Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,20%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori uusiutuva energia osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaNOK
- Lainoitusaste80%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
Fondet er et aksjefond i henhold til Verdipapirfondenes forenings definisjoner som hovedsakelig investerer i aksjer (verdipapirer som representerer en eierandel i et selskap) i selskaper med inntekter fra kjernekraftrelaterte aktiviteter, som er hjemmehørende eller notert på børser og regulerte markeder over hele verden. Fondet har en såkalt passiv investeringsstrategi hvor fondets investeringer skal etterligne sammensetningen av en bestemt aksjeindeks fastsatt i fondets prospekt. Fondets investeringsmandat er nærmere beskrevet i prospektet.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Omistukset
Päivitetty 31.3.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet100%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·2 päivää sittennot much up this year here at least anyone who thinks it will recover a little or are we saying in the basement so back to square one ?? 😊
·6.6.Does anyone have an overview of whether the fund is directly or indirectly exposed to Thorium (both extraction and Thorium reactors)?
·7.6.Gemini AI: The short answer is **no**, there are currently no funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on Nordnet – or in the rest of the world – that have a pure or primary focus on *thorium*. If you want exposure to thorium via Nordnet, you must navigate through broader sectors. The situation is due to specific market mechanisms, but there are concrete alternatives that capture parts of this value chain. ## Why are there no dedicated Thorium funds? The commercial market for thorium is currently extremely small compared to uranium. Since thorium itself is not fissile (it is *fertile* and must be converted to uranium-233 in a reactor with the help of an external neutron source), there is not yet a large, global fleet of commercial thorium reactors in operation. Most of the work being done on thorium today – for example, China's TMSR-LF1 reactor or projects in India – is largely state-funded or at the research stage. In addition, thorium is almost exclusively extracted as a **by-product** of rare earth mining (especially from the mineral monazite). ## The best alternatives on Nordnet To get indirect exposure to companies involved in thorium technology or extraction, you need to look at two specific fund categories on Nordnet's platform: ### 1. Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETFs (Nuclear Energy) The established nuclear power funds focus heavily on uranium producers, but they also include companies developing next-generation reactor technology, including *Small Modular Reactors* (SMRs). Several of these technology environments are researching Molten Salt Reactors, where thorium is highly relevant in the long term. On Nordnet, you can trade UCITS-approved ETFs (which are available to European/Norwegian investors): * **Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF** (Ticker: URNM) – Primarily focuses on mining companies. * **Global X Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF** (Ticker: NUCL / NUKL) – Has a broader approach that includes both uranium producers, equipment suppliers, and technology companies in the nuclear power industry. * **VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF** (Ticker: NUCL) – Invests in companies related to both uranium extraction and new reactor technology. ### 2. Rare Earth Metals ETFs (Rare Earth Metals) Since thorium is found in deposits together with rare earth metals, companies that extract these metals will often hold significant thorium reserves as a by-product. * **VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF** (Ticker: REMX) – Tracks companies globally that extract and process strategic metals and rare earths. > **Note on mining:** For many of these companies, thorium is currently seen as a radioactive by-product that they must handle safely, rather than a major source of income, precisely because the commercial fuel market is lacking. > ## Individual stocks as an alternative? If you want to get closer to thorium, you usually have to pick individual stocks (which you can find on Nordnet if they are listed on available exchanges in, for example, the USA, Canada, or Australia). Examples of companies in this sphere are players developing advanced reactor designs, or companies holding large monazite deposits (such as Australian *Iluka Resources* or American *Energy Fuels*), but even for these, thorium constitutes only a fraction of their total business.
·3.6.Solid gain last 24 hours , up1,9%, we are in a trend shift here now
·28.5.Interesting fund, but it's worth noting that pure nuclear power exposure is difficult to get through funds. Many of the largest players in reactor technology are private companies that are not publicly listed, while those that are actually listed — such as Mitsubishi Heavy and IHI — are primarily defense conglomerates where nuclear power only constitutes a small part of their business. Through this fund, approximately 60% is actually allocated towards nuclear power and its value chain — uranium mining, reactor technology, equipment suppliers, and utilities that operate reactors. The remaining ~40% is more peripherally connected through conglomerates and infrastructure companies where nuclear power is one of many pillars. If one wants sharp, pure exposure to nuclear power, one probably has to own individual stocks like Cameco (uranium), Constellation Energy (nuclear utility), or BWX Technologies (reactor components) — then one actually knows what the money is exposed to. I myself own DNB Nuclear as, in my opinion, it is the best available fund targeting the sector, and I also supplement with individual stocks to further increase exposure. (had to do some reading as I noticed several companies where nuclear only constitutes a few percent of profits)
·2.6."VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies" ETF (not technically a fund) seems to me to be a notch more focused than DNB·3.6.Yes, VanEck's ETF is definitely more directly invested in nuclear power. One positive and one negative I see is that DNB has broader exposure to the nuclear power cycle, while VanEck is more focused on uranium and the nuclear power technology itself. The positive is that VanEck requires at least 50% of the company's revenues to come from uranium mining, construction/maintenance of reactors, nuclear power production, or equipment/technology for the nuclear power industry — so it is definitely a more "pure play" investment. I could well imagine investing in both and seeing how they perform differently over the next 5–10 years.
·22.5.There is always something that constantly affects fund prices. For example, from 2019: The pandemic, then the invasion of Ukraine, then tariffs and trade war, and most recently Iran bombing, krone exchange rate, and energy prices. But if the stock market does well without much disturbance for too long and the values in the stock market become too high, then what they call corrections come. Then shares are often priced down to the correct level. The point is that the value in funds is reasonably correct no matter what disturbs and seemingly destroys, and as long as the return rises steadily, it will be right in the end anyway.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,20%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori uusiutuva energia osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaNOK
- Lainoitusaste80%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
Fondet er et aksjefond i henhold til Verdipapirfondenes forenings definisjoner som hovedsakelig investerer i aksjer (verdipapirer som representerer en eierandel i et selskap) i selskaper med inntekter fra kjernekraftrelaterte aktiviteter, som er hjemmehørende eller notert på børser og regulerte markeder over hele verden. Fondet har en såkalt passiv investeringsstrategi hvor fondets investeringer skal etterligne sammensetningen av en bestemt aksjeindeks fastsatt i fondets prospekt. Fondets investeringsmandat er nærmere beskrevet i prospektet.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Omistukset
Päivitetty 31.3.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet100%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·2 päivää sittennot much up this year here at least anyone who thinks it will recover a little or are we saying in the basement so back to square one ?? 😊
- ·6.6.Does anyone have an overview of whether the fund is directly or indirectly exposed to Thorium (both extraction and Thorium reactors)?·7.6.Gemini AI: The short answer is **no**, there are currently no funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on Nordnet – or in the rest of the world – that have a pure or primary focus on *thorium*. If you want exposure to thorium via Nordnet, you must navigate through broader sectors. The situation is due to specific market mechanisms, but there are concrete alternatives that capture parts of this value chain. ## Why are there no dedicated Thorium funds? The commercial market for thorium is currently extremely small compared to uranium. Since thorium itself is not fissile (it is *fertile* and must be converted to uranium-233 in a reactor with the help of an external neutron source), there is not yet a large, global fleet of commercial thorium reactors in operation. Most of the work being done on thorium today – for example, China's TMSR-LF1 reactor or projects in India – is largely state-funded or at the research stage. In addition, thorium is almost exclusively extracted as a **by-product** of rare earth mining (especially from the mineral monazite). ## The best alternatives on Nordnet To get indirect exposure to companies involved in thorium technology or extraction, you need to look at two specific fund categories on Nordnet's platform: ### 1. Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETFs (Nuclear Energy) The established nuclear power funds focus heavily on uranium producers, but they also include companies developing next-generation reactor technology, including *Small Modular Reactors* (SMRs). Several of these technology environments are researching Molten Salt Reactors, where thorium is highly relevant in the long term. On Nordnet, you can trade UCITS-approved ETFs (which are available to European/Norwegian investors): * **Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF** (Ticker: URNM) – Primarily focuses on mining companies. * **Global X Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF** (Ticker: NUCL / NUKL) – Has a broader approach that includes both uranium producers, equipment suppliers, and technology companies in the nuclear power industry. * **VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF** (Ticker: NUCL) – Invests in companies related to both uranium extraction and new reactor technology. ### 2. Rare Earth Metals ETFs (Rare Earth Metals) Since thorium is found in deposits together with rare earth metals, companies that extract these metals will often hold significant thorium reserves as a by-product. * **VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF** (Ticker: REMX) – Tracks companies globally that extract and process strategic metals and rare earths. > **Note on mining:** For many of these companies, thorium is currently seen as a radioactive by-product that they must handle safely, rather than a major source of income, precisely because the commercial fuel market is lacking. > ## Individual stocks as an alternative? If you want to get closer to thorium, you usually have to pick individual stocks (which you can find on Nordnet if they are listed on available exchanges in, for example, the USA, Canada, or Australia). Examples of companies in this sphere are players developing advanced reactor designs, or companies holding large monazite deposits (such as Australian *Iluka Resources* or American *Energy Fuels*), but even for these, thorium constitutes only a fraction of their total business.
- ·3.6.Solid gain last 24 hours , up1,9%, we are in a trend shift here now
- ·28.5.Interesting fund, but it's worth noting that pure nuclear power exposure is difficult to get through funds. Many of the largest players in reactor technology are private companies that are not publicly listed, while those that are actually listed — such as Mitsubishi Heavy and IHI — are primarily defense conglomerates where nuclear power only constitutes a small part of their business. Through this fund, approximately 60% is actually allocated towards nuclear power and its value chain — uranium mining, reactor technology, equipment suppliers, and utilities that operate reactors. The remaining ~40% is more peripherally connected through conglomerates and infrastructure companies where nuclear power is one of many pillars. If one wants sharp, pure exposure to nuclear power, one probably has to own individual stocks like Cameco (uranium), Constellation Energy (nuclear utility), or BWX Technologies (reactor components) — then one actually knows what the money is exposed to. I myself own DNB Nuclear as, in my opinion, it is the best available fund targeting the sector, and I also supplement with individual stocks to further increase exposure. (had to do some reading as I noticed several companies where nuclear only constitutes a few percent of profits)·2.6."VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies" ETF (not technically a fund) seems to me to be a notch more focused than DNB·3.6.Yes, VanEck's ETF is definitely more directly invested in nuclear power. One positive and one negative I see is that DNB has broader exposure to the nuclear power cycle, while VanEck is more focused on uranium and the nuclear power technology itself. The positive is that VanEck requires at least 50% of the company's revenues to come from uranium mining, construction/maintenance of reactors, nuclear power production, or equipment/technology for the nuclear power industry — so it is definitely a more "pure play" investment. I could well imagine investing in both and seeing how they perform differently over the next 5–10 years.
- ·22.5.There is always something that constantly affects fund prices. For example, from 2019: The pandemic, then the invasion of Ukraine, then tariffs and trade war, and most recently Iran bombing, krone exchange rate, and energy prices. But if the stock market does well without much disturbance for too long and the values in the stock market become too high, then what they call corrections come. Then shares are often priced down to the correct level. The point is that the value in funds is reasonably correct no matter what disturbs and seemingly destroys, and as long as the return rises steadily, it will be right in the end anyway.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,20%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori uusiutuva energia osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaNOK
- Lainoitusaste80%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
Fondet er et aksjefond i henhold til Verdipapirfondenes forenings definisjoner som hovedsakelig investerer i aksjer (verdipapirer som representerer en eierandel i et selskap) i selskaper med inntekter fra kjernekraftrelaterte aktiviteter, som er hjemmehørende eller notert på børser og regulerte markeder over hele verden. Fondet har en såkalt passiv investeringsstrategi hvor fondets investeringer skal etterligne sammensetningen av en bestemt aksjeindeks fastsatt i fondets prospekt. Fondets investeringsmandat er nærmere beskrevet i prospektet.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·2 päivää sittennot much up this year here at least anyone who thinks it will recover a little or are we saying in the basement so back to square one ?? 😊
- ·6.6.Does anyone have an overview of whether the fund is directly or indirectly exposed to Thorium (both extraction and Thorium reactors)?·7.6.Gemini AI: The short answer is **no**, there are currently no funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on Nordnet – or in the rest of the world – that have a pure or primary focus on *thorium*. If you want exposure to thorium via Nordnet, you must navigate through broader sectors. The situation is due to specific market mechanisms, but there are concrete alternatives that capture parts of this value chain. ## Why are there no dedicated Thorium funds? The commercial market for thorium is currently extremely small compared to uranium. Since thorium itself is not fissile (it is *fertile* and must be converted to uranium-233 in a reactor with the help of an external neutron source), there is not yet a large, global fleet of commercial thorium reactors in operation. Most of the work being done on thorium today – for example, China's TMSR-LF1 reactor or projects in India – is largely state-funded or at the research stage. In addition, thorium is almost exclusively extracted as a **by-product** of rare earth mining (especially from the mineral monazite). ## The best alternatives on Nordnet To get indirect exposure to companies involved in thorium technology or extraction, you need to look at two specific fund categories on Nordnet's platform: ### 1. Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETFs (Nuclear Energy) The established nuclear power funds focus heavily on uranium producers, but they also include companies developing next-generation reactor technology, including *Small Modular Reactors* (SMRs). Several of these technology environments are researching Molten Salt Reactors, where thorium is highly relevant in the long term. On Nordnet, you can trade UCITS-approved ETFs (which are available to European/Norwegian investors): * **Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF** (Ticker: URNM) – Primarily focuses on mining companies. * **Global X Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF** (Ticker: NUCL / NUKL) – Has a broader approach that includes both uranium producers, equipment suppliers, and technology companies in the nuclear power industry. * **VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF** (Ticker: NUCL) – Invests in companies related to both uranium extraction and new reactor technology. ### 2. Rare Earth Metals ETFs (Rare Earth Metals) Since thorium is found in deposits together with rare earth metals, companies that extract these metals will often hold significant thorium reserves as a by-product. * **VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF** (Ticker: REMX) – Tracks companies globally that extract and process strategic metals and rare earths. > **Note on mining:** For many of these companies, thorium is currently seen as a radioactive by-product that they must handle safely, rather than a major source of income, precisely because the commercial fuel market is lacking. > ## Individual stocks as an alternative? If you want to get closer to thorium, you usually have to pick individual stocks (which you can find on Nordnet if they are listed on available exchanges in, for example, the USA, Canada, or Australia). Examples of companies in this sphere are players developing advanced reactor designs, or companies holding large monazite deposits (such as Australian *Iluka Resources* or American *Energy Fuels*), but even for these, thorium constitutes only a fraction of their total business.
- ·3.6.Solid gain last 24 hours , up1,9%, we are in a trend shift here now
- ·28.5.Interesting fund, but it's worth noting that pure nuclear power exposure is difficult to get through funds. Many of the largest players in reactor technology are private companies that are not publicly listed, while those that are actually listed — such as Mitsubishi Heavy and IHI — are primarily defense conglomerates where nuclear power only constitutes a small part of their business. Through this fund, approximately 60% is actually allocated towards nuclear power and its value chain — uranium mining, reactor technology, equipment suppliers, and utilities that operate reactors. The remaining ~40% is more peripherally connected through conglomerates and infrastructure companies where nuclear power is one of many pillars. If one wants sharp, pure exposure to nuclear power, one probably has to own individual stocks like Cameco (uranium), Constellation Energy (nuclear utility), or BWX Technologies (reactor components) — then one actually knows what the money is exposed to. I myself own DNB Nuclear as, in my opinion, it is the best available fund targeting the sector, and I also supplement with individual stocks to further increase exposure. (had to do some reading as I noticed several companies where nuclear only constitutes a few percent of profits)·2.6."VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies" ETF (not technically a fund) seems to me to be a notch more focused than DNB·3.6.Yes, VanEck's ETF is definitely more directly invested in nuclear power. One positive and one negative I see is that DNB has broader exposure to the nuclear power cycle, while VanEck is more focused on uranium and the nuclear power technology itself. The positive is that VanEck requires at least 50% of the company's revenues to come from uranium mining, construction/maintenance of reactors, nuclear power production, or equipment/technology for the nuclear power industry — so it is definitely a more "pure play" investment. I could well imagine investing in both and seeing how they perform differently over the next 5–10 years.
- ·22.5.There is always something that constantly affects fund prices. For example, from 2019: The pandemic, then the invasion of Ukraine, then tariffs and trade war, and most recently Iran bombing, krone exchange rate, and energy prices. But if the stock market does well without much disturbance for too long and the values in the stock market become too high, then what they call corrections come. Then shares are often priced down to the correct level. The point is that the value in funds is reasonably correct no matter what disturbs and seemingly destroys, and as long as the return rises steadily, it will be right in the end anyway.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Omistukset
Päivitetty 31.3.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet100%