2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
46 päivää sitten
‧1 t 29 min
7,5033 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | - | - | ||
| 20 | - | - | ||
| 18 | - | - | ||
| 372 | - | - | ||
| 298 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 269 593 | 269 593 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 269 593 | 269 593 | 0 | 0 |
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 3.4.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·2 t sittenTotalEnergies gets billions for giving up seabed – can Ørsted face the same opportunity? The American government has just paid about one billion dollars to TotalEnergies for giving up their offshore‑wind‑lease. It is a remarkable decision: USA actively chooses to refund an energy company for withdrawing from offshore wind and instead focusing on fossil energy. But in the middle of that story, an interesting perspective for Danish investors hides: Ørsted sits on a written-down American seabed asset, which potentially can become worth money again. An asset the market has written off – but which might not be dead Ørsted has in 2024 written down the value of their American seabed‑leases by about 3.5 billion kroner. It is booked as a loss, and the market has in practice treated it as worthless. But the TotalEnergies‑agreement shows one thing: American seabed rights can suddenly gain political value – even when they are not being used. If USA chooses to repeat the model and offer compensation for unused leases, then Ørsted holds an asset that today stands at zero, but which tomorrow can be worth 3–5 billion kroner. It is not a fantasy scenario. It is precedent. Why would USA do that? Because American energy policy is currently in motion: Offshore wind has become more expensive than expected Several projects have stopped or been postponed The government wishes to redirect capital to cheaper energy And they have already shown that they are willing to pay to clear the table If USA wants to “clean up” old leases and create political momentum, Ørsted could very well be in line. What would that mean for Ørsted? A compensation in the order of 3–5 billion kroner would: strengthen the balance sheet improve cash‑flow reduce the risk in USA and give the stock a much-needed psychological boost It does not change the structural challenges in offshore wind, but it changes the calculation for Ørsted here and now. The market has not priced in the possibility Ørsted is traded today as if the American leases are worthless. The TotalEnergies‑agreement shows that this is not necessarily the case. This is not an argument that Ørsted will get money. But it is an argument that the possibility exists, and that the market does not price it in. For investors, it is worth keeping an eye on. Regards, T.
·16.3. · MuokattuDue to Ørsted's large losses in the USA, Bernt Henriksen in Berlinske Saturday calls the Ørsted CEO a compulsive gambler. The adventure should have been stopped long ago. Real economists talk about sunk cost fallecy, a logical fallacy where one continues an unprofitable action because one has already invested time, money, or energy in it. One refuses to accept a loss and therefore often wastes even more resources. Throwing good money after bad, so to speak. And in fact, sunk cost fallecy is also a phenomenon we know from stock investments, where it can be difficult to get rid of a bad purchase.
·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuBerlinske has a bone to pick with Ørsted and fundamentally it is a newspaper that cannot be given much trust. Think of all the parties that chose to let Trump and his troops have free access to bases in Denmark and with full immunity in relation to Danish legislation. They knew Trump and yet they chose to kneel before him. “It is difficult to predict - especially the future”.
·14.3.Ørsted's Revolution Wind now delivers power to more than 350,000 households and businesses in the USA 💪
·12.3.Ørsted is the case study of what happens when an infrastructure company meets an interest rate shock. Write-downs in the USA, 75% share price drop — not because the wind farms stopped producing, but because the discount rate increased. Now interest rates are turning. Have analyzed Ørsted and the offshore wind cycle here: signycle.com/blog-orsted-offshore-wind.html Does anyone see P/Book under 1,2x as an entry signal for Ørsted, or are there other parameters you use? (Founder of Signycle)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
46 päivää sitten
‧1 t 29 min
7,5033 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sittenTotalEnergies gets billions for giving up seabed – can Ørsted face the same opportunity? The American government has just paid about one billion dollars to TotalEnergies for giving up their offshore‑wind‑lease. It is a remarkable decision: USA actively chooses to refund an energy company for withdrawing from offshore wind and instead focusing on fossil energy. But in the middle of that story, an interesting perspective for Danish investors hides: Ørsted sits on a written-down American seabed asset, which potentially can become worth money again. An asset the market has written off – but which might not be dead Ørsted has in 2024 written down the value of their American seabed‑leases by about 3.5 billion kroner. It is booked as a loss, and the market has in practice treated it as worthless. But the TotalEnergies‑agreement shows one thing: American seabed rights can suddenly gain political value – even when they are not being used. If USA chooses to repeat the model and offer compensation for unused leases, then Ørsted holds an asset that today stands at zero, but which tomorrow can be worth 3–5 billion kroner. It is not a fantasy scenario. It is precedent. Why would USA do that? Because American energy policy is currently in motion: Offshore wind has become more expensive than expected Several projects have stopped or been postponed The government wishes to redirect capital to cheaper energy And they have already shown that they are willing to pay to clear the table If USA wants to “clean up” old leases and create political momentum, Ørsted could very well be in line. What would that mean for Ørsted? A compensation in the order of 3–5 billion kroner would: strengthen the balance sheet improve cash‑flow reduce the risk in USA and give the stock a much-needed psychological boost It does not change the structural challenges in offshore wind, but it changes the calculation for Ørsted here and now. The market has not priced in the possibility Ørsted is traded today as if the American leases are worthless. The TotalEnergies‑agreement shows that this is not necessarily the case. This is not an argument that Ørsted will get money. But it is an argument that the possibility exists, and that the market does not price it in. For investors, it is worth keeping an eye on. Regards, T.
- ·16.3. · MuokattuDue to Ørsted's large losses in the USA, Bernt Henriksen in Berlinske Saturday calls the Ørsted CEO a compulsive gambler. The adventure should have been stopped long ago. Real economists talk about sunk cost fallecy, a logical fallacy where one continues an unprofitable action because one has already invested time, money, or energy in it. One refuses to accept a loss and therefore often wastes even more resources. Throwing good money after bad, so to speak. And in fact, sunk cost fallecy is also a phenomenon we know from stock investments, where it can be difficult to get rid of a bad purchase.·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuBerlinske has a bone to pick with Ørsted and fundamentally it is a newspaper that cannot be given much trust. Think of all the parties that chose to let Trump and his troops have free access to bases in Denmark and with full immunity in relation to Danish legislation. They knew Trump and yet they chose to kneel before him. “It is difficult to predict - especially the future”.
- ·14.3.Ørsted's Revolution Wind now delivers power to more than 350,000 households and businesses in the USA 💪
- ·12.3.Ørsted is the case study of what happens when an infrastructure company meets an interest rate shock. Write-downs in the USA, 75% share price drop — not because the wind farms stopped producing, but because the discount rate increased. Now interest rates are turning. Have analyzed Ørsted and the offshore wind cycle here: signycle.com/blog-orsted-offshore-wind.html Does anyone see P/Book under 1,2x as an entry signal for Ørsted, or are there other parameters you use? (Founder of Signycle)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | - | - | ||
| 20 | - | - | ||
| 18 | - | - | ||
| 372 | - | - | ||
| 298 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 269 593 | 269 593 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 269 593 | 269 593 | 0 | 0 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 3.4.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
46 päivää sitten
‧1 t 29 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 3.4.2025 |
7,5033 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sittenTotalEnergies gets billions for giving up seabed – can Ørsted face the same opportunity? The American government has just paid about one billion dollars to TotalEnergies for giving up their offshore‑wind‑lease. It is a remarkable decision: USA actively chooses to refund an energy company for withdrawing from offshore wind and instead focusing on fossil energy. But in the middle of that story, an interesting perspective for Danish investors hides: Ørsted sits on a written-down American seabed asset, which potentially can become worth money again. An asset the market has written off – but which might not be dead Ørsted has in 2024 written down the value of their American seabed‑leases by about 3.5 billion kroner. It is booked as a loss, and the market has in practice treated it as worthless. But the TotalEnergies‑agreement shows one thing: American seabed rights can suddenly gain political value – even when they are not being used. If USA chooses to repeat the model and offer compensation for unused leases, then Ørsted holds an asset that today stands at zero, but which tomorrow can be worth 3–5 billion kroner. It is not a fantasy scenario. It is precedent. Why would USA do that? Because American energy policy is currently in motion: Offshore wind has become more expensive than expected Several projects have stopped or been postponed The government wishes to redirect capital to cheaper energy And they have already shown that they are willing to pay to clear the table If USA wants to “clean up” old leases and create political momentum, Ørsted could very well be in line. What would that mean for Ørsted? A compensation in the order of 3–5 billion kroner would: strengthen the balance sheet improve cash‑flow reduce the risk in USA and give the stock a much-needed psychological boost It does not change the structural challenges in offshore wind, but it changes the calculation for Ørsted here and now. The market has not priced in the possibility Ørsted is traded today as if the American leases are worthless. The TotalEnergies‑agreement shows that this is not necessarily the case. This is not an argument that Ørsted will get money. But it is an argument that the possibility exists, and that the market does not price it in. For investors, it is worth keeping an eye on. Regards, T.
- ·16.3. · MuokattuDue to Ørsted's large losses in the USA, Bernt Henriksen in Berlinske Saturday calls the Ørsted CEO a compulsive gambler. The adventure should have been stopped long ago. Real economists talk about sunk cost fallecy, a logical fallacy where one continues an unprofitable action because one has already invested time, money, or energy in it. One refuses to accept a loss and therefore often wastes even more resources. Throwing good money after bad, so to speak. And in fact, sunk cost fallecy is also a phenomenon we know from stock investments, where it can be difficult to get rid of a bad purchase.·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuBerlinske has a bone to pick with Ørsted and fundamentally it is a newspaper that cannot be given much trust. Think of all the parties that chose to let Trump and his troops have free access to bases in Denmark and with full immunity in relation to Danish legislation. They knew Trump and yet they chose to kneel before him. “It is difficult to predict - especially the future”.
- ·14.3.Ørsted's Revolution Wind now delivers power to more than 350,000 households and businesses in the USA 💪
- ·12.3.Ørsted is the case study of what happens when an infrastructure company meets an interest rate shock. Write-downs in the USA, 75% share price drop — not because the wind farms stopped producing, but because the discount rate increased. Now interest rates are turning. Have analyzed Ørsted and the offshore wind cycle here: signycle.com/blog-orsted-offshore-wind.html Does anyone see P/Book under 1,2x as an entry signal for Ørsted, or are there other parameters you use? (Founder of Signycle)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | - | - | ||
| 20 | - | - | ||
| 18 | - | - | ||
| 372 | - | - | ||
| 298 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 269 593 | 269 593 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 269 593 | 269 593 | 0 | 0 |