2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
52 päivää sitten
‧46 min
0,42 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
8,17%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 5.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 18.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·4 t sittenMUCH POSITIVE IN STORE? With the Remote concept in a separate company, Reach once again becomes a pure-play subsea company, which is their core competence. This removes a lot of uncertainty. Reach spins off the Remote vessels with associated equipment (ROV) and proprietary software, as well as accumulated debt related to the Reach concept. Reach retains ROV pilots and performs all underwater work. What will be exciting is what Reach receives as compensation in this deal: -ownership stake in the new company -financial compensation I believe Wilhelmsen (still the largest owner in Reach) will ensure that Reach receives fair compensation for the spun-off assets, development work, and the risk that the Remote concept has entailed.
No! Only misery awaits here. A stock that has fallen almost 50% shows that there is no control.- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI asked AI to analyze Wilhelmsen's (largest owner in Reach with approx 30%) strategic interests in Reach Subsea. I received an answer from which I learned a lot. I hope and believe others will also find something interesting; "Kort" svar: Wilhelmsen has significant power in Reach Subsea – not because they own over 50 %, but because they combine capital, strategic position, technology, global distribution and critical infrastructure that the Remote‑initiative is entirely dependent on. They have functional control, even without a formal majority. Below you will find a structured, deep analysis of where the power actually lies. 1. Ownership power: Wilhelmsen is the largest owner with 29,6. This gives them: - blocking minority in important decisions - dominant position in strategic discussions - right to influence board composition - negotiation power in the Remote‑spin-off In practice, they are the only owner with enough weight to shape the company's direction. 2. Strategic power: Remote cannot succeed without Wilhelmsen. This is the most important power factor. The Remote‑initiative is dependent on: -Massterly (Wilhelmsen + Kongsberg) for remote control -autonomy‑infrastructure that Reach cannot build itself -global distribution that only Wilhelmsen has • capital in the billion-class This gives Wilhelmsen strategic control, even without a majority. 3 Operational power: Massterly is the heart of Remote. The Remote‑vessels will be operated from shore via Massterly. Massterly = Wilhelmsen + Kongsberg. This means: - Wilhelmsen controls the operational platform - The Remote‑fleet cannot be operated without them - Reach Subsea is dependent on Wilhelmsen's technology and operations This gives Wilhelmsen operational power over Remote. 4. Market power: Wilhelmsen opens doors globally. Wilhelmsen has: - 2 200 ports in 75 countries - global logistics - customers in offshore wind, subsea, energy and maritime industry Remote cannot be scaled globally without this infrastructure. This gives Wilhelmsen commercial ownership of Remote‑growth. 5. Capital power: Remote needs billions – Reach does not have them. The Remote‑fleet requires: - 1–2 mrd. NOK in equity in the coming years - investors with a long horizon - industrial expertise Reach Subsea cannot finance this alone. Wilhelmsen can. This gives them financial power to shape the ownership in the Remote‑company. 6. Negotiation power: Wilhelmsen is the “must‑have partner”. In the spin-off of Remote, Wilhelmsen has: - negotiation power on price - negotiation power on ownership structure - negotiation power on agreements between Reach and Remote - negotiation power on operations and technology Reach Subsea cannot threaten to “go to someone else”. Wilhelmsen is the only player who can lift Remote globally. 7. Governance power: The board is independent – but Wilhelmsen sets the direction. The board of Reach Subsea has no documented ownership interests. This means: - the board is professional and independent - but the strategy is shaped by the owners - and the largest owner is Wilhelmsen This gives Wilhelmsen agenda-setting power. ─── Summary: How much power does Wilhelmsen have? Area of power Wilhelmsen's position Effect Ownership power Largest owner (29,6 %) High Strategic power Remote dependent on them Very high Operational power Massterly controls operations Very high Commercial power Global distribution High Financial power Can finance Remote Very high Negotiation power “Must‑have partner” Very high Formal control Not a majority Moderate Overall assessment: Wilhelmsen has de facto control over the Remote‑initiative and significant strategic power in Reach Subsea – even without owning the majority.
·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuI believe Kongsberg Maritime (KMAR) will invest in Reach Remote. That is the strategy they have used before: first technological partnership, then acquisition. The close collaboration is mentioned here in a podcast with Artic, from 20:45: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4uotNIAlWIQRUCjyePBbew
I believe a more likely candidate is Deep Ocean. They have their own venture in USV vessels and must invest to not be overtaken and left behind in this technological shift.
·19.6.I take some spot checks now and then via Marinetraffic and check the fleet. To me, it seems that RR2 and Go Electra have been docked a lot in recent weeks, while the other vessels seem to be working all the time. Do others have a different opinion?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
52 päivää sitten
‧46 min
0,42 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
8,17%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·4 t sittenMUCH POSITIVE IN STORE? With the Remote concept in a separate company, Reach once again becomes a pure-play subsea company, which is their core competence. This removes a lot of uncertainty. Reach spins off the Remote vessels with associated equipment (ROV) and proprietary software, as well as accumulated debt related to the Reach concept. Reach retains ROV pilots and performs all underwater work. What will be exciting is what Reach receives as compensation in this deal: -ownership stake in the new company -financial compensation I believe Wilhelmsen (still the largest owner in Reach) will ensure that Reach receives fair compensation for the spun-off assets, development work, and the risk that the Remote concept has entailed.No! Only misery awaits here. A stock that has fallen almost 50% shows that there is no control.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI asked AI to analyze Wilhelmsen's (largest owner in Reach with approx 30%) strategic interests in Reach Subsea. I received an answer from which I learned a lot. I hope and believe others will also find something interesting; "Kort" svar: Wilhelmsen has significant power in Reach Subsea – not because they own over 50 %, but because they combine capital, strategic position, technology, global distribution and critical infrastructure that the Remote‑initiative is entirely dependent on. They have functional control, even without a formal majority. Below you will find a structured, deep analysis of where the power actually lies. 1. Ownership power: Wilhelmsen is the largest owner with 29,6. This gives them: - blocking minority in important decisions - dominant position in strategic discussions - right to influence board composition - negotiation power in the Remote‑spin-off In practice, they are the only owner with enough weight to shape the company's direction. 2. Strategic power: Remote cannot succeed without Wilhelmsen. This is the most important power factor. The Remote‑initiative is dependent on: -Massterly (Wilhelmsen + Kongsberg) for remote control -autonomy‑infrastructure that Reach cannot build itself -global distribution that only Wilhelmsen has • capital in the billion-class This gives Wilhelmsen strategic control, even without a majority. 3 Operational power: Massterly is the heart of Remote. The Remote‑vessels will be operated from shore via Massterly. Massterly = Wilhelmsen + Kongsberg. This means: - Wilhelmsen controls the operational platform - The Remote‑fleet cannot be operated without them - Reach Subsea is dependent on Wilhelmsen's technology and operations This gives Wilhelmsen operational power over Remote. 4. Market power: Wilhelmsen opens doors globally. Wilhelmsen has: - 2 200 ports in 75 countries - global logistics - customers in offshore wind, subsea, energy and maritime industry Remote cannot be scaled globally without this infrastructure. This gives Wilhelmsen commercial ownership of Remote‑growth. 5. Capital power: Remote needs billions – Reach does not have them. The Remote‑fleet requires: - 1–2 mrd. NOK in equity in the coming years - investors with a long horizon - industrial expertise Reach Subsea cannot finance this alone. Wilhelmsen can. This gives them financial power to shape the ownership in the Remote‑company. 6. Negotiation power: Wilhelmsen is the “must‑have partner”. In the spin-off of Remote, Wilhelmsen has: - negotiation power on price - negotiation power on ownership structure - negotiation power on agreements between Reach and Remote - negotiation power on operations and technology Reach Subsea cannot threaten to “go to someone else”. Wilhelmsen is the only player who can lift Remote globally. 7. Governance power: The board is independent – but Wilhelmsen sets the direction. The board of Reach Subsea has no documented ownership interests. This means: - the board is professional and independent - but the strategy is shaped by the owners - and the largest owner is Wilhelmsen This gives Wilhelmsen agenda-setting power. ─── Summary: How much power does Wilhelmsen have? Area of power Wilhelmsen's position Effect Ownership power Largest owner (29,6 %) High Strategic power Remote dependent on them Very high Operational power Massterly controls operations Very high Commercial power Global distribution High Financial power Can finance Remote Very high Negotiation power “Must‑have partner” Very high Formal control Not a majority Moderate Overall assessment: Wilhelmsen has de facto control over the Remote‑initiative and significant strategic power in Reach Subsea – even without owning the majority.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuI believe Kongsberg Maritime (KMAR) will invest in Reach Remote. That is the strategy they have used before: first technological partnership, then acquisition. The close collaboration is mentioned here in a podcast with Artic, from 20:45: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4uotNIAlWIQRUCjyePBbewI believe a more likely candidate is Deep Ocean. They have their own venture in USV vessels and must invest to not be overtaken and left behind in this technological shift.
- ·19.6.I take some spot checks now and then via Marinetraffic and check the fleet. To me, it seems that RR2 and Go Electra have been docked a lot in recent weeks, while the other vessels seem to be working all the time. Do others have a different opinion?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 5.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 18.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
52 päivää sitten
‧46 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 5.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 18.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 |
0,42 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
8,17%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·4 t sittenMUCH POSITIVE IN STORE? With the Remote concept in a separate company, Reach once again becomes a pure-play subsea company, which is their core competence. This removes a lot of uncertainty. Reach spins off the Remote vessels with associated equipment (ROV) and proprietary software, as well as accumulated debt related to the Reach concept. Reach retains ROV pilots and performs all underwater work. What will be exciting is what Reach receives as compensation in this deal: -ownership stake in the new company -financial compensation I believe Wilhelmsen (still the largest owner in Reach) will ensure that Reach receives fair compensation for the spun-off assets, development work, and the risk that the Remote concept has entailed.No! Only misery awaits here. A stock that has fallen almost 50% shows that there is no control.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI asked AI to analyze Wilhelmsen's (largest owner in Reach with approx 30%) strategic interests in Reach Subsea. I received an answer from which I learned a lot. I hope and believe others will also find something interesting; "Kort" svar: Wilhelmsen has significant power in Reach Subsea – not because they own over 50 %, but because they combine capital, strategic position, technology, global distribution and critical infrastructure that the Remote‑initiative is entirely dependent on. They have functional control, even without a formal majority. Below you will find a structured, deep analysis of where the power actually lies. 1. Ownership power: Wilhelmsen is the largest owner with 29,6. This gives them: - blocking minority in important decisions - dominant position in strategic discussions - right to influence board composition - negotiation power in the Remote‑spin-off In practice, they are the only owner with enough weight to shape the company's direction. 2. Strategic power: Remote cannot succeed without Wilhelmsen. This is the most important power factor. The Remote‑initiative is dependent on: -Massterly (Wilhelmsen + Kongsberg) for remote control -autonomy‑infrastructure that Reach cannot build itself -global distribution that only Wilhelmsen has • capital in the billion-class This gives Wilhelmsen strategic control, even without a majority. 3 Operational power: Massterly is the heart of Remote. The Remote‑vessels will be operated from shore via Massterly. Massterly = Wilhelmsen + Kongsberg. This means: - Wilhelmsen controls the operational platform - The Remote‑fleet cannot be operated without them - Reach Subsea is dependent on Wilhelmsen's technology and operations This gives Wilhelmsen operational power over Remote. 4. Market power: Wilhelmsen opens doors globally. Wilhelmsen has: - 2 200 ports in 75 countries - global logistics - customers in offshore wind, subsea, energy and maritime industry Remote cannot be scaled globally without this infrastructure. This gives Wilhelmsen commercial ownership of Remote‑growth. 5. Capital power: Remote needs billions – Reach does not have them. The Remote‑fleet requires: - 1–2 mrd. NOK in equity in the coming years - investors with a long horizon - industrial expertise Reach Subsea cannot finance this alone. Wilhelmsen can. This gives them financial power to shape the ownership in the Remote‑company. 6. Negotiation power: Wilhelmsen is the “must‑have partner”. In the spin-off of Remote, Wilhelmsen has: - negotiation power on price - negotiation power on ownership structure - negotiation power on agreements between Reach and Remote - negotiation power on operations and technology Reach Subsea cannot threaten to “go to someone else”. Wilhelmsen is the only player who can lift Remote globally. 7. Governance power: The board is independent – but Wilhelmsen sets the direction. The board of Reach Subsea has no documented ownership interests. This means: - the board is professional and independent - but the strategy is shaped by the owners - and the largest owner is Wilhelmsen This gives Wilhelmsen agenda-setting power. ─── Summary: How much power does Wilhelmsen have? Area of power Wilhelmsen's position Effect Ownership power Largest owner (29,6 %) High Strategic power Remote dependent on them Very high Operational power Massterly controls operations Very high Commercial power Global distribution High Financial power Can finance Remote Very high Negotiation power “Must‑have partner” Very high Formal control Not a majority Moderate Overall assessment: Wilhelmsen has de facto control over the Remote‑initiative and significant strategic power in Reach Subsea – even without owning the majority.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuI believe Kongsberg Maritime (KMAR) will invest in Reach Remote. That is the strategy they have used before: first technological partnership, then acquisition. The close collaboration is mentioned here in a podcast with Artic, from 20:45: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4uotNIAlWIQRUCjyePBbewI believe a more likely candidate is Deep Ocean. They have their own venture in USV vessels and must invest to not be overtaken and left behind in this technological shift.
- ·19.6.I take some spot checks now and then via Marinetraffic and check the fleet. To me, it seems that RR2 and Go Electra have been docked a lot in recent weeks, while the other vessels seem to be working all the time. Do others have a different opinion?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt