Xetra
Riskitaso
4/7
Morningstar rating
5 stars
Vastuullisuus (SFDR)
6
Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF Acc
Osta-
Myy-
Spreadi %0,11%
Vaihto (EUR)-
Juoksevat kulut0,07%
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,07%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaEurooppa suuret yhtiöt sekatyyli osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the fund is to track the performance of STOXX Europe 600 Index (the "Index"), and to minimize the tracking error between the net asset value of the sub-fund and the performance of the Index. The exposure to the Index will be achieved through a direct replication, mainly by making direct investments in transferable securities and/or other eligible assets representing the Index constituents in a proportion extremely close to their proportion in the Index.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Omistukset
Päivitetty 2.9.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet99,7%
- Muut0,3%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·31.7.Hi everyone. I have long been wondering which general markets one should trade in most geographically, i.e., USA, Europe, emerging markets, or just broadly globally. Many seem to continue to trust the American market, as it has given the best returns over a very long period, 40-50 years, but to what extent does that give reason to think that this trend will continue for the next decades? I often think that precisely this trend gives reason to believe that there is greater untapped growth potential in Europe, and perhaps specifically Denmark, as these countries are more well-functioning than the USA regarding crime, corruption, education, etc., and that this potential is just waiting to be unleashed by an economically liberal government, and by entrepreneurship and growth becoming fashionable again. I think it's a reasonable thought that the American market is a tad more vulnerable to a major crash similar to 1929, the dot-com bubble around the turn of the millennium, and the financial crisis in 2008 than other less overheated markets, especially now that AI is the big thing that seems to just be going to the moon. Investing in Denmark offers the obvious advantage that one can save exchange costs here on Nordnet, but if it is also the market that, on average, can be expected to give the best returns over the next decades, then it might make sense to put a lot of money here. At the same time, the knowledge one naturally gains through news and acquaintances about the Danish market and Danish companies like Novo Nordisk and DSV, which constitute a large part of the Danish market, when one is Danish and lives in Denmark, can be considered an advantage, just as an emotional attachment and a desire to support the Danish market is also a not irrelevant factor for me. An obvious disadvantage if one opts for an ETF for a niche market like the Danish one, for example, if one goes with XACT OMXC25 ESG A1 DKK, would probably be that the higher variation that comes with investing more specifically, both in terms of number of companies, geographical spread, culture, economic and other relevant policies, etc., would mean that when one is taxed on unrealized gains, one might risk a significant return first, with a substantial accompanying tax expense, which would then not be compensated for if one has a similar significant loss the following year. But even this disadvantage could become of minor or no significance if the government, in addition to raising the limit on the investment savings account to 500.000 kr., also changes it to have some form of realization-based taxation similar to the Norwegian investment savings account, which, as far as I understand, it is currently considering. This turned into a somewhat longer spiel, which I am posting on the ETFs of the different markets, as I would like to hear different opinions from those who have chosen to invest in the different markets, and people should feel free to comment in any way they find relevant.
Well, you apparently cannot have currency accounts on a share savings account, see here: https://www.nordnet.dk/faq/aktiesparekonto/kan-jeg-oprette-valutakonti-pa-min-aktiesparekonto
·25.7.When I bought this back then, the fixed annual costs were 0.07%, as there were no transaction costs. But from July 2, 2026, the Fact Sheet shows that 0.09% has been added in the form of transaction costs. So the correct price is therefore closer to 0.16% - even though the transaction costs can vary, as they write.
31.8.Thank you! Does anyone happen to remember how much transactional costs were earlier? I am thinking whether I should buy iShares Core MSCI Europe instead of this in the future
·13.7.Current price primo 13/7 approx. 641 Price target: UBS 690 raised July from 650 J.P. Morgan 680 raised June from 630 Barclays 670 raised June from 620 Goldman S. 660 raised June from 625 Gives in a simple gms. a price target of 675 corresponding to an increase of 5.3% from current price 641
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,07%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaEurooppa suuret yhtiöt sekatyyli osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the fund is to track the performance of STOXX Europe 600 Index (the "Index"), and to minimize the tracking error between the net asset value of the sub-fund and the performance of the Index. The exposure to the Index will be achieved through a direct replication, mainly by making direct investments in transferable securities and/or other eligible assets representing the Index constituents in a proportion extremely close to their proportion in the Index.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Omistukset
Päivitetty 2.9.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet99,7%
- Muut0,3%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·31.7.Hi everyone. I have long been wondering which general markets one should trade in most geographically, i.e., USA, Europe, emerging markets, or just broadly globally. Many seem to continue to trust the American market, as it has given the best returns over a very long period, 40-50 years, but to what extent does that give reason to think that this trend will continue for the next decades? I often think that precisely this trend gives reason to believe that there is greater untapped growth potential in Europe, and perhaps specifically Denmark, as these countries are more well-functioning than the USA regarding crime, corruption, education, etc., and that this potential is just waiting to be unleashed by an economically liberal government, and by entrepreneurship and growth becoming fashionable again. I think it's a reasonable thought that the American market is a tad more vulnerable to a major crash similar to 1929, the dot-com bubble around the turn of the millennium, and the financial crisis in 2008 than other less overheated markets, especially now that AI is the big thing that seems to just be going to the moon. Investing in Denmark offers the obvious advantage that one can save exchange costs here on Nordnet, but if it is also the market that, on average, can be expected to give the best returns over the next decades, then it might make sense to put a lot of money here. At the same time, the knowledge one naturally gains through news and acquaintances about the Danish market and Danish companies like Novo Nordisk and DSV, which constitute a large part of the Danish market, when one is Danish and lives in Denmark, can be considered an advantage, just as an emotional attachment and a desire to support the Danish market is also a not irrelevant factor for me. An obvious disadvantage if one opts for an ETF for a niche market like the Danish one, for example, if one goes with XACT OMXC25 ESG A1 DKK, would probably be that the higher variation that comes with investing more specifically, both in terms of number of companies, geographical spread, culture, economic and other relevant policies, etc., would mean that when one is taxed on unrealized gains, one might risk a significant return first, with a substantial accompanying tax expense, which would then not be compensated for if one has a similar significant loss the following year. But even this disadvantage could become of minor or no significance if the government, in addition to raising the limit on the investment savings account to 500.000 kr., also changes it to have some form of realization-based taxation similar to the Norwegian investment savings account, which, as far as I understand, it is currently considering. This turned into a somewhat longer spiel, which I am posting on the ETFs of the different markets, as I would like to hear different opinions from those who have chosen to invest in the different markets, and people should feel free to comment in any way they find relevant.Well, you apparently cannot have currency accounts on a share savings account, see here: https://www.nordnet.dk/faq/aktiesparekonto/kan-jeg-oprette-valutakonti-pa-min-aktiesparekonto
- ·25.7.When I bought this back then, the fixed annual costs were 0.07%, as there were no transaction costs. But from July 2, 2026, the Fact Sheet shows that 0.09% has been added in the form of transaction costs. So the correct price is therefore closer to 0.16% - even though the transaction costs can vary, as they write.31.8.Thank you! Does anyone happen to remember how much transactional costs were earlier? I am thinking whether I should buy iShares Core MSCI Europe instead of this in the future
- ·13.7.Current price primo 13/7 approx. 641 Price target: UBS 690 raised July from 650 J.P. Morgan 680 raised June from 630 Barclays 670 raised June from 620 Goldman S. 660 raised June from 625 Gives in a simple gms. a price target of 675 corresponding to an increase of 5.3% from current price 641
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,07%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaEurooppa suuret yhtiöt sekatyyli osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The investment objective of the fund is to track the performance of STOXX Europe 600 Index (the "Index"), and to minimize the tracking error between the net asset value of the sub-fund and the performance of the Index. The exposure to the Index will be achieved through a direct replication, mainly by making direct investments in transferable securities and/or other eligible assets representing the Index constituents in a proportion extremely close to their proportion in the Index.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·31.7.Hi everyone. I have long been wondering which general markets one should trade in most geographically, i.e., USA, Europe, emerging markets, or just broadly globally. Many seem to continue to trust the American market, as it has given the best returns over a very long period, 40-50 years, but to what extent does that give reason to think that this trend will continue for the next decades? I often think that precisely this trend gives reason to believe that there is greater untapped growth potential in Europe, and perhaps specifically Denmark, as these countries are more well-functioning than the USA regarding crime, corruption, education, etc., and that this potential is just waiting to be unleashed by an economically liberal government, and by entrepreneurship and growth becoming fashionable again. I think it's a reasonable thought that the American market is a tad more vulnerable to a major crash similar to 1929, the dot-com bubble around the turn of the millennium, and the financial crisis in 2008 than other less overheated markets, especially now that AI is the big thing that seems to just be going to the moon. Investing in Denmark offers the obvious advantage that one can save exchange costs here on Nordnet, but if it is also the market that, on average, can be expected to give the best returns over the next decades, then it might make sense to put a lot of money here. At the same time, the knowledge one naturally gains through news and acquaintances about the Danish market and Danish companies like Novo Nordisk and DSV, which constitute a large part of the Danish market, when one is Danish and lives in Denmark, can be considered an advantage, just as an emotional attachment and a desire to support the Danish market is also a not irrelevant factor for me. An obvious disadvantage if one opts for an ETF for a niche market like the Danish one, for example, if one goes with XACT OMXC25 ESG A1 DKK, would probably be that the higher variation that comes with investing more specifically, both in terms of number of companies, geographical spread, culture, economic and other relevant policies, etc., would mean that when one is taxed on unrealized gains, one might risk a significant return first, with a substantial accompanying tax expense, which would then not be compensated for if one has a similar significant loss the following year. But even this disadvantage could become of minor or no significance if the government, in addition to raising the limit on the investment savings account to 500.000 kr., also changes it to have some form of realization-based taxation similar to the Norwegian investment savings account, which, as far as I understand, it is currently considering. This turned into a somewhat longer spiel, which I am posting on the ETFs of the different markets, as I would like to hear different opinions from those who have chosen to invest in the different markets, and people should feel free to comment in any way they find relevant.Well, you apparently cannot have currency accounts on a share savings account, see here: https://www.nordnet.dk/faq/aktiesparekonto/kan-jeg-oprette-valutakonti-pa-min-aktiesparekonto
- ·25.7.When I bought this back then, the fixed annual costs were 0.07%, as there were no transaction costs. But from July 2, 2026, the Fact Sheet shows that 0.09% has been added in the form of transaction costs. So the correct price is therefore closer to 0.16% - even though the transaction costs can vary, as they write.31.8.Thank you! Does anyone happen to remember how much transactional costs were earlier? I am thinking whether I should buy iShares Core MSCI Europe instead of this in the future
- ·13.7.Current price primo 13/7 approx. 641 Price target: UBS 690 raised July from 650 J.P. Morgan 680 raised June from 630 Barclays 670 raised June from 620 Goldman S. 660 raised June from 625 Gives in a simple gms. a price target of 675 corresponding to an increase of 5.3% from current price 641
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Omistukset
Päivitetty 2.9.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet99,7%
- Muut0,3%