2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧57 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 28.1. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 6.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 22.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenPossible Tesla / SpaceX merger is my big concern as an investor. And it's the math here that I don't like. Let's say that Tesla at the time of merger is worth 0.5 trillion dollars, while SpaceX is worth 2.5 trillion. Then SpaceX is worth 5 times more than Tesla. This means that Tesla shareholders collectively will only own 1/6 of the new company. This is what many don't think through. If Tesla alone later goes from 0.5 to 10 trillion dollars, that's a 20-bagger. But after such a merger, you no longer get the full effect of that upside, because your Tesla shares only make up 1/6 as much as before, compared to the total. For you to end up with the same value as if you had just owned Tesla further, the new company collectively must go up to 60 trillion dollars. So: 10 trillion for the Tesla part is not enough anymore. The whole package must reach 60 trillion! & I have little faith in that! Conversely, this is positive for Elon Musk since he (presumably?) owns a much larger share of SpaceX than of Tesla. The higher SpaceX is valued relative to Tesla at the time of merger, the larger part of the new company will practically end up on the SpaceX side, where his ownership stake is probably higher. Then he can strengthen his relative position in the merged company, while Tesla shareholders are heavily diluted. The exchange ratio means everything. If Tesla is undervalued and SpaceX overvalued at the time of merger, Tesla shareholders are practically giving away large parts of their future upside. It's simple math.
·8 t sittenElon's goals and objectives are incomprehensible to most people. And they are also not compatible with normal ownership structures since he aims far beyond the world's largest in everything he does. Don't know why he wants to merge and do an IPO, but I assume he needs an insane amount of capital for something or other. Hope he manages to give loyal TSLA long shareholders a bonus, but that's probably rather doubtful.
·2 päivää sitten · Muokattuhttps://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2026/04/24/8346503/wall-street-veteran-varsler-episk-fall-for-tesla-aksjen Tesla slammed: – The fall will be epic Tesla beat expectations, but that doesn't convince Wall Street veteran George Noble. He believes the market overlooks serious weaknesses, and warns of an "epic" fall. After Tesla delivered better than expected in the first quarter, Wall Street veteran George Noble strongly criticizes the company – and believes the stock is severely mispriced. Noble, who has over 40 years of experience in asset management and has, among other things, led one of Fidelity's funds, describes the development as dramatic in a comment published on X. – I'll say it straight out: Tesla at 387 dollars is one of the most egregious mispricings I have seen in my entire career, he writes, adding: – The fall will be epic. Reacts to self-driving Noble particularly points to what he believes is a central problem related to Tesla's focus on self-driving technology. During the quarterly presentation, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that the company's so-called Hardware 3 – which is in millions of cars on the road today – does not have the capacity to deliver full, driverless self-driving. – Hardware 3 "simply does not have the capacity to achieve driverless self-driving," writes Noble, referring to Musk's statements. FSD stands for "Full Self-Driving," Tesla's software for self-driving. Many customers have paid between 8,000 and 15,000 dollars for this functionality, based on previous promises that existing hardware would be sufficient. – These promises are now officially broken, writes Noble. He points out that Tesla has said they will offer upgrades or discounted trade-ins for newer cars, which he believes does not fully compensate customers. The market overlooks weaknesses Tesla had revenue of 22.39 billion dollars in the first quarter and delivered an adjusted earnings per share of 0.41 dollars, which was better than analysts' expectations. The stock rose around 4 percent in after-hours trading.
·2 päivää sittenhttps://www.tek.no/stories/362615/vi-har-provd-teslas-selvkjoring?playlistId=KYwzoi68tyAW0pRzuE9Q6tWB Tek.no tested FSD in Amsterdam and was impressed. They had to intervene 2 times in five hours, otherwise smooth sailing.
·2 päivää sittenSo it doesn't work then
·4 t sitten · MuokattuYes, great if they solve it. But the fact remains: currently it is not a self-driving system, but just a very good driving assistance. That difference is enormous. For a driving assistance system, two interventions in five hours is sensationally good. For a self-driving system, it is a catastrophic result.
2 päivää sitten · Muokattu2 päivää sitten · MuokattuWill you be buying yourself an Optimus Robot (Home Edition), when they become available? I definitely could use someone to fold my laundry.
·1 päivä sittenFolding laundry is one of the few activities where you both get to move your arms and concentrate on something relaxing. So it's probably better to get a robot to do uncomfortable things or other time-saving things that one does more frequently.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧57 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenPossible Tesla / SpaceX merger is my big concern as an investor. And it's the math here that I don't like. Let's say that Tesla at the time of merger is worth 0.5 trillion dollars, while SpaceX is worth 2.5 trillion. Then SpaceX is worth 5 times more than Tesla. This means that Tesla shareholders collectively will only own 1/6 of the new company. This is what many don't think through. If Tesla alone later goes from 0.5 to 10 trillion dollars, that's a 20-bagger. But after such a merger, you no longer get the full effect of that upside, because your Tesla shares only make up 1/6 as much as before, compared to the total. For you to end up with the same value as if you had just owned Tesla further, the new company collectively must go up to 60 trillion dollars. So: 10 trillion for the Tesla part is not enough anymore. The whole package must reach 60 trillion! & I have little faith in that! Conversely, this is positive for Elon Musk since he (presumably?) owns a much larger share of SpaceX than of Tesla. The higher SpaceX is valued relative to Tesla at the time of merger, the larger part of the new company will practically end up on the SpaceX side, where his ownership stake is probably higher. Then he can strengthen his relative position in the merged company, while Tesla shareholders are heavily diluted. The exchange ratio means everything. If Tesla is undervalued and SpaceX overvalued at the time of merger, Tesla shareholders are practically giving away large parts of their future upside. It's simple math.·8 t sittenElon's goals and objectives are incomprehensible to most people. And they are also not compatible with normal ownership structures since he aims far beyond the world's largest in everything he does. Don't know why he wants to merge and do an IPO, but I assume he needs an insane amount of capital for something or other. Hope he manages to give loyal TSLA long shareholders a bonus, but that's probably rather doubtful.
- ·2 päivää sitten · Muokattuhttps://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2026/04/24/8346503/wall-street-veteran-varsler-episk-fall-for-tesla-aksjen Tesla slammed: – The fall will be epic Tesla beat expectations, but that doesn't convince Wall Street veteran George Noble. He believes the market overlooks serious weaknesses, and warns of an "epic" fall. After Tesla delivered better than expected in the first quarter, Wall Street veteran George Noble strongly criticizes the company – and believes the stock is severely mispriced. Noble, who has over 40 years of experience in asset management and has, among other things, led one of Fidelity's funds, describes the development as dramatic in a comment published on X. – I'll say it straight out: Tesla at 387 dollars is one of the most egregious mispricings I have seen in my entire career, he writes, adding: – The fall will be epic. Reacts to self-driving Noble particularly points to what he believes is a central problem related to Tesla's focus on self-driving technology. During the quarterly presentation, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that the company's so-called Hardware 3 – which is in millions of cars on the road today – does not have the capacity to deliver full, driverless self-driving. – Hardware 3 "simply does not have the capacity to achieve driverless self-driving," writes Noble, referring to Musk's statements. FSD stands for "Full Self-Driving," Tesla's software for self-driving. Many customers have paid between 8,000 and 15,000 dollars for this functionality, based on previous promises that existing hardware would be sufficient. – These promises are now officially broken, writes Noble. He points out that Tesla has said they will offer upgrades or discounted trade-ins for newer cars, which he believes does not fully compensate customers. The market overlooks weaknesses Tesla had revenue of 22.39 billion dollars in the first quarter and delivered an adjusted earnings per share of 0.41 dollars, which was better than analysts' expectations. The stock rose around 4 percent in after-hours trading.
- ·2 päivää sittenhttps://www.tek.no/stories/362615/vi-har-provd-teslas-selvkjoring?playlistId=KYwzoi68tyAW0pRzuE9Q6tWB Tek.no tested FSD in Amsterdam and was impressed. They had to intervene 2 times in five hours, otherwise smooth sailing.·2 päivää sittenSo it doesn't work then·4 t sitten · MuokattuYes, great if they solve it. But the fact remains: currently it is not a self-driving system, but just a very good driving assistance. That difference is enormous. For a driving assistance system, two interventions in five hours is sensationally good. For a self-driving system, it is a catastrophic result.
- 2 päivää sitten · Muokattu2 päivää sitten · MuokattuWill you be buying yourself an Optimus Robot (Home Edition), when they become available? I definitely could use someone to fold my laundry.·1 päivä sittenFolding laundry is one of the few activities where you both get to move your arms and concentrate on something relaxing. So it's probably better to get a robot to do uncomfortable things or other time-saving things that one does more frequently.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 28.1. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 6.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 22.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧57 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 22.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 28.1. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 6.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 22.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 23.7.2025 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenPossible Tesla / SpaceX merger is my big concern as an investor. And it's the math here that I don't like. Let's say that Tesla at the time of merger is worth 0.5 trillion dollars, while SpaceX is worth 2.5 trillion. Then SpaceX is worth 5 times more than Tesla. This means that Tesla shareholders collectively will only own 1/6 of the new company. This is what many don't think through. If Tesla alone later goes from 0.5 to 10 trillion dollars, that's a 20-bagger. But after such a merger, you no longer get the full effect of that upside, because your Tesla shares only make up 1/6 as much as before, compared to the total. For you to end up with the same value as if you had just owned Tesla further, the new company collectively must go up to 60 trillion dollars. So: 10 trillion for the Tesla part is not enough anymore. The whole package must reach 60 trillion! & I have little faith in that! Conversely, this is positive for Elon Musk since he (presumably?) owns a much larger share of SpaceX than of Tesla. The higher SpaceX is valued relative to Tesla at the time of merger, the larger part of the new company will practically end up on the SpaceX side, where his ownership stake is probably higher. Then he can strengthen his relative position in the merged company, while Tesla shareholders are heavily diluted. The exchange ratio means everything. If Tesla is undervalued and SpaceX overvalued at the time of merger, Tesla shareholders are practically giving away large parts of their future upside. It's simple math.·8 t sittenElon's goals and objectives are incomprehensible to most people. And they are also not compatible with normal ownership structures since he aims far beyond the world's largest in everything he does. Don't know why he wants to merge and do an IPO, but I assume he needs an insane amount of capital for something or other. Hope he manages to give loyal TSLA long shareholders a bonus, but that's probably rather doubtful.
- ·2 päivää sitten · Muokattuhttps://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2026/04/24/8346503/wall-street-veteran-varsler-episk-fall-for-tesla-aksjen Tesla slammed: – The fall will be epic Tesla beat expectations, but that doesn't convince Wall Street veteran George Noble. He believes the market overlooks serious weaknesses, and warns of an "epic" fall. After Tesla delivered better than expected in the first quarter, Wall Street veteran George Noble strongly criticizes the company – and believes the stock is severely mispriced. Noble, who has over 40 years of experience in asset management and has, among other things, led one of Fidelity's funds, describes the development as dramatic in a comment published on X. – I'll say it straight out: Tesla at 387 dollars is one of the most egregious mispricings I have seen in my entire career, he writes, adding: – The fall will be epic. Reacts to self-driving Noble particularly points to what he believes is a central problem related to Tesla's focus on self-driving technology. During the quarterly presentation, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that the company's so-called Hardware 3 – which is in millions of cars on the road today – does not have the capacity to deliver full, driverless self-driving. – Hardware 3 "simply does not have the capacity to achieve driverless self-driving," writes Noble, referring to Musk's statements. FSD stands for "Full Self-Driving," Tesla's software for self-driving. Many customers have paid between 8,000 and 15,000 dollars for this functionality, based on previous promises that existing hardware would be sufficient. – These promises are now officially broken, writes Noble. He points out that Tesla has said they will offer upgrades or discounted trade-ins for newer cars, which he believes does not fully compensate customers. The market overlooks weaknesses Tesla had revenue of 22.39 billion dollars in the first quarter and delivered an adjusted earnings per share of 0.41 dollars, which was better than analysts' expectations. The stock rose around 4 percent in after-hours trading.
- ·2 päivää sittenhttps://www.tek.no/stories/362615/vi-har-provd-teslas-selvkjoring?playlistId=KYwzoi68tyAW0pRzuE9Q6tWB Tek.no tested FSD in Amsterdam and was impressed. They had to intervene 2 times in five hours, otherwise smooth sailing.·2 päivää sittenSo it doesn't work then·4 t sitten · MuokattuYes, great if they solve it. But the fact remains: currently it is not a self-driving system, but just a very good driving assistance. That difference is enormous. For a driving assistance system, two interventions in five hours is sensationally good. For a self-driving system, it is a catastrophic result.
- 2 päivää sitten · Muokattu2 päivää sitten · MuokattuWill you be buying yourself an Optimus Robot (Home Edition), when they become available? I definitely could use someone to fold my laundry.·1 päivä sittenFolding laundry is one of the few activities where you both get to move your arms and concentrate on something relaxing. So it's probably better to get a robot to do uncomfortable things or other time-saving things that one does more frequently.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt