2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧46 min
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 000 | - | - | ||
| 1 985 | - | - | ||
| 3 896 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 4 551 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·4 t sittenBest case scenario is perhaps the following: Abry sold its shares via Norwegian facilitators to prevent as many shares as possible from being picked up by competitors in the USA who have shorted the stock. Could the facilitators have been partially instructed regarding buyers? Thus, the chance of a short squeeze increases significantly. The largest Norwegian long-term owners already control over 30%, and these will not sell cheaply. We or others advise small investors that even smaller purchases combined will push the price upwards. (After all, there are already about 7000 Nordnet customers invested.) Twilio (USA), which needs a higher market share in Europe, will come with a shock bid next week of at least 40,-. (They have enough cash to pay in cash) In that case, the price could go up to 100% above the bid because the shorters cannot find enough sellers, and they are forced to buy back the shares regardless of price. We will be the winners. If the price goes above 30,-, the short squeeze starts even without a bid due to technical buy signals and risk analysis software used by the shorters. A small dream? Yes, but unrealistic? By the way: In advance, happy birthday tomorrow. :-)
·6 t sittenAs Barcelona1986 signed below, Finanstilsynet's latest update on short positions on May 13th at 23:59 actually shows a slight increase in short, 13.03% which still indicates 20% total short. If that's true, they have been completely bypassed. Is it possible we will only get the answer on Monday given that the trade was technically only executed yesterday? Shorts didn’t cover in the block. This is the wild part. Normally, when a big seller exits and a block crosses, shorts use the liquidity to cover, the borrow pool tightens, the short interest drops. But here short interest stayed ~20%, none of the block was used for covering, borrow remains extremely high. 20% short interest in a Norwegian stock is insane. That’s US‑tech‑bubble levels of shorting. The shorts have sold into a fragmented retail‑heavy shareholder base. The shares are now widely dispersed. Reassembling 60M shares is nearly impossible. If Folketrygdfondet recalls even part of its lent shares, the system breaks. 60M short, but only a few million in nominee accounts. “Where are the rest?” The answer: They are synthetic. They are created through rehypothecation. ⭐ And this is why a recall is deadly. Because the real shares are dispersed, the borrowed inventory is small, the short interest is huge, the float is tight, SUNDT is long, ABRY is gone, retail is sticky, AGM is coming, Folketrygdfondet may recall, this is the perfect storm. And the fact that JPM and GS crossed 5% with both real shares AND swaps is a major red flag. It means: ⭐ Hedge funds are short synthetically. ⭐ Banks are hedging aggressively. ⭐ Borrow is tight. ⭐ Recall risk is real. ⭐ The system is under stress. ⭐ 1. The company buying back 13M shares at 22.93 NOK is not normal This is elite execution. They bought 13M shares at an average of 22.93 NOK. Current price is 27.5 NOK. They already had 8M treasury shares. They are proposing to cancel 21M shares at the AGM ⭐ 2. Could these shares have been Folketrygdfondet’s lent shares? YES — and this is a very real possibility. Here’s how it works. Folketrygdfondet lends shares. Hedge fund shorts them. Company buys them back in the open market. Those shares go into treasury. Folketrygdfondet still expects its lent shares back. But the shares no longer exist in the float The short seller now owes shares that no longer exist in circulation This is how a structural short trap is created. It’s not illegal. It’s not even unusual. It’s just… devastating for shorts. Why shorts might not even try to cover right now, because trying to cover would: ⭐ Blow out the price ⭐ Reveal their true size ⭐ Trigger forced buy-ins ⭐ Force banks to hedge more ⭐ Trigger a feedback loop ⭐ Cause a squeeze ⭐ Cause a liquidity crisis ⭐ Cause a mark-to-market loss ⭐ Cause margin calls ⭐ Cause prime brokers to panic So they wait. They hope. They pray. This is exactly what happened in: Volkswagen 2008 GameStop 2021 Tesla 2013–2020 Carvana 2023 Wirecard 2019 The squeeze doesn’t start when shorts are trapped. It starts when shorts try to escape. Right now, they’re not trying. Because they can’t.·1 t sittenActually, I think we are discussing waking a sleeping bear of coordinated small investors. This is a rare chance to influence.
·11 t sittenWho do you think picked up those 38mil shares that were left after Sundt took 2,5mil We should probably get an answer Monday Tuesday next week. I'm wondering if Goldman and JP Morgen can be involved here because both of these indeed flagged over 5 % each a little while ago.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧46 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·4 t sittenBest case scenario is perhaps the following: Abry sold its shares via Norwegian facilitators to prevent as many shares as possible from being picked up by competitors in the USA who have shorted the stock. Could the facilitators have been partially instructed regarding buyers? Thus, the chance of a short squeeze increases significantly. The largest Norwegian long-term owners already control over 30%, and these will not sell cheaply. We or others advise small investors that even smaller purchases combined will push the price upwards. (After all, there are already about 7000 Nordnet customers invested.) Twilio (USA), which needs a higher market share in Europe, will come with a shock bid next week of at least 40,-. (They have enough cash to pay in cash) In that case, the price could go up to 100% above the bid because the shorters cannot find enough sellers, and they are forced to buy back the shares regardless of price. We will be the winners. If the price goes above 30,-, the short squeeze starts even without a bid due to technical buy signals and risk analysis software used by the shorters. A small dream? Yes, but unrealistic? By the way: In advance, happy birthday tomorrow. :-)
- ·6 t sittenAs Barcelona1986 signed below, Finanstilsynet's latest update on short positions on May 13th at 23:59 actually shows a slight increase in short, 13.03% which still indicates 20% total short. If that's true, they have been completely bypassed. Is it possible we will only get the answer on Monday given that the trade was technically only executed yesterday? Shorts didn’t cover in the block. This is the wild part. Normally, when a big seller exits and a block crosses, shorts use the liquidity to cover, the borrow pool tightens, the short interest drops. But here short interest stayed ~20%, none of the block was used for covering, borrow remains extremely high. 20% short interest in a Norwegian stock is insane. That’s US‑tech‑bubble levels of shorting. The shorts have sold into a fragmented retail‑heavy shareholder base. The shares are now widely dispersed. Reassembling 60M shares is nearly impossible. If Folketrygdfondet recalls even part of its lent shares, the system breaks. 60M short, but only a few million in nominee accounts. “Where are the rest?” The answer: They are synthetic. They are created through rehypothecation. ⭐ And this is why a recall is deadly. Because the real shares are dispersed, the borrowed inventory is small, the short interest is huge, the float is tight, SUNDT is long, ABRY is gone, retail is sticky, AGM is coming, Folketrygdfondet may recall, this is the perfect storm. And the fact that JPM and GS crossed 5% with both real shares AND swaps is a major red flag. It means: ⭐ Hedge funds are short synthetically. ⭐ Banks are hedging aggressively. ⭐ Borrow is tight. ⭐ Recall risk is real. ⭐ The system is under stress. ⭐ 1. The company buying back 13M shares at 22.93 NOK is not normal This is elite execution. They bought 13M shares at an average of 22.93 NOK. Current price is 27.5 NOK. They already had 8M treasury shares. They are proposing to cancel 21M shares at the AGM ⭐ 2. Could these shares have been Folketrygdfondet’s lent shares? YES — and this is a very real possibility. Here’s how it works. Folketrygdfondet lends shares. Hedge fund shorts them. Company buys them back in the open market. Those shares go into treasury. Folketrygdfondet still expects its lent shares back. But the shares no longer exist in the float The short seller now owes shares that no longer exist in circulation This is how a structural short trap is created. It’s not illegal. It’s not even unusual. It’s just… devastating for shorts. Why shorts might not even try to cover right now, because trying to cover would: ⭐ Blow out the price ⭐ Reveal their true size ⭐ Trigger forced buy-ins ⭐ Force banks to hedge more ⭐ Trigger a feedback loop ⭐ Cause a squeeze ⭐ Cause a liquidity crisis ⭐ Cause a mark-to-market loss ⭐ Cause margin calls ⭐ Cause prime brokers to panic So they wait. They hope. They pray. This is exactly what happened in: Volkswagen 2008 GameStop 2021 Tesla 2013–2020 Carvana 2023 Wirecard 2019 The squeeze doesn’t start when shorts are trapped. It starts when shorts try to escape. Right now, they’re not trying. Because they can’t.·1 t sittenActually, I think we are discussing waking a sleeping bear of coordinated small investors. This is a rare chance to influence.
- ·11 t sittenWho do you think picked up those 38mil shares that were left after Sundt took 2,5mil We should probably get an answer Monday Tuesday next week. I'm wondering if Goldman and JP Morgen can be involved here because both of these indeed flagged over 5 % each a little while ago.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 000 | - | - | ||
| 1 985 | - | - | ||
| 3 896 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 4 551 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧46 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·4 t sittenBest case scenario is perhaps the following: Abry sold its shares via Norwegian facilitators to prevent as many shares as possible from being picked up by competitors in the USA who have shorted the stock. Could the facilitators have been partially instructed regarding buyers? Thus, the chance of a short squeeze increases significantly. The largest Norwegian long-term owners already control over 30%, and these will not sell cheaply. We or others advise small investors that even smaller purchases combined will push the price upwards. (After all, there are already about 7000 Nordnet customers invested.) Twilio (USA), which needs a higher market share in Europe, will come with a shock bid next week of at least 40,-. (They have enough cash to pay in cash) In that case, the price could go up to 100% above the bid because the shorters cannot find enough sellers, and they are forced to buy back the shares regardless of price. We will be the winners. If the price goes above 30,-, the short squeeze starts even without a bid due to technical buy signals and risk analysis software used by the shorters. A small dream? Yes, but unrealistic? By the way: In advance, happy birthday tomorrow. :-)
- ·6 t sittenAs Barcelona1986 signed below, Finanstilsynet's latest update on short positions on May 13th at 23:59 actually shows a slight increase in short, 13.03% which still indicates 20% total short. If that's true, they have been completely bypassed. Is it possible we will only get the answer on Monday given that the trade was technically only executed yesterday? Shorts didn’t cover in the block. This is the wild part. Normally, when a big seller exits and a block crosses, shorts use the liquidity to cover, the borrow pool tightens, the short interest drops. But here short interest stayed ~20%, none of the block was used for covering, borrow remains extremely high. 20% short interest in a Norwegian stock is insane. That’s US‑tech‑bubble levels of shorting. The shorts have sold into a fragmented retail‑heavy shareholder base. The shares are now widely dispersed. Reassembling 60M shares is nearly impossible. If Folketrygdfondet recalls even part of its lent shares, the system breaks. 60M short, but only a few million in nominee accounts. “Where are the rest?” The answer: They are synthetic. They are created through rehypothecation. ⭐ And this is why a recall is deadly. Because the real shares are dispersed, the borrowed inventory is small, the short interest is huge, the float is tight, SUNDT is long, ABRY is gone, retail is sticky, AGM is coming, Folketrygdfondet may recall, this is the perfect storm. And the fact that JPM and GS crossed 5% with both real shares AND swaps is a major red flag. It means: ⭐ Hedge funds are short synthetically. ⭐ Banks are hedging aggressively. ⭐ Borrow is tight. ⭐ Recall risk is real. ⭐ The system is under stress. ⭐ 1. The company buying back 13M shares at 22.93 NOK is not normal This is elite execution. They bought 13M shares at an average of 22.93 NOK. Current price is 27.5 NOK. They already had 8M treasury shares. They are proposing to cancel 21M shares at the AGM ⭐ 2. Could these shares have been Folketrygdfondet’s lent shares? YES — and this is a very real possibility. Here’s how it works. Folketrygdfondet lends shares. Hedge fund shorts them. Company buys them back in the open market. Those shares go into treasury. Folketrygdfondet still expects its lent shares back. But the shares no longer exist in the float The short seller now owes shares that no longer exist in circulation This is how a structural short trap is created. It’s not illegal. It’s not even unusual. It’s just… devastating for shorts. Why shorts might not even try to cover right now, because trying to cover would: ⭐ Blow out the price ⭐ Reveal their true size ⭐ Trigger forced buy-ins ⭐ Force banks to hedge more ⭐ Trigger a feedback loop ⭐ Cause a squeeze ⭐ Cause a liquidity crisis ⭐ Cause a mark-to-market loss ⭐ Cause margin calls ⭐ Cause prime brokers to panic So they wait. They hope. They pray. This is exactly what happened in: Volkswagen 2008 GameStop 2021 Tesla 2013–2020 Carvana 2023 Wirecard 2019 The squeeze doesn’t start when shorts are trapped. It starts when shorts try to escape. Right now, they’re not trying. Because they can’t.·1 t sittenActually, I think we are discussing waking a sleeping bear of coordinated small investors. This is a rare chance to influence.
- ·11 t sittenWho do you think picked up those 38mil shares that were left after Sundt took 2,5mil We should probably get an answer Monday Tuesday next week. I'm wondering if Goldman and JP Morgen can be involved here because both of these indeed flagged over 5 % each a little while ago.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 000 | - | - | ||
| 1 985 | - | - | ||
| 3 896 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 4 551 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt