Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,00%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaNorja osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaNOK
- Lainoitusaste85%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
Rahasto on Norjan markkinoille sijoittava osakeindeksirahasto, ja rahaston tavoitteena on jäljitellä OBX Index -osakeindeksin koostumusta ja siten myös indeksin muodostamaa tuottoa. Rahasto sijoittaa varansa pääasiassa osakkeisiin ja muihin jälkimarkkinakelpoisiin osakepohjaisiin arvopapereihin. Rahasto saa käyttää johdannaisinstrumentteja osana sijoituspolitiikkaansa.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Omistukset
Päivitetty 30.6.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet100%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·17 t sittenBrent Crude: Hormuz escalation sends oil price up – and OPEC+ meets August 2 with the wrong map in hand Brent crude has had an intense week. After trading around 72 dollars early in July, when the situation in the Strait of Hormuz seemed to calm down, the price is now back over 84-85 dollars a barrel – with a single-day jump of almost 10 % mid-week. It is worth pausing to look at what is driving the movement, because the technical signals diverge sharply depending on the time horizon, and fundamentally we are in a situation that can develop quickly in both directions. Technical: short-term strength, medium-term break Investtech's medium-term analysis shows that the rising trend channel that was intact from last autumn is now broken, with sales targets down towards 71.50 / 66 / 60 if the war premium disappears again. At the same time, short-term momentum indicators (hour/day) show a clear "Strong Buy" picture, because they capture this week's vertical movement. It is not really a contradiction – it is two different time windows measuring two different things. Medium-term structure is weakened after the fall from the April peak, while short-term price action reflects that the market is currently pricing in war in real-time. Fundamental: The Hormuz crisis is far from over 2026 Hormuz crisis has been ongoing since February 28, but the last week has been the most intense phase in a long time. The USA has carried out several rounds of attacks against Iranian military targets along the coast and near the strait, after Iran shot at a ship and declared the strait closed. Wednesday was the fifth consecutive night of American attacks, aimed at Iran's ability to threaten shipping in the strait, and Iran simultaneously claims to have disabled two tankers. One single day this week saw Brent rise almost 10 % on fears of a real blockade. EIA also reported that US crude oil inventories fell by 1.7 million barrels last week, which provides some extra support in addition to the war premium. OPEC+ meets August 2 – with an outdated premise What makes this extra interesting: OPEC+ decided on July 5 a production increase of 188,000 barrels/day from August, and the justification was explicitly that exports through Hormuz seemed to be improving and that the war premium was decreasing. That decision was thus made on a premise that has been completely turned on its head in the last ten days. The next ordinary meeting is August 2, and it will be an important crossroads: does the group continue the gradual ramp-up as planned (they still have about 379,000 barrels/day left to reverse of the old cuts), or do they slow down given that the assumption of a calmer situation in the strait no longer holds? An OPEC+ that increases supply into an escalating Hormuz crisis will be a reminder of how quickly fundamental narratives can become outdated in this market. Connection to the precious metals framework This is exactly the type of shock that moves through the chain geopolitics → oil → inflation expectations → Fed → real interest rates → silver/gold that I have followed through the spring. The question now is whether a sustained oil spike translates into renewed inflationary pressure (headwind for precious metals via an already hawkish Fed under Warsh), or if geopolitical risk triggers enough safe haven demand to offset it – the same dynamic that affected silver prices earlier this year. Sources: - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-15/us-launches-fresh-strikes-on-iran-as-peril-in-strait-deepens - https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/14/us-iran-hormuz-strikes-oil-toll.html - https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/brent-crude-oil - https://www.rigzone.com/news/opec_decides_to_boost_production_further_in_august-06-jul-2026-184064-article/ - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Strait_of_Hormuz_crisis For discussion: Do you think OPEC+ dares to stick to the ramp-up plan on August 2 amidst an escalating crisis, or will they signal a pause? And how much of today's oil price is actually a war premium that can disappear as quickly as it came? Disclaimer: This is not investment advice, only my own observations about the market. Always make your own assessments before trading.- 1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWhen Does the Market Start Pricing In That the SPR Isn't Enough? The Iran war just re-escalated. The US-Iran ceasefire broke down in late June, and overnight on July 14–15 US forces struck targets along the Iranian coast while reinstating the naval blockade of Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz. Brent has risen for three straight sessions to around $85–86/bbl, up from roughly $68 just two weeks earlier — a move of over 25%. Meanwhile the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve keeps draining. DOE data put the SPR at 319.5 million barrels for the week ending July 3, the lowest level since April 1983 — over four decades. Total US inventories, commercial crude plus SPR combined, fell to 734 million barrels as of June 26, the lowest since 1984. What matters most here is timing: the spring buffer is largely spent right as this new escalation hits. The IEA's coordinated 400-million-barrel release was scheduled to land over four months from late March, and the US's 172-million-barrel SPR share was slated for delivery over roughly 120 days from mid-March — both windows are closing right now. The reserve can't physically empty overnight regardless, since max SPR withdrawal capacity is about 2.7 million bbl/day, so full depletion would take well over 100 days — but that's rarely what markets actually price. What tends to move first is backwardation in the futures curve, widening crack spreads as specific crude grades get scarce, refinery utilization pinned near capacity, and commercial stocks slipping further below their five-year seasonal average, all of which have historically surfaced one to three months into a sustained disruption, well before the headline reserve number hits any critical threshold. Discussion: has the market already started pricing in a thinner buffer, or does the real risk premium only show up if Hormuz stays closed through August? Sources: Al Jazeera (July 9, 2026), TankTransport (July 2026), CNBC (July 15, 2026), oilprice.com, Wikipedia — Strategic Petroleum Reserve (United States) Not investment advice. I hold Nordnet Norge Indeks and am therefore not an objective voice on this.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuOSEBX – inverse head and shoulders in the making? Agree? I've been looking a bit closer at the 1-month chart for OSEBX now, and I think the bottom structure from mid-June until today is starting to look suspiciously like a classic inverse head and shoulders formation. As I read it: - Left shoulder: bottom around the 1 900-level just before 29. June - Head: the deepest point of the correction, down towards ~1 895–1 900, shortly after - Right shoulder: a shallower bottom around 1 905–1 920 in the days after the head – exactly as the pattern should look, with less decline than in the head - Neckline: drawn through the two local peaks between the shoulders and the head, somewhere in the 1 935–1 945-area. Not perfectly horizontal, but that is normal - Breakout: the price broke up through the neckline around the start of July, and continued on to a new peak near 1 965–1 970 around 6.–8. July What makes this extra interesting right now: today's fall of −1,10 % has taken the index (1 941,05) right back down to the old neckline-level. This is a classic retest of the breakout – if the level holds as support from here, it significantly strengthens the formation. If it breaks down convincingly, however, the entire interpretation is weakened, and we could be back in the broad consolidation box from June. Target price with standard head and shoulders methodology (neckline + head depth, i.e., approx. 1 940 + 45 points) lands around 1 985. The price has touched ~1 965 at its highest, so we are not quite there yet. A couple of caveats I want to be honest about: the shoulders are not perfectly symmetrical in depth, and the movement between the head and the right shoulder is a bit noisy with several micro-bottoms along the way. This means the pattern can also be interpreted as a rounded bottom or a double bottom variant instead. In other words, the formation is not textbook-perfect, but the structure is there. Discussion: Do others see the same pattern, or do you read this bottom structure differently? And how do you assess the probability that the neckline holds as support in today's retest? Disclaimer: This is my own technical assessment and not investment advice.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,00%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaNorja osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaNOK
- Lainoitusaste85%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
Rahasto on Norjan markkinoille sijoittava osakeindeksirahasto, ja rahaston tavoitteena on jäljitellä OBX Index -osakeindeksin koostumusta ja siten myös indeksin muodostamaa tuottoa. Rahasto sijoittaa varansa pääasiassa osakkeisiin ja muihin jälkimarkkinakelpoisiin osakepohjaisiin arvopapereihin. Rahasto saa käyttää johdannaisinstrumentteja osana sijoituspolitiikkaansa.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Omistukset
Päivitetty 30.6.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet100%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·17 t sittenBrent Crude: Hormuz escalation sends oil price up – and OPEC+ meets August 2 with the wrong map in hand Brent crude has had an intense week. After trading around 72 dollars early in July, when the situation in the Strait of Hormuz seemed to calm down, the price is now back over 84-85 dollars a barrel – with a single-day jump of almost 10 % mid-week. It is worth pausing to look at what is driving the movement, because the technical signals diverge sharply depending on the time horizon, and fundamentally we are in a situation that can develop quickly in both directions. Technical: short-term strength, medium-term break Investtech's medium-term analysis shows that the rising trend channel that was intact from last autumn is now broken, with sales targets down towards 71.50 / 66 / 60 if the war premium disappears again. At the same time, short-term momentum indicators (hour/day) show a clear "Strong Buy" picture, because they capture this week's vertical movement. It is not really a contradiction – it is two different time windows measuring two different things. Medium-term structure is weakened after the fall from the April peak, while short-term price action reflects that the market is currently pricing in war in real-time. Fundamental: The Hormuz crisis is far from over 2026 Hormuz crisis has been ongoing since February 28, but the last week has been the most intense phase in a long time. The USA has carried out several rounds of attacks against Iranian military targets along the coast and near the strait, after Iran shot at a ship and declared the strait closed. Wednesday was the fifth consecutive night of American attacks, aimed at Iran's ability to threaten shipping in the strait, and Iran simultaneously claims to have disabled two tankers. One single day this week saw Brent rise almost 10 % on fears of a real blockade. EIA also reported that US crude oil inventories fell by 1.7 million barrels last week, which provides some extra support in addition to the war premium. OPEC+ meets August 2 – with an outdated premise What makes this extra interesting: OPEC+ decided on July 5 a production increase of 188,000 barrels/day from August, and the justification was explicitly that exports through Hormuz seemed to be improving and that the war premium was decreasing. That decision was thus made on a premise that has been completely turned on its head in the last ten days. The next ordinary meeting is August 2, and it will be an important crossroads: does the group continue the gradual ramp-up as planned (they still have about 379,000 barrels/day left to reverse of the old cuts), or do they slow down given that the assumption of a calmer situation in the strait no longer holds? An OPEC+ that increases supply into an escalating Hormuz crisis will be a reminder of how quickly fundamental narratives can become outdated in this market. Connection to the precious metals framework This is exactly the type of shock that moves through the chain geopolitics → oil → inflation expectations → Fed → real interest rates → silver/gold that I have followed through the spring. The question now is whether a sustained oil spike translates into renewed inflationary pressure (headwind for precious metals via an already hawkish Fed under Warsh), or if geopolitical risk triggers enough safe haven demand to offset it – the same dynamic that affected silver prices earlier this year. Sources: - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-15/us-launches-fresh-strikes-on-iran-as-peril-in-strait-deepens - https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/14/us-iran-hormuz-strikes-oil-toll.html - https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/brent-crude-oil - https://www.rigzone.com/news/opec_decides_to_boost_production_further_in_august-06-jul-2026-184064-article/ - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Strait_of_Hormuz_crisis For discussion: Do you think OPEC+ dares to stick to the ramp-up plan on August 2 amidst an escalating crisis, or will they signal a pause? And how much of today's oil price is actually a war premium that can disappear as quickly as it came? Disclaimer: This is not investment advice, only my own observations about the market. Always make your own assessments before trading.
- 1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWhen Does the Market Start Pricing In That the SPR Isn't Enough? The Iran war just re-escalated. The US-Iran ceasefire broke down in late June, and overnight on July 14–15 US forces struck targets along the Iranian coast while reinstating the naval blockade of Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz. Brent has risen for three straight sessions to around $85–86/bbl, up from roughly $68 just two weeks earlier — a move of over 25%. Meanwhile the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve keeps draining. DOE data put the SPR at 319.5 million barrels for the week ending July 3, the lowest level since April 1983 — over four decades. Total US inventories, commercial crude plus SPR combined, fell to 734 million barrels as of June 26, the lowest since 1984. What matters most here is timing: the spring buffer is largely spent right as this new escalation hits. The IEA's coordinated 400-million-barrel release was scheduled to land over four months from late March, and the US's 172-million-barrel SPR share was slated for delivery over roughly 120 days from mid-March — both windows are closing right now. The reserve can't physically empty overnight regardless, since max SPR withdrawal capacity is about 2.7 million bbl/day, so full depletion would take well over 100 days — but that's rarely what markets actually price. What tends to move first is backwardation in the futures curve, widening crack spreads as specific crude grades get scarce, refinery utilization pinned near capacity, and commercial stocks slipping further below their five-year seasonal average, all of which have historically surfaced one to three months into a sustained disruption, well before the headline reserve number hits any critical threshold. Discussion: has the market already started pricing in a thinner buffer, or does the real risk premium only show up if Hormuz stays closed through August? Sources: Al Jazeera (July 9, 2026), TankTransport (July 2026), CNBC (July 15, 2026), oilprice.com, Wikipedia — Strategic Petroleum Reserve (United States) Not investment advice. I hold Nordnet Norge Indeks and am therefore not an objective voice on this.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuOSEBX – inverse head and shoulders in the making? Agree? I've been looking a bit closer at the 1-month chart for OSEBX now, and I think the bottom structure from mid-June until today is starting to look suspiciously like a classic inverse head and shoulders formation. As I read it: - Left shoulder: bottom around the 1 900-level just before 29. June - Head: the deepest point of the correction, down towards ~1 895–1 900, shortly after - Right shoulder: a shallower bottom around 1 905–1 920 in the days after the head – exactly as the pattern should look, with less decline than in the head - Neckline: drawn through the two local peaks between the shoulders and the head, somewhere in the 1 935–1 945-area. Not perfectly horizontal, but that is normal - Breakout: the price broke up through the neckline around the start of July, and continued on to a new peak near 1 965–1 970 around 6.–8. July What makes this extra interesting right now: today's fall of −1,10 % has taken the index (1 941,05) right back down to the old neckline-level. This is a classic retest of the breakout – if the level holds as support from here, it significantly strengthens the formation. If it breaks down convincingly, however, the entire interpretation is weakened, and we could be back in the broad consolidation box from June. Target price with standard head and shoulders methodology (neckline + head depth, i.e., approx. 1 940 + 45 points) lands around 1 985. The price has touched ~1 965 at its highest, so we are not quite there yet. A couple of caveats I want to be honest about: the shoulders are not perfectly symmetrical in depth, and the movement between the head and the right shoulder is a bit noisy with several micro-bottoms along the way. This means the pattern can also be interpreted as a rounded bottom or a double bottom variant instead. In other words, the formation is not textbook-perfect, but the structure is there. Discussion: Do others see the same pattern, or do you read this bottom structure differently? And how do you assess the probability that the neckline holds as support in today's retest? Disclaimer: This is my own technical assessment and not investment advice.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,00%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaNorja osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaNOK
- Lainoitusaste85%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
Rahasto on Norjan markkinoille sijoittava osakeindeksirahasto, ja rahaston tavoitteena on jäljitellä OBX Index -osakeindeksin koostumusta ja siten myös indeksin muodostamaa tuottoa. Rahasto sijoittaa varansa pääasiassa osakkeisiin ja muihin jälkimarkkinakelpoisiin osakepohjaisiin arvopapereihin. Rahasto saa käyttää johdannaisinstrumentteja osana sijoituspolitiikkaansa.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·17 t sittenBrent Crude: Hormuz escalation sends oil price up – and OPEC+ meets August 2 with the wrong map in hand Brent crude has had an intense week. After trading around 72 dollars early in July, when the situation in the Strait of Hormuz seemed to calm down, the price is now back over 84-85 dollars a barrel – with a single-day jump of almost 10 % mid-week. It is worth pausing to look at what is driving the movement, because the technical signals diverge sharply depending on the time horizon, and fundamentally we are in a situation that can develop quickly in both directions. Technical: short-term strength, medium-term break Investtech's medium-term analysis shows that the rising trend channel that was intact from last autumn is now broken, with sales targets down towards 71.50 / 66 / 60 if the war premium disappears again. At the same time, short-term momentum indicators (hour/day) show a clear "Strong Buy" picture, because they capture this week's vertical movement. It is not really a contradiction – it is two different time windows measuring two different things. Medium-term structure is weakened after the fall from the April peak, while short-term price action reflects that the market is currently pricing in war in real-time. Fundamental: The Hormuz crisis is far from over 2026 Hormuz crisis has been ongoing since February 28, but the last week has been the most intense phase in a long time. The USA has carried out several rounds of attacks against Iranian military targets along the coast and near the strait, after Iran shot at a ship and declared the strait closed. Wednesday was the fifth consecutive night of American attacks, aimed at Iran's ability to threaten shipping in the strait, and Iran simultaneously claims to have disabled two tankers. One single day this week saw Brent rise almost 10 % on fears of a real blockade. EIA also reported that US crude oil inventories fell by 1.7 million barrels last week, which provides some extra support in addition to the war premium. OPEC+ meets August 2 – with an outdated premise What makes this extra interesting: OPEC+ decided on July 5 a production increase of 188,000 barrels/day from August, and the justification was explicitly that exports through Hormuz seemed to be improving and that the war premium was decreasing. That decision was thus made on a premise that has been completely turned on its head in the last ten days. The next ordinary meeting is August 2, and it will be an important crossroads: does the group continue the gradual ramp-up as planned (they still have about 379,000 barrels/day left to reverse of the old cuts), or do they slow down given that the assumption of a calmer situation in the strait no longer holds? An OPEC+ that increases supply into an escalating Hormuz crisis will be a reminder of how quickly fundamental narratives can become outdated in this market. Connection to the precious metals framework This is exactly the type of shock that moves through the chain geopolitics → oil → inflation expectations → Fed → real interest rates → silver/gold that I have followed through the spring. The question now is whether a sustained oil spike translates into renewed inflationary pressure (headwind for precious metals via an already hawkish Fed under Warsh), or if geopolitical risk triggers enough safe haven demand to offset it – the same dynamic that affected silver prices earlier this year. Sources: - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-15/us-launches-fresh-strikes-on-iran-as-peril-in-strait-deepens - https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/14/us-iran-hormuz-strikes-oil-toll.html - https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/brent-crude-oil - https://www.rigzone.com/news/opec_decides_to_boost_production_further_in_august-06-jul-2026-184064-article/ - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Strait_of_Hormuz_crisis For discussion: Do you think OPEC+ dares to stick to the ramp-up plan on August 2 amidst an escalating crisis, or will they signal a pause? And how much of today's oil price is actually a war premium that can disappear as quickly as it came? Disclaimer: This is not investment advice, only my own observations about the market. Always make your own assessments before trading.
- 1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWhen Does the Market Start Pricing In That the SPR Isn't Enough? The Iran war just re-escalated. The US-Iran ceasefire broke down in late June, and overnight on July 14–15 US forces struck targets along the Iranian coast while reinstating the naval blockade of Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz. Brent has risen for three straight sessions to around $85–86/bbl, up from roughly $68 just two weeks earlier — a move of over 25%. Meanwhile the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve keeps draining. DOE data put the SPR at 319.5 million barrels for the week ending July 3, the lowest level since April 1983 — over four decades. Total US inventories, commercial crude plus SPR combined, fell to 734 million barrels as of June 26, the lowest since 1984. What matters most here is timing: the spring buffer is largely spent right as this new escalation hits. The IEA's coordinated 400-million-barrel release was scheduled to land over four months from late March, and the US's 172-million-barrel SPR share was slated for delivery over roughly 120 days from mid-March — both windows are closing right now. The reserve can't physically empty overnight regardless, since max SPR withdrawal capacity is about 2.7 million bbl/day, so full depletion would take well over 100 days — but that's rarely what markets actually price. What tends to move first is backwardation in the futures curve, widening crack spreads as specific crude grades get scarce, refinery utilization pinned near capacity, and commercial stocks slipping further below their five-year seasonal average, all of which have historically surfaced one to three months into a sustained disruption, well before the headline reserve number hits any critical threshold. Discussion: has the market already started pricing in a thinner buffer, or does the real risk premium only show up if Hormuz stays closed through August? Sources: Al Jazeera (July 9, 2026), TankTransport (July 2026), CNBC (July 15, 2026), oilprice.com, Wikipedia — Strategic Petroleum Reserve (United States) Not investment advice. I hold Nordnet Norge Indeks and am therefore not an objective voice on this.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuOSEBX – inverse head and shoulders in the making? Agree? I've been looking a bit closer at the 1-month chart for OSEBX now, and I think the bottom structure from mid-June until today is starting to look suspiciously like a classic inverse head and shoulders formation. As I read it: - Left shoulder: bottom around the 1 900-level just before 29. June - Head: the deepest point of the correction, down towards ~1 895–1 900, shortly after - Right shoulder: a shallower bottom around 1 905–1 920 in the days after the head – exactly as the pattern should look, with less decline than in the head - Neckline: drawn through the two local peaks between the shoulders and the head, somewhere in the 1 935–1 945-area. Not perfectly horizontal, but that is normal - Breakout: the price broke up through the neckline around the start of July, and continued on to a new peak near 1 965–1 970 around 6.–8. July What makes this extra interesting right now: today's fall of −1,10 % has taken the index (1 941,05) right back down to the old neckline-level. This is a classic retest of the breakout – if the level holds as support from here, it significantly strengthens the formation. If it breaks down convincingly, however, the entire interpretation is weakened, and we could be back in the broad consolidation box from June. Target price with standard head and shoulders methodology (neckline + head depth, i.e., approx. 1 940 + 45 points) lands around 1 985. The price has touched ~1 965 at its highest, so we are not quite there yet. A couple of caveats I want to be honest about: the shoulders are not perfectly symmetrical in depth, and the movement between the head and the right shoulder is a bit noisy with several micro-bottoms along the way. This means the pattern can also be interpreted as a rounded bottom or a double bottom variant instead. In other words, the formation is not textbook-perfect, but the structure is there. Discussion: Do others see the same pattern, or do you read this bottom structure differently? And how do you assess the probability that the neckline holds as support in today's retest? Disclaimer: This is my own technical assessment and not investment advice.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Omistukset
Päivitetty 30.6.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet100%