2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
11 päivää sittenTarjoustasot
TSX Venture Exchange
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 3.6. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·23 t sittenWhile we wait anyway, I asked chat which companies could be potential buyers of QEM and why. Here is the answer: 👉 For Quantum eMotion, it's not about who is biggest, but about strategic fit + timing. 🧠 1. What QEM actually offers (the core) QRNG (quantum random number generation) hardware-based security potential for chip/SoC integration on the way to FIPS 140-3 👉 translated: > “hardware-level trust” in a world that fears quantum attacks 🔥 2. The 4 most realistic buyer types 🟢 1. Semiconductor / chip manufacturers (TOP candidates) They make the most sense. Examples: Intel STMicroelectronics NXP Semiconductors Infineon Technologies Why? can integrate QRNG directly into chips sells to: automotive IoT secure devices 👉 here OEM integration = direct path to acquisition 🟢 2. Cybersecurity companies Examples: Palo Alto Networks CrowdStrike Fortinet Why? will differentiate themselves with quantum-safe security can use QEM as a “hardware trust anchor” 👉 BUT: requires more maturity/adoption first 🟢 3. Defense / government contractors (very realistic) Examples: Lockheed Martin Raytheon Technologies Thales Group Why? extreme focus on: security certification FIPS = direct access 👉 often underestimated – but a very obvious buyer group 🟡 4. Big Tech (later stage) Examples: Microsoft Google Amazon Why? cloud security quantum race 👉 BUT: > they typically only buy when: technology is proven the market is there ⚖️ 3. Most realistic scenario (honestly) If we rank probability: 1. 🟢 Chip/semiconductor 2. 🟢 Defense/security 3. 🟡 Cybersecurity 4. 🔴 Big Tech (last) 🧠 4. The hidden “wildcard” category 👉 smaller, specialized players niche security firms embedded systems companies crypto/security startups 👉 they can: form partnership → acquisition later 🔍 5. What you should look out for (VERY important) If one of these happens: repeated collaborations with the same company integration into product co-development 👉 then it is: > first sign of a potential buyer 🔥 6. The most important insight Acquisitions do not happen by chance. It happens when: > QEM solves a concrete problem for one actor 🔚 The short version > The most likely buyers are not the biggest – but those who need the technology most
·19 t sittenI hope it is not sold, but rather enters into cooperation with many companies. Now that the chip is supposed to be so small that it can fit in a smartphone and when the technology can be used for everything regarding cybersecurity.... it would be a shame if Trump were to get his hands on it.
·1 päivä sitten
·2 päivää sittenI am a bit disappointed with this and the world in general. We started with a crazy start around one. Followed my strategy and took profits out continuously but filled up just as much on dips and especially just before the war. I am very much in doubt about my continued interest in this. Does anyone know how far we are from an AI-Quantum breakthrough? I hope a combination of the two technologies can get this back on track. But am I perhaps just dreaming a bit too much in these uncertain times? Chips and technology should surely matter more than that damn war propaganda. Or what?!
·1 päivä sittenI fully understand the doubt. Quantum stocks are a good example of what happens when expectations run ahead of reality. The technology is real, and the need is only increasing. But… most companies in the sector are still far from proving a sustainable business model. That means one thing: You don't invest in performance, you invest in potential. And that is a completely different discipline. It's not about hitting “the next big breakthrough”, but about understanding the risk: How much of the portfolio do you really dare to put at stake? How long is your time horizon? What is your exit if the case does not materialize? Quantum is not hype. But the pricing has been. The next 2–5 years will be crucial.
·2 päivää sittenWe are already up to 3,38!!!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
11 päivää sittenUutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·23 t sittenWhile we wait anyway, I asked chat which companies could be potential buyers of QEM and why. Here is the answer: 👉 For Quantum eMotion, it's not about who is biggest, but about strategic fit + timing. 🧠 1. What QEM actually offers (the core) QRNG (quantum random number generation) hardware-based security potential for chip/SoC integration on the way to FIPS 140-3 👉 translated: > “hardware-level trust” in a world that fears quantum attacks 🔥 2. The 4 most realistic buyer types 🟢 1. Semiconductor / chip manufacturers (TOP candidates) They make the most sense. Examples: Intel STMicroelectronics NXP Semiconductors Infineon Technologies Why? can integrate QRNG directly into chips sells to: automotive IoT secure devices 👉 here OEM integration = direct path to acquisition 🟢 2. Cybersecurity companies Examples: Palo Alto Networks CrowdStrike Fortinet Why? will differentiate themselves with quantum-safe security can use QEM as a “hardware trust anchor” 👉 BUT: requires more maturity/adoption first 🟢 3. Defense / government contractors (very realistic) Examples: Lockheed Martin Raytheon Technologies Thales Group Why? extreme focus on: security certification FIPS = direct access 👉 often underestimated – but a very obvious buyer group 🟡 4. Big Tech (later stage) Examples: Microsoft Google Amazon Why? cloud security quantum race 👉 BUT: > they typically only buy when: technology is proven the market is there ⚖️ 3. Most realistic scenario (honestly) If we rank probability: 1. 🟢 Chip/semiconductor 2. 🟢 Defense/security 3. 🟡 Cybersecurity 4. 🔴 Big Tech (last) 🧠 4. The hidden “wildcard” category 👉 smaller, specialized players niche security firms embedded systems companies crypto/security startups 👉 they can: form partnership → acquisition later 🔍 5. What you should look out for (VERY important) If one of these happens: repeated collaborations with the same company integration into product co-development 👉 then it is: > first sign of a potential buyer 🔥 6. The most important insight Acquisitions do not happen by chance. It happens when: > QEM solves a concrete problem for one actor 🔚 The short version > The most likely buyers are not the biggest – but those who need the technology most·19 t sittenI hope it is not sold, but rather enters into cooperation with many companies. Now that the chip is supposed to be so small that it can fit in a smartphone and when the technology can be used for everything regarding cybersecurity.... it would be a shame if Trump were to get his hands on it.
- ·1 päivä sitten
- ·2 päivää sittenI am a bit disappointed with this and the world in general. We started with a crazy start around one. Followed my strategy and took profits out continuously but filled up just as much on dips and especially just before the war. I am very much in doubt about my continued interest in this. Does anyone know how far we are from an AI-Quantum breakthrough? I hope a combination of the two technologies can get this back on track. But am I perhaps just dreaming a bit too much in these uncertain times? Chips and technology should surely matter more than that damn war propaganda. Or what?!·1 päivä sittenI fully understand the doubt. Quantum stocks are a good example of what happens when expectations run ahead of reality. The technology is real, and the need is only increasing. But… most companies in the sector are still far from proving a sustainable business model. That means one thing: You don't invest in performance, you invest in potential. And that is a completely different discipline. It's not about hitting “the next big breakthrough”, but about understanding the risk: How much of the portfolio do you really dare to put at stake? How long is your time horizon? What is your exit if the case does not materialize? Quantum is not hype. But the pricing has been. The next 2–5 years will be crucial.
- ·2 päivää sittenWe are already up to 3,38!!!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
TSX Venture Exchange
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 3.6. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
11 päivää sittenUutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 3.6. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 30.4.2025 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·23 t sittenWhile we wait anyway, I asked chat which companies could be potential buyers of QEM and why. Here is the answer: 👉 For Quantum eMotion, it's not about who is biggest, but about strategic fit + timing. 🧠 1. What QEM actually offers (the core) QRNG (quantum random number generation) hardware-based security potential for chip/SoC integration on the way to FIPS 140-3 👉 translated: > “hardware-level trust” in a world that fears quantum attacks 🔥 2. The 4 most realistic buyer types 🟢 1. Semiconductor / chip manufacturers (TOP candidates) They make the most sense. Examples: Intel STMicroelectronics NXP Semiconductors Infineon Technologies Why? can integrate QRNG directly into chips sells to: automotive IoT secure devices 👉 here OEM integration = direct path to acquisition 🟢 2. Cybersecurity companies Examples: Palo Alto Networks CrowdStrike Fortinet Why? will differentiate themselves with quantum-safe security can use QEM as a “hardware trust anchor” 👉 BUT: requires more maturity/adoption first 🟢 3. Defense / government contractors (very realistic) Examples: Lockheed Martin Raytheon Technologies Thales Group Why? extreme focus on: security certification FIPS = direct access 👉 often underestimated – but a very obvious buyer group 🟡 4. Big Tech (later stage) Examples: Microsoft Google Amazon Why? cloud security quantum race 👉 BUT: > they typically only buy when: technology is proven the market is there ⚖️ 3. Most realistic scenario (honestly) If we rank probability: 1. 🟢 Chip/semiconductor 2. 🟢 Defense/security 3. 🟡 Cybersecurity 4. 🔴 Big Tech (last) 🧠 4. The hidden “wildcard” category 👉 smaller, specialized players niche security firms embedded systems companies crypto/security startups 👉 they can: form partnership → acquisition later 🔍 5. What you should look out for (VERY important) If one of these happens: repeated collaborations with the same company integration into product co-development 👉 then it is: > first sign of a potential buyer 🔥 6. The most important insight Acquisitions do not happen by chance. It happens when: > QEM solves a concrete problem for one actor 🔚 The short version > The most likely buyers are not the biggest – but those who need the technology most·19 t sittenI hope it is not sold, but rather enters into cooperation with many companies. Now that the chip is supposed to be so small that it can fit in a smartphone and when the technology can be used for everything regarding cybersecurity.... it would be a shame if Trump were to get his hands on it.
- ·1 päivä sitten
- ·2 päivää sittenI am a bit disappointed with this and the world in general. We started with a crazy start around one. Followed my strategy and took profits out continuously but filled up just as much on dips and especially just before the war. I am very much in doubt about my continued interest in this. Does anyone know how far we are from an AI-Quantum breakthrough? I hope a combination of the two technologies can get this back on track. But am I perhaps just dreaming a bit too much in these uncertain times? Chips and technology should surely matter more than that damn war propaganda. Or what?!·1 päivä sittenI fully understand the doubt. Quantum stocks are a good example of what happens when expectations run ahead of reality. The technology is real, and the need is only increasing. But… most companies in the sector are still far from proving a sustainable business model. That means one thing: You don't invest in performance, you invest in potential. And that is a completely different discipline. It's not about hitting “the next big breakthrough”, but about understanding the risk: How much of the portfolio do you really dare to put at stake? How long is your time horizon? What is your exit if the case does not materialize? Quantum is not hype. But the pricing has been. The next 2–5 years will be crucial.
- ·2 päivää sittenWe are already up to 3,38!!!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
TSX Venture Exchange
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt