Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.

Napatech

2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
36 päivää sitten

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
20--
195--
218--
1 000--
15--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
25.8.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
7.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
26.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
5.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
26.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
26.5.2025

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
  • 4 t sitten
    ·
    4 t sitten
    ·
    Low volume and quiet before the storm. Ref. DNB Carnegie - asymmetric risk/reward. D-Matrix has announced full production. Stock exchange announcement with volume order can come any time now.
  • 5 t sitten
    ·
    5 t sitten
    ·
    A bit from today's prompting: When I look at Napatech's board as a whole, it's not the financial background that stands out most – it's how heavily the board is weighted towards data center infrastructure, network technology, semiconductors, and the commercialization of technology. That's quite unusual for a company of Napatech's size. Patty Kummrow: Probably the clearest link to the bullish scenario. Former head of Intel's Cloud Networking Group. Built the business to over 1 billion dollars in revenue. Deep experience in cloud, enterprise, telecom, and data center products. If Napatech's future depends on becoming relevant in AI clusters and modern data centers, then Kummrow has worked on exactly this on a global scale. Zane Ball: Potentially the most important board appointment. Former Corporate Vice President at Intel. Led development of data center platforms and AI product management. Experience with Xeon platforms, hyperscale customers, and AI infrastructure. If one asks: "Who on this board understands how Nvidia, Intel, AMD, and hyperscale customers think?", Ball is probably among the strongest candidates. His presence does not guarantee success, but signals that Napatech wants to be a player in AI infrastructure – not just a niche company for packet capture and network monitoring. Shannon Poulin: Highly relevant for commercialization. Leadership experience from Intel, Altera, and Microchip. Combination of technical and commercial background. Strong experience with design wins and ecosystem building. Many technology companies fail not because the technology is bad, but because they fail to get the market to adopt it. Poulin adds expertise precisely in this area. Lynn A. Comp: Less known among investors, but strategically relevant. Experience in networking, communication infrastructure, software-defined networking, cloud, and product strategy. She appears to contribute insights into product strategy, market positioning, and how technology can be translated into commercial growth. Lars Boilesen: Not a semiconductor expert, but perhaps the most important business builder. Former CEO of Opera. Long experience in scaling technology companies internationally. Experience with acquisitions, partnerships, and capital markets. If Napatech succeeds and becomes significantly larger, the challenges may become organizational and commercial rather than technological. Boilesen's experience is highly relevant there. It is also worth noting that he owns significant amounts of shares and warrants, which creates a strong alignment of interests with shareholders. Christian Jebsen: The investor and capital allocation perspective. Partner at Verdane. Former CEO and CFO experience from technology companies. Background in investment banking. Jebsen adds less technological expertise and more experience in financing growth, strategic transactions, and value creation for shareholders. What is the overall signal? If I were to put together a board for a company that wants to take a position in AI networks, SmartNICs, DPUs, or other data center technology, I would want: - semiconductor veterans, - people with Intel and data center backgrounds, - network experts, - commercial leaders, - an experienced technology builder as chairman, - an investor with transaction and capital market expertise. It is remarkably close to what Napatech has actually built. The most bullish aspect is that several board members have spent large parts of their careers in Intel's data center, cloud, and networking business. That is exactly the market Napatech is trying to position itself towards. At the same time, it is important to remember: A world-class board can help a company capitalize on an opportunity, but the board cannot create the opportunity alone. What ultimately determines value creation is whether Napatech manages to translate this expertise into: - design wins, - long-term customer agreements, - profitable growth, - a lasting position in the AI infrastructure market. My interpretation is that the board composition suggests that insiders see significantly greater potential than the historical business Napatech has been known for. The crucial question for investors is whether revenues in the coming years actually begin to reflect this potential.
  • 5 t sitten
    ·
    5 t sitten
    ·
    It did not go down today, and slowly creeps up. That is good.
  • 23 t sitten
    ·
    23 t sitten
    ·
    it's just that many are taking profits after last month's rally. if one doesn't believe the world is going under anytime soon, then one stays put
    5 t sitten
    ·
    5 t sitten
    ·
    I'm holding too. checking newsweb.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    I had expected that the news of the last few days related to d-Matrix, as well as the coverage from Sundal and DNB Carnegie, would contribute to a positive stock price development. The market, however, seems to be taking a wait-and-see approach. Could it be that investors are waiting for clearer confirmation or a concrete update from Napatech before they price in the potential? Fridays usually tend to be positive then!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
36 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
  • 4 t sitten
    ·
    4 t sitten
    ·
    Low volume and quiet before the storm. Ref. DNB Carnegie - asymmetric risk/reward. D-Matrix has announced full production. Stock exchange announcement with volume order can come any time now.
  • 5 t sitten
    ·
    5 t sitten
    ·
    A bit from today's prompting: When I look at Napatech's board as a whole, it's not the financial background that stands out most – it's how heavily the board is weighted towards data center infrastructure, network technology, semiconductors, and the commercialization of technology. That's quite unusual for a company of Napatech's size. Patty Kummrow: Probably the clearest link to the bullish scenario. Former head of Intel's Cloud Networking Group. Built the business to over 1 billion dollars in revenue. Deep experience in cloud, enterprise, telecom, and data center products. If Napatech's future depends on becoming relevant in AI clusters and modern data centers, then Kummrow has worked on exactly this on a global scale. Zane Ball: Potentially the most important board appointment. Former Corporate Vice President at Intel. Led development of data center platforms and AI product management. Experience with Xeon platforms, hyperscale customers, and AI infrastructure. If one asks: "Who on this board understands how Nvidia, Intel, AMD, and hyperscale customers think?", Ball is probably among the strongest candidates. His presence does not guarantee success, but signals that Napatech wants to be a player in AI infrastructure – not just a niche company for packet capture and network monitoring. Shannon Poulin: Highly relevant for commercialization. Leadership experience from Intel, Altera, and Microchip. Combination of technical and commercial background. Strong experience with design wins and ecosystem building. Many technology companies fail not because the technology is bad, but because they fail to get the market to adopt it. Poulin adds expertise precisely in this area. Lynn A. Comp: Less known among investors, but strategically relevant. Experience in networking, communication infrastructure, software-defined networking, cloud, and product strategy. She appears to contribute insights into product strategy, market positioning, and how technology can be translated into commercial growth. Lars Boilesen: Not a semiconductor expert, but perhaps the most important business builder. Former CEO of Opera. Long experience in scaling technology companies internationally. Experience with acquisitions, partnerships, and capital markets. If Napatech succeeds and becomes significantly larger, the challenges may become organizational and commercial rather than technological. Boilesen's experience is highly relevant there. It is also worth noting that he owns significant amounts of shares and warrants, which creates a strong alignment of interests with shareholders. Christian Jebsen: The investor and capital allocation perspective. Partner at Verdane. Former CEO and CFO experience from technology companies. Background in investment banking. Jebsen adds less technological expertise and more experience in financing growth, strategic transactions, and value creation for shareholders. What is the overall signal? If I were to put together a board for a company that wants to take a position in AI networks, SmartNICs, DPUs, or other data center technology, I would want: - semiconductor veterans, - people with Intel and data center backgrounds, - network experts, - commercial leaders, - an experienced technology builder as chairman, - an investor with transaction and capital market expertise. It is remarkably close to what Napatech has actually built. The most bullish aspect is that several board members have spent large parts of their careers in Intel's data center, cloud, and networking business. That is exactly the market Napatech is trying to position itself towards. At the same time, it is important to remember: A world-class board can help a company capitalize on an opportunity, but the board cannot create the opportunity alone. What ultimately determines value creation is whether Napatech manages to translate this expertise into: - design wins, - long-term customer agreements, - profitable growth, - a lasting position in the AI infrastructure market. My interpretation is that the board composition suggests that insiders see significantly greater potential than the historical business Napatech has been known for. The crucial question for investors is whether revenues in the coming years actually begin to reflect this potential.
  • 5 t sitten
    ·
    5 t sitten
    ·
    It did not go down today, and slowly creeps up. That is good.
  • 23 t sitten
    ·
    23 t sitten
    ·
    it's just that many are taking profits after last month's rally. if one doesn't believe the world is going under anytime soon, then one stays put
    5 t sitten
    ·
    5 t sitten
    ·
    I'm holding too. checking newsweb.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    I had expected that the news of the last few days related to d-Matrix, as well as the coverage from Sundal and DNB Carnegie, would contribute to a positive stock price development. The market, however, seems to be taking a wait-and-see approach. Could it be that investors are waiting for clearer confirmation or a concrete update from Napatech before they price in the potential? Fridays usually tend to be positive then!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
20--
195--
218--
1 000--
15--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
25.8.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
7.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
26.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
5.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
26.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
26.5.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
36 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
25.8.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
7.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
26.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
5.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
26.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
26.5.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
  • 4 t sitten
    ·
    4 t sitten
    ·
    Low volume and quiet before the storm. Ref. DNB Carnegie - asymmetric risk/reward. D-Matrix has announced full production. Stock exchange announcement with volume order can come any time now.
  • 5 t sitten
    ·
    5 t sitten
    ·
    A bit from today's prompting: When I look at Napatech's board as a whole, it's not the financial background that stands out most – it's how heavily the board is weighted towards data center infrastructure, network technology, semiconductors, and the commercialization of technology. That's quite unusual for a company of Napatech's size. Patty Kummrow: Probably the clearest link to the bullish scenario. Former head of Intel's Cloud Networking Group. Built the business to over 1 billion dollars in revenue. Deep experience in cloud, enterprise, telecom, and data center products. If Napatech's future depends on becoming relevant in AI clusters and modern data centers, then Kummrow has worked on exactly this on a global scale. Zane Ball: Potentially the most important board appointment. Former Corporate Vice President at Intel. Led development of data center platforms and AI product management. Experience with Xeon platforms, hyperscale customers, and AI infrastructure. If one asks: "Who on this board understands how Nvidia, Intel, AMD, and hyperscale customers think?", Ball is probably among the strongest candidates. His presence does not guarantee success, but signals that Napatech wants to be a player in AI infrastructure – not just a niche company for packet capture and network monitoring. Shannon Poulin: Highly relevant for commercialization. Leadership experience from Intel, Altera, and Microchip. Combination of technical and commercial background. Strong experience with design wins and ecosystem building. Many technology companies fail not because the technology is bad, but because they fail to get the market to adopt it. Poulin adds expertise precisely in this area. Lynn A. Comp: Less known among investors, but strategically relevant. Experience in networking, communication infrastructure, software-defined networking, cloud, and product strategy. She appears to contribute insights into product strategy, market positioning, and how technology can be translated into commercial growth. Lars Boilesen: Not a semiconductor expert, but perhaps the most important business builder. Former CEO of Opera. Long experience in scaling technology companies internationally. Experience with acquisitions, partnerships, and capital markets. If Napatech succeeds and becomes significantly larger, the challenges may become organizational and commercial rather than technological. Boilesen's experience is highly relevant there. It is also worth noting that he owns significant amounts of shares and warrants, which creates a strong alignment of interests with shareholders. Christian Jebsen: The investor and capital allocation perspective. Partner at Verdane. Former CEO and CFO experience from technology companies. Background in investment banking. Jebsen adds less technological expertise and more experience in financing growth, strategic transactions, and value creation for shareholders. What is the overall signal? If I were to put together a board for a company that wants to take a position in AI networks, SmartNICs, DPUs, or other data center technology, I would want: - semiconductor veterans, - people with Intel and data center backgrounds, - network experts, - commercial leaders, - an experienced technology builder as chairman, - an investor with transaction and capital market expertise. It is remarkably close to what Napatech has actually built. The most bullish aspect is that several board members have spent large parts of their careers in Intel's data center, cloud, and networking business. That is exactly the market Napatech is trying to position itself towards. At the same time, it is important to remember: A world-class board can help a company capitalize on an opportunity, but the board cannot create the opportunity alone. What ultimately determines value creation is whether Napatech manages to translate this expertise into: - design wins, - long-term customer agreements, - profitable growth, - a lasting position in the AI infrastructure market. My interpretation is that the board composition suggests that insiders see significantly greater potential than the historical business Napatech has been known for. The crucial question for investors is whether revenues in the coming years actually begin to reflect this potential.
  • 5 t sitten
    ·
    5 t sitten
    ·
    It did not go down today, and slowly creeps up. That is good.
  • 23 t sitten
    ·
    23 t sitten
    ·
    it's just that many are taking profits after last month's rally. if one doesn't believe the world is going under anytime soon, then one stays put
    5 t sitten
    ·
    5 t sitten
    ·
    I'm holding too. checking newsweb.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    I had expected that the news of the last few days related to d-Matrix, as well as the coverage from Sundal and DNB Carnegie, would contribute to a positive stock price development. The market, however, seems to be taking a wait-and-see approach. Could it be that investors are waiting for clearer confirmation or a concrete update from Napatech before they price in the potential? Fridays usually tend to be positive then!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
20--
195--
218--
1 000--
15--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt