2026 Q4 -tulosraportti
47 päivää sitten
‧1 t 8 min
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2027 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q4 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 3.2. | ||
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 6.11.2025 | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 15.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·12 t sittenRockstar Games has spent over 10 years developing GTA 6. We as players have also had over 10 years to save up for it. Everyone expects a game that is close to perfect, but at the same time many complain about the price of the game. Quality costs, and here Take-Two stands out from the other game companies. If we look at Rockstar Games, they know exactly how to create products that people keep spending money on. GTA 6 is not a game you just play for a couple of months – it's a game that will probably live for many years, just look at GTA 5. Therefore, Rockstar Games and its parent company Take-Two will also earn absolutely enormous sums for a long time to come - think long-term now and not short-term. That is precisely why I don't just look at the situation here and now. I invest with a long-term perspective. Over time, new content, new updates, and new ways to make money can continuously be added to the game. That's why I am so long-term in Take-Two. Show me one other game company that can create the same hype, the same quality, and the same long-term earnings as Take-Two – no one can, Take-Two is in a completely different league of its own - period!
Good to see an entity inside that understands the concept. Or as it's called: games as a service. This is a very long-term investment from Rockstar. And the players. Their bread and butter for at least 10 years…Can show you one that is similar. Minecraft and fortnite fall under the same concept. But take two earns an insane amount MORE. The most lucrative Game IP humanity has created…
·15 t sittenI have a theory that I would like to share. It might be a bit tin-foil hat-like, but the more I think about it, the more it actually makes sense. My theory is that the pre-order does not include GTA Online, and that GTA Online instead becomes a subscription-based service via GTA+. Here are my arguments: 1. The price seems suspiciously low Despite the enormous hype, GTA VI is actually the cheapest GTA game ever, if you correct for inflation. It honestly seems a bit strange. One could have expected a significantly higher price, but they have deliberately refrained from that. Why? 2. The description of the game In the description for the pre-order, it states directly that “Grand Theft Auto VI is a single-player experience.” I don't recall Rockstar previously being so explicit about this in a product description. This makes me think that the phrasing was chosen with care and perhaps is a subtle way to signal that the online component is not part of the package one buys. 3. GTA+ suddenly makes more sense With a pre-order, you get, among other things, a month of free GTA+. But what is that month actually supposed to be used for, if GTA VI Online is not linked to the subscription? It seems unlikely that Rockstar expects people to buy GTA VI and then use their free month to get small bonuses in GTA V Online. It makes much more sense if the free month is intended as access to GTA VI Online. Furthermore, when you redeem the free month, it states that the subscription automatically continues, unless you actively cancel it yourself before the free period expires. This seems like a somewhat peculiar phrasing if GTA+ were still just a niche subscription with cosmetic benefits. It makes much more sense if the subscription in the future becomes central for access to GTA Online. 4. Rockstar's business model Rockstar's largest and most stable source of income has for years been the online component. At the same time, almost the entire entertainment industry is moving towards subscription models. A monthly subscription of, for example, 59 kr. would create a much more stable and predictable revenue than solely selling Shark Cards. 5. The timing If that is the plan, it makes sense that Rockstar keeps its cards close to its chest. If they announced a mandatory subscription already now, it would probably create negative publicity and potentially affect sales. I could easily imagine that they only announce the model shortly before launch – or perhaps even after the game's release. After that, GTA Online could become a separate, free download, but with a monthly subscription via GTA+. I actually got the idea already when GTA+ was launched, and I have since heard several profiles in the GTA community speculate the same. What do you think? Is the theory completely off, or is there perhaps something to it? And what does that do to the stock price??
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q4 -tulosraportti
47 päivää sitten
‧1 t 8 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·12 t sittenRockstar Games has spent over 10 years developing GTA 6. We as players have also had over 10 years to save up for it. Everyone expects a game that is close to perfect, but at the same time many complain about the price of the game. Quality costs, and here Take-Two stands out from the other game companies. If we look at Rockstar Games, they know exactly how to create products that people keep spending money on. GTA 6 is not a game you just play for a couple of months – it's a game that will probably live for many years, just look at GTA 5. Therefore, Rockstar Games and its parent company Take-Two will also earn absolutely enormous sums for a long time to come - think long-term now and not short-term. That is precisely why I don't just look at the situation here and now. I invest with a long-term perspective. Over time, new content, new updates, and new ways to make money can continuously be added to the game. That's why I am so long-term in Take-Two. Show me one other game company that can create the same hype, the same quality, and the same long-term earnings as Take-Two – no one can, Take-Two is in a completely different league of its own - period!Good to see an entity inside that understands the concept. Or as it's called: games as a service. This is a very long-term investment from Rockstar. And the players. Their bread and butter for at least 10 years…Can show you one that is similar. Minecraft and fortnite fall under the same concept. But take two earns an insane amount MORE. The most lucrative Game IP humanity has created…
- ·15 t sittenI have a theory that I would like to share. It might be a bit tin-foil hat-like, but the more I think about it, the more it actually makes sense. My theory is that the pre-order does not include GTA Online, and that GTA Online instead becomes a subscription-based service via GTA+. Here are my arguments: 1. The price seems suspiciously low Despite the enormous hype, GTA VI is actually the cheapest GTA game ever, if you correct for inflation. It honestly seems a bit strange. One could have expected a significantly higher price, but they have deliberately refrained from that. Why? 2. The description of the game In the description for the pre-order, it states directly that “Grand Theft Auto VI is a single-player experience.” I don't recall Rockstar previously being so explicit about this in a product description. This makes me think that the phrasing was chosen with care and perhaps is a subtle way to signal that the online component is not part of the package one buys. 3. GTA+ suddenly makes more sense With a pre-order, you get, among other things, a month of free GTA+. But what is that month actually supposed to be used for, if GTA VI Online is not linked to the subscription? It seems unlikely that Rockstar expects people to buy GTA VI and then use their free month to get small bonuses in GTA V Online. It makes much more sense if the free month is intended as access to GTA VI Online. Furthermore, when you redeem the free month, it states that the subscription automatically continues, unless you actively cancel it yourself before the free period expires. This seems like a somewhat peculiar phrasing if GTA+ were still just a niche subscription with cosmetic benefits. It makes much more sense if the subscription in the future becomes central for access to GTA Online. 4. Rockstar's business model Rockstar's largest and most stable source of income has for years been the online component. At the same time, almost the entire entertainment industry is moving towards subscription models. A monthly subscription of, for example, 59 kr. would create a much more stable and predictable revenue than solely selling Shark Cards. 5. The timing If that is the plan, it makes sense that Rockstar keeps its cards close to its chest. If they announced a mandatory subscription already now, it would probably create negative publicity and potentially affect sales. I could easily imagine that they only announce the model shortly before launch – or perhaps even after the game's release. After that, GTA Online could become a separate, free download, but with a monthly subscription via GTA+. I actually got the idea already when GTA+ was launched, and I have since heard several profiles in the GTA community speculate the same. What do you think? Is the theory completely off, or is there perhaps something to it? And what does that do to the stock price??
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2027 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q4 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 3.2. | ||
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 6.11.2025 | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 15.5.2025 |
2026 Q4 -tulosraportti
47 päivää sitten
‧1 t 8 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2027 Q1 -tulosraportti 6.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q4 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 3.2. | ||
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 6.11.2025 | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 15.5.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·12 t sittenRockstar Games has spent over 10 years developing GTA 6. We as players have also had over 10 years to save up for it. Everyone expects a game that is close to perfect, but at the same time many complain about the price of the game. Quality costs, and here Take-Two stands out from the other game companies. If we look at Rockstar Games, they know exactly how to create products that people keep spending money on. GTA 6 is not a game you just play for a couple of months – it's a game that will probably live for many years, just look at GTA 5. Therefore, Rockstar Games and its parent company Take-Two will also earn absolutely enormous sums for a long time to come - think long-term now and not short-term. That is precisely why I don't just look at the situation here and now. I invest with a long-term perspective. Over time, new content, new updates, and new ways to make money can continuously be added to the game. That's why I am so long-term in Take-Two. Show me one other game company that can create the same hype, the same quality, and the same long-term earnings as Take-Two – no one can, Take-Two is in a completely different league of its own - period!Good to see an entity inside that understands the concept. Or as it's called: games as a service. This is a very long-term investment from Rockstar. And the players. Their bread and butter for at least 10 years…Can show you one that is similar. Minecraft and fortnite fall under the same concept. But take two earns an insane amount MORE. The most lucrative Game IP humanity has created…
- ·15 t sittenI have a theory that I would like to share. It might be a bit tin-foil hat-like, but the more I think about it, the more it actually makes sense. My theory is that the pre-order does not include GTA Online, and that GTA Online instead becomes a subscription-based service via GTA+. Here are my arguments: 1. The price seems suspiciously low Despite the enormous hype, GTA VI is actually the cheapest GTA game ever, if you correct for inflation. It honestly seems a bit strange. One could have expected a significantly higher price, but they have deliberately refrained from that. Why? 2. The description of the game In the description for the pre-order, it states directly that “Grand Theft Auto VI is a single-player experience.” I don't recall Rockstar previously being so explicit about this in a product description. This makes me think that the phrasing was chosen with care and perhaps is a subtle way to signal that the online component is not part of the package one buys. 3. GTA+ suddenly makes more sense With a pre-order, you get, among other things, a month of free GTA+. But what is that month actually supposed to be used for, if GTA VI Online is not linked to the subscription? It seems unlikely that Rockstar expects people to buy GTA VI and then use their free month to get small bonuses in GTA V Online. It makes much more sense if the free month is intended as access to GTA VI Online. Furthermore, when you redeem the free month, it states that the subscription automatically continues, unless you actively cancel it yourself before the free period expires. This seems like a somewhat peculiar phrasing if GTA+ were still just a niche subscription with cosmetic benefits. It makes much more sense if the subscription in the future becomes central for access to GTA Online. 4. Rockstar's business model Rockstar's largest and most stable source of income has for years been the online component. At the same time, almost the entire entertainment industry is moving towards subscription models. A monthly subscription of, for example, 59 kr. would create a much more stable and predictable revenue than solely selling Shark Cards. 5. The timing If that is the plan, it makes sense that Rockstar keeps its cards close to its chest. If they announced a mandatory subscription already now, it would probably create negative publicity and potentially affect sales. I could easily imagine that they only announce the model shortly before launch – or perhaps even after the game's release. After that, GTA Online could become a separate, free download, but with a monthly subscription via GTA+. I actually got the idea already when GTA+ was launched, and I have since heard several profiles in the GTA community speculate the same. What do you think? Is the theory completely off, or is there perhaps something to it? And what does that do to the stock price??
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt