2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
76 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 581 | - | - | ||
| 2 680 | - | - | ||
| 200 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 3 870 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·4 t sitten · MuokattuPersonally, I have not previously been "on the inside" of such a heavily shorted stock. Therefore, I did a Copilot search for similar past events on the Oslo Stock Exchange related to the upcoming OGF (29 days). I found the result somewhat interesting. It seems that all the situations listed have ended with more or less "action". **********************************************************************' Historical comparable cases – Oslo Stock Exchange 1. **Kahoot! (2020–2021)** **Short interest:** ~15–22 % (periodically) **Event:** Capital raising, strategic owners, GM / EGM **Liquidity:** Moderate before the rally What happened? * Several rounds of **high shorting into defined events** * Positive news flow + increasing institutional interest * **Short covering first gradual, then accelerating** Price response * Several **30–50 % movements in weeks** * Strong daily movements on relatively low volume 📌 Learning: When short >15 % and the stock starts to rise *before* the event → short loses control quickly. 2. **NEL ASA (2019–2020)** **Short interest:** 10–18 % **Event:** Contracts, sector momentum, capital markets days **Liquidity:** High – but the short is large What happened? * Short positions built on "overpricing" * Event-driven news flow made it impossible to stay short * Covering happened **in waves** Price response * Rapid doubling from local bottoms * Typical pattern: * sideways * sudden breakout * **short-driven momentum** 📌 Learning: Even in liquid stocks, collective shorting can face structural problems due to event risk. 3. **REC Silicon (2020–2021)** **Short interest:** >20 % at its highest **Event:** Negotiations, strategic uncertainty, possible turn-around **Liquidity:** Low–moderate What happened? * Short built on rational fundamental thesis * Small positive signals → **unexpected covering** * Very little supply of shares on the upside Price response * Extreme movements: * +100 % in a short time * Several days with "no sellers" 📌 Learning: When **free float is small and short is large**, the market loses price discovery control. 4. **Borr Drilling (several periods 2019–2022)** **Short interest:** 10–18 % **Event:** Refinancing, debt clarifications, GM/EGM **Liquidity:** Moderate What happened? * The short was correct in the long term * **Event risk** forced covering in the short term * Short was "right, but too early" Price response * 25–40 % up in a few weeks * Then new shorting at a higher level 📌 **Learning:** Shorts may be fundamentally right – but **event risk always wins in the short term**. 5. **ArcticZymes (2020)** **Short interest:** ~15 % **Event:** Positive signals / inefficient information **Liquidity:** Low Price response * Abrupt price doubling * Short almost completely disappeared 📌 **Learning:** In small/mid-cap OSE stocks, **20 % short is extremely much**. *** Comparison against **Link Mobility – today's situation** | Factor | Historical squeezes | Link Mobility | | ---------------- | --------------- | ----------------------- | | Short interest | 15–25 % | **>20 %** ✅ | | Liquidity | Low–moderate | **Moderate** ✅ | | Defined event | GM / EGM / news | **GM in 29 days** ✅ | | Buyback / capital return | Often a trigger | **Ongoing buyback** ✅ | Institutional ownership | Concentrated | **Very concentrated** ✅ | 🔴 **Important point:** In several of the cases above, the short was **lower than in Link** and still enough for strong movements. What history suggests for Link Mobility Based on Oslo Stock Exchange precedent: **Upside before GM is far more common than neutral development** Shorts tend to: * Cover **too early and expensively** * Underestimate recall risk Price movements often occur: * without news * on low volume * in short, steep bursts Sober estimate (no guarantee): * +10–20 %**: fully plausible without specific news * +25–40 %**: likely if parts of the short must cover * >50 %**: requires either coordinated recall, buyback escalation or positive guidance.- ·6 t sitten · MuokattuIn yesterday's shareholder overview, Folketrygdfondet is still listed with only 3.9 million shares. The status is therefore the same as mentioned in Knash's previous post, i.e., that they still have 18.6 million shares outstanding for short selling. No recall so far. 17 trading days left until the general meeting, and if FTF wants to vote, the shares must probably be registered in the account a few days before. Combined with normal daily turnover in Link, this provides a basis for some exciting calculations…. But it seems the short sellers are calm. Price movements and volume appear to be quite normal.
·5 t sittenCould it be that they are gambling on a bad Q1, so that they can easily buy the shares back after the report? 
·10 t sittenCould get pretty ugly for all short sellers going forward.- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sitten25 🙏
·1 päivä sittenYey, where are you Bellmann... ? 😄
·8 t sitten · MuokattuBullman has sent the crystal ball bought on Temu back. Complaint. Waiting for a new one, it may take some time now that air freight to/from Asia has become expensive and slow.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
76 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·4 t sitten · MuokattuPersonally, I have not previously been "on the inside" of such a heavily shorted stock. Therefore, I did a Copilot search for similar past events on the Oslo Stock Exchange related to the upcoming OGF (29 days). I found the result somewhat interesting. It seems that all the situations listed have ended with more or less "action". **********************************************************************' Historical comparable cases – Oslo Stock Exchange 1. **Kahoot! (2020–2021)** **Short interest:** ~15–22 % (periodically) **Event:** Capital raising, strategic owners, GM / EGM **Liquidity:** Moderate before the rally What happened? * Several rounds of **high shorting into defined events** * Positive news flow + increasing institutional interest * **Short covering first gradual, then accelerating** Price response * Several **30–50 % movements in weeks** * Strong daily movements on relatively low volume 📌 Learning: When short >15 % and the stock starts to rise *before* the event → short loses control quickly. 2. **NEL ASA (2019–2020)** **Short interest:** 10–18 % **Event:** Contracts, sector momentum, capital markets days **Liquidity:** High – but the short is large What happened? * Short positions built on "overpricing" * Event-driven news flow made it impossible to stay short * Covering happened **in waves** Price response * Rapid doubling from local bottoms * Typical pattern: * sideways * sudden breakout * **short-driven momentum** 📌 Learning: Even in liquid stocks, collective shorting can face structural problems due to event risk. 3. **REC Silicon (2020–2021)** **Short interest:** >20 % at its highest **Event:** Negotiations, strategic uncertainty, possible turn-around **Liquidity:** Low–moderate What happened? * Short built on rational fundamental thesis * Small positive signals → **unexpected covering** * Very little supply of shares on the upside Price response * Extreme movements: * +100 % in a short time * Several days with "no sellers" 📌 Learning: When **free float is small and short is large**, the market loses price discovery control. 4. **Borr Drilling (several periods 2019–2022)** **Short interest:** 10–18 % **Event:** Refinancing, debt clarifications, GM/EGM **Liquidity:** Moderate What happened? * The short was correct in the long term * **Event risk** forced covering in the short term * Short was "right, but too early" Price response * 25–40 % up in a few weeks * Then new shorting at a higher level 📌 **Learning:** Shorts may be fundamentally right – but **event risk always wins in the short term**. 5. **ArcticZymes (2020)** **Short interest:** ~15 % **Event:** Positive signals / inefficient information **Liquidity:** Low Price response * Abrupt price doubling * Short almost completely disappeared 📌 **Learning:** In small/mid-cap OSE stocks, **20 % short is extremely much**. *** Comparison against **Link Mobility – today's situation** | Factor | Historical squeezes | Link Mobility | | ---------------- | --------------- | ----------------------- | | Short interest | 15–25 % | **>20 %** ✅ | | Liquidity | Low–moderate | **Moderate** ✅ | | Defined event | GM / EGM / news | **GM in 29 days** ✅ | | Buyback / capital return | Often a trigger | **Ongoing buyback** ✅ | Institutional ownership | Concentrated | **Very concentrated** ✅ | 🔴 **Important point:** In several of the cases above, the short was **lower than in Link** and still enough for strong movements. What history suggests for Link Mobility Based on Oslo Stock Exchange precedent: **Upside before GM is far more common than neutral development** Shorts tend to: * Cover **too early and expensively** * Underestimate recall risk Price movements often occur: * without news * on low volume * in short, steep bursts Sober estimate (no guarantee): * +10–20 %**: fully plausible without specific news * +25–40 %**: likely if parts of the short must cover * >50 %**: requires either coordinated recall, buyback escalation or positive guidance.
- ·6 t sitten · MuokattuIn yesterday's shareholder overview, Folketrygdfondet is still listed with only 3.9 million shares. The status is therefore the same as mentioned in Knash's previous post, i.e., that they still have 18.6 million shares outstanding for short selling. No recall so far. 17 trading days left until the general meeting, and if FTF wants to vote, the shares must probably be registered in the account a few days before. Combined with normal daily turnover in Link, this provides a basis for some exciting calculations…. But it seems the short sellers are calm. Price movements and volume appear to be quite normal.·5 t sittenCould it be that they are gambling on a bad Q1, so that they can easily buy the shares back after the report?
- ·10 t sittenCould get pretty ugly for all short sellers going forward.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sitten25 🙏·1 päivä sittenYey, where are you Bellmann... ? 😄·8 t sitten · MuokattuBullman has sent the crystal ball bought on Temu back. Complaint. Waiting for a new one, it may take some time now that air freight to/from Asia has become expensive and slow.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 581 | - | - | ||
| 2 680 | - | - | ||
| 200 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 3 870 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
76 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·4 t sitten · MuokattuPersonally, I have not previously been "on the inside" of such a heavily shorted stock. Therefore, I did a Copilot search for similar past events on the Oslo Stock Exchange related to the upcoming OGF (29 days). I found the result somewhat interesting. It seems that all the situations listed have ended with more or less "action". **********************************************************************' Historical comparable cases – Oslo Stock Exchange 1. **Kahoot! (2020–2021)** **Short interest:** ~15–22 % (periodically) **Event:** Capital raising, strategic owners, GM / EGM **Liquidity:** Moderate before the rally What happened? * Several rounds of **high shorting into defined events** * Positive news flow + increasing institutional interest * **Short covering first gradual, then accelerating** Price response * Several **30–50 % movements in weeks** * Strong daily movements on relatively low volume 📌 Learning: When short >15 % and the stock starts to rise *before* the event → short loses control quickly. 2. **NEL ASA (2019–2020)** **Short interest:** 10–18 % **Event:** Contracts, sector momentum, capital markets days **Liquidity:** High – but the short is large What happened? * Short positions built on "overpricing" * Event-driven news flow made it impossible to stay short * Covering happened **in waves** Price response * Rapid doubling from local bottoms * Typical pattern: * sideways * sudden breakout * **short-driven momentum** 📌 Learning: Even in liquid stocks, collective shorting can face structural problems due to event risk. 3. **REC Silicon (2020–2021)** **Short interest:** >20 % at its highest **Event:** Negotiations, strategic uncertainty, possible turn-around **Liquidity:** Low–moderate What happened? * Short built on rational fundamental thesis * Small positive signals → **unexpected covering** * Very little supply of shares on the upside Price response * Extreme movements: * +100 % in a short time * Several days with "no sellers" 📌 Learning: When **free float is small and short is large**, the market loses price discovery control. 4. **Borr Drilling (several periods 2019–2022)** **Short interest:** 10–18 % **Event:** Refinancing, debt clarifications, GM/EGM **Liquidity:** Moderate What happened? * The short was correct in the long term * **Event risk** forced covering in the short term * Short was "right, but too early" Price response * 25–40 % up in a few weeks * Then new shorting at a higher level 📌 **Learning:** Shorts may be fundamentally right – but **event risk always wins in the short term**. 5. **ArcticZymes (2020)** **Short interest:** ~15 % **Event:** Positive signals / inefficient information **Liquidity:** Low Price response * Abrupt price doubling * Short almost completely disappeared 📌 **Learning:** In small/mid-cap OSE stocks, **20 % short is extremely much**. *** Comparison against **Link Mobility – today's situation** | Factor | Historical squeezes | Link Mobility | | ---------------- | --------------- | ----------------------- | | Short interest | 15–25 % | **>20 %** ✅ | | Liquidity | Low–moderate | **Moderate** ✅ | | Defined event | GM / EGM / news | **GM in 29 days** ✅ | | Buyback / capital return | Often a trigger | **Ongoing buyback** ✅ | Institutional ownership | Concentrated | **Very concentrated** ✅ | 🔴 **Important point:** In several of the cases above, the short was **lower than in Link** and still enough for strong movements. What history suggests for Link Mobility Based on Oslo Stock Exchange precedent: **Upside before GM is far more common than neutral development** Shorts tend to: * Cover **too early and expensively** * Underestimate recall risk Price movements often occur: * without news * on low volume * in short, steep bursts Sober estimate (no guarantee): * +10–20 %**: fully plausible without specific news * +25–40 %**: likely if parts of the short must cover * >50 %**: requires either coordinated recall, buyback escalation or positive guidance.
- ·6 t sitten · MuokattuIn yesterday's shareholder overview, Folketrygdfondet is still listed with only 3.9 million shares. The status is therefore the same as mentioned in Knash's previous post, i.e., that they still have 18.6 million shares outstanding for short selling. No recall so far. 17 trading days left until the general meeting, and if FTF wants to vote, the shares must probably be registered in the account a few days before. Combined with normal daily turnover in Link, this provides a basis for some exciting calculations…. But it seems the short sellers are calm. Price movements and volume appear to be quite normal.·5 t sittenCould it be that they are gambling on a bad Q1, so that they can easily buy the shares back after the report?
- ·10 t sittenCould get pretty ugly for all short sellers going forward.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sitten25 🙏·1 päivä sittenYey, where are you Bellmann... ? 😄·8 t sitten · MuokattuBullman has sent the crystal ball bought on Temu back. Complaint. Waiting for a new one, it may take some time now that air freight to/from Asia has become expensive and slow.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 581 | - | - | ||
| 2 680 | - | - | ||
| 200 | - | - | ||
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 3 870 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt