2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
36 päivää sittenTarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
500
Myynti
Määrä
15 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 999 | - | - | ||
| 1 000 | - | - | ||
| 1 065 | - | - | ||
| 1 129 | - | - |
Ylin
1,69VWAP
Alin
1,395VaihtoMäärä
0,7 476 424
VWAP
Ylin
1,69Alin
1,395VaihtoMäärä
0,7 476 424
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 7.8. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 8.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 18.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 7.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·3 t sittenOne thing is certain and that is that today's announcement means that GEM is entering a more active phase, and that in itself will trigger more updates to the market.
6 t sitten6 t sitteni suppose this means the potential is very big?
·7 t sittenThe company has now taken the politicians' approach into account, and is making a decision to shift focus away from Norway. Bad news for Norway, but very good for the company.·7 t sitten · MuokattuYes, a pity for little Norway. Fortunately, there are opportunities elsewhere. What is important is that it is now clarified that Norway is shelved, and that Global expansion/ CCZ is the primary strategy going forward. A little about what Schjødt is: Schjødt is Norway's heaviest player in M&A, energy and transactions Schjødt is used when a company: -is to carry out strategic transactions -considers merger / acquisition / sale - enters into international license agreements - handles complex mineral and energy processes - is to enter into heavier negotiations In other words: One does not use Schjødt for small matters.
·7 t sittenHaha, do you say so? My AI model is set up super strictly precisely to avoid pleasing. The problem here is not objectivity, but that you are hyping a case that is now fundamentally weakened. The crypto nonsense you fronted earlier is not mentioned with a single word in today's announcement. The announcement describes the clearly worst situation the company has been in. The main strategy in Norway is blocked, international direction lacks agreements, and the capital requirement increases. When the volume dries up, the best-case scenario is an emergency share issue. Those are the realities.- ·8 t sitten• The company itself states that Norway as a main strategy is practically blocked indefinitely. This is not a voluntary change, but a consequence of political risk that renders the original business model unusable. • The CCZ agreement is only an MoU and depends on ISA regulations that still do not exist. No timeline has been given, and no financial key figures or capital requirements have been mentioned. • That the board has to start a strategic review a few years after listing means that the foundation is weaker than assumed. Such processes often end in dilution, partner search due to lack of capital, or in the worst case, sale of individual assets. • «Runway» is not documented. Cash balance, burn, or financing plan are not mentioned. • The signal to the market is that the company no longer has a clear path to revenue or regulatory approval in its home market. In short: This is not an offensive initiative, but a sign that the company is being forced out of Norway and does not yet have a mature alternative plan. A lot needs to fall into place before this can be interpreted as bullish.·7 t sittenYou must surely be the 2 biggest clowns on the forum. I'm out of words...·6 t sittenHaha, I'm well in profit in GEM, but traded it since the start due to the clear development. Now the sentiment is clearly negative, and I'm therefore completely on the sidelines. If something fundamental changes or improves, it can change, but your nonsense is far from convincing unfortunately.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
36 päivää sittenUutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 t sittenOne thing is certain and that is that today's announcement means that GEM is entering a more active phase, and that in itself will trigger more updates to the market.
- 6 t sitten6 t sitteni suppose this means the potential is very big?
- ·7 t sittenThe company has now taken the politicians' approach into account, and is making a decision to shift focus away from Norway. Bad news for Norway, but very good for the company.·7 t sitten · MuokattuYes, a pity for little Norway. Fortunately, there are opportunities elsewhere. What is important is that it is now clarified that Norway is shelved, and that Global expansion/ CCZ is the primary strategy going forward. A little about what Schjødt is: Schjødt is Norway's heaviest player in M&A, energy and transactions Schjødt is used when a company: -is to carry out strategic transactions -considers merger / acquisition / sale - enters into international license agreements - handles complex mineral and energy processes - is to enter into heavier negotiations In other words: One does not use Schjødt for small matters.·7 t sittenHaha, do you say so? My AI model is set up super strictly precisely to avoid pleasing. The problem here is not objectivity, but that you are hyping a case that is now fundamentally weakened. The crypto nonsense you fronted earlier is not mentioned with a single word in today's announcement. The announcement describes the clearly worst situation the company has been in. The main strategy in Norway is blocked, international direction lacks agreements, and the capital requirement increases. When the volume dries up, the best-case scenario is an emergency share issue. Those are the realities.
- ·8 t sitten• The company itself states that Norway as a main strategy is practically blocked indefinitely. This is not a voluntary change, but a consequence of political risk that renders the original business model unusable. • The CCZ agreement is only an MoU and depends on ISA regulations that still do not exist. No timeline has been given, and no financial key figures or capital requirements have been mentioned. • That the board has to start a strategic review a few years after listing means that the foundation is weaker than assumed. Such processes often end in dilution, partner search due to lack of capital, or in the worst case, sale of individual assets. • «Runway» is not documented. Cash balance, burn, or financing plan are not mentioned. • The signal to the market is that the company no longer has a clear path to revenue or regulatory approval in its home market. In short: This is not an offensive initiative, but a sign that the company is being forced out of Norway and does not yet have a mature alternative plan. A lot needs to fall into place before this can be interpreted as bullish.·7 t sittenYou must surely be the 2 biggest clowns on the forum. I'm out of words...·6 t sittenHaha, I'm well in profit in GEM, but traded it since the start due to the clear development. Now the sentiment is clearly negative, and I'm therefore completely on the sidelines. If something fundamental changes or improves, it can change, but your nonsense is far from convincing unfortunately.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
500
Myynti
Määrä
15 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 999 | - | - | ||
| 1 000 | - | - | ||
| 1 065 | - | - | ||
| 1 129 | - | - |
Ylin
1,69VWAP
Alin
1,395VaihtoMäärä
0,7 476 424
VWAP
Ylin
1,69Alin
1,395VaihtoMäärä
0,7 476 424
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 7.8. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 8.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 18.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 7.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
36 päivää sittenUutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 7.8. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 8.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 18.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 7.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 t sittenOne thing is certain and that is that today's announcement means that GEM is entering a more active phase, and that in itself will trigger more updates to the market.
- 6 t sitten6 t sitteni suppose this means the potential is very big?
- ·7 t sittenThe company has now taken the politicians' approach into account, and is making a decision to shift focus away from Norway. Bad news for Norway, but very good for the company.·7 t sitten · MuokattuYes, a pity for little Norway. Fortunately, there are opportunities elsewhere. What is important is that it is now clarified that Norway is shelved, and that Global expansion/ CCZ is the primary strategy going forward. A little about what Schjødt is: Schjødt is Norway's heaviest player in M&A, energy and transactions Schjødt is used when a company: -is to carry out strategic transactions -considers merger / acquisition / sale - enters into international license agreements - handles complex mineral and energy processes - is to enter into heavier negotiations In other words: One does not use Schjødt for small matters.·7 t sittenHaha, do you say so? My AI model is set up super strictly precisely to avoid pleasing. The problem here is not objectivity, but that you are hyping a case that is now fundamentally weakened. The crypto nonsense you fronted earlier is not mentioned with a single word in today's announcement. The announcement describes the clearly worst situation the company has been in. The main strategy in Norway is blocked, international direction lacks agreements, and the capital requirement increases. When the volume dries up, the best-case scenario is an emergency share issue. Those are the realities.
- ·8 t sitten• The company itself states that Norway as a main strategy is practically blocked indefinitely. This is not a voluntary change, but a consequence of political risk that renders the original business model unusable. • The CCZ agreement is only an MoU and depends on ISA regulations that still do not exist. No timeline has been given, and no financial key figures or capital requirements have been mentioned. • That the board has to start a strategic review a few years after listing means that the foundation is weaker than assumed. Such processes often end in dilution, partner search due to lack of capital, or in the worst case, sale of individual assets. • «Runway» is not documented. Cash balance, burn, or financing plan are not mentioned. • The signal to the market is that the company no longer has a clear path to revenue or regulatory approval in its home market. In short: This is not an offensive initiative, but a sign that the company is being forced out of Norway and does not yet have a mature alternative plan. A lot needs to fall into place before this can be interpreted as bullish.·7 t sittenYou must surely be the 2 biggest clowns on the forum. I'm out of words...·6 t sittenHaha, I'm well in profit in GEM, but traded it since the start due to the clear development. Now the sentiment is clearly negative, and I'm therefore completely on the sidelines. If something fundamental changes or improves, it can change, but your nonsense is far from convincing unfortunately.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
500
Myynti
Määrä
15 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 999 | - | - | ||
| 1 000 | - | - | ||
| 1 065 | - | - | ||
| 1 129 | - | - |
Ylin
1,69VWAP
Alin
1,395VaihtoMäärä
0,7 476 424
VWAP
Ylin
1,69Alin
1,395VaihtoMäärä
0,7 476 424
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt