2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
7 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä |
|---|---|---|
| 3 360 | ||
| 1 640 | ||
| 26 846 | ||
| 45 000 | ||
| 30 000 |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti 12.2.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 6.11. | ||
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 5.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 6.11.2025 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuThe problem is probably that hydrogen technology is actually a truly safe, clean, efficient, natural, simple, universal, economical, ecological and most certainly future-proof solution, whereas battery and electric technology have completely opposite effects on nature, health, economy. The saturated digital electromagnetic field causes negative influences for humans. An electrification and digitalization agenda has been set. The fact that hydrogen technology is far superior and much healthier and more reliable does not help if there is a policy that something else must be pushed through. Hydrogen is the working block of the entire universe, a hydrogen engine should in my assessment be much less polluting with electromagnetic smog than both electric and internal combustion engines. We are talking about implosion technology and not explosion. It is natural, no pollution and that is not at all the way the world wants to go. It is claimed, but in reality we are being completely smeared in radio, magnetic and other electrical technologies which destroy birds, insects, whales, animals, nature and ourselves. We build data centers that use unbelievable amounts of energy and will certainly increase the "unnatural" in their surroundings. It is not so much about climate after a quick overview, it is much more about electrification. We should think forward, not backward, allow proper research in electrification, not politically choose which technology is the future. Tesla wanted to supply everyone through the air with power. That is why he had to go down. Now they want to supply everyone with power not through the air to a mast, but through a total magnetization 24/7 of all biological electrical fields. It is a mockery of Tesla who died alone in a hotel room with his pigeons. Those who have this company need to open their eyes a bit and make a breakthrough because their technical lobby is the size of a grain of sand on a beach compared to a gigantic political agenda about robot, electric and digital societyIt was funnily enough that industry that around the 1920s won over that time's electric cars. Now we have gone back to electric cars. In fact not much different other than that the batteries are significantly more efficient relative to weight. Everything based on Implosion is as such not properly utilized. We use hydrogen to send up rockets. We can use it there. Nature has arranged it so that in an Implosion where things melt together you get greater energy than in an explosion where you split things apart. Furthermore no waste products aka pollution. So something we must not... That would lead us to... New stars and a clean planet... yuck... how are we then supposed to get people to save on electricity and spend their whole lives surviving instead of living. That won't do then the control over the masses is lost and definitely not on multiple planets then people could just go to the planet that was nice.... NO... that won't do.. We keep the monkeys in a cage for the next xxx years more until our robots are completely ready- ·1 päivä sittenAccording to Cell Impact's annual report for 2025, the CEO received 1,775,000 SEK in base salary and 2,311,000 SEK in total compensation including pension. The other five executives in the executive management team received a total of 4,710,000 SEK in base salary, which corresponds to an average of approximately 78,500 SEK per month before pension.----- WHAT IS THE MEANING!!!!! they shouldn't get a penny.. but a kick in the ass6 managers out of 30 employees. What on earth is happening. Does it take one manager for every 4 employees? They should be paying and not getting paid to be part of the company. They accomplish absolutely nothing
- ·1 päivä sittenthe trading bot apparently short-circuited because someone bought at 0.0125.. Maybe it and its owners burned out, let's hope so
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 16 506 115 | 16 506 115 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 16 506 115 | 16 506 115 | 0 | 0 |
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
7 päivää sitten
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuThe problem is probably that hydrogen technology is actually a truly safe, clean, efficient, natural, simple, universal, economical, ecological and most certainly future-proof solution, whereas battery and electric technology have completely opposite effects on nature, health, economy. The saturated digital electromagnetic field causes negative influences for humans. An electrification and digitalization agenda has been set. The fact that hydrogen technology is far superior and much healthier and more reliable does not help if there is a policy that something else must be pushed through. Hydrogen is the working block of the entire universe, a hydrogen engine should in my assessment be much less polluting with electromagnetic smog than both electric and internal combustion engines. We are talking about implosion technology and not explosion. It is natural, no pollution and that is not at all the way the world wants to go. It is claimed, but in reality we are being completely smeared in radio, magnetic and other electrical technologies which destroy birds, insects, whales, animals, nature and ourselves. We build data centers that use unbelievable amounts of energy and will certainly increase the "unnatural" in their surroundings. It is not so much about climate after a quick overview, it is much more about electrification. We should think forward, not backward, allow proper research in electrification, not politically choose which technology is the future. Tesla wanted to supply everyone through the air with power. That is why he had to go down. Now they want to supply everyone with power not through the air to a mast, but through a total magnetization 24/7 of all biological electrical fields. It is a mockery of Tesla who died alone in a hotel room with his pigeons. Those who have this company need to open their eyes a bit and make a breakthrough because their technical lobby is the size of a grain of sand on a beach compared to a gigantic political agenda about robot, electric and digital societyIt was funnily enough that industry that around the 1920s won over that time's electric cars. Now we have gone back to electric cars. In fact not much different other than that the batteries are significantly more efficient relative to weight. Everything based on Implosion is as such not properly utilized. We use hydrogen to send up rockets. We can use it there. Nature has arranged it so that in an Implosion where things melt together you get greater energy than in an explosion where you split things apart. Furthermore no waste products aka pollution. So something we must not... That would lead us to... New stars and a clean planet... yuck... how are we then supposed to get people to save on electricity and spend their whole lives surviving instead of living. That won't do then the control over the masses is lost and definitely not on multiple planets then people could just go to the planet that was nice.... NO... that won't do.. We keep the monkeys in a cage for the next xxx years more until our robots are completely ready
- ·1 päivä sittenAccording to Cell Impact's annual report for 2025, the CEO received 1,775,000 SEK in base salary and 2,311,000 SEK in total compensation including pension. The other five executives in the executive management team received a total of 4,710,000 SEK in base salary, which corresponds to an average of approximately 78,500 SEK per month before pension.----- WHAT IS THE MEANING!!!!! they shouldn't get a penny.. but a kick in the ass6 managers out of 30 employees. What on earth is happening. Does it take one manager for every 4 employees? They should be paying and not getting paid to be part of the company. They accomplish absolutely nothing
- ·1 päivä sittenthe trading bot apparently short-circuited because someone bought at 0.0125.. Maybe it and its owners burned out, let's hope so
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä |
|---|---|---|
| 3 360 | ||
| 1 640 | ||
| 26 846 | ||
| 45 000 | ||
| 30 000 |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti 12.2.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 6.11. | ||
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 5.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 6.11.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 16 506 115 | 16 506 115 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 16 506 115 | 16 506 115 | 0 | 0 |
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
7 päivää sitten
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti 12.2.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 6.11. | ||
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 5.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 6.11.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuThe problem is probably that hydrogen technology is actually a truly safe, clean, efficient, natural, simple, universal, economical, ecological and most certainly future-proof solution, whereas battery and electric technology have completely opposite effects on nature, health, economy. The saturated digital electromagnetic field causes negative influences for humans. An electrification and digitalization agenda has been set. The fact that hydrogen technology is far superior and much healthier and more reliable does not help if there is a policy that something else must be pushed through. Hydrogen is the working block of the entire universe, a hydrogen engine should in my assessment be much less polluting with electromagnetic smog than both electric and internal combustion engines. We are talking about implosion technology and not explosion. It is natural, no pollution and that is not at all the way the world wants to go. It is claimed, but in reality we are being completely smeared in radio, magnetic and other electrical technologies which destroy birds, insects, whales, animals, nature and ourselves. We build data centers that use unbelievable amounts of energy and will certainly increase the "unnatural" in their surroundings. It is not so much about climate after a quick overview, it is much more about electrification. We should think forward, not backward, allow proper research in electrification, not politically choose which technology is the future. Tesla wanted to supply everyone through the air with power. That is why he had to go down. Now they want to supply everyone with power not through the air to a mast, but through a total magnetization 24/7 of all biological electrical fields. It is a mockery of Tesla who died alone in a hotel room with his pigeons. Those who have this company need to open their eyes a bit and make a breakthrough because their technical lobby is the size of a grain of sand on a beach compared to a gigantic political agenda about robot, electric and digital societyIt was funnily enough that industry that around the 1920s won over that time's electric cars. Now we have gone back to electric cars. In fact not much different other than that the batteries are significantly more efficient relative to weight. Everything based on Implosion is as such not properly utilized. We use hydrogen to send up rockets. We can use it there. Nature has arranged it so that in an Implosion where things melt together you get greater energy than in an explosion where you split things apart. Furthermore no waste products aka pollution. So something we must not... That would lead us to... New stars and a clean planet... yuck... how are we then supposed to get people to save on electricity and spend their whole lives surviving instead of living. That won't do then the control over the masses is lost and definitely not on multiple planets then people could just go to the planet that was nice.... NO... that won't do.. We keep the monkeys in a cage for the next xxx years more until our robots are completely ready
- ·1 päivä sittenAccording to Cell Impact's annual report for 2025, the CEO received 1,775,000 SEK in base salary and 2,311,000 SEK in total compensation including pension. The other five executives in the executive management team received a total of 4,710,000 SEK in base salary, which corresponds to an average of approximately 78,500 SEK per month before pension.----- WHAT IS THE MEANING!!!!! they shouldn't get a penny.. but a kick in the ass6 managers out of 30 employees. What on earth is happening. Does it take one manager for every 4 employees? They should be paying and not getting paid to be part of the company. They accomplish absolutely nothing
- ·1 päivä sittenthe trading bot apparently short-circuited because someone bought at 0.0125.. Maybe it and its owners burned out, let's hope so
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä |
|---|---|---|
| 3 360 | ||
| 1 640 | ||
| 26 846 | ||
| 45 000 | ||
| 30 000 |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 16 506 115 | 16 506 115 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 16 506 115 | 16 506 115 | 0 | 0 |