who buy a stock because it's highlighted as the stock of the week. When it ended up almost 7% down, it's just to conclude that Teigland was terribly wrong. But maybe he managed to sell the shares he owned to someone who had read his scribblings?
  • 22.3.
    ·
    22.3.
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    Espen Teigland had a good overview on X where he predicted the price of oil. One could follow his recommendations and earn a good amount of money. There are rumors that he earned 1.6 billion. A later article says he charged money to write this. Now he has written about green minerals. traded today ? 365 shares,,, so we'll let that lie for a bit,,
  • 17.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    17.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    What could this mean in relation to the strategic review that is currently underway?
    20.3.
    ·
    20.3.
    ·
    I have faith.. had it since they came out from SeaBird Exploration - a very beautiful day.. so it's stuck at the crossroads
  • 26.2.
    ·
    26.2.
    ·
    1 kr now..hope most who bought during the pumping of rocksolid get out..but it looks bleak. Recommend staying far away from rocksolid and his "expert recommendations"
    3.3.
    ·
    3.3.
    ·
    Just sitting and waiting for that one day a year it shoots up as it usually does. Flipped a lot of money on this stock.
    10.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    10.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    Risky. Might as well trade Crude now, it's worse than memecoins, but a lot to earn :)
  • 18.2.
    ·
    18.2.
    ·
    Strategic review can naturally take time (March/April is not unrealistic), and there is no guarantee for the outcome. Nevertheless, one can outline some realistic scenarios: ⸻ 1️⃣ CLEAR STRUCTURE WITH CAPITAL (STRONGEST SCENARIO) Content: • Named industrial partner • Concrete capital (e.g. USD 5–10m+) • Equity stake/JV structure • Possible offtake / work program Possible share price reaction: • +100–250 % • Potential price range: 2.5–4.5 kr • With a strong player, 5+ kr can be tested Duration: If capital and structure are robust → new higher base level. This is the truly price-driving outcome. ⸻ 2️⃣ BINDING LOI / TERM SHEET WITH FIGURES Content: • Signed letter of intent • Amount and structure outlined • Exclusivity / further process Possible share price reaction: • +60–150 % spike • Price range: 2–3.5 kr Risk: If not followed up by final agreement → re-pricing down again. ⸻ 3️⃣ STRATEGIC PARTNER WITHOUT CAPITAL Content: • Technology-/offshore player • Joint development agreement • No immediate investment Effect: • Moderate uplift • More sentiment-driven • Legitimizes the project, but does not change the fundamentals ⸻ 4️⃣ NON-DILUTIVE FINANCING Content: • Loan / grant / project financing • Extended runway Effect: • Removes short-term equity issue risk • Stabilizes price • Normally does not give explosive re-pricing ⸻ 5️⃣ REGULATORY BREAKTHROUGH (EXTERNAL) Content: • USA grants first commercial permit • Norwegian process resumes Effect: • Sector validation • Increased option value • Indirect price driver ⸻ 6️⃣ REVIEW CONCLUDES WITHOUT STRUCTURE Possible share price reaction: • -30–60 % • Price below 1 kr cannot be ruled out ⸻ Summary: Only scenario 1 fundamentally changes the valuation. The other scenarios can provide temporary uplifts, stabilization – or in the worst case, negative re-pricing.
    19.2. · Muokattu
    ·
    19.2. · Muokattu
    ·
    AI-slop! Completely useless and a big red flag. This is too sloppy even for you.. And by all means mark it as AI-generated. I can spam the comment section with negative AI-slop too, but it's worthless..
    20.2.
    ·
    20.2.
    ·
    The fact that AI might have been used to write this does not therefore make it wrong. The 6 scenarios are indeed some very probable scenarios that are described here. And are there really any major errors or improbabilities in any of these scenarios?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
52 päivää sitten

Uutiset

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Investornytt's "stock of the week" down 6.77% last week. It did go up quite a bit and touched 1.80 one day, before it limped down again. I think it was proof that these bullish articles by Teigland incredibly enough have their audience who buy a stock because it's highlighted as the stock of the week. When it ended up almost 7% down, it's just to conclude that Teigland was terribly wrong. But maybe he managed to sell the shares he owned to someone who had read his scribblings?
  • 22.3.
    ·
    22.3.
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    Espen Teigland had a good overview on X where he predicted the price of oil. One could follow his recommendations and earn a good amount of money. There are rumors that he earned 1.6 billion. A later article says he charged money to write this. Now he has written about green minerals. traded today ? 365 shares,,, so we'll let that lie for a bit,,
  • 17.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    17.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    What could this mean in relation to the strategic review that is currently underway?
    20.3.
    ·
    20.3.
    ·
    I have faith.. had it since they came out from SeaBird Exploration - a very beautiful day.. so it's stuck at the crossroads
  • 26.2.
    ·
    26.2.
    ·
    1 kr now..hope most who bought during the pumping of rocksolid get out..but it looks bleak. Recommend staying far away from rocksolid and his "expert recommendations"
    3.3.
    ·
    3.3.
    ·
    Just sitting and waiting for that one day a year it shoots up as it usually does. Flipped a lot of money on this stock.
    10.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    10.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    Risky. Might as well trade Crude now, it's worse than memecoins, but a lot to earn :)
  • 18.2.
    ·
    18.2.
    ·
    Strategic review can naturally take time (March/April is not unrealistic), and there is no guarantee for the outcome. Nevertheless, one can outline some realistic scenarios: ⸻ 1️⃣ CLEAR STRUCTURE WITH CAPITAL (STRONGEST SCENARIO) Content: • Named industrial partner • Concrete capital (e.g. USD 5–10m+) • Equity stake/JV structure • Possible offtake / work program Possible share price reaction: • +100–250 % • Potential price range: 2.5–4.5 kr • With a strong player, 5+ kr can be tested Duration: If capital and structure are robust → new higher base level. This is the truly price-driving outcome. ⸻ 2️⃣ BINDING LOI / TERM SHEET WITH FIGURES Content: • Signed letter of intent • Amount and structure outlined • Exclusivity / further process Possible share price reaction: • +60–150 % spike • Price range: 2–3.5 kr Risk: If not followed up by final agreement → re-pricing down again. ⸻ 3️⃣ STRATEGIC PARTNER WITHOUT CAPITAL Content: • Technology-/offshore player • Joint development agreement • No immediate investment Effect: • Moderate uplift • More sentiment-driven • Legitimizes the project, but does not change the fundamentals ⸻ 4️⃣ NON-DILUTIVE FINANCING Content: • Loan / grant / project financing • Extended runway Effect: • Removes short-term equity issue risk • Stabilizes price • Normally does not give explosive re-pricing ⸻ 5️⃣ REGULATORY BREAKTHROUGH (EXTERNAL) Content: • USA grants first commercial permit • Norwegian process resumes Effect: • Sector validation • Increased option value • Indirect price driver ⸻ 6️⃣ REVIEW CONCLUDES WITHOUT STRUCTURE Possible share price reaction: • -30–60 % • Price below 1 kr cannot be ruled out ⸻ Summary: Only scenario 1 fundamentally changes the valuation. The other scenarios can provide temporary uplifts, stabilization – or in the worst case, negative re-pricing.
    19.2. · Muokattu
    ·
    19.2. · Muokattu
    ·
    AI-slop! Completely useless and a big red flag. This is too sloppy even for you.. And by all means mark it as AI-generated. I can spam the comment section with negative AI-slop too, but it's worthless..
    20.2.
    ·
    20.2.
    ·
    The fact that AI might have been used to write this does not therefore make it wrong. The 6 scenarios are indeed some very probable scenarios that are described here. And are there really any major errors or improbabilities in any of these scenarios?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

NorwayEuronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
25--
6 567--
9 900--
108--
1 500--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
14.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
5.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
5.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
8.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
18.2.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
52 päivää sitten

Uutiset

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
14.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
5.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
5.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
8.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
18.2.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Investornytt's "stock of the week" down 6.77% last week. It did go up quite a bit and touched 1.80 one day, before it limped down again. I think it was proof that these bullish articles by Teigland incredibly enough have their audience who buy a stock because it's highlighted as the stock of the week. When it ended up almost 7% down, it's just to conclude that Teigland was terribly wrong. But maybe he managed to sell the shares he owned to someone who had read his scribblings?
  • 22.3.
    ·
    22.3.
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    Espen Teigland had a good overview on X where he predicted the price of oil. One could follow his recommendations and earn a good amount of money. There are rumors that he earned 1.6 billion. A later article says he charged money to write this. Now he has written about green minerals. traded today ? 365 shares,,, so we'll let that lie for a bit,,
  • 17.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    17.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    What could this mean in relation to the strategic review that is currently underway?
    20.3.
    ·
    20.3.
    ·
    I have faith.. had it since they came out from SeaBird Exploration - a very beautiful day.. so it's stuck at the crossroads
  • 26.2.
    ·
    26.2.
    ·
    1 kr now..hope most who bought during the pumping of rocksolid get out..but it looks bleak. Recommend staying far away from rocksolid and his "expert recommendations"
    3.3.
    ·
    3.3.
    ·
    Just sitting and waiting for that one day a year it shoots up as it usually does. Flipped a lot of money on this stock.
    10.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    10.3. · Muokattu
    ·
    Risky. Might as well trade Crude now, it's worse than memecoins, but a lot to earn :)
  • 18.2.
    ·
    18.2.
    ·
    Strategic review can naturally take time (March/April is not unrealistic), and there is no guarantee for the outcome. Nevertheless, one can outline some realistic scenarios: ⸻ 1️⃣ CLEAR STRUCTURE WITH CAPITAL (STRONGEST SCENARIO) Content: • Named industrial partner • Concrete capital (e.g. USD 5–10m+) • Equity stake/JV structure • Possible offtake / work program Possible share price reaction: • +100–250 % • Potential price range: 2.5–4.5 kr • With a strong player, 5+ kr can be tested Duration: If capital and structure are robust → new higher base level. This is the truly price-driving outcome. ⸻ 2️⃣ BINDING LOI / TERM SHEET WITH FIGURES Content: • Signed letter of intent • Amount and structure outlined • Exclusivity / further process Possible share price reaction: • +60–150 % spike • Price range: 2–3.5 kr Risk: If not followed up by final agreement → re-pricing down again. ⸻ 3️⃣ STRATEGIC PARTNER WITHOUT CAPITAL Content: • Technology-/offshore player • Joint development agreement • No immediate investment Effect: • Moderate uplift • More sentiment-driven • Legitimizes the project, but does not change the fundamentals ⸻ 4️⃣ NON-DILUTIVE FINANCING Content: • Loan / grant / project financing • Extended runway Effect: • Removes short-term equity issue risk • Stabilizes price • Normally does not give explosive re-pricing ⸻ 5️⃣ REGULATORY BREAKTHROUGH (EXTERNAL) Content: • USA grants first commercial permit • Norwegian process resumes Effect: • Sector validation • Increased option value • Indirect price driver ⸻ 6️⃣ REVIEW CONCLUDES WITHOUT STRUCTURE Possible share price reaction: • -30–60 % • Price below 1 kr cannot be ruled out ⸻ Summary: Only scenario 1 fundamentally changes the valuation. The other scenarios can provide temporary uplifts, stabilization – or in the worst case, negative re-pricing.
    19.2. · Muokattu
    ·
    19.2. · Muokattu
    ·
    AI-slop! Completely useless and a big red flag. This is too sloppy even for you.. And by all means mark it as AI-generated. I can spam the comment section with negative AI-slop too, but it's worthless..
    20.2.
    ·
    20.2.
    ·
    The fact that AI might have been used to write this does not therefore make it wrong. The 6 scenarios are indeed some very probable scenarios that are described here. And are there really any major errors or improbabilities in any of these scenarios?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

NorwayEuronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
25--
6 567--
9 900--
108--
1 500--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt
© 2026 Nordnet Bank AB.
Nordnet | Alvar Aallon katu 5 C, 3. krs | FI-00100 Helsinki