2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
49 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
1 000
Myynti
Määrä
476
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
13,9VWAP
Alin
11,95VaihtoMäärä
0,1 9 460
VWAP
Ylin
13,9Alin
11,95VaihtoMäärä
0,1 9 460
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 13.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 28.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 12.6.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
23.12.202523.12.2025Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Stay tuned for what is about to unfold. Share price will show the way.- ·16.12.2025
- ·16.12.2025 · MuokattuWhat is the grand plan behind NCOD with a very strong ownership constellation in the form of the Danes (31), the Canadians (11) and the Portuguese (13) - a total of 55 Mill shares out of a total of 70 or almost 80% ownership stake. Maybe more....??? My fear is that they are running some variant where they take the company private at a ridiculously low valuation and offer us small shareholders only crumbs. Does anyone have an understanding of how this might possibly happen and if it is even possible at all? It seems Røkke and Aker have had countless fights throughout time, and at least the small shareholders haven't come out well from it....:-( without any Financial Supervisory Authority or other supervisory bodies having managed to stop them. Is that the "grand plan" for NCOD? That at least makes me a bit uncertain about the future as a small shareholder in NCOD. I don't trust anyone who comes into such a dominant "ownership situation". They are closest to themselves. The question is whether you can manage something like this? In my eyes, this company is ridiculously priced compared to all the positive things that have happened recently around cod farming and especially price realization in the market. It also seems the company has gained better control over operations. So, viewed in isolation - the future seems very positive - but with a potential and possible "curve ball" out of nowhere!
·6.12.2025Very much agree with Mister E.👍 Also really strong of Norcod to find a super relevant major shareholder, as the situation looked like yet another share issue and even at a price very close to the daily price, here other companies have often sold with huge discounts, which really diluted the shares👍. However, it's honest that they are not quite ready to deliver the large quantities yet, as prices are apparently soaring. Awaiting a comment in the thread soon from JonnyH. you usually have great insight into the case?🙏
3.12.20253.12.2025I have observed the various posts and opinions here for some time and it is peculiar how the negative bias by a few takes up the space. Now, I don't know what prompts people to thrash a company and its management like that, but what stands out is the lack of facts and objectivity on top of slim business understanding and a conspiratory atmosphere with a narrow approach. If anyone is here for a quick cash-in from quarter to quarter then they probably should not invested in a scale-up company in a new line of business outside the hype of AI and Mag-7. If anyone feels compelled to point fingers at any given obstacle or set-back along the way then they have never been part of starting up business or being responsible on such a scale. But being an anonymous conspirator is just so easy. I am very positive about this company offering a rare opportunity as a private investor in one of the few good listed start-ups in a promising line of business backed by strong partnerships. 1. Very focused and professional approach to actually building the consumer market and off-take channels with strong commercial partnerships and alliances. 2. Big partnerships and stakes from and by key players who both bring synergies, funding and knowledge. 3. Clear and gradual upscaling of production while learning and adapting along the growth path. 4. Strong development in sales prices with strong future macro fundamentals. 5. Good development and potential in cost reduction efforts already at somewhat low volumes. 6. A potential future balance sheet upside, should the Norwegian government at some point decide to make the sites neutral to more species but cod. There is no reason why an EBIT of a least 20% shouldn't be achieved at the current production target of 25,000 tonnes. That indicates a share price of +/- NOK 50, disregarding various upside potentials and future growth which is off course incredibly conservative. Everyone must make up his/her own mind - but if you're here just for conspiracies and gossip there are other online fora more relevant for you.31.12.202531.12.2025Hi Youkon Happy New Year too. It is a bit peculiar that there is this negative bias by, expectedly, a few. If they are invested, then it makes little logic. If they are not, then they shouldn’t be concerned for any professional reason. Swing traders will only make peanuts here, but could be. Having said that, then it may also be somewhat human nature to start blaming or conspire when things don't go as hoped or expected. But that doesn't mean it's valid at all. And honestly, the current share price should be of less and only psychological interest in a low volume and low attention period if you believe in the long term prospect. I am certainly a positive Norcod investor myself. I am so because I see far more pros than cons here obviously. Current share price is far from representative of the fair value. A significantly greater amount than the current market cap has already been injected. Macros are moving very favourably - namely the increasingly lower quotas of wild cod, the surge in market price, the healthy protein option and the perception that this (rightly or wrongly) offers a more eco friendly alternative to other protein options. There is zero value added currently that this may be the start of not just a fish farmer, but a brand, a product and a market controller. Currently somewhat intangible - but if successful a huge future value multiplier. A management that appears focused and has its priorities well laid out and focused on implementation. Other factors, such as likely opening of sites for salmon farming as well as future growth as well as network synergies, support, safety net and premium from parters like Highliner, Sirena and JM are currently not considered by the market. There are residual risks for sure. To me they are namely stabilising the biological environment and timing of financial break even. But as far as I am concerned that is a matter of when, not if. But you're right that it has required patience so far - yet that is an underestimated investor quality these days. Do they inform enough and transparently? I generally believe so; they are long-term focused, they are formal and non-emotional, they measure points up against their communicated strategy plan. Everyone wants an online feed out of curiosity, but it's just not relevant nor necessarily interesting what happens from week to week as long as the direction of travel is unchanged. LinkedIn offers some stories from time to time. Happy New Year again and all the best in 2026.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
49 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 23.12.202523.12.2025Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Stay tuned for what is about to unfold. Share price will show the way.
- ·16.12.2025
- ·16.12.2025 · MuokattuWhat is the grand plan behind NCOD with a very strong ownership constellation in the form of the Danes (31), the Canadians (11) and the Portuguese (13) - a total of 55 Mill shares out of a total of 70 or almost 80% ownership stake. Maybe more....??? My fear is that they are running some variant where they take the company private at a ridiculously low valuation and offer us small shareholders only crumbs. Does anyone have an understanding of how this might possibly happen and if it is even possible at all? It seems Røkke and Aker have had countless fights throughout time, and at least the small shareholders haven't come out well from it....:-( without any Financial Supervisory Authority or other supervisory bodies having managed to stop them. Is that the "grand plan" for NCOD? That at least makes me a bit uncertain about the future as a small shareholder in NCOD. I don't trust anyone who comes into such a dominant "ownership situation". They are closest to themselves. The question is whether you can manage something like this? In my eyes, this company is ridiculously priced compared to all the positive things that have happened recently around cod farming and especially price realization in the market. It also seems the company has gained better control over operations. So, viewed in isolation - the future seems very positive - but with a potential and possible "curve ball" out of nowhere!
- ·6.12.2025Very much agree with Mister E.👍 Also really strong of Norcod to find a super relevant major shareholder, as the situation looked like yet another share issue and even at a price very close to the daily price, here other companies have often sold with huge discounts, which really diluted the shares👍. However, it's honest that they are not quite ready to deliver the large quantities yet, as prices are apparently soaring. Awaiting a comment in the thread soon from JonnyH. you usually have great insight into the case?🙏
- 3.12.20253.12.2025I have observed the various posts and opinions here for some time and it is peculiar how the negative bias by a few takes up the space. Now, I don't know what prompts people to thrash a company and its management like that, but what stands out is the lack of facts and objectivity on top of slim business understanding and a conspiratory atmosphere with a narrow approach. If anyone is here for a quick cash-in from quarter to quarter then they probably should not invested in a scale-up company in a new line of business outside the hype of AI and Mag-7. If anyone feels compelled to point fingers at any given obstacle or set-back along the way then they have never been part of starting up business or being responsible on such a scale. But being an anonymous conspirator is just so easy. I am very positive about this company offering a rare opportunity as a private investor in one of the few good listed start-ups in a promising line of business backed by strong partnerships. 1. Very focused and professional approach to actually building the consumer market and off-take channels with strong commercial partnerships and alliances. 2. Big partnerships and stakes from and by key players who both bring synergies, funding and knowledge. 3. Clear and gradual upscaling of production while learning and adapting along the growth path. 4. Strong development in sales prices with strong future macro fundamentals. 5. Good development and potential in cost reduction efforts already at somewhat low volumes. 6. A potential future balance sheet upside, should the Norwegian government at some point decide to make the sites neutral to more species but cod. There is no reason why an EBIT of a least 20% shouldn't be achieved at the current production target of 25,000 tonnes. That indicates a share price of +/- NOK 50, disregarding various upside potentials and future growth which is off course incredibly conservative. Everyone must make up his/her own mind - but if you're here just for conspiracies and gossip there are other online fora more relevant for you.31.12.202531.12.2025Hi Youkon Happy New Year too. It is a bit peculiar that there is this negative bias by, expectedly, a few. If they are invested, then it makes little logic. If they are not, then they shouldn’t be concerned for any professional reason. Swing traders will only make peanuts here, but could be. Having said that, then it may also be somewhat human nature to start blaming or conspire when things don't go as hoped or expected. But that doesn't mean it's valid at all. And honestly, the current share price should be of less and only psychological interest in a low volume and low attention period if you believe in the long term prospect. I am certainly a positive Norcod investor myself. I am so because I see far more pros than cons here obviously. Current share price is far from representative of the fair value. A significantly greater amount than the current market cap has already been injected. Macros are moving very favourably - namely the increasingly lower quotas of wild cod, the surge in market price, the healthy protein option and the perception that this (rightly or wrongly) offers a more eco friendly alternative to other protein options. There is zero value added currently that this may be the start of not just a fish farmer, but a brand, a product and a market controller. Currently somewhat intangible - but if successful a huge future value multiplier. A management that appears focused and has its priorities well laid out and focused on implementation. Other factors, such as likely opening of sites for salmon farming as well as future growth as well as network synergies, support, safety net and premium from parters like Highliner, Sirena and JM are currently not considered by the market. There are residual risks for sure. To me they are namely stabilising the biological environment and timing of financial break even. But as far as I am concerned that is a matter of when, not if. But you're right that it has required patience so far - yet that is an underestimated investor quality these days. Do they inform enough and transparently? I generally believe so; they are long-term focused, they are formal and non-emotional, they measure points up against their communicated strategy plan. Everyone wants an online feed out of curiosity, but it's just not relevant nor necessarily interesting what happens from week to week as long as the direction of travel is unchanged. LinkedIn offers some stories from time to time. Happy New Year again and all the best in 2026.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
1 000
Myynti
Määrä
476
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
13,9VWAP
Alin
11,95VaihtoMäärä
0,1 9 460
VWAP
Ylin
13,9Alin
11,95VaihtoMäärä
0,1 9 460
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 13.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 28.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 12.6.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
49 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 13.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 28.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 12.6.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 23.12.202523.12.2025Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Stay tuned for what is about to unfold. Share price will show the way.
- ·16.12.2025
- ·16.12.2025 · MuokattuWhat is the grand plan behind NCOD with a very strong ownership constellation in the form of the Danes (31), the Canadians (11) and the Portuguese (13) - a total of 55 Mill shares out of a total of 70 or almost 80% ownership stake. Maybe more....??? My fear is that they are running some variant where they take the company private at a ridiculously low valuation and offer us small shareholders only crumbs. Does anyone have an understanding of how this might possibly happen and if it is even possible at all? It seems Røkke and Aker have had countless fights throughout time, and at least the small shareholders haven't come out well from it....:-( without any Financial Supervisory Authority or other supervisory bodies having managed to stop them. Is that the "grand plan" for NCOD? That at least makes me a bit uncertain about the future as a small shareholder in NCOD. I don't trust anyone who comes into such a dominant "ownership situation". They are closest to themselves. The question is whether you can manage something like this? In my eyes, this company is ridiculously priced compared to all the positive things that have happened recently around cod farming and especially price realization in the market. It also seems the company has gained better control over operations. So, viewed in isolation - the future seems very positive - but with a potential and possible "curve ball" out of nowhere!
- ·6.12.2025Very much agree with Mister E.👍 Also really strong of Norcod to find a super relevant major shareholder, as the situation looked like yet another share issue and even at a price very close to the daily price, here other companies have often sold with huge discounts, which really diluted the shares👍. However, it's honest that they are not quite ready to deliver the large quantities yet, as prices are apparently soaring. Awaiting a comment in the thread soon from JonnyH. you usually have great insight into the case?🙏
- 3.12.20253.12.2025I have observed the various posts and opinions here for some time and it is peculiar how the negative bias by a few takes up the space. Now, I don't know what prompts people to thrash a company and its management like that, but what stands out is the lack of facts and objectivity on top of slim business understanding and a conspiratory atmosphere with a narrow approach. If anyone is here for a quick cash-in from quarter to quarter then they probably should not invested in a scale-up company in a new line of business outside the hype of AI and Mag-7. If anyone feels compelled to point fingers at any given obstacle or set-back along the way then they have never been part of starting up business or being responsible on such a scale. But being an anonymous conspirator is just so easy. I am very positive about this company offering a rare opportunity as a private investor in one of the few good listed start-ups in a promising line of business backed by strong partnerships. 1. Very focused and professional approach to actually building the consumer market and off-take channels with strong commercial partnerships and alliances. 2. Big partnerships and stakes from and by key players who both bring synergies, funding and knowledge. 3. Clear and gradual upscaling of production while learning and adapting along the growth path. 4. Strong development in sales prices with strong future macro fundamentals. 5. Good development and potential in cost reduction efforts already at somewhat low volumes. 6. A potential future balance sheet upside, should the Norwegian government at some point decide to make the sites neutral to more species but cod. There is no reason why an EBIT of a least 20% shouldn't be achieved at the current production target of 25,000 tonnes. That indicates a share price of +/- NOK 50, disregarding various upside potentials and future growth which is off course incredibly conservative. Everyone must make up his/her own mind - but if you're here just for conspiracies and gossip there are other online fora more relevant for you.31.12.202531.12.2025Hi Youkon Happy New Year too. It is a bit peculiar that there is this negative bias by, expectedly, a few. If they are invested, then it makes little logic. If they are not, then they shouldn’t be concerned for any professional reason. Swing traders will only make peanuts here, but could be. Having said that, then it may also be somewhat human nature to start blaming or conspire when things don't go as hoped or expected. But that doesn't mean it's valid at all. And honestly, the current share price should be of less and only psychological interest in a low volume and low attention period if you believe in the long term prospect. I am certainly a positive Norcod investor myself. I am so because I see far more pros than cons here obviously. Current share price is far from representative of the fair value. A significantly greater amount than the current market cap has already been injected. Macros are moving very favourably - namely the increasingly lower quotas of wild cod, the surge in market price, the healthy protein option and the perception that this (rightly or wrongly) offers a more eco friendly alternative to other protein options. There is zero value added currently that this may be the start of not just a fish farmer, but a brand, a product and a market controller. Currently somewhat intangible - but if successful a huge future value multiplier. A management that appears focused and has its priorities well laid out and focused on implementation. Other factors, such as likely opening of sites for salmon farming as well as future growth as well as network synergies, support, safety net and premium from parters like Highliner, Sirena and JM are currently not considered by the market. There are residual risks for sure. To me they are namely stabilising the biological environment and timing of financial break even. But as far as I am concerned that is a matter of when, not if. But you're right that it has required patience so far - yet that is an underestimated investor quality these days. Do they inform enough and transparently? I generally believe so; they are long-term focused, they are formal and non-emotional, they measure points up against their communicated strategy plan. Everyone wants an online feed out of curiosity, but it's just not relevant nor necessarily interesting what happens from week to week as long as the direction of travel is unchanged. LinkedIn offers some stories from time to time. Happy New Year again and all the best in 2026.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
1 000
Myynti
Määrä
476
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
13,9VWAP
Alin
11,95VaihtoMäärä
0,1 9 460
VWAP
Ylin
13,9Alin
11,95VaihtoMäärä
0,1 9 460
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt