2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten
‧2 t 34 min
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 30.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 30.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 8.6. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 5.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 30.10.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·6 t sittenAn interesting overall picture is gradually emerging for Bitcoin. Not because one indicator can predict the market, but because several independent signals from macro, on-chain data, capital flows, and market structure are gradually moving in the same direction. The Copper/Gold ratio has started to turn up from a low level. Historically, a rising ratio has been associated with improved global growth expectations and a greater appetite for risky assets. It is not a precise Bitcoin signal, but it supports the thesis that macroeconomic headwinds may be subsiding. At the same time, models based on global central bank liquidity indicate that the most restrictive liquidity phase may be coming to an end. Bitcoin does not always react immediately to liquidity changes, but the large cyclical movements have historically been closely linked to the direction of global dollar liquidity. If liquidity momentum continues to turn, it will significantly change the risk landscape. On-chain data also shows that long-term holders are once again absorbing supply. Accumulation is not limited to a single wallet group but is observed across multiple holding segments. It looks more like a transfer from distressed and short-term investors to capital with a longer time horizon than the beginning of a broad distribution phase. At the same time, selling pressure appears to be absorbed more effectively. Market depth in the spot market has improved around recent lows, and the decline has not been accompanied by the same sustained capitulation that typically characterizes the beginning of a deep bear market. The market is still under repair, but the structure looks less fragile than earlier in the year. The ETF picture is not unambiguously positive, and the year's total flows are still weaker than in the previous expansion phase. But July showed that institutional demand can quickly return when price and macro expectations stabilize. Several positive trading days and periods of weekly net inflows show that regulated capital access is still functioning. The crucial factor will be whether this development continues and lifts the overall trend from recovery to sustained net demand. Corporate accumulation also continues. Strategy, despite the sharp price drop, has increased its Bitcoin holdings and simultaneously reported growth in Bitcoin per share. This shows that the institutional treasury model has not disappeared during the correction. On the contrary, the largest players are trying to strengthen their capital structure so they can survive longer periods of volatility and continue accumulation. The CLARITY Act could become a significant regulatory catalyst if passed. The bill will not directly change Bitcoin's protocol or supply, but clearer US regulations could reduce legal uncertainty for exchanges, banks, asset managers, and other institutional players. Currently, the outcome is politically uncertain, but the process itself shows that digital assets have moved from a regulatory grey zone to a central fiscal policy issue. BIP-110 should be assessed separately. It is not a classic bull signal, but a controversial discussion about Bitcoin's data usage, node policy, and governance. An orderly clarification can strengthen the perception of the network's resilience, while a conflict-ridden activation could create short-term uncertainty. Therefore, it should not be uncritically placed on the list of positive catalysts. Technically, the market is not confirmed yet either. A strong and sustained break through the previous resistance zone will be necessary before one can speak of an established bull market rather than a recovery within a larger consolidation. But markets usually turn before the narrative does. When everyone agrees that the bull market has begun, a significant portion of the movement has often already occurred. My thesis is therefore not that Bitcoin will necessarily move vertically up from here. My thesis is that the probability distribution is changing. Global liquidity looks less restrictive. Long-term holders are accumulating. Selling pressure is being absorbed. Institutional infrastructure is intact. Companies continue to build Bitcoin reserves. Regulatory clarity remains politically on the agenda. Several statistical and macroeconomic models are simultaneously moving away from extremely defensive levels. Each signal can fail in isolation. But when independent data points begin to converge, one should at least consider whether the market is closer to the beginning of a new expansion phase than to the beginning of another multi-year bear market. It is not yet a fully confirmed bull market. But the foundation for a possible regime shift is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore https://x.com/saylor/status/2082818586263830820?s=46
·8 t sittenWe hit the bottom in Q4, where BTC hits the bottom. Exactly as in 2022, 2018 and 2014. I myself have been wrecked in both MSTR, BTC and altcoins because I didn't know better. But it seems BTC follows the pattern it always has. When BTC hits 250-500.000$ in Q4 2029, I think it would have been smart to keep one's MSTR. Still bullish and I won't sell even if it hits 1$. Then I'll just buy even more :-)
3 t sittenI think there's a good analysis on the correlation of the Global liquidity cycle and bitcoin price action by Michael Howell. Liquidity moves the markets after all.
·22 t sittenHow high will the price reach in 2026 and 2027, do you think?3 t sittenBetween 70-350 ish? Depends how quickly we will go back to ease the liquidity cycle, but i think it's most probably at the start of 2027. The debt is too large for sustained tightening.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten
‧2 t 34 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·6 t sittenAn interesting overall picture is gradually emerging for Bitcoin. Not because one indicator can predict the market, but because several independent signals from macro, on-chain data, capital flows, and market structure are gradually moving in the same direction. The Copper/Gold ratio has started to turn up from a low level. Historically, a rising ratio has been associated with improved global growth expectations and a greater appetite for risky assets. It is not a precise Bitcoin signal, but it supports the thesis that macroeconomic headwinds may be subsiding. At the same time, models based on global central bank liquidity indicate that the most restrictive liquidity phase may be coming to an end. Bitcoin does not always react immediately to liquidity changes, but the large cyclical movements have historically been closely linked to the direction of global dollar liquidity. If liquidity momentum continues to turn, it will significantly change the risk landscape. On-chain data also shows that long-term holders are once again absorbing supply. Accumulation is not limited to a single wallet group but is observed across multiple holding segments. It looks more like a transfer from distressed and short-term investors to capital with a longer time horizon than the beginning of a broad distribution phase. At the same time, selling pressure appears to be absorbed more effectively. Market depth in the spot market has improved around recent lows, and the decline has not been accompanied by the same sustained capitulation that typically characterizes the beginning of a deep bear market. The market is still under repair, but the structure looks less fragile than earlier in the year. The ETF picture is not unambiguously positive, and the year's total flows are still weaker than in the previous expansion phase. But July showed that institutional demand can quickly return when price and macro expectations stabilize. Several positive trading days and periods of weekly net inflows show that regulated capital access is still functioning. The crucial factor will be whether this development continues and lifts the overall trend from recovery to sustained net demand. Corporate accumulation also continues. Strategy, despite the sharp price drop, has increased its Bitcoin holdings and simultaneously reported growth in Bitcoin per share. This shows that the institutional treasury model has not disappeared during the correction. On the contrary, the largest players are trying to strengthen their capital structure so they can survive longer periods of volatility and continue accumulation. The CLARITY Act could become a significant regulatory catalyst if passed. The bill will not directly change Bitcoin's protocol or supply, but clearer US regulations could reduce legal uncertainty for exchanges, banks, asset managers, and other institutional players. Currently, the outcome is politically uncertain, but the process itself shows that digital assets have moved from a regulatory grey zone to a central fiscal policy issue. BIP-110 should be assessed separately. It is not a classic bull signal, but a controversial discussion about Bitcoin's data usage, node policy, and governance. An orderly clarification can strengthen the perception of the network's resilience, while a conflict-ridden activation could create short-term uncertainty. Therefore, it should not be uncritically placed on the list of positive catalysts. Technically, the market is not confirmed yet either. A strong and sustained break through the previous resistance zone will be necessary before one can speak of an established bull market rather than a recovery within a larger consolidation. But markets usually turn before the narrative does. When everyone agrees that the bull market has begun, a significant portion of the movement has often already occurred. My thesis is therefore not that Bitcoin will necessarily move vertically up from here. My thesis is that the probability distribution is changing. Global liquidity looks less restrictive. Long-term holders are accumulating. Selling pressure is being absorbed. Institutional infrastructure is intact. Companies continue to build Bitcoin reserves. Regulatory clarity remains politically on the agenda. Several statistical and macroeconomic models are simultaneously moving away from extremely defensive levels. Each signal can fail in isolation. But when independent data points begin to converge, one should at least consider whether the market is closer to the beginning of a new expansion phase than to the beginning of another multi-year bear market. It is not yet a fully confirmed bull market. But the foundation for a possible regime shift is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore https://x.com/saylor/status/2082818586263830820?s=46
- ·8 t sittenWe hit the bottom in Q4, where BTC hits the bottom. Exactly as in 2022, 2018 and 2014. I myself have been wrecked in both MSTR, BTC and altcoins because I didn't know better. But it seems BTC follows the pattern it always has. When BTC hits 250-500.000$ in Q4 2029, I think it would have been smart to keep one's MSTR. Still bullish and I won't sell even if it hits 1$. Then I'll just buy even more :-)3 t sittenI think there's a good analysis on the correlation of the Global liquidity cycle and bitcoin price action by Michael Howell. Liquidity moves the markets after all.
- ·22 t sittenHow high will the price reach in 2026 and 2027, do you think?3 t sittenBetween 70-350 ish? Depends how quickly we will go back to ease the liquidity cycle, but i think it's most probably at the start of 2027. The debt is too large for sustained tightening.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 30.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 30.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 8.6. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 5.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 30.10.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten
‧2 t 34 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 30.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 30.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 8.6. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 5.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 30.10.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·6 t sittenAn interesting overall picture is gradually emerging for Bitcoin. Not because one indicator can predict the market, but because several independent signals from macro, on-chain data, capital flows, and market structure are gradually moving in the same direction. The Copper/Gold ratio has started to turn up from a low level. Historically, a rising ratio has been associated with improved global growth expectations and a greater appetite for risky assets. It is not a precise Bitcoin signal, but it supports the thesis that macroeconomic headwinds may be subsiding. At the same time, models based on global central bank liquidity indicate that the most restrictive liquidity phase may be coming to an end. Bitcoin does not always react immediately to liquidity changes, but the large cyclical movements have historically been closely linked to the direction of global dollar liquidity. If liquidity momentum continues to turn, it will significantly change the risk landscape. On-chain data also shows that long-term holders are once again absorbing supply. Accumulation is not limited to a single wallet group but is observed across multiple holding segments. It looks more like a transfer from distressed and short-term investors to capital with a longer time horizon than the beginning of a broad distribution phase. At the same time, selling pressure appears to be absorbed more effectively. Market depth in the spot market has improved around recent lows, and the decline has not been accompanied by the same sustained capitulation that typically characterizes the beginning of a deep bear market. The market is still under repair, but the structure looks less fragile than earlier in the year. The ETF picture is not unambiguously positive, and the year's total flows are still weaker than in the previous expansion phase. But July showed that institutional demand can quickly return when price and macro expectations stabilize. Several positive trading days and periods of weekly net inflows show that regulated capital access is still functioning. The crucial factor will be whether this development continues and lifts the overall trend from recovery to sustained net demand. Corporate accumulation also continues. Strategy, despite the sharp price drop, has increased its Bitcoin holdings and simultaneously reported growth in Bitcoin per share. This shows that the institutional treasury model has not disappeared during the correction. On the contrary, the largest players are trying to strengthen their capital structure so they can survive longer periods of volatility and continue accumulation. The CLARITY Act could become a significant regulatory catalyst if passed. The bill will not directly change Bitcoin's protocol or supply, but clearer US regulations could reduce legal uncertainty for exchanges, banks, asset managers, and other institutional players. Currently, the outcome is politically uncertain, but the process itself shows that digital assets have moved from a regulatory grey zone to a central fiscal policy issue. BIP-110 should be assessed separately. It is not a classic bull signal, but a controversial discussion about Bitcoin's data usage, node policy, and governance. An orderly clarification can strengthen the perception of the network's resilience, while a conflict-ridden activation could create short-term uncertainty. Therefore, it should not be uncritically placed on the list of positive catalysts. Technically, the market is not confirmed yet either. A strong and sustained break through the previous resistance zone will be necessary before one can speak of an established bull market rather than a recovery within a larger consolidation. But markets usually turn before the narrative does. When everyone agrees that the bull market has begun, a significant portion of the movement has often already occurred. My thesis is therefore not that Bitcoin will necessarily move vertically up from here. My thesis is that the probability distribution is changing. Global liquidity looks less restrictive. Long-term holders are accumulating. Selling pressure is being absorbed. Institutional infrastructure is intact. Companies continue to build Bitcoin reserves. Regulatory clarity remains politically on the agenda. Several statistical and macroeconomic models are simultaneously moving away from extremely defensive levels. Each signal can fail in isolation. But when independent data points begin to converge, one should at least consider whether the market is closer to the beginning of a new expansion phase than to the beginning of another multi-year bear market. It is not yet a fully confirmed bull market. But the foundation for a possible regime shift is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore https://x.com/saylor/status/2082818586263830820?s=46
- ·8 t sittenWe hit the bottom in Q4, where BTC hits the bottom. Exactly as in 2022, 2018 and 2014. I myself have been wrecked in both MSTR, BTC and altcoins because I didn't know better. But it seems BTC follows the pattern it always has. When BTC hits 250-500.000$ in Q4 2029, I think it would have been smart to keep one's MSTR. Still bullish and I won't sell even if it hits 1$. Then I'll just buy even more :-)3 t sittenI think there's a good analysis on the correlation of the Global liquidity cycle and bitcoin price action by Michael Howell. Liquidity moves the markets after all.
- ·22 t sittenHow high will the price reach in 2026 and 2027, do you think?3 t sittenBetween 70-350 ish? Depends how quickly we will go back to ease the liquidity cycle, but i think it's most probably at the start of 2027. The debt is too large for sustained tightening.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt