Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.

Eli Lilly

Eli Lilly

1 062,19USD
+3,33% (+34,20)
Päätöskurssi
+0,67% (+7,11)
1 069,30Pre-market
1 069,30
+0,67% (+7,11)
Pre-market
1 062,19USD
+3,33% (+34,20)
Päätöskurssi
+0,67% (+7,11)
1 069,30Pre-market
1 069,30USD
+0,67% (+7,11)
Pre-market
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-

Eli Lilly

Eli Lilly

1 062,19USD
+3,33% (+34,20)
Päätöskurssi
+0,67% (+7,11)
1 069,30Pre-market
1 069,30
+0,67% (+7,11)
Pre-market
1 062,19USD
+3,33% (+34,20)
Päätöskurssi
+0,67% (+7,11)
1 069,30Pre-market
1 069,30USD
+0,67% (+7,11)
Pre-market
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-

Eli Lilly

Eli Lilly

1 062,19USD
+3,33% (+34,20)
Päätöskurssi
+0,67% (+7,11)
1 069,30Pre-market
1 069,30
+0,67% (+7,11)
Pre-market
1 062,19USD
+3,33% (+34,20)
Päätöskurssi
+0,67% (+7,11)
1 069,30Pre-market
1 069,30USD
+0,67% (+7,11)
Pre-market
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
47 päivää sitten
1,73 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.2.2026
0,56 %Tuotto/v

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
10
Myynti
Määrä
101

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----
Ylin
-
VWAP
-
Alin
-
Vaihto ()
-
VWAP
-
Ylin
-
Alin
-
Vaihto ()
-

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
11.2.2026
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti30.10.
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti7.8.
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 20255.5.
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti1.5.
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti6.2.
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Market value of Eli Lilly approx 6 times larger than Novo Nordisk completely incomprehensible to me. Even with all the USA bias and USA first and the orange monkey, Novo cannot be kept down in the long run, the truth will also emerge in the USA. Novo has the best obesity products with the fewest side effects. I believe more and more patients will opt out of Lilly products going forward due to greater side effects and opt for Novo products which are not quite as effective but with fewer side effects and gentler on the body. We'll see if I'm right. Future financial reports in the coming quarters will show this. Lilly has captured market shares from Novo in '25 admittedly, but I believe that pattern will change already in '26. We'll see.
    7 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    7 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    I think you're onto something. LLY has gained market share over the past year, but as you say, fewer people probably have the tolerance to handle their side effects. As a doctor, one would then say, maybe we should try something else? And something else would often be a Novo product with a milder profile. LLY's focus has probably been to beat Novo on maximum weight reduction in the shortest possible time. But unfortunately, that's probably a failed strategy in the long run. Big headlines about %-wise weight reduction over x number of weeks create expectations, but over time, doctors will ultimately choose what is the best approach for a balanced weight reduction. Therefore, I believe we will see a shift towards a more balanced weight reduction, which is the key to lasting success, and an equalization of market value between these two companies - with new competitors entering in the long term.
  • 3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Again today we see huge trading volume in Eli Lilly in USA approx 5 times larger than Novo. Is there anyone who can explain this difference between 2 companies approximately similar in size and product offering?? Will that relationship between the 2 companies ever change??
    2 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    2 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    There will always be a higher turnover in a company that has a much larger market value. Eli Lilly is after all worth around 6 trillion DKK, or valued over 4 times higher than Novo. The trades are thus also worth more, and provide a higher revenue value. Besides that, there will generally also be a higher proportional turnover in optimistic stocks. Eli Lilly's growth is expected to generate higher earnings, due to their larger market share and easier-to-use (here I'm primarily thinking of Zepbound, which doesn't need to be taken as often as Wegovy or Ozempic) products, compared to Novo. The latest data from Retatrutid shows 23% weight loss in 68 weeks (here there is great short-term optimism, which further increases turnover). Better than Novo's 7.2 mg Wegovy medicine, with 20.7 percent in 72 weeks, which has otherwise received positive reviews from the EU. There is a fundamental pessimism about Novo, because they have faced very strong competition in recent years, and today have significant headwinds with a very biased American government, which clearly prefers American companies, like LLY.
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Many thanks for a good answer Andreas.
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    https://medwatch.com/News/Pharma___Biotech/article18839298.ece always good with unfair competitive conditions and corruption in the USA.
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    :-( exactly..
  • 10.12.
    Lilly to build $6 billion facility to manufacture active pharmaceutical ingredients in Alabama https://investor.lilly.com/news-releases/news-release-details/lilly-build-6-billion-facility-manufacture-active-pharmaceutical
  • 7.12.
    ·
    7.12.
    ·
    Found an interesting article about how much revenue is required to justify Eli Lilly's valuation. https://www.patreon.com/posts/145222738?utm_campaign=postshare_creator
    10.12.
    ·
    10.12.
    ·
    Eli Lilly trades at a significantly higher P/E than Novo Nordisk, because the market prices in higher growth expectations, a broader pipeline (incl. Alzheimer’s), and strong momentum in the obesity/diabetes segment. Novo Nordisk has a more focused profile and therefore trades at lower multiples, even though the company is very profitable. Source: Copilot
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

Ai
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
47 päivää sitten
1,73 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.2.2026
0,56 %Tuotto/v

Uutiset

Ai
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Market value of Eli Lilly approx 6 times larger than Novo Nordisk completely incomprehensible to me. Even with all the USA bias and USA first and the orange monkey, Novo cannot be kept down in the long run, the truth will also emerge in the USA. Novo has the best obesity products with the fewest side effects. I believe more and more patients will opt out of Lilly products going forward due to greater side effects and opt for Novo products which are not quite as effective but with fewer side effects and gentler on the body. We'll see if I'm right. Future financial reports in the coming quarters will show this. Lilly has captured market shares from Novo in '25 admittedly, but I believe that pattern will change already in '26. We'll see.
    7 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    7 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    I think you're onto something. LLY has gained market share over the past year, but as you say, fewer people probably have the tolerance to handle their side effects. As a doctor, one would then say, maybe we should try something else? And something else would often be a Novo product with a milder profile. LLY's focus has probably been to beat Novo on maximum weight reduction in the shortest possible time. But unfortunately, that's probably a failed strategy in the long run. Big headlines about %-wise weight reduction over x number of weeks create expectations, but over time, doctors will ultimately choose what is the best approach for a balanced weight reduction. Therefore, I believe we will see a shift towards a more balanced weight reduction, which is the key to lasting success, and an equalization of market value between these two companies - with new competitors entering in the long term.
  • 3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Again today we see huge trading volume in Eli Lilly in USA approx 5 times larger than Novo. Is there anyone who can explain this difference between 2 companies approximately similar in size and product offering?? Will that relationship between the 2 companies ever change??
    2 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    2 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    There will always be a higher turnover in a company that has a much larger market value. Eli Lilly is after all worth around 6 trillion DKK, or valued over 4 times higher than Novo. The trades are thus also worth more, and provide a higher revenue value. Besides that, there will generally also be a higher proportional turnover in optimistic stocks. Eli Lilly's growth is expected to generate higher earnings, due to their larger market share and easier-to-use (here I'm primarily thinking of Zepbound, which doesn't need to be taken as often as Wegovy or Ozempic) products, compared to Novo. The latest data from Retatrutid shows 23% weight loss in 68 weeks (here there is great short-term optimism, which further increases turnover). Better than Novo's 7.2 mg Wegovy medicine, with 20.7 percent in 72 weeks, which has otherwise received positive reviews from the EU. There is a fundamental pessimism about Novo, because they have faced very strong competition in recent years, and today have significant headwinds with a very biased American government, which clearly prefers American companies, like LLY.
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Many thanks for a good answer Andreas.
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    https://medwatch.com/News/Pharma___Biotech/article18839298.ece always good with unfair competitive conditions and corruption in the USA.
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    :-( exactly..
  • 10.12.
    Lilly to build $6 billion facility to manufacture active pharmaceutical ingredients in Alabama https://investor.lilly.com/news-releases/news-release-details/lilly-build-6-billion-facility-manufacture-active-pharmaceutical
  • 7.12.
    ·
    7.12.
    ·
    Found an interesting article about how much revenue is required to justify Eli Lilly's valuation. https://www.patreon.com/posts/145222738?utm_campaign=postshare_creator
    10.12.
    ·
    10.12.
    ·
    Eli Lilly trades at a significantly higher P/E than Novo Nordisk, because the market prices in higher growth expectations, a broader pipeline (incl. Alzheimer’s), and strong momentum in the obesity/diabetes segment. Novo Nordisk has a more focused profile and therefore trades at lower multiples, even though the company is very profitable. Source: Copilot
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
10
Myynti
Määrä
101

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----
Ylin
-
VWAP
-
Alin
-
Vaihto ()
-
VWAP
-
Ylin
-
Alin
-
Vaihto ()
-

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
11.2.2026
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti30.10.
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti7.8.
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 20255.5.
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti1.5.
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti6.2.
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
47 päivää sitten

Uutiset

Ai
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
11.2.2026
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti30.10.
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti7.8.
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 20255.5.
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti1.5.
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti6.2.
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

1,73 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 13.2.2026
0,56 %Tuotto/v

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Market value of Eli Lilly approx 6 times larger than Novo Nordisk completely incomprehensible to me. Even with all the USA bias and USA first and the orange monkey, Novo cannot be kept down in the long run, the truth will also emerge in the USA. Novo has the best obesity products with the fewest side effects. I believe more and more patients will opt out of Lilly products going forward due to greater side effects and opt for Novo products which are not quite as effective but with fewer side effects and gentler on the body. We'll see if I'm right. Future financial reports in the coming quarters will show this. Lilly has captured market shares from Novo in '25 admittedly, but I believe that pattern will change already in '26. We'll see.
    7 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    7 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    I think you're onto something. LLY has gained market share over the past year, but as you say, fewer people probably have the tolerance to handle their side effects. As a doctor, one would then say, maybe we should try something else? And something else would often be a Novo product with a milder profile. LLY's focus has probably been to beat Novo on maximum weight reduction in the shortest possible time. But unfortunately, that's probably a failed strategy in the long run. Big headlines about %-wise weight reduction over x number of weeks create expectations, but over time, doctors will ultimately choose what is the best approach for a balanced weight reduction. Therefore, I believe we will see a shift towards a more balanced weight reduction, which is the key to lasting success, and an equalization of market value between these two companies - with new competitors entering in the long term.
  • 3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Again today we see huge trading volume in Eli Lilly in USA approx 5 times larger than Novo. Is there anyone who can explain this difference between 2 companies approximately similar in size and product offering?? Will that relationship between the 2 companies ever change??
    2 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    2 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    There will always be a higher turnover in a company that has a much larger market value. Eli Lilly is after all worth around 6 trillion DKK, or valued over 4 times higher than Novo. The trades are thus also worth more, and provide a higher revenue value. Besides that, there will generally also be a higher proportional turnover in optimistic stocks. Eli Lilly's growth is expected to generate higher earnings, due to their larger market share and easier-to-use (here I'm primarily thinking of Zepbound, which doesn't need to be taken as often as Wegovy or Ozempic) products, compared to Novo. The latest data from Retatrutid shows 23% weight loss in 68 weeks (here there is great short-term optimism, which further increases turnover). Better than Novo's 7.2 mg Wegovy medicine, with 20.7 percent in 72 weeks, which has otherwise received positive reviews from the EU. There is a fundamental pessimism about Novo, because they have faced very strong competition in recent years, and today have significant headwinds with a very biased American government, which clearly prefers American companies, like LLY.
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Many thanks for a good answer Andreas.
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    https://medwatch.com/News/Pharma___Biotech/article18839298.ece always good with unfair competitive conditions and corruption in the USA.
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    :-( exactly..
  • 10.12.
    Lilly to build $6 billion facility to manufacture active pharmaceutical ingredients in Alabama https://investor.lilly.com/news-releases/news-release-details/lilly-build-6-billion-facility-manufacture-active-pharmaceutical
  • 7.12.
    ·
    7.12.
    ·
    Found an interesting article about how much revenue is required to justify Eli Lilly's valuation. https://www.patreon.com/posts/145222738?utm_campaign=postshare_creator
    10.12.
    ·
    10.12.
    ·
    Eli Lilly trades at a significantly higher P/E than Novo Nordisk, because the market prices in higher growth expectations, a broader pipeline (incl. Alzheimer’s), and strong momentum in the obesity/diabetes segment. Novo Nordisk has a more focused profile and therefore trades at lower multiples, even though the company is very profitable. Source: Copilot
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
10
Myynti
Määrä
101

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----
Ylin
-
VWAP
-
Alin
-
Vaihto ()
-
VWAP
-
Ylin
-
Alin
-
Vaihto ()
-

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt