2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
49 päivää sitten
‧42 min
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 329 | - | - | ||
| 1 471 | - | - | ||
| 529 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 7.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·22.3.Stock of the Week https://www.investornytt.no/bors/kampen-om-naturressursene/525377
·2 t sittenEspen Teigland had a good overview on X where he predicted the price of oil. One could follow his recommendations and earn a good amount of money. There are rumors that he earned 1.6 billion. A later article says he charged money to write this. Now he has written about green minerals. traded today ? 365 shares,,, so we'll let that lie for a bit,,
·26.2.1 kr now..hope most who bought during the pumping of rocksolid get out..but it looks bleak. Recommend staying far away from rocksolid and his "expert recommendations"
·18.2.Strategic review can naturally take time (March/April is not unrealistic), and there is no guarantee for the outcome. Nevertheless, one can outline some realistic scenarios: ⸻ 1️⃣ CLEAR STRUCTURE WITH CAPITAL (STRONGEST SCENARIO) Content: • Named industrial partner • Concrete capital (e.g. USD 5–10m+) • Equity stake/JV structure • Possible offtake / work program Possible share price reaction: • +100–250 % • Potential price range: 2.5–4.5 kr • With a strong player, 5+ kr can be tested Duration: If capital and structure are robust → new higher base level. This is the truly price-driving outcome. ⸻ 2️⃣ BINDING LOI / TERM SHEET WITH FIGURES Content: • Signed letter of intent • Amount and structure outlined • Exclusivity / further process Possible share price reaction: • +60–150 % spike • Price range: 2–3.5 kr Risk: If not followed up by final agreement → re-pricing down again. ⸻ 3️⃣ STRATEGIC PARTNER WITHOUT CAPITAL Content: • Technology-/offshore player • Joint development agreement • No immediate investment Effect: • Moderate uplift • More sentiment-driven • Legitimizes the project, but does not change the fundamentals ⸻ 4️⃣ NON-DILUTIVE FINANCING Content: • Loan / grant / project financing • Extended runway Effect: • Removes short-term equity issue risk • Stabilizes price • Normally does not give explosive re-pricing ⸻ 5️⃣ REGULATORY BREAKTHROUGH (EXTERNAL) Content: • USA grants first commercial permit • Norwegian process resumes Effect: • Sector validation • Increased option value • Indirect price driver ⸻ 6️⃣ REVIEW CONCLUDES WITHOUT STRUCTURE Possible share price reaction: • -30–60 % • Price below 1 kr cannot be ruled out ⸻ Summary: Only scenario 1 fundamentally changes the valuation. The other scenarios can provide temporary uplifts, stabilization – or in the worst case, negative re-pricing.
·19.2. · MuokattuAI-slop! Completely useless and a big red flag. This is too sloppy even for you.. And by all means mark it as AI-generated. I can spam the comment section with negative AI-slop too, but it's worthless..
·20.2.The fact that AI might have been used to write this does not therefore make it wrong. The 6 scenarios are indeed some very probable scenarios that are described here. And are there really any major errors or improbabilities in any of these scenarios?- ·11.2. · MuokattuChairman of the Board Ståle Rodahl mentioned TMC's application in the audiocast on 05.02. https://investors.metals.co/news-releases/news-release-details/tmc-usa-files-first-consolidated-deep-seabed-mining-application/ Important development in the sector: The Metals Company has now submitted the first consolidated application to NOAA for both exploration license and commercial recovery in CCZ, under new American regulations. This is important for Green Minerals AS for one reason: It confirms that deep-sea mining actually has a regulatory track that is moving forward – instead of being politically dead. For GEM it means: Sector risk is reduced The industry gains increased legitimacy Partner dialogue becomes more rational The option value in CCZ becomes more credible This does not grant a license tomorrow – but it reduces the zero-scenario. In an option case, this is essential.·9.3. · MuokattuNews today https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/noaa-finds-tmcs-deep-seabed-mining-application-in-compliance-93CH-4549690 This is actually one of the most important news in deep-sea mining for a long time, and it is relevant for the sector where Green Minerals AS operates. The main player here is The Metals Company Inc. which is seeking permission from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Let's break down what this actually means. ⸻ 🔎 What NOAA has actually said NOAA has not granted permission for mining yet. They have said that the application is: “in substantial compliance with regulatory requirements.” That means: ✔ The application meets formal requirements ✔ It can proceed in the processing ✔ It will not be rejected This is an important milestone in the regulatory process. This is: the first application under the USA's new “fast track”-regime after Trump's executive order on offshore minerals. In practice, this means: The USA is trying to be the first country to open deep-sea mining commercially. ⸻ 📈 What it means for the sector If TMC gets a permit in 2026: • the entire sector will be validated • investors get regulatory clarity • capital flows in This can lead to repricing in many deep-sea companies. ⸻ 🔗 Why this is also relevant for GEM For Green Minerals AS this is indirectly important because: 1️⃣ it shows that extraction can actually be permitted 2️⃣ it reduces regulatory risk globally 3️⃣ it makes partnerships more realistic If the USA opens first, more players will try to position themselves. ⸻ 💡 Interesting detail TMC is applying for: 65 000 km² with 619 million tons of nodules (+ potentially 200 million tons extra). This shows how enormous the resources in CCZ are.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
49 päivää sitten
‧42 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·22.3.Stock of the Week https://www.investornytt.no/bors/kampen-om-naturressursene/525377·2 t sittenEspen Teigland had a good overview on X where he predicted the price of oil. One could follow his recommendations and earn a good amount of money. There are rumors that he earned 1.6 billion. A later article says he charged money to write this. Now he has written about green minerals. traded today ? 365 shares,,, so we'll let that lie for a bit,,
- ·26.2.1 kr now..hope most who bought during the pumping of rocksolid get out..but it looks bleak. Recommend staying far away from rocksolid and his "expert recommendations"
- ·18.2.Strategic review can naturally take time (March/April is not unrealistic), and there is no guarantee for the outcome. Nevertheless, one can outline some realistic scenarios: ⸻ 1️⃣ CLEAR STRUCTURE WITH CAPITAL (STRONGEST SCENARIO) Content: • Named industrial partner • Concrete capital (e.g. USD 5–10m+) • Equity stake/JV structure • Possible offtake / work program Possible share price reaction: • +100–250 % • Potential price range: 2.5–4.5 kr • With a strong player, 5+ kr can be tested Duration: If capital and structure are robust → new higher base level. This is the truly price-driving outcome. ⸻ 2️⃣ BINDING LOI / TERM SHEET WITH FIGURES Content: • Signed letter of intent • Amount and structure outlined • Exclusivity / further process Possible share price reaction: • +60–150 % spike • Price range: 2–3.5 kr Risk: If not followed up by final agreement → re-pricing down again. ⸻ 3️⃣ STRATEGIC PARTNER WITHOUT CAPITAL Content: • Technology-/offshore player • Joint development agreement • No immediate investment Effect: • Moderate uplift • More sentiment-driven • Legitimizes the project, but does not change the fundamentals ⸻ 4️⃣ NON-DILUTIVE FINANCING Content: • Loan / grant / project financing • Extended runway Effect: • Removes short-term equity issue risk • Stabilizes price • Normally does not give explosive re-pricing ⸻ 5️⃣ REGULATORY BREAKTHROUGH (EXTERNAL) Content: • USA grants first commercial permit • Norwegian process resumes Effect: • Sector validation • Increased option value • Indirect price driver ⸻ 6️⃣ REVIEW CONCLUDES WITHOUT STRUCTURE Possible share price reaction: • -30–60 % • Price below 1 kr cannot be ruled out ⸻ Summary: Only scenario 1 fundamentally changes the valuation. The other scenarios can provide temporary uplifts, stabilization – or in the worst case, negative re-pricing.·19.2. · MuokattuAI-slop! Completely useless and a big red flag. This is too sloppy even for you.. And by all means mark it as AI-generated. I can spam the comment section with negative AI-slop too, but it's worthless..·20.2.The fact that AI might have been used to write this does not therefore make it wrong. The 6 scenarios are indeed some very probable scenarios that are described here. And are there really any major errors or improbabilities in any of these scenarios?
- ·11.2. · MuokattuChairman of the Board Ståle Rodahl mentioned TMC's application in the audiocast on 05.02. https://investors.metals.co/news-releases/news-release-details/tmc-usa-files-first-consolidated-deep-seabed-mining-application/ Important development in the sector: The Metals Company has now submitted the first consolidated application to NOAA for both exploration license and commercial recovery in CCZ, under new American regulations. This is important for Green Minerals AS for one reason: It confirms that deep-sea mining actually has a regulatory track that is moving forward – instead of being politically dead. For GEM it means: Sector risk is reduced The industry gains increased legitimacy Partner dialogue becomes more rational The option value in CCZ becomes more credible This does not grant a license tomorrow – but it reduces the zero-scenario. In an option case, this is essential.·9.3. · MuokattuNews today https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/noaa-finds-tmcs-deep-seabed-mining-application-in-compliance-93CH-4549690 This is actually one of the most important news in deep-sea mining for a long time, and it is relevant for the sector where Green Minerals AS operates. The main player here is The Metals Company Inc. which is seeking permission from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Let's break down what this actually means. ⸻ 🔎 What NOAA has actually said NOAA has not granted permission for mining yet. They have said that the application is: “in substantial compliance with regulatory requirements.” That means: ✔ The application meets formal requirements ✔ It can proceed in the processing ✔ It will not be rejected This is an important milestone in the regulatory process. This is: the first application under the USA's new “fast track”-regime after Trump's executive order on offshore minerals. In practice, this means: The USA is trying to be the first country to open deep-sea mining commercially. ⸻ 📈 What it means for the sector If TMC gets a permit in 2026: • the entire sector will be validated • investors get regulatory clarity • capital flows in This can lead to repricing in many deep-sea companies. ⸻ 🔗 Why this is also relevant for GEM For Green Minerals AS this is indirectly important because: 1️⃣ it shows that extraction can actually be permitted 2️⃣ it reduces regulatory risk globally 3️⃣ it makes partnerships more realistic If the USA opens first, more players will try to position themselves. ⸻ 💡 Interesting detail TMC is applying for: 65 000 km² with 619 million tons of nodules (+ potentially 200 million tons extra). This shows how enormous the resources in CCZ are.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 329 | - | - | ||
| 1 471 | - | - | ||
| 529 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 7.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
49 päivää sitten
‧42 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 7.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 18.2.2025 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·22.3.Stock of the Week https://www.investornytt.no/bors/kampen-om-naturressursene/525377·2 t sittenEspen Teigland had a good overview on X where he predicted the price of oil. One could follow his recommendations and earn a good amount of money. There are rumors that he earned 1.6 billion. A later article says he charged money to write this. Now he has written about green minerals. traded today ? 365 shares,,, so we'll let that lie for a bit,,
- ·26.2.1 kr now..hope most who bought during the pumping of rocksolid get out..but it looks bleak. Recommend staying far away from rocksolid and his "expert recommendations"
- ·18.2.Strategic review can naturally take time (March/April is not unrealistic), and there is no guarantee for the outcome. Nevertheless, one can outline some realistic scenarios: ⸻ 1️⃣ CLEAR STRUCTURE WITH CAPITAL (STRONGEST SCENARIO) Content: • Named industrial partner • Concrete capital (e.g. USD 5–10m+) • Equity stake/JV structure • Possible offtake / work program Possible share price reaction: • +100–250 % • Potential price range: 2.5–4.5 kr • With a strong player, 5+ kr can be tested Duration: If capital and structure are robust → new higher base level. This is the truly price-driving outcome. ⸻ 2️⃣ BINDING LOI / TERM SHEET WITH FIGURES Content: • Signed letter of intent • Amount and structure outlined • Exclusivity / further process Possible share price reaction: • +60–150 % spike • Price range: 2–3.5 kr Risk: If not followed up by final agreement → re-pricing down again. ⸻ 3️⃣ STRATEGIC PARTNER WITHOUT CAPITAL Content: • Technology-/offshore player • Joint development agreement • No immediate investment Effect: • Moderate uplift • More sentiment-driven • Legitimizes the project, but does not change the fundamentals ⸻ 4️⃣ NON-DILUTIVE FINANCING Content: • Loan / grant / project financing • Extended runway Effect: • Removes short-term equity issue risk • Stabilizes price • Normally does not give explosive re-pricing ⸻ 5️⃣ REGULATORY BREAKTHROUGH (EXTERNAL) Content: • USA grants first commercial permit • Norwegian process resumes Effect: • Sector validation • Increased option value • Indirect price driver ⸻ 6️⃣ REVIEW CONCLUDES WITHOUT STRUCTURE Possible share price reaction: • -30–60 % • Price below 1 kr cannot be ruled out ⸻ Summary: Only scenario 1 fundamentally changes the valuation. The other scenarios can provide temporary uplifts, stabilization – or in the worst case, negative re-pricing.·19.2. · MuokattuAI-slop! Completely useless and a big red flag. This is too sloppy even for you.. And by all means mark it as AI-generated. I can spam the comment section with negative AI-slop too, but it's worthless..·20.2.The fact that AI might have been used to write this does not therefore make it wrong. The 6 scenarios are indeed some very probable scenarios that are described here. And are there really any major errors or improbabilities in any of these scenarios?
- ·11.2. · MuokattuChairman of the Board Ståle Rodahl mentioned TMC's application in the audiocast on 05.02. https://investors.metals.co/news-releases/news-release-details/tmc-usa-files-first-consolidated-deep-seabed-mining-application/ Important development in the sector: The Metals Company has now submitted the first consolidated application to NOAA for both exploration license and commercial recovery in CCZ, under new American regulations. This is important for Green Minerals AS for one reason: It confirms that deep-sea mining actually has a regulatory track that is moving forward – instead of being politically dead. For GEM it means: Sector risk is reduced The industry gains increased legitimacy Partner dialogue becomes more rational The option value in CCZ becomes more credible This does not grant a license tomorrow – but it reduces the zero-scenario. In an option case, this is essential.·9.3. · MuokattuNews today https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/noaa-finds-tmcs-deep-seabed-mining-application-in-compliance-93CH-4549690 This is actually one of the most important news in deep-sea mining for a long time, and it is relevant for the sector where Green Minerals AS operates. The main player here is The Metals Company Inc. which is seeking permission from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Let's break down what this actually means. ⸻ 🔎 What NOAA has actually said NOAA has not granted permission for mining yet. They have said that the application is: “in substantial compliance with regulatory requirements.” That means: ✔ The application meets formal requirements ✔ It can proceed in the processing ✔ It will not be rejected This is an important milestone in the regulatory process. This is: the first application under the USA's new “fast track”-regime after Trump's executive order on offshore minerals. In practice, this means: The USA is trying to be the first country to open deep-sea mining commercially. ⸻ 📈 What it means for the sector If TMC gets a permit in 2026: • the entire sector will be validated • investors get regulatory clarity • capital flows in This can lead to repricing in many deep-sea companies. ⸻ 🔗 Why this is also relevant for GEM For Green Minerals AS this is indirectly important because: 1️⃣ it shows that extraction can actually be permitted 2️⃣ it reduces regulatory risk globally 3️⃣ it makes partnerships more realistic If the USA opens first, more players will try to position themselves. ⸻ 💡 Interesting detail TMC is applying for: 65 000 km² with 619 million tons of nodules (+ potentially 200 million tons extra). This shows how enormous the resources in CCZ are.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 329 | - | - | ||
| 1 471 | - | - | ||
| 529 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt