Nasdaq Copenhagen
Riskitaso
4/7
Morningstar rating
2 stars
Vastuullisuus (SFDR)
8
XACT OMXC25 ESG A1 DKK
Osta-
Myy-
Spreadi %-
Vaihto (DKK)-
Juoksevat kulut0,21%
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,21%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaTanska osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaDKK
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The fund is an exchange-traded index fund and its objective is to follow the performance of the OMX Copenhagen 25 Index as closely as possible. OMX Copenhagen 25 Index is a market-value weighted index consisting of the 25 most-traded equities on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange. The index applies weight restrictions from individual issuers (capping). The composition of the index is normally adjusted bi-annually with regard to the transferable securities included as well as the percentage of the index to ensure sensitivity to market performance. The selection criteria and other adjustments to the composition of the index are governed by the Nasdaq OMX Copenhagen 25 Index Methodology.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Omistukset
Päivitetty 30.9.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet100%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·6.10.Hi Maybe a stupid question when you haven't invested for a long time, " Is it best to have ETFs in an ASK and mutual funds in a regular account.
For tax reasons best with ETFs on ASK (here they must be on Skat's positive list !), aldersopsparing and ratepension. Dividend-paying Danish investment associations in a free account, as they are then taxed on realization. Remember that on ASK after the new year you can probably deposit a much larger amount than before.
·7.9.Banks, green energy, shipping - all industries that historically trade at low multiples. Then there's health care which can certainly have high multiples but is also very volatile. The majority of the index is concentrated on a few large companies. Absolutely no good reason to place one's hard-earned money in a Danish index.
·31.7.Hi everyone. I have long been wondering which general markets one should trade in most geographically, i.e., USA, Europe, emerging markets, or just broadly globally. Many seem to continue to trust the American market, as it has given the best returns over a very long period, 40-50 years, but to what extent does that give reason to think that this trend will continue for the next decades? I often think that precisely this trend gives reason to believe that there is greater untapped growth potential in Europe, and perhaps specifically Denmark, as these countries are more well-functioning than the USA regarding crime, corruption, education, etc., and that this potential is just waiting to be unleashed by an economically liberal government, and by entrepreneurship and growth becoming fashionable again. I think it's a reasonable thought that the American market is a tad more vulnerable to a major crash similar to 1929, the dot-com bubble around the turn of the millennium, and the financial crisis in 2008 than other less overheated markets, especially now that AI is the big thing that seems to just be going to the moon. Investing in Denmark offers the obvious advantage that one can save exchange costs here on Nordnet, but if it is also the market that, on average, can be expected to give the best returns over the next decades, then it might make sense to put a lot of money here. At the same time, the knowledge one naturally gains through news and acquaintances about the Danish market and Danish companies like Novo Nordisk and DSV, which constitute a large part of the Danish market, when one is Danish and lives in Denmark, can be considered an advantage, just as an emotional attachment and a desire to support the Danish market is also a not irrelevant factor for me. An obvious disadvantage if one opts for an ETF for a niche market like the Danish one, for example, if one goes with XACT OMXC25 ESG A1 DKK, would probably be that the higher variation that comes with investing more specifically, both in terms of number of companies, geographical spread, culture, economic and other relevant policies, etc., would mean that when one is taxed on unrealized gains, one might risk a significant return first, with a substantial accompanying tax expense, which would then not be compensated for if one has a similar significant loss the following year. But even this disadvantage could become of minor or no significance if the government, in addition to raising the limit on the investment savings account to 500.000 kr., also changes it to have some form of realization-based taxation similar to the Norwegian investment savings account, which, as far as I understand, it is currently considering. This turned into a somewhat longer spiel, which I am posting on the ETFs of the different markets, as I would like to hear different opinions from those who have chosen to invest in the different markets, and people should feel free to comment in any way they find relevant.
In short, I don't think one can guess all those things, in my opinion the best way to invest is to have large broad ETFs distributed across the whole world, if you only invest in Danish stocks and funds, you will be left on the platform watching the train rush by.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,21%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaTanska osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaDKK
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The fund is an exchange-traded index fund and its objective is to follow the performance of the OMX Copenhagen 25 Index as closely as possible. OMX Copenhagen 25 Index is a market-value weighted index consisting of the 25 most-traded equities on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange. The index applies weight restrictions from individual issuers (capping). The composition of the index is normally adjusted bi-annually with regard to the transferable securities included as well as the percentage of the index to ensure sensitivity to market performance. The selection criteria and other adjustments to the composition of the index are governed by the Nasdaq OMX Copenhagen 25 Index Methodology.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Omistukset
Päivitetty 30.9.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet100%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·6.10.Hi Maybe a stupid question when you haven't invested for a long time, " Is it best to have ETFs in an ASK and mutual funds in a regular account.For tax reasons best with ETFs on ASK (here they must be on Skat's positive list !), aldersopsparing and ratepension. Dividend-paying Danish investment associations in a free account, as they are then taxed on realization. Remember that on ASK after the new year you can probably deposit a much larger amount than before.
- ·7.9.Banks, green energy, shipping - all industries that historically trade at low multiples. Then there's health care which can certainly have high multiples but is also very volatile. The majority of the index is concentrated on a few large companies. Absolutely no good reason to place one's hard-earned money in a Danish index.
- ·31.7.Hi everyone. I have long been wondering which general markets one should trade in most geographically, i.e., USA, Europe, emerging markets, or just broadly globally. Many seem to continue to trust the American market, as it has given the best returns over a very long period, 40-50 years, but to what extent does that give reason to think that this trend will continue for the next decades? I often think that precisely this trend gives reason to believe that there is greater untapped growth potential in Europe, and perhaps specifically Denmark, as these countries are more well-functioning than the USA regarding crime, corruption, education, etc., and that this potential is just waiting to be unleashed by an economically liberal government, and by entrepreneurship and growth becoming fashionable again. I think it's a reasonable thought that the American market is a tad more vulnerable to a major crash similar to 1929, the dot-com bubble around the turn of the millennium, and the financial crisis in 2008 than other less overheated markets, especially now that AI is the big thing that seems to just be going to the moon. Investing in Denmark offers the obvious advantage that one can save exchange costs here on Nordnet, but if it is also the market that, on average, can be expected to give the best returns over the next decades, then it might make sense to put a lot of money here. At the same time, the knowledge one naturally gains through news and acquaintances about the Danish market and Danish companies like Novo Nordisk and DSV, which constitute a large part of the Danish market, when one is Danish and lives in Denmark, can be considered an advantage, just as an emotional attachment and a desire to support the Danish market is also a not irrelevant factor for me. An obvious disadvantage if one opts for an ETF for a niche market like the Danish one, for example, if one goes with XACT OMXC25 ESG A1 DKK, would probably be that the higher variation that comes with investing more specifically, both in terms of number of companies, geographical spread, culture, economic and other relevant policies, etc., would mean that when one is taxed on unrealized gains, one might risk a significant return first, with a substantial accompanying tax expense, which would then not be compensated for if one has a similar significant loss the following year. But even this disadvantage could become of minor or no significance if the government, in addition to raising the limit on the investment savings account to 500.000 kr., also changes it to have some form of realization-based taxation similar to the Norwegian investment savings account, which, as far as I understand, it is currently considering. This turned into a somewhat longer spiel, which I am posting on the ETFs of the different markets, as I would like to hear different opinions from those who have chosen to invest in the different markets, and people should feel free to comment in any way they find relevant.In short, I don't think one can guess all those things, in my opinion the best way to invest is to have large broad ETFs distributed across the whole world, if you only invest in Danish stocks and funds, you will be left on the platform watching the train rush by.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,21%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaTanska osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaDKK
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The fund is an exchange-traded index fund and its objective is to follow the performance of the OMX Copenhagen 25 Index as closely as possible. OMX Copenhagen 25 Index is a market-value weighted index consisting of the 25 most-traded equities on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange. The index applies weight restrictions from individual issuers (capping). The composition of the index is normally adjusted bi-annually with regard to the transferable securities included as well as the percentage of the index to ensure sensitivity to market performance. The selection criteria and other adjustments to the composition of the index are governed by the Nasdaq OMX Copenhagen 25 Index Methodology.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·6.10.Hi Maybe a stupid question when you haven't invested for a long time, " Is it best to have ETFs in an ASK and mutual funds in a regular account.For tax reasons best with ETFs on ASK (here they must be on Skat's positive list !), aldersopsparing and ratepension. Dividend-paying Danish investment associations in a free account, as they are then taxed on realization. Remember that on ASK after the new year you can probably deposit a much larger amount than before.
- ·7.9.Banks, green energy, shipping - all industries that historically trade at low multiples. Then there's health care which can certainly have high multiples but is also very volatile. The majority of the index is concentrated on a few large companies. Absolutely no good reason to place one's hard-earned money in a Danish index.
- ·31.7.Hi everyone. I have long been wondering which general markets one should trade in most geographically, i.e., USA, Europe, emerging markets, or just broadly globally. Many seem to continue to trust the American market, as it has given the best returns over a very long period, 40-50 years, but to what extent does that give reason to think that this trend will continue for the next decades? I often think that precisely this trend gives reason to believe that there is greater untapped growth potential in Europe, and perhaps specifically Denmark, as these countries are more well-functioning than the USA regarding crime, corruption, education, etc., and that this potential is just waiting to be unleashed by an economically liberal government, and by entrepreneurship and growth becoming fashionable again. I think it's a reasonable thought that the American market is a tad more vulnerable to a major crash similar to 1929, the dot-com bubble around the turn of the millennium, and the financial crisis in 2008 than other less overheated markets, especially now that AI is the big thing that seems to just be going to the moon. Investing in Denmark offers the obvious advantage that one can save exchange costs here on Nordnet, but if it is also the market that, on average, can be expected to give the best returns over the next decades, then it might make sense to put a lot of money here. At the same time, the knowledge one naturally gains through news and acquaintances about the Danish market and Danish companies like Novo Nordisk and DSV, which constitute a large part of the Danish market, when one is Danish and lives in Denmark, can be considered an advantage, just as an emotional attachment and a desire to support the Danish market is also a not irrelevant factor for me. An obvious disadvantage if one opts for an ETF for a niche market like the Danish one, for example, if one goes with XACT OMXC25 ESG A1 DKK, would probably be that the higher variation that comes with investing more specifically, both in terms of number of companies, geographical spread, culture, economic and other relevant policies, etc., would mean that when one is taxed on unrealized gains, one might risk a significant return first, with a substantial accompanying tax expense, which would then not be compensated for if one has a similar significant loss the following year. But even this disadvantage could become of minor or no significance if the government, in addition to raising the limit on the investment savings account to 500.000 kr., also changes it to have some form of realization-based taxation similar to the Norwegian investment savings account, which, as far as I understand, it is currently considering. This turned into a somewhat longer spiel, which I am posting on the ETFs of the different markets, as I would like to hear different opinions from those who have chosen to invest in the different markets, and people should feel free to comment in any way they find relevant.In short, I don't think one can guess all those things, in my opinion the best way to invest is to have large broad ETFs distributed across the whole world, if you only invest in Danish stocks and funds, you will be left on the platform watching the train rush by.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Omistukset
Päivitetty 30.9.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet100%