2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
79 päivää sitten1 t 21 min
7,5033 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
14 348
Myynti
Määrä
18 435
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 70 641 | 70 641 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 70 641 | 70 641 | 0 | 0 |
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 11.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 7.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 3.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·21 t sittenUSA, nuclear power and Greenland: A strategic connection On December 18, 2025, Trump Media & Technology Group announced a 50/50 merger with TAE Technologies, an American company working with advanced fusion technology. The agreement gave Donald Trump — as the largest single shareholder in TMTG — a direct financial interest in an energy company that aims to shape the future of nuclear power. Fusion is not yet commercial, but the potential is enormous, and when a sitting president has financial interests in the energy sector, it is inevitable that energy policy gains new political weight. Shortly thereafter, on December 22, 2025, the federal government issued a national stop work order for offshore wind projects. It was the first time in American history that offshore wind was paused on such a large scale. In Davos, harsh rhetoric against wind turbines followed, and energy policy became a central field of conflict. At the same time, the USA’s interest in Greenland increased significantly — and this is no coincidence. The USA faces a growing challenge in the nuclear fuel chain. The country needs secure access to uranium, wants to reduce its dependence on Russia and Kazakhstan, and aims to strengthen its energy security through stable, Western suppliers. The USA has uranium, but production is low, and enrichment capacity is only now being rebuilt. Therefore, the USA is looking for alternative, politically reliable raw material sources. Here, Greenland becomes strategically interesting. The island holds some of the world’s largest unexploited uranium deposits, especially at Kvanefjeld/Kuannersuit, as well as thorium and rare earth elements — precisely the raw materials that the West lacks in competition with China and Russia. Greenland can technically and geologically supply the raw materials for a Western, non-Russian fuel chain for nuclear power. Enrichment will take place in the USA or the EU, but the raw materials can come from Greenland. Even without mining, Greenland functions as a strategic reserve: merely the existence of resources in a stable, Western area strengthens the USA’s and NATO’s global position. If thorium reactors become commercial, Greenland becomes even more important. The combination of thorium, rare earth elements, and uranium in the same geological area makes Greenland one of the most strategically interesting places in the Arctic. Greenland’s importance to the USA is not just about raw materials. The island is close to North America, is already integrated into the American security structure via Thule Air Base, and is part of the Danish Realm and thus NATO. For the USA, it is far more attractive to secure raw materials from Greenland than from Russia, Kazakhstan, or China-controlled projects in Africa. But there are political barriers. Greenland has decided not to extract uranium, and uranium is politically controversial both in Greenland and Denmark. Any American strategy involving Greenlandic uranium will therefore be long-term, politically sensitive, and dependent on local support. Therefore, Greenland is today a strategic opportunity — not an active part of the USA’s fuel strategy. The conclusion is clear: Greenland can become a central piece in a Western, USA-led fuel chain for nuclear power. The country’s raw materials fit directly into the USA’s need to free itself from Russian and Kazakh uranium and secure future energy supply. But the key to Greenland’s raw materials lies in Greenland and Copenhagen — not in Washington. It is precisely the combination of strategic potential and political inaccessibility that explains why the USA has historically shown interest in gaining greater control over Greenland. If the USA owned Greenland, they would not be limited by the current political decisions on uranium extraction. For an American administration that wants to dominate the future energy market — both fusion and fission — Greenland is not just a geographical area, but a strategic raw material center. It is about energy, security, geopolitics, and future global power. We have hardly heard the last of that saga. And we have probably not seen the last obstacle for wind turbines in the USA either.16 t sitten16 t sittenMoscow Times, march 2025: On Feb. 24, the pro-Kremlin outlet EA Daily reported that Tenex, a subsidiary of Rosatom, had resumed exporting low-enriched uranium to the United States. Citing data from the procurement tracking service ImportGenius, the report said that on Feb. 12, the vessel Atlantic Navigator II delivered a total of 100 tons of enriched uranium to the port of Baltimore. In mid-November 2024, the Russian government imposed a temporary ban on exporting enriched uranium to the U.S. until the end of 2025 and revoked current export licenses. This measure was a response to a U.S. law passed six months earlier, which prohibits the purchase of enriched uranium from Russia starting in 2028. Until then, purchases are allowed only for limited quantities and require special approval to prove they serve U.S. interests. Russia’s restrictions likewise include exceptions, allowing for one-time licenses to resume exports to the U.S. According to the Kremlin, export permits are granted when they align with "Russia’s interests." What are Russia’s interests in this situation? More specifically, what are the interests of the Russian government and Rosatom? First, there is the financial aspect: Rosatom earns approximately $1 billion annually from exporting enriched uranium to the U.S. Additionally, Rosatom's reputation is at stake. The Kremlin values the state corporation as an instrument of both economic and political influence abroad. Given that Rosatom is one of the largest players in the global nuclear market, operating in dozens of countries and remains one of the few Russian exporters not heavily sanctioned, maintaining its status as a reliable supplier is crucial for both the Kremlin and Rosatom — at least as long as it remains possible. This is why Rosatom’s subsidiaries are keen to fulfill American contracts and continue operating in the U.S. market. The United States is one of their most profitable and long-established markets, accounting for nearly half of Russia’s enriched uranium exports. When Russia introduced its export restrictions in November, it was expected that they would have little impact on overall supply plans. Rosatom and Tenex were anticipated to request — and receive — approval to continue exports to the U.S. On Feb. 6, Centrus, the primary American buyer of Russian enriched uranium — which then resells it to other U.S. consumers — said in its 2024 annual report that "as of today, Tenex has received three special licenses allowing it to export low-enriched uranium to us." Additionally, Centrus reported that "Tenex has informed Centrus of its plan to request additional export licenses to fulfill its contractual supply obligations." Blot til orientering.
·21 t sittenAll new homes should be established with with a requirement for a home battery Home batteries should be promoted with the best possible commitment for balancing the energy grid The price of energy will show why wind turbines are necessary
·20 t sittenFrom ChatGPT Can typically V2H: Nissan Leaf (CHAdeMO) ✅ Nissan e-NV200 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV Some Hyundai / Kia (newer models, selected markets) Some Japanese models Cannot (yet): Tesla (no V2H in EU) VW ID-series (V2G promised, but limited) BMW, Mercedes, Audi (very limited / pilot projects) Most electric cars on the market
·22 t sittenWhen Trump lost face over Greenland, revenge against wind power will probably come soon. In isolation, it's good to get rid of something so destructive to nature, so the Danes can also switch to future-oriented solar energy.
·20 t sittenNature-destroying! Perhaps you are confusing the concept of NATURE with landscape. It is the purest form of energy·20 t sittenThat is the delusion far too many still find themselves in. Wind power in Denmark is one thing, but in Norway large untouched natural areas are completely destroyed. The mountain wilderness is mutilated with roads and looks like industrial areas where wind power is allowed. It must be stopped for our sake and for the sake of our descendants. Offshore wind makes fishing impossible, cables are laid criss-cross, quantities of stone are dumped and stir up loose masses that spread in the sea and kill all life. The fjords are dying.- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuIt just dipped when he, in his speech in Davos, wanted to take down all wind turbines. It grew again when he was done with Greenland, yes, the speech is not finished yet at the time of writing, Maybe he'll finish with a round of tariffs!!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
79 päivää sitten1 t 21 min
7,5033 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·21 t sittenUSA, nuclear power and Greenland: A strategic connection On December 18, 2025, Trump Media & Technology Group announced a 50/50 merger with TAE Technologies, an American company working with advanced fusion technology. The agreement gave Donald Trump — as the largest single shareholder in TMTG — a direct financial interest in an energy company that aims to shape the future of nuclear power. Fusion is not yet commercial, but the potential is enormous, and when a sitting president has financial interests in the energy sector, it is inevitable that energy policy gains new political weight. Shortly thereafter, on December 22, 2025, the federal government issued a national stop work order for offshore wind projects. It was the first time in American history that offshore wind was paused on such a large scale. In Davos, harsh rhetoric against wind turbines followed, and energy policy became a central field of conflict. At the same time, the USA’s interest in Greenland increased significantly — and this is no coincidence. The USA faces a growing challenge in the nuclear fuel chain. The country needs secure access to uranium, wants to reduce its dependence on Russia and Kazakhstan, and aims to strengthen its energy security through stable, Western suppliers. The USA has uranium, but production is low, and enrichment capacity is only now being rebuilt. Therefore, the USA is looking for alternative, politically reliable raw material sources. Here, Greenland becomes strategically interesting. The island holds some of the world’s largest unexploited uranium deposits, especially at Kvanefjeld/Kuannersuit, as well as thorium and rare earth elements — precisely the raw materials that the West lacks in competition with China and Russia. Greenland can technically and geologically supply the raw materials for a Western, non-Russian fuel chain for nuclear power. Enrichment will take place in the USA or the EU, but the raw materials can come from Greenland. Even without mining, Greenland functions as a strategic reserve: merely the existence of resources in a stable, Western area strengthens the USA’s and NATO’s global position. If thorium reactors become commercial, Greenland becomes even more important. The combination of thorium, rare earth elements, and uranium in the same geological area makes Greenland one of the most strategically interesting places in the Arctic. Greenland’s importance to the USA is not just about raw materials. The island is close to North America, is already integrated into the American security structure via Thule Air Base, and is part of the Danish Realm and thus NATO. For the USA, it is far more attractive to secure raw materials from Greenland than from Russia, Kazakhstan, or China-controlled projects in Africa. But there are political barriers. Greenland has decided not to extract uranium, and uranium is politically controversial both in Greenland and Denmark. Any American strategy involving Greenlandic uranium will therefore be long-term, politically sensitive, and dependent on local support. Therefore, Greenland is today a strategic opportunity — not an active part of the USA’s fuel strategy. The conclusion is clear: Greenland can become a central piece in a Western, USA-led fuel chain for nuclear power. The country’s raw materials fit directly into the USA’s need to free itself from Russian and Kazakh uranium and secure future energy supply. But the key to Greenland’s raw materials lies in Greenland and Copenhagen — not in Washington. It is precisely the combination of strategic potential and political inaccessibility that explains why the USA has historically shown interest in gaining greater control over Greenland. If the USA owned Greenland, they would not be limited by the current political decisions on uranium extraction. For an American administration that wants to dominate the future energy market — both fusion and fission — Greenland is not just a geographical area, but a strategic raw material center. It is about energy, security, geopolitics, and future global power. We have hardly heard the last of that saga. And we have probably not seen the last obstacle for wind turbines in the USA either.16 t sitten16 t sittenMoscow Times, march 2025: On Feb. 24, the pro-Kremlin outlet EA Daily reported that Tenex, a subsidiary of Rosatom, had resumed exporting low-enriched uranium to the United States. Citing data from the procurement tracking service ImportGenius, the report said that on Feb. 12, the vessel Atlantic Navigator II delivered a total of 100 tons of enriched uranium to the port of Baltimore. In mid-November 2024, the Russian government imposed a temporary ban on exporting enriched uranium to the U.S. until the end of 2025 and revoked current export licenses. This measure was a response to a U.S. law passed six months earlier, which prohibits the purchase of enriched uranium from Russia starting in 2028. Until then, purchases are allowed only for limited quantities and require special approval to prove they serve U.S. interests. Russia’s restrictions likewise include exceptions, allowing for one-time licenses to resume exports to the U.S. According to the Kremlin, export permits are granted when they align with "Russia’s interests." What are Russia’s interests in this situation? More specifically, what are the interests of the Russian government and Rosatom? First, there is the financial aspect: Rosatom earns approximately $1 billion annually from exporting enriched uranium to the U.S. Additionally, Rosatom's reputation is at stake. The Kremlin values the state corporation as an instrument of both economic and political influence abroad. Given that Rosatom is one of the largest players in the global nuclear market, operating in dozens of countries and remains one of the few Russian exporters not heavily sanctioned, maintaining its status as a reliable supplier is crucial for both the Kremlin and Rosatom — at least as long as it remains possible. This is why Rosatom’s subsidiaries are keen to fulfill American contracts and continue operating in the U.S. market. The United States is one of their most profitable and long-established markets, accounting for nearly half of Russia’s enriched uranium exports. When Russia introduced its export restrictions in November, it was expected that they would have little impact on overall supply plans. Rosatom and Tenex were anticipated to request — and receive — approval to continue exports to the U.S. On Feb. 6, Centrus, the primary American buyer of Russian enriched uranium — which then resells it to other U.S. consumers — said in its 2024 annual report that "as of today, Tenex has received three special licenses allowing it to export low-enriched uranium to us." Additionally, Centrus reported that "Tenex has informed Centrus of its plan to request additional export licenses to fulfill its contractual supply obligations." Blot til orientering.
- ·21 t sittenAll new homes should be established with with a requirement for a home battery Home batteries should be promoted with the best possible commitment for balancing the energy grid The price of energy will show why wind turbines are necessary·20 t sittenFrom ChatGPT Can typically V2H: Nissan Leaf (CHAdeMO) ✅ Nissan e-NV200 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV Some Hyundai / Kia (newer models, selected markets) Some Japanese models Cannot (yet): Tesla (no V2H in EU) VW ID-series (V2G promised, but limited) BMW, Mercedes, Audi (very limited / pilot projects) Most electric cars on the market
- ·22 t sittenWhen Trump lost face over Greenland, revenge against wind power will probably come soon. In isolation, it's good to get rid of something so destructive to nature, so the Danes can also switch to future-oriented solar energy.·20 t sittenNature-destroying! Perhaps you are confusing the concept of NATURE with landscape. It is the purest form of energy·20 t sittenThat is the delusion far too many still find themselves in. Wind power in Denmark is one thing, but in Norway large untouched natural areas are completely destroyed. The mountain wilderness is mutilated with roads and looks like industrial areas where wind power is allowed. It must be stopped for our sake and for the sake of our descendants. Offshore wind makes fishing impossible, cables are laid criss-cross, quantities of stone are dumped and stir up loose masses that spread in the sea and kill all life. The fjords are dying.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuIt just dipped when he, in his speech in Davos, wanted to take down all wind turbines. It grew again when he was done with Greenland, yes, the speech is not finished yet at the time of writing, Maybe he'll finish with a round of tariffs!!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
14 348
Myynti
Määrä
18 435
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 70 641 | 70 641 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 70 641 | 70 641 | 0 | 0 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 11.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 7.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 3.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2.2025 |
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
79 päivää sitten1 t 21 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 5.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 11.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 7.5.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 3.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 6.2.2025 |
7,5033 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·21 t sittenUSA, nuclear power and Greenland: A strategic connection On December 18, 2025, Trump Media & Technology Group announced a 50/50 merger with TAE Technologies, an American company working with advanced fusion technology. The agreement gave Donald Trump — as the largest single shareholder in TMTG — a direct financial interest in an energy company that aims to shape the future of nuclear power. Fusion is not yet commercial, but the potential is enormous, and when a sitting president has financial interests in the energy sector, it is inevitable that energy policy gains new political weight. Shortly thereafter, on December 22, 2025, the federal government issued a national stop work order for offshore wind projects. It was the first time in American history that offshore wind was paused on such a large scale. In Davos, harsh rhetoric against wind turbines followed, and energy policy became a central field of conflict. At the same time, the USA’s interest in Greenland increased significantly — and this is no coincidence. The USA faces a growing challenge in the nuclear fuel chain. The country needs secure access to uranium, wants to reduce its dependence on Russia and Kazakhstan, and aims to strengthen its energy security through stable, Western suppliers. The USA has uranium, but production is low, and enrichment capacity is only now being rebuilt. Therefore, the USA is looking for alternative, politically reliable raw material sources. Here, Greenland becomes strategically interesting. The island holds some of the world’s largest unexploited uranium deposits, especially at Kvanefjeld/Kuannersuit, as well as thorium and rare earth elements — precisely the raw materials that the West lacks in competition with China and Russia. Greenland can technically and geologically supply the raw materials for a Western, non-Russian fuel chain for nuclear power. Enrichment will take place in the USA or the EU, but the raw materials can come from Greenland. Even without mining, Greenland functions as a strategic reserve: merely the existence of resources in a stable, Western area strengthens the USA’s and NATO’s global position. If thorium reactors become commercial, Greenland becomes even more important. The combination of thorium, rare earth elements, and uranium in the same geological area makes Greenland one of the most strategically interesting places in the Arctic. Greenland’s importance to the USA is not just about raw materials. The island is close to North America, is already integrated into the American security structure via Thule Air Base, and is part of the Danish Realm and thus NATO. For the USA, it is far more attractive to secure raw materials from Greenland than from Russia, Kazakhstan, or China-controlled projects in Africa. But there are political barriers. Greenland has decided not to extract uranium, and uranium is politically controversial both in Greenland and Denmark. Any American strategy involving Greenlandic uranium will therefore be long-term, politically sensitive, and dependent on local support. Therefore, Greenland is today a strategic opportunity — not an active part of the USA’s fuel strategy. The conclusion is clear: Greenland can become a central piece in a Western, USA-led fuel chain for nuclear power. The country’s raw materials fit directly into the USA’s need to free itself from Russian and Kazakh uranium and secure future energy supply. But the key to Greenland’s raw materials lies in Greenland and Copenhagen — not in Washington. It is precisely the combination of strategic potential and political inaccessibility that explains why the USA has historically shown interest in gaining greater control over Greenland. If the USA owned Greenland, they would not be limited by the current political decisions on uranium extraction. For an American administration that wants to dominate the future energy market — both fusion and fission — Greenland is not just a geographical area, but a strategic raw material center. It is about energy, security, geopolitics, and future global power. We have hardly heard the last of that saga. And we have probably not seen the last obstacle for wind turbines in the USA either.16 t sitten16 t sittenMoscow Times, march 2025: On Feb. 24, the pro-Kremlin outlet EA Daily reported that Tenex, a subsidiary of Rosatom, had resumed exporting low-enriched uranium to the United States. Citing data from the procurement tracking service ImportGenius, the report said that on Feb. 12, the vessel Atlantic Navigator II delivered a total of 100 tons of enriched uranium to the port of Baltimore. In mid-November 2024, the Russian government imposed a temporary ban on exporting enriched uranium to the U.S. until the end of 2025 and revoked current export licenses. This measure was a response to a U.S. law passed six months earlier, which prohibits the purchase of enriched uranium from Russia starting in 2028. Until then, purchases are allowed only for limited quantities and require special approval to prove they serve U.S. interests. Russia’s restrictions likewise include exceptions, allowing for one-time licenses to resume exports to the U.S. According to the Kremlin, export permits are granted when they align with "Russia’s interests." What are Russia’s interests in this situation? More specifically, what are the interests of the Russian government and Rosatom? First, there is the financial aspect: Rosatom earns approximately $1 billion annually from exporting enriched uranium to the U.S. Additionally, Rosatom's reputation is at stake. The Kremlin values the state corporation as an instrument of both economic and political influence abroad. Given that Rosatom is one of the largest players in the global nuclear market, operating in dozens of countries and remains one of the few Russian exporters not heavily sanctioned, maintaining its status as a reliable supplier is crucial for both the Kremlin and Rosatom — at least as long as it remains possible. This is why Rosatom’s subsidiaries are keen to fulfill American contracts and continue operating in the U.S. market. The United States is one of their most profitable and long-established markets, accounting for nearly half of Russia’s enriched uranium exports. When Russia introduced its export restrictions in November, it was expected that they would have little impact on overall supply plans. Rosatom and Tenex were anticipated to request — and receive — approval to continue exports to the U.S. On Feb. 6, Centrus, the primary American buyer of Russian enriched uranium — which then resells it to other U.S. consumers — said in its 2024 annual report that "as of today, Tenex has received three special licenses allowing it to export low-enriched uranium to us." Additionally, Centrus reported that "Tenex has informed Centrus of its plan to request additional export licenses to fulfill its contractual supply obligations." Blot til orientering.
- ·21 t sittenAll new homes should be established with with a requirement for a home battery Home batteries should be promoted with the best possible commitment for balancing the energy grid The price of energy will show why wind turbines are necessary·20 t sittenFrom ChatGPT Can typically V2H: Nissan Leaf (CHAdeMO) ✅ Nissan e-NV200 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV Some Hyundai / Kia (newer models, selected markets) Some Japanese models Cannot (yet): Tesla (no V2H in EU) VW ID-series (V2G promised, but limited) BMW, Mercedes, Audi (very limited / pilot projects) Most electric cars on the market
- ·22 t sittenWhen Trump lost face over Greenland, revenge against wind power will probably come soon. In isolation, it's good to get rid of something so destructive to nature, so the Danes can also switch to future-oriented solar energy.·20 t sittenNature-destroying! Perhaps you are confusing the concept of NATURE with landscape. It is the purest form of energy·20 t sittenThat is the delusion far too many still find themselves in. Wind power in Denmark is one thing, but in Norway large untouched natural areas are completely destroyed. The mountain wilderness is mutilated with roads and looks like industrial areas where wind power is allowed. It must be stopped for our sake and for the sake of our descendants. Offshore wind makes fishing impossible, cables are laid criss-cross, quantities of stone are dumped and stir up loose masses that spread in the sea and kill all life. The fjords are dying.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuIt just dipped when he, in his speech in Davos, wanted to take down all wind turbines. It grew again when he was done with Greenland, yes, the speech is not finished yet at the time of writing, Maybe he'll finish with a round of tariffs!!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
14 348
Myynti
Määrä
18 435
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 70 641 | 70 641 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 70 641 | 70 641 | 0 | 0 |