2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
80 päivää sitten1 t 21 min
7,5033 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
1 306 716
Myynti
Määrä
1 350 179
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | - | - | ||
| 20 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 16 | - | - | ||
| 47 | - | - |
Ylin
138,3VWAP
Alin
135,2VaihtoMäärä
223,6 1 625 418
VWAP
Ylin
138,3Alin
135,2VaihtoMäärä
223,6 1 625 418
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 11.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 7.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 3.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenI think the sentiment from the American administration is a bit schizophrenic. I wonder if we just have to get used to it changing every other week.
·1 päivä sittenUSA, nuclear power and Greenland: A strategic connection On December 18, 2025, Trump Media & Technology Group announced a 50/50 merger with TAE Technologies, an American company working with advanced fusion technology. The agreement gave Donald Trump — as the largest single shareholder in TMTG — a direct financial interest in an energy company that aims to shape the future of nuclear power. Fusion is not yet commercial, but the potential is enormous, and when a sitting president has financial interests in the energy sector, it is inevitable that energy policy gains new political weight. Shortly thereafter, on December 22, 2025, the federal government issued a national stop work order for offshore wind projects. It was the first time in American history that offshore wind was paused on such a large scale. In Davos, harsh rhetoric against wind turbines followed, and energy policy became a central field of conflict. At the same time, the USA’s interest in Greenland increased significantly — and this is no coincidence. The USA faces a growing challenge in the nuclear fuel chain. The country needs secure access to uranium, wants to reduce its dependence on Russia and Kazakhstan, and aims to strengthen its energy security through stable, Western suppliers. The USA has uranium, but production is low, and enrichment capacity is only now being rebuilt. Therefore, the USA is looking for alternative, politically reliable raw material sources. Here, Greenland becomes strategically interesting. The island holds some of the world’s largest unexploited uranium deposits, especially at Kvanefjeld/Kuannersuit, as well as thorium and rare earth elements — precisely the raw materials that the West lacks in competition with China and Russia. Greenland can technically and geologically supply the raw materials for a Western, non-Russian fuel chain for nuclear power. Enrichment will take place in the USA or the EU, but the raw materials can come from Greenland. Even without mining, Greenland functions as a strategic reserve: merely the existence of resources in a stable, Western area strengthens the USA’s and NATO’s global position. If thorium reactors become commercial, Greenland becomes even more important. The combination of thorium, rare earth elements, and uranium in the same geological area makes Greenland one of the most strategically interesting places in the Arctic. Greenland’s importance to the USA is not just about raw materials. The island is close to North America, is already integrated into the American security structure via Thule Air Base, and is part of the Danish Realm and thus NATO. For the USA, it is far more attractive to secure raw materials from Greenland than from Russia, Kazakhstan, or China-controlled projects in Africa. But there are political barriers. Greenland has decided not to extract uranium, and uranium is politically controversial both in Greenland and Denmark. Any American strategy involving Greenlandic uranium will therefore be long-term, politically sensitive, and dependent on local support. Therefore, Greenland is today a strategic opportunity — not an active part of the USA’s fuel strategy. The conclusion is clear: Greenland can become a central piece in a Western, USA-led fuel chain for nuclear power. The country’s raw materials fit directly into the USA’s need to free itself from Russian and Kazakh uranium and secure future energy supply. But the key to Greenland’s raw materials lies in Greenland and Copenhagen — not in Washington. It is precisely the combination of strategic potential and political inaccessibility that explains why the USA has historically shown interest in gaining greater control over Greenland. If the USA owned Greenland, they would not be limited by the current political decisions on uranium extraction. For an American administration that wants to dominate the future energy market — both fusion and fission — Greenland is not just a geographical area, but a strategic raw material center. It is about energy, security, geopolitics, and future global power. We have hardly heard the last of that saga. And we have probably not seen the last obstacle for wind turbines in the USA either.
·18 t sitten · MuokattuRepublish in its entirety because I think it was well-written and interesting, waiting for debate. Nice forum where everyone is welcome even if Ørsted never garnered anyone's interest. Let me know if I should remove it. https://nyaborssnack.com/kategori/borssnack/trad/usa-krnkraft-och-grnland-244567
·1 päivä sittenAll new homes should be established with with a requirement for a home battery Home batteries should be promoted with the best possible commitment for balancing the energy grid The price of energy will show why wind turbines are necessary
·1 päivä sittenFrom ChatGPT Can typically V2H: Nissan Leaf (CHAdeMO) ✅ Nissan e-NV200 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV Some Hyundai / Kia (newer models, selected markets) Some Japanese models Cannot (yet): Tesla (no V2H in EU) VW ID-series (V2G promised, but limited) BMW, Mercedes, Audi (very limited / pilot projects) Most electric cars on the market
·1 päivä sittenWhen Trump lost face over Greenland, revenge against wind power will probably come soon. In isolation, it's good to get rid of something so destructive to nature, so the Danes can also switch to future-oriented solar energy.
·1 päivä sittenNature-destroying! Perhaps you are confusing the concept of NATURE with landscape. It is the purest form of energy- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuIt just dipped when he, in his speech in Davos, wanted to take down all wind turbines. It grew again when he was done with Greenland, yes, the speech is not finished yet at the time of writing, Maybe he'll finish with a round of tariffs!!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
80 päivää sitten1 t 21 min
7,5033 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenI think the sentiment from the American administration is a bit schizophrenic. I wonder if we just have to get used to it changing every other week.
- ·1 päivä sittenUSA, nuclear power and Greenland: A strategic connection On December 18, 2025, Trump Media & Technology Group announced a 50/50 merger with TAE Technologies, an American company working with advanced fusion technology. The agreement gave Donald Trump — as the largest single shareholder in TMTG — a direct financial interest in an energy company that aims to shape the future of nuclear power. Fusion is not yet commercial, but the potential is enormous, and when a sitting president has financial interests in the energy sector, it is inevitable that energy policy gains new political weight. Shortly thereafter, on December 22, 2025, the federal government issued a national stop work order for offshore wind projects. It was the first time in American history that offshore wind was paused on such a large scale. In Davos, harsh rhetoric against wind turbines followed, and energy policy became a central field of conflict. At the same time, the USA’s interest in Greenland increased significantly — and this is no coincidence. The USA faces a growing challenge in the nuclear fuel chain. The country needs secure access to uranium, wants to reduce its dependence on Russia and Kazakhstan, and aims to strengthen its energy security through stable, Western suppliers. The USA has uranium, but production is low, and enrichment capacity is only now being rebuilt. Therefore, the USA is looking for alternative, politically reliable raw material sources. Here, Greenland becomes strategically interesting. The island holds some of the world’s largest unexploited uranium deposits, especially at Kvanefjeld/Kuannersuit, as well as thorium and rare earth elements — precisely the raw materials that the West lacks in competition with China and Russia. Greenland can technically and geologically supply the raw materials for a Western, non-Russian fuel chain for nuclear power. Enrichment will take place in the USA or the EU, but the raw materials can come from Greenland. Even without mining, Greenland functions as a strategic reserve: merely the existence of resources in a stable, Western area strengthens the USA’s and NATO’s global position. If thorium reactors become commercial, Greenland becomes even more important. The combination of thorium, rare earth elements, and uranium in the same geological area makes Greenland one of the most strategically interesting places in the Arctic. Greenland’s importance to the USA is not just about raw materials. The island is close to North America, is already integrated into the American security structure via Thule Air Base, and is part of the Danish Realm and thus NATO. For the USA, it is far more attractive to secure raw materials from Greenland than from Russia, Kazakhstan, or China-controlled projects in Africa. But there are political barriers. Greenland has decided not to extract uranium, and uranium is politically controversial both in Greenland and Denmark. Any American strategy involving Greenlandic uranium will therefore be long-term, politically sensitive, and dependent on local support. Therefore, Greenland is today a strategic opportunity — not an active part of the USA’s fuel strategy. The conclusion is clear: Greenland can become a central piece in a Western, USA-led fuel chain for nuclear power. The country’s raw materials fit directly into the USA’s need to free itself from Russian and Kazakh uranium and secure future energy supply. But the key to Greenland’s raw materials lies in Greenland and Copenhagen — not in Washington. It is precisely the combination of strategic potential and political inaccessibility that explains why the USA has historically shown interest in gaining greater control over Greenland. If the USA owned Greenland, they would not be limited by the current political decisions on uranium extraction. For an American administration that wants to dominate the future energy market — both fusion and fission — Greenland is not just a geographical area, but a strategic raw material center. It is about energy, security, geopolitics, and future global power. We have hardly heard the last of that saga. And we have probably not seen the last obstacle for wind turbines in the USA either.·18 t sitten · MuokattuRepublish in its entirety because I think it was well-written and interesting, waiting for debate. Nice forum where everyone is welcome even if Ørsted never garnered anyone's interest. Let me know if I should remove it. https://nyaborssnack.com/kategori/borssnack/trad/usa-krnkraft-och-grnland-244567
- ·1 päivä sittenAll new homes should be established with with a requirement for a home battery Home batteries should be promoted with the best possible commitment for balancing the energy grid The price of energy will show why wind turbines are necessary·1 päivä sittenFrom ChatGPT Can typically V2H: Nissan Leaf (CHAdeMO) ✅ Nissan e-NV200 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV Some Hyundai / Kia (newer models, selected markets) Some Japanese models Cannot (yet): Tesla (no V2H in EU) VW ID-series (V2G promised, but limited) BMW, Mercedes, Audi (very limited / pilot projects) Most electric cars on the market
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen Trump lost face over Greenland, revenge against wind power will probably come soon. In isolation, it's good to get rid of something so destructive to nature, so the Danes can also switch to future-oriented solar energy.·1 päivä sittenNature-destroying! Perhaps you are confusing the concept of NATURE with landscape. It is the purest form of energy
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuIt just dipped when he, in his speech in Davos, wanted to take down all wind turbines. It grew again when he was done with Greenland, yes, the speech is not finished yet at the time of writing, Maybe he'll finish with a round of tariffs!!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
1 306 716
Myynti
Määrä
1 350 179
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | - | - | ||
| 20 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 16 | - | - | ||
| 47 | - | - |
Ylin
138,3VWAP
Alin
135,2VaihtoMäärä
223,6 1 625 418
VWAP
Ylin
138,3Alin
135,2VaihtoMäärä
223,6 1 625 418
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 11.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 7.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 3.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2.2025 |
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
80 päivää sitten1 t 21 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 11.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 7.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 3.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2.2025 |
7,5033 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenI think the sentiment from the American administration is a bit schizophrenic. I wonder if we just have to get used to it changing every other week.
- ·1 päivä sittenUSA, nuclear power and Greenland: A strategic connection On December 18, 2025, Trump Media & Technology Group announced a 50/50 merger with TAE Technologies, an American company working with advanced fusion technology. The agreement gave Donald Trump — as the largest single shareholder in TMTG — a direct financial interest in an energy company that aims to shape the future of nuclear power. Fusion is not yet commercial, but the potential is enormous, and when a sitting president has financial interests in the energy sector, it is inevitable that energy policy gains new political weight. Shortly thereafter, on December 22, 2025, the federal government issued a national stop work order for offshore wind projects. It was the first time in American history that offshore wind was paused on such a large scale. In Davos, harsh rhetoric against wind turbines followed, and energy policy became a central field of conflict. At the same time, the USA’s interest in Greenland increased significantly — and this is no coincidence. The USA faces a growing challenge in the nuclear fuel chain. The country needs secure access to uranium, wants to reduce its dependence on Russia and Kazakhstan, and aims to strengthen its energy security through stable, Western suppliers. The USA has uranium, but production is low, and enrichment capacity is only now being rebuilt. Therefore, the USA is looking for alternative, politically reliable raw material sources. Here, Greenland becomes strategically interesting. The island holds some of the world’s largest unexploited uranium deposits, especially at Kvanefjeld/Kuannersuit, as well as thorium and rare earth elements — precisely the raw materials that the West lacks in competition with China and Russia. Greenland can technically and geologically supply the raw materials for a Western, non-Russian fuel chain for nuclear power. Enrichment will take place in the USA or the EU, but the raw materials can come from Greenland. Even without mining, Greenland functions as a strategic reserve: merely the existence of resources in a stable, Western area strengthens the USA’s and NATO’s global position. If thorium reactors become commercial, Greenland becomes even more important. The combination of thorium, rare earth elements, and uranium in the same geological area makes Greenland one of the most strategically interesting places in the Arctic. Greenland’s importance to the USA is not just about raw materials. The island is close to North America, is already integrated into the American security structure via Thule Air Base, and is part of the Danish Realm and thus NATO. For the USA, it is far more attractive to secure raw materials from Greenland than from Russia, Kazakhstan, or China-controlled projects in Africa. But there are political barriers. Greenland has decided not to extract uranium, and uranium is politically controversial both in Greenland and Denmark. Any American strategy involving Greenlandic uranium will therefore be long-term, politically sensitive, and dependent on local support. Therefore, Greenland is today a strategic opportunity — not an active part of the USA’s fuel strategy. The conclusion is clear: Greenland can become a central piece in a Western, USA-led fuel chain for nuclear power. The country’s raw materials fit directly into the USA’s need to free itself from Russian and Kazakh uranium and secure future energy supply. But the key to Greenland’s raw materials lies in Greenland and Copenhagen — not in Washington. It is precisely the combination of strategic potential and political inaccessibility that explains why the USA has historically shown interest in gaining greater control over Greenland. If the USA owned Greenland, they would not be limited by the current political decisions on uranium extraction. For an American administration that wants to dominate the future energy market — both fusion and fission — Greenland is not just a geographical area, but a strategic raw material center. It is about energy, security, geopolitics, and future global power. We have hardly heard the last of that saga. And we have probably not seen the last obstacle for wind turbines in the USA either.·18 t sitten · MuokattuRepublish in its entirety because I think it was well-written and interesting, waiting for debate. Nice forum where everyone is welcome even if Ørsted never garnered anyone's interest. Let me know if I should remove it. https://nyaborssnack.com/kategori/borssnack/trad/usa-krnkraft-och-grnland-244567
- ·1 päivä sittenAll new homes should be established with with a requirement for a home battery Home batteries should be promoted with the best possible commitment for balancing the energy grid The price of energy will show why wind turbines are necessary·1 päivä sittenFrom ChatGPT Can typically V2H: Nissan Leaf (CHAdeMO) ✅ Nissan e-NV200 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV Some Hyundai / Kia (newer models, selected markets) Some Japanese models Cannot (yet): Tesla (no V2H in EU) VW ID-series (V2G promised, but limited) BMW, Mercedes, Audi (very limited / pilot projects) Most electric cars on the market
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen Trump lost face over Greenland, revenge against wind power will probably come soon. In isolation, it's good to get rid of something so destructive to nature, so the Danes can also switch to future-oriented solar energy.·1 päivä sittenNature-destroying! Perhaps you are confusing the concept of NATURE with landscape. It is the purest form of energy
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuIt just dipped when he, in his speech in Davos, wanted to take down all wind turbines. It grew again when he was done with Greenland, yes, the speech is not finished yet at the time of writing, Maybe he'll finish with a round of tariffs!!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
1 306 716
Myynti
Määrä
1 350 179
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | - | - | ||
| 20 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 16 | - | - | ||
| 47 | - | - |
Ylin
138,3VWAP
Alin
135,2VaihtoMäärä
223,6 1 625 418
VWAP
Ylin
138,3Alin
135,2VaihtoMäärä
223,6 1 625 418
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt