2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
59 päivää sitten
‧20 min
2,00 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
4,38%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 13.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 21.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·2.7.Does anyone have an opinion on the further progress/timeline for the bidding process, clarification from konkurransetilsynet etc.?
From the moment Oslo Børs approves (expected in early July), it normally takes between 1 and 2 months before the financial settlement takes place, provided that Konkurransetilsynet does not drag out the time. But what would the authority achieve with that? Here are some examples of other players' existing market shares in the consumer market. NorgesGruppen 43,0% – 43,5% Sport Holding (Sport 1, etc.): >50% Apokjeden (Apotek 1): Around 45% Elkjøp Nordic: Around 35–40% In case of compulsory acquisition, Fortum must pay NOK 47 per share. (verdipapirhandelloven § 6-22). That gives a 2% increase from today's price. And an estimated annual value increase corresponding to approx. 12%. AUDAX can still come with a higher bid. And will in any case hardly await or rely on the authority's need to show itself off.
·2.7.I think today's price is relatively high considering that the competition authority will also evaluate this. It seems that Fjordkraft and Fortum have half of the electricity customers in Norway. In addition, Audax seems uninterested since Elmera has not facilitated DD.
By the way, today's bid is too low. It hasn't been long since the share was over 40 kroner entirely on its own. And since then, the reporting has certainly not been bad. I have previously calculated 60 kr + as a fair price for a company like Fortum. They will immediately gain economies of scale and achieve large synergy effects by reducing operating costs per sold KW (per customer). At this level, it is possible I will vote no.
·1.7.At least someone just bought many shares here for 46.3 per share.
·1.7.Cannot understand why Elmera is so reluctant to grant Audax access to a due diligence process. It must surely be in the shareholders' interest that both bidders get the opportunity to make a fair bid, not just lock themselves to Fortum. Audax will furthermore provide a better opportunity to maintain competition in the Norwegian/Nordic market. In addition, I want the most possible for my shares.
The process should be open and transparent. It is not. Fortum's economies of scale will be massive, will Audax have the same room for opportunity? I don't think so. If Fortum wins, I don't think it will be long before many of the employees at fjordkraft are out. Folketrygdfondet hasn't replied yet, I guess? We'll see what happens, but as I said, I dislike the board's commitment to the Fortun bid.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
59 päivää sitten
‧20 min
2,00 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
4,38%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2.7.Does anyone have an opinion on the further progress/timeline for the bidding process, clarification from konkurransetilsynet etc.?From the moment Oslo Børs approves (expected in early July), it normally takes between 1 and 2 months before the financial settlement takes place, provided that Konkurransetilsynet does not drag out the time. But what would the authority achieve with that? Here are some examples of other players' existing market shares in the consumer market. NorgesGruppen 43,0% – 43,5% Sport Holding (Sport 1, etc.): >50% Apokjeden (Apotek 1): Around 45% Elkjøp Nordic: Around 35–40% In case of compulsory acquisition, Fortum must pay NOK 47 per share. (verdipapirhandelloven § 6-22). That gives a 2% increase from today's price. And an estimated annual value increase corresponding to approx. 12%. AUDAX can still come with a higher bid. And will in any case hardly await or rely on the authority's need to show itself off.
- ·2.7.I think today's price is relatively high considering that the competition authority will also evaluate this. It seems that Fjordkraft and Fortum have half of the electricity customers in Norway. In addition, Audax seems uninterested since Elmera has not facilitated DD.By the way, today's bid is too low. It hasn't been long since the share was over 40 kroner entirely on its own. And since then, the reporting has certainly not been bad. I have previously calculated 60 kr + as a fair price for a company like Fortum. They will immediately gain economies of scale and achieve large synergy effects by reducing operating costs per sold KW (per customer). At this level, it is possible I will vote no.
- ·1.7.At least someone just bought many shares here for 46.3 per share.
- ·1.7.Cannot understand why Elmera is so reluctant to grant Audax access to a due diligence process. It must surely be in the shareholders' interest that both bidders get the opportunity to make a fair bid, not just lock themselves to Fortum. Audax will furthermore provide a better opportunity to maintain competition in the Norwegian/Nordic market. In addition, I want the most possible for my shares.The process should be open and transparent. It is not. Fortum's economies of scale will be massive, will Audax have the same room for opportunity? I don't think so. If Fortum wins, I don't think it will be long before many of the employees at fjordkraft are out. Folketrygdfondet hasn't replied yet, I guess? We'll see what happens, but as I said, I dislike the board's commitment to the Fortun bid.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 13.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 21.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
59 päivää sitten
‧20 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 13.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 21.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5.2025 |
2,00 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
4,38%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2.7.Does anyone have an opinion on the further progress/timeline for the bidding process, clarification from konkurransetilsynet etc.?From the moment Oslo Børs approves (expected in early July), it normally takes between 1 and 2 months before the financial settlement takes place, provided that Konkurransetilsynet does not drag out the time. But what would the authority achieve with that? Here are some examples of other players' existing market shares in the consumer market. NorgesGruppen 43,0% – 43,5% Sport Holding (Sport 1, etc.): >50% Apokjeden (Apotek 1): Around 45% Elkjøp Nordic: Around 35–40% In case of compulsory acquisition, Fortum must pay NOK 47 per share. (verdipapirhandelloven § 6-22). That gives a 2% increase from today's price. And an estimated annual value increase corresponding to approx. 12%. AUDAX can still come with a higher bid. And will in any case hardly await or rely on the authority's need to show itself off.
- ·2.7.I think today's price is relatively high considering that the competition authority will also evaluate this. It seems that Fjordkraft and Fortum have half of the electricity customers in Norway. In addition, Audax seems uninterested since Elmera has not facilitated DD.By the way, today's bid is too low. It hasn't been long since the share was over 40 kroner entirely on its own. And since then, the reporting has certainly not been bad. I have previously calculated 60 kr + as a fair price for a company like Fortum. They will immediately gain economies of scale and achieve large synergy effects by reducing operating costs per sold KW (per customer). At this level, it is possible I will vote no.
- ·1.7.At least someone just bought many shares here for 46.3 per share.
- ·1.7.Cannot understand why Elmera is so reluctant to grant Audax access to a due diligence process. It must surely be in the shareholders' interest that both bidders get the opportunity to make a fair bid, not just lock themselves to Fortum. Audax will furthermore provide a better opportunity to maintain competition in the Norwegian/Nordic market. In addition, I want the most possible for my shares.The process should be open and transparent. It is not. Fortum's economies of scale will be massive, will Audax have the same room for opportunity? I don't think so. If Fortum wins, I don't think it will be long before many of the employees at fjordkraft are out. Folketrygdfondet hasn't replied yet, I guess? We'll see what happens, but as I said, I dislike the board's commitment to the Fortun bid.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt