2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
7 päivää sitten
‧24 min
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 7.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·14.8.BATTERY – WHY MANY ARE WRONG ABOUT CLEAN ENERGY and TIME The tobacco industry once formulated that DOUBT IS OUR PRODUCT, as it is the best means to compete with the body of knowledge available to the general public. The coal, oil, and gas industry is now buying time to utilize production capacity, which creates DOUBT and uncertainty among car buyers, linked to a lack of balanced information (USA). “ROSLING believes that making information more accessible has the potential to change the quality of the information itself.” — Business Week Online https://www.gapminder.org/ – Get rid of the most common global MISCONCEPTIONS the world-renowned professor and communicator Hans Rosling – https://www.ted.com/speakers/hans_rosling COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS – https://upgrader.gapminder.org/q/85/ Test yourself: – https://upgrader.gapminder.org/t/climate-study-2024?tab=q "THINGS TAKE TIME" (TTT) means that changes, tasks, and processes require a certain period of time to be completed. The time it takes from the development of a new product or production method until it generates revenue varies from months to over 10 years – depending on both industry and complexity. One can rarely expect immediate results. The expression is used to show PATIENCE. The S-curve for technological progress/development is a model that shows how a new idea, method, or system (over time) can contribute to solving challenges in society. Its adoption starts slowly, accelerates, and then flattens out – when it reaches physical or market limits. Technology will improve over time, through experience and increased research. Development often starts slowly, accelerates as processes are better understood, and then flattens out when the physical/theoretical limits for the product are reached. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/nature-environment/organisations-environmental-management-and-innovation/content-section-1.7https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgBTARXEfxU – (watch from approximately 6 minutes) As another participant on this forum has written (Supertrikker): "So one might think it's too slow – completely fair. But then the question is perhaps not why the agreements aren't there yet, but whether one can truly tolerate being early in something that is still under development. Because here you rarely get both speed and an early position simultaneously." As mentioned earlier – Compared to Elkem (silica fume), technology development in BCS has progressed six times faster, at one-sixth of the price. BCS is COST-EFFECTIVE and FAST. In addition to utilizing Norway's comparative advantage in ELECTROLYSIS (the core technology used to produce BCS-CNT), the company also leverages Norway's advantage related to the production of NANOMATERIALS (monodisperse polymer particles – Ugelstad spheres) https://www.ntnu.no/kjempros/ugelstadkulene BCS-CNT has now achieved consistent quality and reproducibility in its production process. With help from IFE (Institutt for energiteknikk) and SINTEF Energi, BCS has every opportunity to achieve success in the commercialization/development of BCS-CNT. Now the focus is on external tests with several industrial players in both Europe and Asia, with applications in several areas and concrete battery applications, where the next step could be full-scale tests at an industrial level (production). THE DEVELOPMENT PATH for battery testing – brutally briefly explained: • COIN cells (button cells) – tests materials at laboratory scale (milligram) • POUCH cells (pouch cells) – tests multi-layer design and performance at a smaller scale (gram) • COMMERCIAL/full-scale cells – tests industrial production, including thermal management and mechanical stability (kilogram) • BATTERY MODULES, several cells assembled (if the process goes further) • BATTERY PACKS (finally), the finished system. See continuation in comments section:
Kr 20 000 in royalty per produced kg😁 That would be something to think about 😆🤑 Is it allowed to dream on a Friday? 🫠 Happy weekend
·12.8.BCS Q2 – this is starting to get really interesting 🚀 I think the Q2 report from Bergen Carbon Solutions is clearly stronger than the market so far seems to price in. The most important thing in my opinion is not the income statement, but that the technological risk seems to have been reduced a notch. BCS now says that they **consistently manage to produce their baseline BCS-CNT quality**. That might not sound spectacular, but for a materials company at this stage, reproducibility is absolutely crucial. It helps little to create a fantastic material once if one cannot repeat the process. Now the focus shifts further from process development to **product development, external tests and concrete battery applications**. And here it starts to get exciting: 🔹 External tests are said to have yielded very promising results in lithium-sulfur. 🔹 The material moves from coin cells to **pouch cells**, which is a clear step closer to industrial application. 🔹 BCS-CNT is already being tested by several industrial players in both Europe and Asia. 🔹 It is not only tested in one application, but among other things as conductive additive, in silicon anodes and dry-electrode technology. 🔹 The dialogue increasingly seems to take place with the customers' technical and R&D environments. That means the material is actually being evaluated on performance – not just presented in a sales prospectus. At the same time, BCS has around **122 million kroner in cash**, the cost level is still relatively low, and the company has time to develop the technology further without having to rush out into the market hat in hand. Of course, the big confirmation is still missing: **a commercial agreement, order or customer who publicly states that they will use BCS-CNT.** But that is precisely why the valuation is still where it is. If BCS first manages to document strong pouch cell results and one industrial player moves from testing to qualification or commercial agreement, I believe the market can start to look quite differently at the company. For me, Q2 is therefore not "the breakthrough". It is the report that shows that BCS seems to be moving **steadily closer to the breakthrough**. And in such companies, the difference between "promising technology" and "externally validated commercial material" can be enormous in valuation. 🔋📈
There is strikingly little turnover in the stock, after the Q2 2026 presentation was published, and few shares with visible volume for sale. Have more people noticed it? Or is it just me imagining it?
·12.8.So I have read the report and heard the presentation from BCS. For my part, I think this was a very positive update. Good progress in several areas, while cost control seems good and cash burn is kept at a relatively low level. Much exciting stuff still needs to be put in place, but I think the development is going in the right direction. I am absolutely positive about the way forward and look forward to the continuation.
I think we can quickly end up in the black today. The result was, as expected, blood red, but the presentation and guidance were clearly better than expected. BCS is on track👌😊
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
7 päivää sitten
‧24 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·14.8.BATTERY – WHY MANY ARE WRONG ABOUT CLEAN ENERGY and TIME The tobacco industry once formulated that DOUBT IS OUR PRODUCT, as it is the best means to compete with the body of knowledge available to the general public. The coal, oil, and gas industry is now buying time to utilize production capacity, which creates DOUBT and uncertainty among car buyers, linked to a lack of balanced information (USA). “ROSLING believes that making information more accessible has the potential to change the quality of the information itself.” — Business Week Online https://www.gapminder.org/ – Get rid of the most common global MISCONCEPTIONS the world-renowned professor and communicator Hans Rosling – https://www.ted.com/speakers/hans_rosling COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS – https://upgrader.gapminder.org/q/85/ Test yourself: – https://upgrader.gapminder.org/t/climate-study-2024?tab=q "THINGS TAKE TIME" (TTT) means that changes, tasks, and processes require a certain period of time to be completed. The time it takes from the development of a new product or production method until it generates revenue varies from months to over 10 years – depending on both industry and complexity. One can rarely expect immediate results. The expression is used to show PATIENCE. The S-curve for technological progress/development is a model that shows how a new idea, method, or system (over time) can contribute to solving challenges in society. Its adoption starts slowly, accelerates, and then flattens out – when it reaches physical or market limits. Technology will improve over time, through experience and increased research. Development often starts slowly, accelerates as processes are better understood, and then flattens out when the physical/theoretical limits for the product are reached. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/nature-environment/organisations-environmental-management-and-innovation/content-section-1.7https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgBTARXEfxU – (watch from approximately 6 minutes) As another participant on this forum has written (Supertrikker): "So one might think it's too slow – completely fair. But then the question is perhaps not why the agreements aren't there yet, but whether one can truly tolerate being early in something that is still under development. Because here you rarely get both speed and an early position simultaneously." As mentioned earlier – Compared to Elkem (silica fume), technology development in BCS has progressed six times faster, at one-sixth of the price. BCS is COST-EFFECTIVE and FAST. In addition to utilizing Norway's comparative advantage in ELECTROLYSIS (the core technology used to produce BCS-CNT), the company also leverages Norway's advantage related to the production of NANOMATERIALS (monodisperse polymer particles – Ugelstad spheres) https://www.ntnu.no/kjempros/ugelstadkulene BCS-CNT has now achieved consistent quality and reproducibility in its production process. With help from IFE (Institutt for energiteknikk) and SINTEF Energi, BCS has every opportunity to achieve success in the commercialization/development of BCS-CNT. Now the focus is on external tests with several industrial players in both Europe and Asia, with applications in several areas and concrete battery applications, where the next step could be full-scale tests at an industrial level (production). THE DEVELOPMENT PATH for battery testing – brutally briefly explained: • COIN cells (button cells) – tests materials at laboratory scale (milligram) • POUCH cells (pouch cells) – tests multi-layer design and performance at a smaller scale (gram) • COMMERCIAL/full-scale cells – tests industrial production, including thermal management and mechanical stability (kilogram) • BATTERY MODULES, several cells assembled (if the process goes further) • BATTERY PACKS (finally), the finished system. See continuation in comments section:Kr 20 000 in royalty per produced kg😁 That would be something to think about 😆🤑 Is it allowed to dream on a Friday? 🫠 Happy weekend
- ·12.8.BCS Q2 – this is starting to get really interesting 🚀 I think the Q2 report from Bergen Carbon Solutions is clearly stronger than the market so far seems to price in. The most important thing in my opinion is not the income statement, but that the technological risk seems to have been reduced a notch. BCS now says that they **consistently manage to produce their baseline BCS-CNT quality**. That might not sound spectacular, but for a materials company at this stage, reproducibility is absolutely crucial. It helps little to create a fantastic material once if one cannot repeat the process. Now the focus shifts further from process development to **product development, external tests and concrete battery applications**. And here it starts to get exciting: 🔹 External tests are said to have yielded very promising results in lithium-sulfur. 🔹 The material moves from coin cells to **pouch cells**, which is a clear step closer to industrial application. 🔹 BCS-CNT is already being tested by several industrial players in both Europe and Asia. 🔹 It is not only tested in one application, but among other things as conductive additive, in silicon anodes and dry-electrode technology. 🔹 The dialogue increasingly seems to take place with the customers' technical and R&D environments. That means the material is actually being evaluated on performance – not just presented in a sales prospectus. At the same time, BCS has around **122 million kroner in cash**, the cost level is still relatively low, and the company has time to develop the technology further without having to rush out into the market hat in hand. Of course, the big confirmation is still missing: **a commercial agreement, order or customer who publicly states that they will use BCS-CNT.** But that is precisely why the valuation is still where it is. If BCS first manages to document strong pouch cell results and one industrial player moves from testing to qualification or commercial agreement, I believe the market can start to look quite differently at the company. For me, Q2 is therefore not "the breakthrough". It is the report that shows that BCS seems to be moving **steadily closer to the breakthrough**. And in such companies, the difference between "promising technology" and "externally validated commercial material" can be enormous in valuation. 🔋📈There is strikingly little turnover in the stock, after the Q2 2026 presentation was published, and few shares with visible volume for sale. Have more people noticed it? Or is it just me imagining it?
- ·12.8.So I have read the report and heard the presentation from BCS. For my part, I think this was a very positive update. Good progress in several areas, while cost control seems good and cash burn is kept at a relatively low level. Much exciting stuff still needs to be put in place, but I think the development is going in the right direction. I am absolutely positive about the way forward and look forward to the continuation.I think we can quickly end up in the black today. The result was, as expected, blood red, but the presentation and guidance were clearly better than expected. BCS is on track👌😊
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 7.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
7 päivää sitten
‧24 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 7.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·14.8.BATTERY – WHY MANY ARE WRONG ABOUT CLEAN ENERGY and TIME The tobacco industry once formulated that DOUBT IS OUR PRODUCT, as it is the best means to compete with the body of knowledge available to the general public. The coal, oil, and gas industry is now buying time to utilize production capacity, which creates DOUBT and uncertainty among car buyers, linked to a lack of balanced information (USA). “ROSLING believes that making information more accessible has the potential to change the quality of the information itself.” — Business Week Online https://www.gapminder.org/ – Get rid of the most common global MISCONCEPTIONS the world-renowned professor and communicator Hans Rosling – https://www.ted.com/speakers/hans_rosling COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS – https://upgrader.gapminder.org/q/85/ Test yourself: – https://upgrader.gapminder.org/t/climate-study-2024?tab=q "THINGS TAKE TIME" (TTT) means that changes, tasks, and processes require a certain period of time to be completed. The time it takes from the development of a new product or production method until it generates revenue varies from months to over 10 years – depending on both industry and complexity. One can rarely expect immediate results. The expression is used to show PATIENCE. The S-curve for technological progress/development is a model that shows how a new idea, method, or system (over time) can contribute to solving challenges in society. Its adoption starts slowly, accelerates, and then flattens out – when it reaches physical or market limits. Technology will improve over time, through experience and increased research. Development often starts slowly, accelerates as processes are better understood, and then flattens out when the physical/theoretical limits for the product are reached. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/nature-environment/organisations-environmental-management-and-innovation/content-section-1.7https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgBTARXEfxU – (watch from approximately 6 minutes) As another participant on this forum has written (Supertrikker): "So one might think it's too slow – completely fair. But then the question is perhaps not why the agreements aren't there yet, but whether one can truly tolerate being early in something that is still under development. Because here you rarely get both speed and an early position simultaneously." As mentioned earlier – Compared to Elkem (silica fume), technology development in BCS has progressed six times faster, at one-sixth of the price. BCS is COST-EFFECTIVE and FAST. In addition to utilizing Norway's comparative advantage in ELECTROLYSIS (the core technology used to produce BCS-CNT), the company also leverages Norway's advantage related to the production of NANOMATERIALS (monodisperse polymer particles – Ugelstad spheres) https://www.ntnu.no/kjempros/ugelstadkulene BCS-CNT has now achieved consistent quality and reproducibility in its production process. With help from IFE (Institutt for energiteknikk) and SINTEF Energi, BCS has every opportunity to achieve success in the commercialization/development of BCS-CNT. Now the focus is on external tests with several industrial players in both Europe and Asia, with applications in several areas and concrete battery applications, where the next step could be full-scale tests at an industrial level (production). THE DEVELOPMENT PATH for battery testing – brutally briefly explained: • COIN cells (button cells) – tests materials at laboratory scale (milligram) • POUCH cells (pouch cells) – tests multi-layer design and performance at a smaller scale (gram) • COMMERCIAL/full-scale cells – tests industrial production, including thermal management and mechanical stability (kilogram) • BATTERY MODULES, several cells assembled (if the process goes further) • BATTERY PACKS (finally), the finished system. See continuation in comments section:Kr 20 000 in royalty per produced kg😁 That would be something to think about 😆🤑 Is it allowed to dream on a Friday? 🫠 Happy weekend
- ·12.8.BCS Q2 – this is starting to get really interesting 🚀 I think the Q2 report from Bergen Carbon Solutions is clearly stronger than the market so far seems to price in. The most important thing in my opinion is not the income statement, but that the technological risk seems to have been reduced a notch. BCS now says that they **consistently manage to produce their baseline BCS-CNT quality**. That might not sound spectacular, but for a materials company at this stage, reproducibility is absolutely crucial. It helps little to create a fantastic material once if one cannot repeat the process. Now the focus shifts further from process development to **product development, external tests and concrete battery applications**. And here it starts to get exciting: 🔹 External tests are said to have yielded very promising results in lithium-sulfur. 🔹 The material moves from coin cells to **pouch cells**, which is a clear step closer to industrial application. 🔹 BCS-CNT is already being tested by several industrial players in both Europe and Asia. 🔹 It is not only tested in one application, but among other things as conductive additive, in silicon anodes and dry-electrode technology. 🔹 The dialogue increasingly seems to take place with the customers' technical and R&D environments. That means the material is actually being evaluated on performance – not just presented in a sales prospectus. At the same time, BCS has around **122 million kroner in cash**, the cost level is still relatively low, and the company has time to develop the technology further without having to rush out into the market hat in hand. Of course, the big confirmation is still missing: **a commercial agreement, order or customer who publicly states that they will use BCS-CNT.** But that is precisely why the valuation is still where it is. If BCS first manages to document strong pouch cell results and one industrial player moves from testing to qualification or commercial agreement, I believe the market can start to look quite differently at the company. For me, Q2 is therefore not "the breakthrough". It is the report that shows that BCS seems to be moving **steadily closer to the breakthrough**. And in such companies, the difference between "promising technology" and "externally validated commercial material" can be enormous in valuation. 🔋📈There is strikingly little turnover in the stock, after the Q2 2026 presentation was published, and few shares with visible volume for sale. Have more people noticed it? Or is it just me imagining it?
- ·12.8.So I have read the report and heard the presentation from BCS. For my part, I think this was a very positive update. Good progress in several areas, while cost control seems good and cash burn is kept at a relatively low level. Much exciting stuff still needs to be put in place, but I think the development is going in the right direction. I am absolutely positive about the way forward and look forward to the continuation.I think we can quickly end up in the black today. The result was, as expected, blood red, but the presentation and guidance were clearly better than expected. BCS is on track👌😊
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt