Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.
Germany
Xetra
Riskitaso
4/7
Morningstar rating
5 stars
Vastuullisuus (SFDR)

6

iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Osta-
Myy-
Spreadi %0,11%
Vaihto (EUR)-
Juoksevat kulut0,20%

Tarjoustasot

Ei dataa

Tunnusluvut

Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7

Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
  • Juoksevat kulut
    0,20%
  • Omaisuusluokka
    Osake
  • Kategoria
    Maailma suuryhtiöt sekatyyli osakkeet
  • Perusvaluutta
    EUR
  • Osinkopolitiikka
    Kasvuosuudet
  • Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investors with a total return, taking into account both capital and income returns, which reflects the return of the MSCI World Index. In order to achieve this investment objective, the investment policy of this Fund is to invest in a portfolio of equity securities that as far as possible and practicable consists of the component securities of the MSCI World Index, this Fund’s Benchmark Index.

Omistukset

Päivitetty 3.7.2026

Jakauma

  • Osakkeet99,7%
  • Lyhyt korko0,3%

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 13 t sitten
    ·
    What can this ETF rise to Max? So now the price is 126. And I am well aware ETFs grow slowly and steadily over several years, but is it possible that it can rise to 300? Or 500? Or 1000?
    Riippuu inflaatiosta
  • 15 t sitten
    ·
    I am still very new to investing. Is this a good suggestion to fill one's aktiesparekonto with?
    11 t sitten
    ·
    Choose WEBN (amundi) instead. It is cheaper in costs and based in Europe.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    Good to enter now? 5-year horizon
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    it might be too little but there are many things that play a role.. if you DCA, let's say through the first 3 years and don't go all in, then you have bought yourself a safety buffer (so have cash on the sidelines) why 5 years? is it because of pension.. one doesn't take everything out on pension day but over time, so your money will in that case accumulate for 15 more years after that... if you use the right account (ask) then you can withdraw your deposits tax-free initially. I recommend you set up an investment plan, stress test it.. a stress test is: what happens if you get a recession in year 1, 2, 3. what will the DCA effect do with that, what will ex 20% cash you can deploy on 10, 20, 30% down etc say about that.. if one has a smart strategy, then you will be surprised how little it matters if the market takes a 30% dip one year, as long as you DCA, as long as you take a buffer of 10/20% that ensures it doesn't matter that much.. in these AI days... make yourself an app in the cloud, give your inputs and simulate different scenarios...the market is at its most expensive in history and an American economy that might slide into a recession within a year, if macro doesn't improve, and that should be included in your analyses.. but it can actually be an advantage for you, if you have planned in advance and know exactly what you should do and what your output will be. I myself am 7/8 years away from pension, but my money will accumulate for 20 more years anyway... they will still increase even if I start withdrawing at pension... so... summa summarum... 5 years is not too little if you have done the preparatory work and prepared for bad scenarios happening at some point within those 5 years... as said, a 30% drop in year 1, 2 or 3 has zero impact for you if you take care and use that time smartly. don't let yourself be scared away from the market because of time, rather make the plan so you secure it as much as possible... money outside will lose enormous purchasing power to inflation.. so there are no other alternatives unless you are then in real estate, business etc.. we are in a secular bull market that still has a few years to go (based on times from previous secular bull markets), but even in a bull market there are weaknesses, but if you have accounted for them then it doesn't matter.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    Hi there, Lately been thinking of investing in more defensive ETFs like health, infrastructure, and agriculture. The reason is to decrease the stake in the US tech market: 1. I acknowledge that the US tech market made my portfolio grow a bit! Historically I am an optimistic investor, with strong supremacy in US sector. So in my portfolio US was 80-90 percent. (I am a young investor and started investing as the US economy is doing unprecedentedly). 2. This world etf is 72 percent US and a huge chunk is the US tech sector. 3. Recalling on my weekly readings the US sector has a 1-30 or 40 price to earn ratio. Quite bigger than the historical average (ofc I don't recall this number) but not as quite huge as Japan during the economic crisis (1-65). (There are other red flags, but let's keep this post short) I am thinking of selling Nasdaq, S&P and to decrease my stake in this world index. Why? Diversification in the over-hyped economy in the US tech sector. I am still etf positive, but my personal view on US tech sector has changed. Q1: Does anyone recommends staying not decreasing my position in this? (Keep in mind I don't invest long and invested initially with a lump sum). "So just go through the downturns and crashes it is still a valid view. yet in my case (being short in the market) it has less weight") Q2: what etf would you recommend me to look at? E.g. health etf. Looking for one that does well in economical downturns. --Ofc any comment below or this post should not be considered as financial advise.
    2 päivää sitten
    Probably keep World ETF but don’t forget about adding EXUS, if you are looking to balance out things.
  • Hi, isn’t this super exposed to the US market? If the AI/USA market goes down, am I at risk of losing most of my investment?
    29.6.
    ·
    If you are afraid of losing money here or it goes a bit up and down, then it's better you put them into an interest account.. With this etf, I would say one is reasonably secured, it has on average given over 10% each year. But of course, no one knows the next downturn. But at the last downturn, it has risen again.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tunnusluvut

Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7

Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
  • Juoksevat kulut
    0,20%
  • Omaisuusluokka
    Osake
  • Kategoria
    Maailma suuryhtiöt sekatyyli osakkeet
  • Perusvaluutta
    EUR
  • Osinkopolitiikka
    Kasvuosuudet
  • Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investors with a total return, taking into account both capital and income returns, which reflects the return of the MSCI World Index. In order to achieve this investment objective, the investment policy of this Fund is to invest in a portfolio of equity securities that as far as possible and practicable consists of the component securities of the MSCI World Index, this Fund’s Benchmark Index.

Uutiset

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tarjoustasot

Ei dataa

Omistukset

Päivitetty 3.7.2026

Jakauma

  • Osakkeet99,7%
  • Lyhyt korko0,3%

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 13 t sitten
    ·
    What can this ETF rise to Max? So now the price is 126. And I am well aware ETFs grow slowly and steadily over several years, but is it possible that it can rise to 300? Or 500? Or 1000?
    Riippuu inflaatiosta
  • 15 t sitten
    ·
    I am still very new to investing. Is this a good suggestion to fill one's aktiesparekonto with?
    11 t sitten
    ·
    Choose WEBN (amundi) instead. It is cheaper in costs and based in Europe.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    Good to enter now? 5-year horizon
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    it might be too little but there are many things that play a role.. if you DCA, let's say through the first 3 years and don't go all in, then you have bought yourself a safety buffer (so have cash on the sidelines) why 5 years? is it because of pension.. one doesn't take everything out on pension day but over time, so your money will in that case accumulate for 15 more years after that... if you use the right account (ask) then you can withdraw your deposits tax-free initially. I recommend you set up an investment plan, stress test it.. a stress test is: what happens if you get a recession in year 1, 2, 3. what will the DCA effect do with that, what will ex 20% cash you can deploy on 10, 20, 30% down etc say about that.. if one has a smart strategy, then you will be surprised how little it matters if the market takes a 30% dip one year, as long as you DCA, as long as you take a buffer of 10/20% that ensures it doesn't matter that much.. in these AI days... make yourself an app in the cloud, give your inputs and simulate different scenarios...the market is at its most expensive in history and an American economy that might slide into a recession within a year, if macro doesn't improve, and that should be included in your analyses.. but it can actually be an advantage for you, if you have planned in advance and know exactly what you should do and what your output will be. I myself am 7/8 years away from pension, but my money will accumulate for 20 more years anyway... they will still increase even if I start withdrawing at pension... so... summa summarum... 5 years is not too little if you have done the preparatory work and prepared for bad scenarios happening at some point within those 5 years... as said, a 30% drop in year 1, 2 or 3 has zero impact for you if you take care and use that time smartly. don't let yourself be scared away from the market because of time, rather make the plan so you secure it as much as possible... money outside will lose enormous purchasing power to inflation.. so there are no other alternatives unless you are then in real estate, business etc.. we are in a secular bull market that still has a few years to go (based on times from previous secular bull markets), but even in a bull market there are weaknesses, but if you have accounted for them then it doesn't matter.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    Hi there, Lately been thinking of investing in more defensive ETFs like health, infrastructure, and agriculture. The reason is to decrease the stake in the US tech market: 1. I acknowledge that the US tech market made my portfolio grow a bit! Historically I am an optimistic investor, with strong supremacy in US sector. So in my portfolio US was 80-90 percent. (I am a young investor and started investing as the US economy is doing unprecedentedly). 2. This world etf is 72 percent US and a huge chunk is the US tech sector. 3. Recalling on my weekly readings the US sector has a 1-30 or 40 price to earn ratio. Quite bigger than the historical average (ofc I don't recall this number) but not as quite huge as Japan during the economic crisis (1-65). (There are other red flags, but let's keep this post short) I am thinking of selling Nasdaq, S&P and to decrease my stake in this world index. Why? Diversification in the over-hyped economy in the US tech sector. I am still etf positive, but my personal view on US tech sector has changed. Q1: Does anyone recommends staying not decreasing my position in this? (Keep in mind I don't invest long and invested initially with a lump sum). "So just go through the downturns and crashes it is still a valid view. yet in my case (being short in the market) it has less weight") Q2: what etf would you recommend me to look at? E.g. health etf. Looking for one that does well in economical downturns. --Ofc any comment below or this post should not be considered as financial advise.
    2 päivää sitten
    Probably keep World ETF but don’t forget about adding EXUS, if you are looking to balance out things.
  • Hi, isn’t this super exposed to the US market? If the AI/USA market goes down, am I at risk of losing most of my investment?
    29.6.
    ·
    If you are afraid of losing money here or it goes a bit up and down, then it's better you put them into an interest account.. With this etf, I would say one is reasonably secured, it has on average given over 10% each year. But of course, no one knows the next downturn. But at the last downturn, it has risen again.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tunnusluvut

Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7

Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
  • Juoksevat kulut
    0,20%
  • Omaisuusluokka
    Osake
  • Kategoria
    Maailma suuryhtiöt sekatyyli osakkeet
  • Perusvaluutta
    EUR
  • Osinkopolitiikka
    Kasvuosuudet
  • Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investors with a total return, taking into account both capital and income returns, which reflects the return of the MSCI World Index. In order to achieve this investment objective, the investment policy of this Fund is to invest in a portfolio of equity securities that as far as possible and practicable consists of the component securities of the MSCI World Index, this Fund’s Benchmark Index.

Uutiset

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 13 t sitten
    ·
    What can this ETF rise to Max? So now the price is 126. And I am well aware ETFs grow slowly and steadily over several years, but is it possible that it can rise to 300? Or 500? Or 1000?
    Riippuu inflaatiosta
  • 15 t sitten
    ·
    I am still very new to investing. Is this a good suggestion to fill one's aktiesparekonto with?
    11 t sitten
    ·
    Choose WEBN (amundi) instead. It is cheaper in costs and based in Europe.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    Good to enter now? 5-year horizon
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    it might be too little but there are many things that play a role.. if you DCA, let's say through the first 3 years and don't go all in, then you have bought yourself a safety buffer (so have cash on the sidelines) why 5 years? is it because of pension.. one doesn't take everything out on pension day but over time, so your money will in that case accumulate for 15 more years after that... if you use the right account (ask) then you can withdraw your deposits tax-free initially. I recommend you set up an investment plan, stress test it.. a stress test is: what happens if you get a recession in year 1, 2, 3. what will the DCA effect do with that, what will ex 20% cash you can deploy on 10, 20, 30% down etc say about that.. if one has a smart strategy, then you will be surprised how little it matters if the market takes a 30% dip one year, as long as you DCA, as long as you take a buffer of 10/20% that ensures it doesn't matter that much.. in these AI days... make yourself an app in the cloud, give your inputs and simulate different scenarios...the market is at its most expensive in history and an American economy that might slide into a recession within a year, if macro doesn't improve, and that should be included in your analyses.. but it can actually be an advantage for you, if you have planned in advance and know exactly what you should do and what your output will be. I myself am 7/8 years away from pension, but my money will accumulate for 20 more years anyway... they will still increase even if I start withdrawing at pension... so... summa summarum... 5 years is not too little if you have done the preparatory work and prepared for bad scenarios happening at some point within those 5 years... as said, a 30% drop in year 1, 2 or 3 has zero impact for you if you take care and use that time smartly. don't let yourself be scared away from the market because of time, rather make the plan so you secure it as much as possible... money outside will lose enormous purchasing power to inflation.. so there are no other alternatives unless you are then in real estate, business etc.. we are in a secular bull market that still has a few years to go (based on times from previous secular bull markets), but even in a bull market there are weaknesses, but if you have accounted for them then it doesn't matter.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    Hi there, Lately been thinking of investing in more defensive ETFs like health, infrastructure, and agriculture. The reason is to decrease the stake in the US tech market: 1. I acknowledge that the US tech market made my portfolio grow a bit! Historically I am an optimistic investor, with strong supremacy in US sector. So in my portfolio US was 80-90 percent. (I am a young investor and started investing as the US economy is doing unprecedentedly). 2. This world etf is 72 percent US and a huge chunk is the US tech sector. 3. Recalling on my weekly readings the US sector has a 1-30 or 40 price to earn ratio. Quite bigger than the historical average (ofc I don't recall this number) but not as quite huge as Japan during the economic crisis (1-65). (There are other red flags, but let's keep this post short) I am thinking of selling Nasdaq, S&P and to decrease my stake in this world index. Why? Diversification in the over-hyped economy in the US tech sector. I am still etf positive, but my personal view on US tech sector has changed. Q1: Does anyone recommends staying not decreasing my position in this? (Keep in mind I don't invest long and invested initially with a lump sum). "So just go through the downturns and crashes it is still a valid view. yet in my case (being short in the market) it has less weight") Q2: what etf would you recommend me to look at? E.g. health etf. Looking for one that does well in economical downturns. --Ofc any comment below or this post should not be considered as financial advise.
    2 päivää sitten
    Probably keep World ETF but don’t forget about adding EXUS, if you are looking to balance out things.
  • Hi, isn’t this super exposed to the US market? If the AI/USA market goes down, am I at risk of losing most of my investment?
    29.6.
    ·
    If you are afraid of losing money here or it goes a bit up and down, then it's better you put them into an interest account.. With this etf, I would say one is reasonably secured, it has on average given over 10% each year. But of course, no one knows the next downturn. But at the last downturn, it has risen again.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Ei dataa

Omistukset

Päivitetty 3.7.2026

Jakauma

  • Osakkeet99,7%
  • Lyhyt korko0,3%