2026 Q4 - tulosraportti
21 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä |
|---|---|---|
| 1 262 | ||
| 800 | ||
| 5 000 | ||
| 100 | ||
| 4 017 |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2027 Q1 - tulosraportti 15.1.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti 16.10. | ||
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 17.7. | ||
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 8.4. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 16.1. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 17.10.2025 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·5 t sittenENERGY SUPPLY IS NOW A DESIGNATED SABOTAGE TARGET – TOTAL DEFENCE REQUIRES REDUNDANCY On November 5, the government decided on continued internal border control, with explicit reference to Russian hybrid threats and hostile actors on Swedish soil. This is not grand politics for diplomats – it is brutal infrastructure facts that redraw the entire playing field for Swedish preparedness. 1. ENERGY IS A DESIGNATED TARGET FOR SABOTAGE The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MCF) and the Swedish Armed Forces now explicitly designate energy supply and submarine cables as sabotage targets in hybrid warfare. They state that Russia is continuously making preparations for sabotage. Säpo is equally uncompromising: "The sabotage threat from Russia is real." The consequence is inevitable. An LNG terminal on the coast or an international cable is no longer just an asset – it is an extremely vulnerable pinpoint target. Total defence is no longer chasing paper contracts, they demand geographical dispersion and physical redundancy. 2. SVENSKA KRAFTNÄT'S 15-MINUTE LIFELINE Sweden has already realized the need for decentralized survival power. Svenska kraftnät currently manages overloads with 20 strategically distributed gas turbines (1,300 MW) that can be started within 15 minutes when the grid is knocked out. The government notes that we have about 40 turbines in the country and is now investigating support for more. But when total defence is scaled up to handle physical attacks, the need for rapid, distributed backup power will explode. 3. A TURBINE WITHOUT DOMESTIC FUEL IS JUST STEEL Regardless of how many turbines are built, the defence equation falls on a single question: What happens when the fuel for all this distributed backup power must be transported in via ships to closed or sabotaged ports? This is where Siljansgasen becomes indispensable. Local, protected extraction inland, connected to geographically distributed turbines, provides immediate backup power when international import routes are cut off. CONCLUSION: SOU 2025:68 HAS ALREADY PROVIDED THE ANSWER The state's own inquiry (SOU 2025:68) establishes that commercial investments in Swedish natural gas must be permitted already in peacetime for us to have access to it when trade flows are disrupted. The inquiry's conclusion is explicit: the 2022 extraction ban must be completely abolished. When Sweden explicitly plans for Russian sabotage against critical energy infrastructure, a ban on Swedish energy extraction is defence policy idiocy. What is produced beneath Swedish soil gives the country a supply route that no foreign power can close.
·15 t sittenAlthough @mxrobban seems to be pulling the strings in this thread, it is important to understand today's realities and not fool oneself. Well, now we really must distinguish between what has actually been paid in and what will possibly come later. With the option premium of 3 öre that you state, the four have paid 30,000 kronor each. A total of 120,000 kronor. The remaining 4.96 million will only come if all options are exercised in the autumn of 2029. That hardly secures the cash position and peace of mind "all the way". To understand what we are actually talking about: Biokraft stated at the launch of Stockholm Bio-LNG in 2023 a project investment of approximately 330 MSEK. The capacity was 50 tonnes of liquefied gas per day. Igrene's previously presented ambition was 50,000 tonnes per year, corresponding to approximately 137 tonnes per day. The projects are not directly comparable. Biokraft's investment referred to an expansion at an existing biogas plant, and the cost cannot be scaled up proportionally. But it is a concrete Swedish reference showing the scale that the investments can have. In Mora, a financing plan must also include work on wells, production tests, gas collection and possible water management. Before major expansion capital can be justified, investors need reliable production profiles over several months: sustained gas flows, pressure development, water production and documented operating costs. A good flow during a short test is not the same as secured production over many years. And all of this presupposes that legislation opens up for extraction and that the necessary permits are in place. The board's option purchases may be a sign of faith in the future. But a significantly stronger message would have been to subscribe and pay for new shares already today and thereby provide the company with capital that can actually be used. Especially when the latest rights issue was not fully subscribed. Now they are paying a limited premium for the opportunity to invest more in 2029, if developments justify it. That is fully understandable from their perspective, but hardly the same as committing the full amount here and now. The company needs cash in hand, not potential money in three years. The subscription price of 1.24 kronor is an option condition. It is neither an independent valuation of the project nor proof of commercially extractable gas volumes. It goes without saying that one may be optimistic. But between 120,000 kronor in option premiums and a functioning LNG operation lies quite a substantial amount of work and a completely different capital requirement. Surely we can have some sense of proportion Source: Biokraft's press release on August 24, 2023.ColdAsIce, you are turning the industrial chronology completely upside down. You demand that hundreds of millions in fixed capital should be on the bank account before it is even legal to extract the gas. You are confusing the board incentive program with the financing of heavy infrastructure. Let us sort out the order. 1. THE OPTION PROGRAM IS NOT STEEL AND CONCRETE Nobody is claiming that 120 000 SEK in option premiums will build an LNG plant. The purpose of the program is to tie the board members' own wallets to the company's success. That four board members enter at maximum allocation with a pain threshold around 1.27 SEK (strike + premium), when the stock was at 0.38 SEK, is the relevant signal. It forces management to deliver fundamental, structural results in order to get their money back at all. 2. BIOKRAFT PROVES THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMPANY CASH AND INDUSTRIAL CAPEX Your reference to Biokraft is completely correct, and it shows exactly why your calculations are wrong. Heavy energy infrastructure in that size category is never financed by building a massive cash pile in advance via continuous new share issues from retail investors. It is financed via project financing, bank syndicates, industrial partners, and long-term customer contracts (off-take) where the industry commits to future volumes. But this heavy capital is never activated as long as there is a Swedish legal ban on extraction. 3. SOU 2025:68 DICTATES THE INDUSTRIAL CHRONOLOGY The state's own security of supply inquiry is crystal clear. If Sweden is to have the freedom of action to use domestic natural gas when international trade flows are disrupted, commercial actors must be able to invest in extraction already in peacetime. The inquiry therefore notes that the ban needs to be abolished if the government wants to create that freedom of action. The industrial chain is inescapable: 1. Legal opening (the ban is lifted according to SOU). 2. Verified production flows over time. 3. Investment decisions and large-scale project financing. You are practically demanding step 3 before step 1 is resolved. Between today's option premiums and a finished plant lies a massive amount of work, and it is precisely that legal and industrial preparatory work that management has now taken the financial responsibility to deliver. It is "skin in the game". The real gauge of value thereafter will be exactly what you are asking for: legal opening, sustainable production data, and thereafter industrial project financing.- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuTHE BOARD SETS THE PRICE TAG ON ITS OWN PROMISE: 1.27 SEK PER SHARE For those of you who still describe Igrene's new direction as merely "hopes," the final financial receipt has just arrived. The board is no longer talking - they are acting with their own capital. Let's look at the pure timeline and exactly what it costs them. 1. THE TIMELINE What we are seeing is not a series of random events, an exact plan is now being executed: Oct 16: Igrene focuses its core strategy on commercially extracting the gas. Oct 22: Robert Tingvall takes over as CEO. Nov 4: Tingvall, Chairman of the Board Henrik Badin, Mats Budh, and acting CEO Ragnar Krefting step in and subscribe for maximum allocation: a total of 4 million options. And they pay for them out of their own pockets directly. 2. THE MATHEMATICS: REQUIREMENT FOR 234% UPPWARD MOVEMENT AND OVER 5 MILLION IN NEW CAPITAL These are no free options. The exercise price is set at 1.24 SEK. In addition comes the option premium of exactly 3 öre that they are now paying in cash. This means that the board's actual break-even lies at 1.27 SEK per share. Compared to the share price at the time of the announcement (0.38 SEK), a value increase of a brutal 234 percent is thus required before management earns a single krona at all. And here is the crucial financial effect: Through this option program, a total capital contribution to the company of over 5 million kronor is rigged. For a company of Igrene's size, this secures the cash position and the financial peace of mind to reach all the way. 3. THE PROMISE TO THE MARKET: "CONCRETE RESULTS" Igrene's management knows what the state and shareholders now demand, and acting CEO Ragnar Krefting puts it in black and white in the press release: "The board truly feels that the company's shareholders have given the board a challenge to achieve concrete results in the near future". Concrete results. Nothing else. SUMMARY Heavyweights from the Swedish energy sector do not throw in their own capital and rig capital contributions of over five million if they base their calculation on guesses. Tingvall and the rest of the board know what the state's own investigation (SOU 2025:68) requires, and they have just priced their conviction that they will succeed in breaking the extraction ban. The price tag is 1.27 SEK.
Waoow, what can possibly go wrong. Oooooh so much money out of equity ! High stakes one might think, and no guarantees. Is the intention in that way to impress the government's clerks to let them understand that the gas is "friendly ", and that companies are also prepared to execute their plan, as well as having far-reaching intentions, to supply the state with domestic fossil-free gas - over a long time. Before the ban has been lifted, perhaps Igrene's representatives will get the opportunity to present their "case" to make it possible, not least starting from the current prevailing global situation regarding own production of gas and oil. Before that we get to follow with excitement all now remaining votes in the Riksdag when the Speaker's final word shall be dropped with a gavel. - ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuTHE STATE'S OWN INQUIRY AND RESEARCH SHOW THE WAY: THE BAN MUST GO Yesterday it was noted how energy supply has become an absolute part of Europe's defense logistics. Then the Swedish question remains. Sweden is discussing how gas supply is to be secured for total defense, while commercial extraction of domestic natural gas has been banned since 2022. This equation has now crashed, and the legal path to solve it is already identified in the state's own inquiry. 1. SOU 2025:68: THE BAN MUST BE COMPLETELY ABOLISHED It is not Igrene that has constructed the legal path forward. The state inquiry on supply preparedness (SOU 2025:68) explicitly addresses Swedish natural gas. The inquiry establishes the industrial fundamental rule: real preparedness cannot be built only when the crisis is already here. If Sweden wants freedom of action, commercial actors must be able to invest in extraction already in peacetime. The inquiry's conclusion is uncompromising: if the government wants to be able to utilize domestic natural gas during disrupted trade flows, the extraction ban needs to be abolished. For this to work across the entire threat spectrum, the inquiry assesses that the ban needs to be completely abolished. 2. THE SCIENCE: ACTIVE PRODUCTION AND MASSIVE LEAKAGE At the same time, research has changed the very definition of the Siljan Ring. It is not a fossil, static gas pocket. Peer-reviewed research from 400 meters depth proves that the methane has a microbial origin, and researchers have experimentally demonstrated active methane production. Consequence of this living system is uncontrolled emissions through the rock's fracture system. Chalmers has recently identified hotspots in the Siljan area emitting 3.5 tons of methane per year – with emissions up to 300 times higher than what normally occurs in lakes. Methane is 80 times stronger than carbon dioxide. Commercially handling a resource that is actively produced and leaks uncontrollably into the atmosphere is the next logical industrial step. 3. IGRENE'S EXECUTIVE CALIBRATION In the middle of this storm of SOU demands and scientific evidence, Igrene has streamlined its strategy toward commercial natural gas. The company itself lays out the figures behind Sweden's vulnerability: a peacetime baseline dependence of 14 TWh of imported gas annually. But this is only the beginning. When total defense is activated, reserve power must be secured, and gas turbines started to keep Swedish industry afloat in crisis, the need for physical gas will multiply. Already now at this peacetime bottom level, geopolitics and closed shipping lanes at Hormuz have pushed prices to extreme 100 EUR/MWh. To push through what SOU 2025:68 recommends, Robert Tingvall has been brought in from Söderenergi. After nine months on Igrene's board of directors, he now takes operational responsibility for executing the decisive dialogue with authorities, total defense, and industry. The stated goal is: to reach political and regulatory support for exemption or law amendment, and thereby secure national access through a locally produced energy source. SUMMARY Three lines now meet. The state's own inquiry says the ban must go. Research proves the gas is biogenic and leaking out. Igrene has rigged the executive management to drive the issue to the finish line. Sweden cannot build its defense logistics on foreign ships that stop when the world burns. What exists beneath Swedish soil cannot be stopped in Hormuz.All of this sounds fantastic, thank you for that. To go to the moon, the final step needed is to push a button. Igrene is now in an expectant position, and with that has prepared itself for the journey towards full-scale extraction of the gas, and is waiting precisely for that moment when someone with authority shall push - the removal of the ban - that button which frees up continued work at the Siljan Ring. The question is when or ...... never
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuDEFENCE TURNS ENERGY INTO OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY – EU WANTS TO BUILD DOMESTIC PRODUCTION Gas is no longer a civilian market issue regarding price. Europe's security policy institutions have reclassified energy access as a core military capability. The heaviest players in Europe have put their foot down, and the demand is precisely what we must deliver: defence capability requires physical, domestic energy production. NATO AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION SET THE LIMIT At FORTE 2026 in Vilnius, the NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence stated that operational readiness and Host Nation Support require a secure gas and fuel supply. Energy is now described as a strategic enabler for military operational capability. Shortly thereafter, the European Commission closed the door on import dependency. In a meeting with the defence industry and NATO, Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius formulated the industrial and military truth: Wars are won through logistics, and fuel is a central part of logistics. The demand from the European Commission is explicit: Europe must build sufficient domestic fuel production and preserve strategic production capacity for energy security and defence preparedness. IEA AND QATAR PROVE WHY THE DEMAND IS MADE The International Energy Agency's (IEA) report Global Gas Security Review 2026 delivers the mathematical burden of proof for why NATO and the EU are acting right now. The EU is entering winter with the lowest gas storage levels since 2013. LNG flows through the Strait of Hormuz have practically ceased – over 60 billion cubic meters in shipments were erased from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates in half a year. The IEA states that this enormous refilling need will keep the global market tight well into 2027. Even the world's dominant gas producer has realized the vulnerability. QatarEnergy, which is expected to account for 40 percent of all new global LNG capacity up to 2029, is now building geographical redundancy by importing gas from the USA. When an LNG giant hedges against its own shipping lanes by buying American gas, import risk is beyond all debate. An international contract provides access to a market, but zero physical control. TOTAL DEFENCE IN PARLIAMENT This security policy reality now dictates Swedish policy. A new parliamentary motion links gas supply directly to total defence and states that new infrastructure is "directly necessary from a total defence perspective". The chain of facts is closed. NATO and the EU explicitly demand domestic capacity. The IEA rules out the international import market. Energy is logistics, and military endurance requires robust, physical access to energy. That Sweden builds its strategy and its total defence on energy produced outside the country's borders is no longer a sustainable security policy alternative.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avanza Bank AB | 55 091 | 30 293 | 24 798 | 14 244 |
| Swedbank AB | 12 500 | 0 | 12 500 | 0 |
| SSW Market Making GmbH | 33 664 | 23 146 | 10 518 | 0 |
| Nordnet Bank AB | 14 059 | 13 230 | 829 | 0 |
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB | 355 | 49 000 | −48 645 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB | 355 | 49 000 | −48 645 | 0 |
| Nordnet Bank AB | 14 059 | 13 230 | 829 | 0 |
| SSW Market Making GmbH | 33 664 | 23 146 | 10 518 | 0 |
| Swedbank AB | 12 500 | 0 | 12 500 | 0 |
| Avanza Bank AB | 55 091 | 30 293 | 24 798 | 14 244 |
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti
21 päivää sitten
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·5 t sittenENERGY SUPPLY IS NOW A DESIGNATED SABOTAGE TARGET – TOTAL DEFENCE REQUIRES REDUNDANCY On November 5, the government decided on continued internal border control, with explicit reference to Russian hybrid threats and hostile actors on Swedish soil. This is not grand politics for diplomats – it is brutal infrastructure facts that redraw the entire playing field for Swedish preparedness. 1. ENERGY IS A DESIGNATED TARGET FOR SABOTAGE The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MCF) and the Swedish Armed Forces now explicitly designate energy supply and submarine cables as sabotage targets in hybrid warfare. They state that Russia is continuously making preparations for sabotage. Säpo is equally uncompromising: "The sabotage threat from Russia is real." The consequence is inevitable. An LNG terminal on the coast or an international cable is no longer just an asset – it is an extremely vulnerable pinpoint target. Total defence is no longer chasing paper contracts, they demand geographical dispersion and physical redundancy. 2. SVENSKA KRAFTNÄT'S 15-MINUTE LIFELINE Sweden has already realized the need for decentralized survival power. Svenska kraftnät currently manages overloads with 20 strategically distributed gas turbines (1,300 MW) that can be started within 15 minutes when the grid is knocked out. The government notes that we have about 40 turbines in the country and is now investigating support for more. But when total defence is scaled up to handle physical attacks, the need for rapid, distributed backup power will explode. 3. A TURBINE WITHOUT DOMESTIC FUEL IS JUST STEEL Regardless of how many turbines are built, the defence equation falls on a single question: What happens when the fuel for all this distributed backup power must be transported in via ships to closed or sabotaged ports? This is where Siljansgasen becomes indispensable. Local, protected extraction inland, connected to geographically distributed turbines, provides immediate backup power when international import routes are cut off. CONCLUSION: SOU 2025:68 HAS ALREADY PROVIDED THE ANSWER The state's own inquiry (SOU 2025:68) establishes that commercial investments in Swedish natural gas must be permitted already in peacetime for us to have access to it when trade flows are disrupted. The inquiry's conclusion is explicit: the 2022 extraction ban must be completely abolished. When Sweden explicitly plans for Russian sabotage against critical energy infrastructure, a ban on Swedish energy extraction is defence policy idiocy. What is produced beneath Swedish soil gives the country a supply route that no foreign power can close.
- ·15 t sittenAlthough @mxrobban seems to be pulling the strings in this thread, it is important to understand today's realities and not fool oneself. Well, now we really must distinguish between what has actually been paid in and what will possibly come later. With the option premium of 3 öre that you state, the four have paid 30,000 kronor each. A total of 120,000 kronor. The remaining 4.96 million will only come if all options are exercised in the autumn of 2029. That hardly secures the cash position and peace of mind "all the way". To understand what we are actually talking about: Biokraft stated at the launch of Stockholm Bio-LNG in 2023 a project investment of approximately 330 MSEK. The capacity was 50 tonnes of liquefied gas per day. Igrene's previously presented ambition was 50,000 tonnes per year, corresponding to approximately 137 tonnes per day. The projects are not directly comparable. Biokraft's investment referred to an expansion at an existing biogas plant, and the cost cannot be scaled up proportionally. But it is a concrete Swedish reference showing the scale that the investments can have. In Mora, a financing plan must also include work on wells, production tests, gas collection and possible water management. Before major expansion capital can be justified, investors need reliable production profiles over several months: sustained gas flows, pressure development, water production and documented operating costs. A good flow during a short test is not the same as secured production over many years. And all of this presupposes that legislation opens up for extraction and that the necessary permits are in place. The board's option purchases may be a sign of faith in the future. But a significantly stronger message would have been to subscribe and pay for new shares already today and thereby provide the company with capital that can actually be used. Especially when the latest rights issue was not fully subscribed. Now they are paying a limited premium for the opportunity to invest more in 2029, if developments justify it. That is fully understandable from their perspective, but hardly the same as committing the full amount here and now. The company needs cash in hand, not potential money in three years. The subscription price of 1.24 kronor is an option condition. It is neither an independent valuation of the project nor proof of commercially extractable gas volumes. It goes without saying that one may be optimistic. But between 120,000 kronor in option premiums and a functioning LNG operation lies quite a substantial amount of work and a completely different capital requirement. Surely we can have some sense of proportion Source: Biokraft's press release on August 24, 2023.ColdAsIce, you are turning the industrial chronology completely upside down. You demand that hundreds of millions in fixed capital should be on the bank account before it is even legal to extract the gas. You are confusing the board incentive program with the financing of heavy infrastructure. Let us sort out the order. 1. THE OPTION PROGRAM IS NOT STEEL AND CONCRETE Nobody is claiming that 120 000 SEK in option premiums will build an LNG plant. The purpose of the program is to tie the board members' own wallets to the company's success. That four board members enter at maximum allocation with a pain threshold around 1.27 SEK (strike + premium), when the stock was at 0.38 SEK, is the relevant signal. It forces management to deliver fundamental, structural results in order to get their money back at all. 2. BIOKRAFT PROVES THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMPANY CASH AND INDUSTRIAL CAPEX Your reference to Biokraft is completely correct, and it shows exactly why your calculations are wrong. Heavy energy infrastructure in that size category is never financed by building a massive cash pile in advance via continuous new share issues from retail investors. It is financed via project financing, bank syndicates, industrial partners, and long-term customer contracts (off-take) where the industry commits to future volumes. But this heavy capital is never activated as long as there is a Swedish legal ban on extraction. 3. SOU 2025:68 DICTATES THE INDUSTRIAL CHRONOLOGY The state's own security of supply inquiry is crystal clear. If Sweden is to have the freedom of action to use domestic natural gas when international trade flows are disrupted, commercial actors must be able to invest in extraction already in peacetime. The inquiry therefore notes that the ban needs to be abolished if the government wants to create that freedom of action. The industrial chain is inescapable: 1. Legal opening (the ban is lifted according to SOU). 2. Verified production flows over time. 3. Investment decisions and large-scale project financing. You are practically demanding step 3 before step 1 is resolved. Between today's option premiums and a finished plant lies a massive amount of work, and it is precisely that legal and industrial preparatory work that management has now taken the financial responsibility to deliver. It is "skin in the game". The real gauge of value thereafter will be exactly what you are asking for: legal opening, sustainable production data, and thereafter industrial project financing.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuTHE BOARD SETS THE PRICE TAG ON ITS OWN PROMISE: 1.27 SEK PER SHARE For those of you who still describe Igrene's new direction as merely "hopes," the final financial receipt has just arrived. The board is no longer talking - they are acting with their own capital. Let's look at the pure timeline and exactly what it costs them. 1. THE TIMELINE What we are seeing is not a series of random events, an exact plan is now being executed: Oct 16: Igrene focuses its core strategy on commercially extracting the gas. Oct 22: Robert Tingvall takes over as CEO. Nov 4: Tingvall, Chairman of the Board Henrik Badin, Mats Budh, and acting CEO Ragnar Krefting step in and subscribe for maximum allocation: a total of 4 million options. And they pay for them out of their own pockets directly. 2. THE MATHEMATICS: REQUIREMENT FOR 234% UPPWARD MOVEMENT AND OVER 5 MILLION IN NEW CAPITAL These are no free options. The exercise price is set at 1.24 SEK. In addition comes the option premium of exactly 3 öre that they are now paying in cash. This means that the board's actual break-even lies at 1.27 SEK per share. Compared to the share price at the time of the announcement (0.38 SEK), a value increase of a brutal 234 percent is thus required before management earns a single krona at all. And here is the crucial financial effect: Through this option program, a total capital contribution to the company of over 5 million kronor is rigged. For a company of Igrene's size, this secures the cash position and the financial peace of mind to reach all the way. 3. THE PROMISE TO THE MARKET: "CONCRETE RESULTS" Igrene's management knows what the state and shareholders now demand, and acting CEO Ragnar Krefting puts it in black and white in the press release: "The board truly feels that the company's shareholders have given the board a challenge to achieve concrete results in the near future". Concrete results. Nothing else. SUMMARY Heavyweights from the Swedish energy sector do not throw in their own capital and rig capital contributions of over five million if they base their calculation on guesses. Tingvall and the rest of the board know what the state's own investigation (SOU 2025:68) requires, and they have just priced their conviction that they will succeed in breaking the extraction ban. The price tag is 1.27 SEK.Waoow, what can possibly go wrong. Oooooh so much money out of equity ! High stakes one might think, and no guarantees. Is the intention in that way to impress the government's clerks to let them understand that the gas is "friendly ", and that companies are also prepared to execute their plan, as well as having far-reaching intentions, to supply the state with domestic fossil-free gas - over a long time. Before the ban has been lifted, perhaps Igrene's representatives will get the opportunity to present their "case" to make it possible, not least starting from the current prevailing global situation regarding own production of gas and oil. Before that we get to follow with excitement all now remaining votes in the Riksdag when the Speaker's final word shall be dropped with a gavel.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuTHE STATE'S OWN INQUIRY AND RESEARCH SHOW THE WAY: THE BAN MUST GO Yesterday it was noted how energy supply has become an absolute part of Europe's defense logistics. Then the Swedish question remains. Sweden is discussing how gas supply is to be secured for total defense, while commercial extraction of domestic natural gas has been banned since 2022. This equation has now crashed, and the legal path to solve it is already identified in the state's own inquiry. 1. SOU 2025:68: THE BAN MUST BE COMPLETELY ABOLISHED It is not Igrene that has constructed the legal path forward. The state inquiry on supply preparedness (SOU 2025:68) explicitly addresses Swedish natural gas. The inquiry establishes the industrial fundamental rule: real preparedness cannot be built only when the crisis is already here. If Sweden wants freedom of action, commercial actors must be able to invest in extraction already in peacetime. The inquiry's conclusion is uncompromising: if the government wants to be able to utilize domestic natural gas during disrupted trade flows, the extraction ban needs to be abolished. For this to work across the entire threat spectrum, the inquiry assesses that the ban needs to be completely abolished. 2. THE SCIENCE: ACTIVE PRODUCTION AND MASSIVE LEAKAGE At the same time, research has changed the very definition of the Siljan Ring. It is not a fossil, static gas pocket. Peer-reviewed research from 400 meters depth proves that the methane has a microbial origin, and researchers have experimentally demonstrated active methane production. Consequence of this living system is uncontrolled emissions through the rock's fracture system. Chalmers has recently identified hotspots in the Siljan area emitting 3.5 tons of methane per year – with emissions up to 300 times higher than what normally occurs in lakes. Methane is 80 times stronger than carbon dioxide. Commercially handling a resource that is actively produced and leaks uncontrollably into the atmosphere is the next logical industrial step. 3. IGRENE'S EXECUTIVE CALIBRATION In the middle of this storm of SOU demands and scientific evidence, Igrene has streamlined its strategy toward commercial natural gas. The company itself lays out the figures behind Sweden's vulnerability: a peacetime baseline dependence of 14 TWh of imported gas annually. But this is only the beginning. When total defense is activated, reserve power must be secured, and gas turbines started to keep Swedish industry afloat in crisis, the need for physical gas will multiply. Already now at this peacetime bottom level, geopolitics and closed shipping lanes at Hormuz have pushed prices to extreme 100 EUR/MWh. To push through what SOU 2025:68 recommends, Robert Tingvall has been brought in from Söderenergi. After nine months on Igrene's board of directors, he now takes operational responsibility for executing the decisive dialogue with authorities, total defense, and industry. The stated goal is: to reach political and regulatory support for exemption or law amendment, and thereby secure national access through a locally produced energy source. SUMMARY Three lines now meet. The state's own inquiry says the ban must go. Research proves the gas is biogenic and leaking out. Igrene has rigged the executive management to drive the issue to the finish line. Sweden cannot build its defense logistics on foreign ships that stop when the world burns. What exists beneath Swedish soil cannot be stopped in Hormuz.All of this sounds fantastic, thank you for that. To go to the moon, the final step needed is to push a button. Igrene is now in an expectant position, and with that has prepared itself for the journey towards full-scale extraction of the gas, and is waiting precisely for that moment when someone with authority shall push - the removal of the ban - that button which frees up continued work at the Siljan Ring. The question is when or ...... never
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuDEFENCE TURNS ENERGY INTO OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY – EU WANTS TO BUILD DOMESTIC PRODUCTION Gas is no longer a civilian market issue regarding price. Europe's security policy institutions have reclassified energy access as a core military capability. The heaviest players in Europe have put their foot down, and the demand is precisely what we must deliver: defence capability requires physical, domestic energy production. NATO AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION SET THE LIMIT At FORTE 2026 in Vilnius, the NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence stated that operational readiness and Host Nation Support require a secure gas and fuel supply. Energy is now described as a strategic enabler for military operational capability. Shortly thereafter, the European Commission closed the door on import dependency. In a meeting with the defence industry and NATO, Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius formulated the industrial and military truth: Wars are won through logistics, and fuel is a central part of logistics. The demand from the European Commission is explicit: Europe must build sufficient domestic fuel production and preserve strategic production capacity for energy security and defence preparedness. IEA AND QATAR PROVE WHY THE DEMAND IS MADE The International Energy Agency's (IEA) report Global Gas Security Review 2026 delivers the mathematical burden of proof for why NATO and the EU are acting right now. The EU is entering winter with the lowest gas storage levels since 2013. LNG flows through the Strait of Hormuz have practically ceased – over 60 billion cubic meters in shipments were erased from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates in half a year. The IEA states that this enormous refilling need will keep the global market tight well into 2027. Even the world's dominant gas producer has realized the vulnerability. QatarEnergy, which is expected to account for 40 percent of all new global LNG capacity up to 2029, is now building geographical redundancy by importing gas from the USA. When an LNG giant hedges against its own shipping lanes by buying American gas, import risk is beyond all debate. An international contract provides access to a market, but zero physical control. TOTAL DEFENCE IN PARLIAMENT This security policy reality now dictates Swedish policy. A new parliamentary motion links gas supply directly to total defence and states that new infrastructure is "directly necessary from a total defence perspective". The chain of facts is closed. NATO and the EU explicitly demand domestic capacity. The IEA rules out the international import market. Energy is logistics, and military endurance requires robust, physical access to energy. That Sweden builds its strategy and its total defence on energy produced outside the country's borders is no longer a sustainable security policy alternative.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä |
|---|---|---|
| 1 262 | ||
| 800 | ||
| 5 000 | ||
| 100 | ||
| 4 017 |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2027 Q1 - tulosraportti 15.1.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti 16.10. | ||
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 17.7. | ||
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 8.4. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 16.1. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 17.10.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avanza Bank AB | 55 091 | 30 293 | 24 798 | 14 244 |
| Swedbank AB | 12 500 | 0 | 12 500 | 0 |
| SSW Market Making GmbH | 33 664 | 23 146 | 10 518 | 0 |
| Nordnet Bank AB | 14 059 | 13 230 | 829 | 0 |
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB | 355 | 49 000 | −48 645 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB | 355 | 49 000 | −48 645 | 0 |
| Nordnet Bank AB | 14 059 | 13 230 | 829 | 0 |
| SSW Market Making GmbH | 33 664 | 23 146 | 10 518 | 0 |
| Swedbank AB | 12 500 | 0 | 12 500 | 0 |
| Avanza Bank AB | 55 091 | 30 293 | 24 798 | 14 244 |
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti
21 päivää sitten
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2027 Q1 - tulosraportti 15.1.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti 16.10. | ||
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 17.7. | ||
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 8.4. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 16.1. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 17.10.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·5 t sittenENERGY SUPPLY IS NOW A DESIGNATED SABOTAGE TARGET – TOTAL DEFENCE REQUIRES REDUNDANCY On November 5, the government decided on continued internal border control, with explicit reference to Russian hybrid threats and hostile actors on Swedish soil. This is not grand politics for diplomats – it is brutal infrastructure facts that redraw the entire playing field for Swedish preparedness. 1. ENERGY IS A DESIGNATED TARGET FOR SABOTAGE The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MCF) and the Swedish Armed Forces now explicitly designate energy supply and submarine cables as sabotage targets in hybrid warfare. They state that Russia is continuously making preparations for sabotage. Säpo is equally uncompromising: "The sabotage threat from Russia is real." The consequence is inevitable. An LNG terminal on the coast or an international cable is no longer just an asset – it is an extremely vulnerable pinpoint target. Total defence is no longer chasing paper contracts, they demand geographical dispersion and physical redundancy. 2. SVENSKA KRAFTNÄT'S 15-MINUTE LIFELINE Sweden has already realized the need for decentralized survival power. Svenska kraftnät currently manages overloads with 20 strategically distributed gas turbines (1,300 MW) that can be started within 15 minutes when the grid is knocked out. The government notes that we have about 40 turbines in the country and is now investigating support for more. But when total defence is scaled up to handle physical attacks, the need for rapid, distributed backup power will explode. 3. A TURBINE WITHOUT DOMESTIC FUEL IS JUST STEEL Regardless of how many turbines are built, the defence equation falls on a single question: What happens when the fuel for all this distributed backup power must be transported in via ships to closed or sabotaged ports? This is where Siljansgasen becomes indispensable. Local, protected extraction inland, connected to geographically distributed turbines, provides immediate backup power when international import routes are cut off. CONCLUSION: SOU 2025:68 HAS ALREADY PROVIDED THE ANSWER The state's own inquiry (SOU 2025:68) establishes that commercial investments in Swedish natural gas must be permitted already in peacetime for us to have access to it when trade flows are disrupted. The inquiry's conclusion is explicit: the 2022 extraction ban must be completely abolished. When Sweden explicitly plans for Russian sabotage against critical energy infrastructure, a ban on Swedish energy extraction is defence policy idiocy. What is produced beneath Swedish soil gives the country a supply route that no foreign power can close.
- ·15 t sittenAlthough @mxrobban seems to be pulling the strings in this thread, it is important to understand today's realities and not fool oneself. Well, now we really must distinguish between what has actually been paid in and what will possibly come later. With the option premium of 3 öre that you state, the four have paid 30,000 kronor each. A total of 120,000 kronor. The remaining 4.96 million will only come if all options are exercised in the autumn of 2029. That hardly secures the cash position and peace of mind "all the way". To understand what we are actually talking about: Biokraft stated at the launch of Stockholm Bio-LNG in 2023 a project investment of approximately 330 MSEK. The capacity was 50 tonnes of liquefied gas per day. Igrene's previously presented ambition was 50,000 tonnes per year, corresponding to approximately 137 tonnes per day. The projects are not directly comparable. Biokraft's investment referred to an expansion at an existing biogas plant, and the cost cannot be scaled up proportionally. But it is a concrete Swedish reference showing the scale that the investments can have. In Mora, a financing plan must also include work on wells, production tests, gas collection and possible water management. Before major expansion capital can be justified, investors need reliable production profiles over several months: sustained gas flows, pressure development, water production and documented operating costs. A good flow during a short test is not the same as secured production over many years. And all of this presupposes that legislation opens up for extraction and that the necessary permits are in place. The board's option purchases may be a sign of faith in the future. But a significantly stronger message would have been to subscribe and pay for new shares already today and thereby provide the company with capital that can actually be used. Especially when the latest rights issue was not fully subscribed. Now they are paying a limited premium for the opportunity to invest more in 2029, if developments justify it. That is fully understandable from their perspective, but hardly the same as committing the full amount here and now. The company needs cash in hand, not potential money in three years. The subscription price of 1.24 kronor is an option condition. It is neither an independent valuation of the project nor proof of commercially extractable gas volumes. It goes without saying that one may be optimistic. But between 120,000 kronor in option premiums and a functioning LNG operation lies quite a substantial amount of work and a completely different capital requirement. Surely we can have some sense of proportion Source: Biokraft's press release on August 24, 2023.ColdAsIce, you are turning the industrial chronology completely upside down. You demand that hundreds of millions in fixed capital should be on the bank account before it is even legal to extract the gas. You are confusing the board incentive program with the financing of heavy infrastructure. Let us sort out the order. 1. THE OPTION PROGRAM IS NOT STEEL AND CONCRETE Nobody is claiming that 120 000 SEK in option premiums will build an LNG plant. The purpose of the program is to tie the board members' own wallets to the company's success. That four board members enter at maximum allocation with a pain threshold around 1.27 SEK (strike + premium), when the stock was at 0.38 SEK, is the relevant signal. It forces management to deliver fundamental, structural results in order to get their money back at all. 2. BIOKRAFT PROVES THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMPANY CASH AND INDUSTRIAL CAPEX Your reference to Biokraft is completely correct, and it shows exactly why your calculations are wrong. Heavy energy infrastructure in that size category is never financed by building a massive cash pile in advance via continuous new share issues from retail investors. It is financed via project financing, bank syndicates, industrial partners, and long-term customer contracts (off-take) where the industry commits to future volumes. But this heavy capital is never activated as long as there is a Swedish legal ban on extraction. 3. SOU 2025:68 DICTATES THE INDUSTRIAL CHRONOLOGY The state's own security of supply inquiry is crystal clear. If Sweden is to have the freedom of action to use domestic natural gas when international trade flows are disrupted, commercial actors must be able to invest in extraction already in peacetime. The inquiry therefore notes that the ban needs to be abolished if the government wants to create that freedom of action. The industrial chain is inescapable: 1. Legal opening (the ban is lifted according to SOU). 2. Verified production flows over time. 3. Investment decisions and large-scale project financing. You are practically demanding step 3 before step 1 is resolved. Between today's option premiums and a finished plant lies a massive amount of work, and it is precisely that legal and industrial preparatory work that management has now taken the financial responsibility to deliver. It is "skin in the game". The real gauge of value thereafter will be exactly what you are asking for: legal opening, sustainable production data, and thereafter industrial project financing.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuTHE BOARD SETS THE PRICE TAG ON ITS OWN PROMISE: 1.27 SEK PER SHARE For those of you who still describe Igrene's new direction as merely "hopes," the final financial receipt has just arrived. The board is no longer talking - they are acting with their own capital. Let's look at the pure timeline and exactly what it costs them. 1. THE TIMELINE What we are seeing is not a series of random events, an exact plan is now being executed: Oct 16: Igrene focuses its core strategy on commercially extracting the gas. Oct 22: Robert Tingvall takes over as CEO. Nov 4: Tingvall, Chairman of the Board Henrik Badin, Mats Budh, and acting CEO Ragnar Krefting step in and subscribe for maximum allocation: a total of 4 million options. And they pay for them out of their own pockets directly. 2. THE MATHEMATICS: REQUIREMENT FOR 234% UPPWARD MOVEMENT AND OVER 5 MILLION IN NEW CAPITAL These are no free options. The exercise price is set at 1.24 SEK. In addition comes the option premium of exactly 3 öre that they are now paying in cash. This means that the board's actual break-even lies at 1.27 SEK per share. Compared to the share price at the time of the announcement (0.38 SEK), a value increase of a brutal 234 percent is thus required before management earns a single krona at all. And here is the crucial financial effect: Through this option program, a total capital contribution to the company of over 5 million kronor is rigged. For a company of Igrene's size, this secures the cash position and the financial peace of mind to reach all the way. 3. THE PROMISE TO THE MARKET: "CONCRETE RESULTS" Igrene's management knows what the state and shareholders now demand, and acting CEO Ragnar Krefting puts it in black and white in the press release: "The board truly feels that the company's shareholders have given the board a challenge to achieve concrete results in the near future". Concrete results. Nothing else. SUMMARY Heavyweights from the Swedish energy sector do not throw in their own capital and rig capital contributions of over five million if they base their calculation on guesses. Tingvall and the rest of the board know what the state's own investigation (SOU 2025:68) requires, and they have just priced their conviction that they will succeed in breaking the extraction ban. The price tag is 1.27 SEK.Waoow, what can possibly go wrong. Oooooh so much money out of equity ! High stakes one might think, and no guarantees. Is the intention in that way to impress the government's clerks to let them understand that the gas is "friendly ", and that companies are also prepared to execute their plan, as well as having far-reaching intentions, to supply the state with domestic fossil-free gas - over a long time. Before the ban has been lifted, perhaps Igrene's representatives will get the opportunity to present their "case" to make it possible, not least starting from the current prevailing global situation regarding own production of gas and oil. Before that we get to follow with excitement all now remaining votes in the Riksdag when the Speaker's final word shall be dropped with a gavel.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuTHE STATE'S OWN INQUIRY AND RESEARCH SHOW THE WAY: THE BAN MUST GO Yesterday it was noted how energy supply has become an absolute part of Europe's defense logistics. Then the Swedish question remains. Sweden is discussing how gas supply is to be secured for total defense, while commercial extraction of domestic natural gas has been banned since 2022. This equation has now crashed, and the legal path to solve it is already identified in the state's own inquiry. 1. SOU 2025:68: THE BAN MUST BE COMPLETELY ABOLISHED It is not Igrene that has constructed the legal path forward. The state inquiry on supply preparedness (SOU 2025:68) explicitly addresses Swedish natural gas. The inquiry establishes the industrial fundamental rule: real preparedness cannot be built only when the crisis is already here. If Sweden wants freedom of action, commercial actors must be able to invest in extraction already in peacetime. The inquiry's conclusion is uncompromising: if the government wants to be able to utilize domestic natural gas during disrupted trade flows, the extraction ban needs to be abolished. For this to work across the entire threat spectrum, the inquiry assesses that the ban needs to be completely abolished. 2. THE SCIENCE: ACTIVE PRODUCTION AND MASSIVE LEAKAGE At the same time, research has changed the very definition of the Siljan Ring. It is not a fossil, static gas pocket. Peer-reviewed research from 400 meters depth proves that the methane has a microbial origin, and researchers have experimentally demonstrated active methane production. Consequence of this living system is uncontrolled emissions through the rock's fracture system. Chalmers has recently identified hotspots in the Siljan area emitting 3.5 tons of methane per year – with emissions up to 300 times higher than what normally occurs in lakes. Methane is 80 times stronger than carbon dioxide. Commercially handling a resource that is actively produced and leaks uncontrollably into the atmosphere is the next logical industrial step. 3. IGRENE'S EXECUTIVE CALIBRATION In the middle of this storm of SOU demands and scientific evidence, Igrene has streamlined its strategy toward commercial natural gas. The company itself lays out the figures behind Sweden's vulnerability: a peacetime baseline dependence of 14 TWh of imported gas annually. But this is only the beginning. When total defense is activated, reserve power must be secured, and gas turbines started to keep Swedish industry afloat in crisis, the need for physical gas will multiply. Already now at this peacetime bottom level, geopolitics and closed shipping lanes at Hormuz have pushed prices to extreme 100 EUR/MWh. To push through what SOU 2025:68 recommends, Robert Tingvall has been brought in from Söderenergi. After nine months on Igrene's board of directors, he now takes operational responsibility for executing the decisive dialogue with authorities, total defense, and industry. The stated goal is: to reach political and regulatory support for exemption or law amendment, and thereby secure national access through a locally produced energy source. SUMMARY Three lines now meet. The state's own inquiry says the ban must go. Research proves the gas is biogenic and leaking out. Igrene has rigged the executive management to drive the issue to the finish line. Sweden cannot build its defense logistics on foreign ships that stop when the world burns. What exists beneath Swedish soil cannot be stopped in Hormuz.All of this sounds fantastic, thank you for that. To go to the moon, the final step needed is to push a button. Igrene is now in an expectant position, and with that has prepared itself for the journey towards full-scale extraction of the gas, and is waiting precisely for that moment when someone with authority shall push - the removal of the ban - that button which frees up continued work at the Siljan Ring. The question is when or ...... never
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuDEFENCE TURNS ENERGY INTO OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY – EU WANTS TO BUILD DOMESTIC PRODUCTION Gas is no longer a civilian market issue regarding price. Europe's security policy institutions have reclassified energy access as a core military capability. The heaviest players in Europe have put their foot down, and the demand is precisely what we must deliver: defence capability requires physical, domestic energy production. NATO AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION SET THE LIMIT At FORTE 2026 in Vilnius, the NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence stated that operational readiness and Host Nation Support require a secure gas and fuel supply. Energy is now described as a strategic enabler for military operational capability. Shortly thereafter, the European Commission closed the door on import dependency. In a meeting with the defence industry and NATO, Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius formulated the industrial and military truth: Wars are won through logistics, and fuel is a central part of logistics. The demand from the European Commission is explicit: Europe must build sufficient domestic fuel production and preserve strategic production capacity for energy security and defence preparedness. IEA AND QATAR PROVE WHY THE DEMAND IS MADE The International Energy Agency's (IEA) report Global Gas Security Review 2026 delivers the mathematical burden of proof for why NATO and the EU are acting right now. The EU is entering winter with the lowest gas storage levels since 2013. LNG flows through the Strait of Hormuz have practically ceased – over 60 billion cubic meters in shipments were erased from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates in half a year. The IEA states that this enormous refilling need will keep the global market tight well into 2027. Even the world's dominant gas producer has realized the vulnerability. QatarEnergy, which is expected to account for 40 percent of all new global LNG capacity up to 2029, is now building geographical redundancy by importing gas from the USA. When an LNG giant hedges against its own shipping lanes by buying American gas, import risk is beyond all debate. An international contract provides access to a market, but zero physical control. TOTAL DEFENCE IN PARLIAMENT This security policy reality now dictates Swedish policy. A new parliamentary motion links gas supply directly to total defence and states that new infrastructure is "directly necessary from a total defence perspective". The chain of facts is closed. NATO and the EU explicitly demand domestic capacity. The IEA rules out the international import market. Energy is logistics, and military endurance requires robust, physical access to energy. That Sweden builds its strategy and its total defence on energy produced outside the country's borders is no longer a sustainable security policy alternative.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä |
|---|---|---|
| 1 262 | ||
| 800 | ||
| 5 000 | ||
| 100 | ||
| 4 017 |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avanza Bank AB | 55 091 | 30 293 | 24 798 | 14 244 |
| Swedbank AB | 12 500 | 0 | 12 500 | 0 |
| SSW Market Making GmbH | 33 664 | 23 146 | 10 518 | 0 |
| Nordnet Bank AB | 14 059 | 13 230 | 829 | 0 |
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB | 355 | 49 000 | −48 645 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB | 355 | 49 000 | −48 645 | 0 |
| Nordnet Bank AB | 14 059 | 13 230 | 829 | 0 |
| SSW Market Making GmbH | 33 664 | 23 146 | 10 518 | 0 |
| Swedbank AB | 12 500 | 0 | 12 500 | 0 |
| Avanza Bank AB | 55 091 | 30 293 | 24 798 | 14 244 |