2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
45 päivää sitten
10,50 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
6,80%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 13.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 15.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·8.4.ROMER's establishment of a savings bank foundation, new dividend policy, and not least gift policy have received little attention, but are clearly visible in the stock price. The change probably also indicates that ROMER is more interested in buying others than being bought itself.
I agree that in the big picture, this will be positive in the long run from the EKB (equity certificate/share) owners' point of view, here broken down point by point (as I see it) 1. Establish a savings bank foundation - In itself, slightly negative in that it reduces the primary capital fund which, due to today's legislation, functions as a buffer/airbag for EKB owners if the bank were to incur significant losses (see e.g. Tysnes Sparebank before they merged with Haugesund SPB). But with a primary capital fund that constitutes 55% of the equity, the buffer is sufficiently large anyway. Also provides an opportunity to distribute customer dividends if the bank decides to do so, and it is still possible in the future. 2. New dividend policy - In itself, neither positive nor negative, but can attract somewhat different investors based on whether one desires growth or dividends. It is important that sufficient profit is retained so that the bank can finance desired growth. 3. New gift policy - Very positive for EKB owners. It has been a bad practice that several savings banks have not managed to distribute sufficient gifts to maintain the ownership share of the EKB owners, which has led to slow dilution of EKB. Point 1 now becomes very positive (and important) so that the savings bank can uphold the promise of equal treatment of equity in connection with dividends/gifts, whether it is EKB or the primary capital fund. The primary capital fund's share of the dividend (gift) is merely transferred to the foundation. Sparebanken Møre was ordered to compensate the primary capital fund by the financial supervisory authority because they had not managed to distribute gifts fast enough (which the financial supervisory authority argued in practice gave a higher ownership share to the primary capital fund). This was discovered when they established their own savings bank foundation. We hope the same has not happened here. 4. Divestment of EKB by the Savings Bank Foundation - Negative in the short run. Will put significant selling pressure on EKB during that period (see Sparebanken 1 Nordmøre, where the relatively newly established savings bank foundation divested over a longer period and put pressure on the price). In the longer run, it will be positive because it will increase liquidity in trading. 5. Listing on Oslo Børs - Very positive. Will make the bank relevant for investors who mostly only trade on ASK. Can increase liquidity by investors buying and selling more without needing to think about tax on the gain before eventually withdrawing from the ASK account. ASK also provides deferred tax on dividends (now only available for those who use an IKZ account at Nordnet or similar, or invest through a limited company (AS)). The total therefore becomes very positive in the long run, but the divestment can dampen the price development as long as the savings bank foundation sells down its stake. We can hope that the foundation perhaps starts with a larger divestment where both institutional and private investors, as well as small shareholders and employees, get the opportunity to subscribe.
·13.2.Exciting prospects ahead. I believe it is absolutely right to get this listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange for more visibility and liquidity. If the development continues and the transition to the Oslo Stock Exchange goes smoothly, then I honestly believe we can see the outlines of the 200-mark within one to two years. But bank is bank, it's boring, but it puts butter on the bread.
·15.12.2025Is Romerike Sparebank an acquisition case? Perhaps interesting for Sparebanken Norge to gain a foothold north of Oslo 🤔
Can Romerike be an acquisition candidate for Sparebanken Norge or Sparebank 1 Sör-Norge?- ·14.8.2025Nice report as usual. Positioning itself more and more to become a major bank in the local community. If it continues like this, we could soon see dividends of up to 12-13kr, assuming everything goes as smoothly as it is now for the rest of the year
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
45 päivää sitten
10,50 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
6,80%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·8.4.ROMER's establishment of a savings bank foundation, new dividend policy, and not least gift policy have received little attention, but are clearly visible in the stock price. The change probably also indicates that ROMER is more interested in buying others than being bought itself.I agree that in the big picture, this will be positive in the long run from the EKB (equity certificate/share) owners' point of view, here broken down point by point (as I see it) 1. Establish a savings bank foundation - In itself, slightly negative in that it reduces the primary capital fund which, due to today's legislation, functions as a buffer/airbag for EKB owners if the bank were to incur significant losses (see e.g. Tysnes Sparebank before they merged with Haugesund SPB). But with a primary capital fund that constitutes 55% of the equity, the buffer is sufficiently large anyway. Also provides an opportunity to distribute customer dividends if the bank decides to do so, and it is still possible in the future. 2. New dividend policy - In itself, neither positive nor negative, but can attract somewhat different investors based on whether one desires growth or dividends. It is important that sufficient profit is retained so that the bank can finance desired growth. 3. New gift policy - Very positive for EKB owners. It has been a bad practice that several savings banks have not managed to distribute sufficient gifts to maintain the ownership share of the EKB owners, which has led to slow dilution of EKB. Point 1 now becomes very positive (and important) so that the savings bank can uphold the promise of equal treatment of equity in connection with dividends/gifts, whether it is EKB or the primary capital fund. The primary capital fund's share of the dividend (gift) is merely transferred to the foundation. Sparebanken Møre was ordered to compensate the primary capital fund by the financial supervisory authority because they had not managed to distribute gifts fast enough (which the financial supervisory authority argued in practice gave a higher ownership share to the primary capital fund). This was discovered when they established their own savings bank foundation. We hope the same has not happened here. 4. Divestment of EKB by the Savings Bank Foundation - Negative in the short run. Will put significant selling pressure on EKB during that period (see Sparebanken 1 Nordmøre, where the relatively newly established savings bank foundation divested over a longer period and put pressure on the price). In the longer run, it will be positive because it will increase liquidity in trading. 5. Listing on Oslo Børs - Very positive. Will make the bank relevant for investors who mostly only trade on ASK. Can increase liquidity by investors buying and selling more without needing to think about tax on the gain before eventually withdrawing from the ASK account. ASK also provides deferred tax on dividends (now only available for those who use an IKZ account at Nordnet or similar, or invest through a limited company (AS)). The total therefore becomes very positive in the long run, but the divestment can dampen the price development as long as the savings bank foundation sells down its stake. We can hope that the foundation perhaps starts with a larger divestment where both institutional and private investors, as well as small shareholders and employees, get the opportunity to subscribe.
- ·13.2.Exciting prospects ahead. I believe it is absolutely right to get this listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange for more visibility and liquidity. If the development continues and the transition to the Oslo Stock Exchange goes smoothly, then I honestly believe we can see the outlines of the 200-mark within one to two years. But bank is bank, it's boring, but it puts butter on the bread.
- ·15.12.2025Is Romerike Sparebank an acquisition case? Perhaps interesting for Sparebanken Norge to gain a foothold north of Oslo 🤔Can Romerike be an acquisition candidate for Sparebanken Norge or Sparebank 1 Sör-Norge?
- ·14.8.2025Nice report as usual. Positioning itself more and more to become a major bank in the local community. If it continues like this, we could soon see dividends of up to 12-13kr, assuming everything goes as smoothly as it is now for the rest of the year
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 13.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 15.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
45 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 13.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 15.5.2025 |
10,50 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
6,80%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·8.4.ROMER's establishment of a savings bank foundation, new dividend policy, and not least gift policy have received little attention, but are clearly visible in the stock price. The change probably also indicates that ROMER is more interested in buying others than being bought itself.I agree that in the big picture, this will be positive in the long run from the EKB (equity certificate/share) owners' point of view, here broken down point by point (as I see it) 1. Establish a savings bank foundation - In itself, slightly negative in that it reduces the primary capital fund which, due to today's legislation, functions as a buffer/airbag for EKB owners if the bank were to incur significant losses (see e.g. Tysnes Sparebank before they merged with Haugesund SPB). But with a primary capital fund that constitutes 55% of the equity, the buffer is sufficiently large anyway. Also provides an opportunity to distribute customer dividends if the bank decides to do so, and it is still possible in the future. 2. New dividend policy - In itself, neither positive nor negative, but can attract somewhat different investors based on whether one desires growth or dividends. It is important that sufficient profit is retained so that the bank can finance desired growth. 3. New gift policy - Very positive for EKB owners. It has been a bad practice that several savings banks have not managed to distribute sufficient gifts to maintain the ownership share of the EKB owners, which has led to slow dilution of EKB. Point 1 now becomes very positive (and important) so that the savings bank can uphold the promise of equal treatment of equity in connection with dividends/gifts, whether it is EKB or the primary capital fund. The primary capital fund's share of the dividend (gift) is merely transferred to the foundation. Sparebanken Møre was ordered to compensate the primary capital fund by the financial supervisory authority because they had not managed to distribute gifts fast enough (which the financial supervisory authority argued in practice gave a higher ownership share to the primary capital fund). This was discovered when they established their own savings bank foundation. We hope the same has not happened here. 4. Divestment of EKB by the Savings Bank Foundation - Negative in the short run. Will put significant selling pressure on EKB during that period (see Sparebanken 1 Nordmøre, where the relatively newly established savings bank foundation divested over a longer period and put pressure on the price). In the longer run, it will be positive because it will increase liquidity in trading. 5. Listing on Oslo Børs - Very positive. Will make the bank relevant for investors who mostly only trade on ASK. Can increase liquidity by investors buying and selling more without needing to think about tax on the gain before eventually withdrawing from the ASK account. ASK also provides deferred tax on dividends (now only available for those who use an IKZ account at Nordnet or similar, or invest through a limited company (AS)). The total therefore becomes very positive in the long run, but the divestment can dampen the price development as long as the savings bank foundation sells down its stake. We can hope that the foundation perhaps starts with a larger divestment where both institutional and private investors, as well as small shareholders and employees, get the opportunity to subscribe.
- ·13.2.Exciting prospects ahead. I believe it is absolutely right to get this listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange for more visibility and liquidity. If the development continues and the transition to the Oslo Stock Exchange goes smoothly, then I honestly believe we can see the outlines of the 200-mark within one to two years. But bank is bank, it's boring, but it puts butter on the bread.
- ·15.12.2025Is Romerike Sparebank an acquisition case? Perhaps interesting for Sparebanken Norge to gain a foothold north of Oslo 🤔Can Romerike be an acquisition candidate for Sparebanken Norge or Sparebank 1 Sör-Norge?
- ·14.8.2025Nice report as usual. Positioning itself more and more to become a major bank in the local community. If it continues like this, we could soon see dividends of up to 12-13kr, assuming everything goes as smoothly as it is now for the rest of the year
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt