2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
16 päivää sitten
‧1 t 22 min
2,20 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,68%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 30.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 30.4. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 23.10.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·2.8.Not only Renault that notices Chinese competition. https://www.finansavisen.no/samfunn/2026/08/02/8369628/dumper-hundrevis-av-direktorer
·22.7. · MuokattuRenault is solidly profitable and pays good dividends to its owners, while also sitting on over seven billion euro in net cash. This means that the stock market practically values their car factories and new EV initiative at zero – you get the entire car business almost for free with the purchase. In addition, they have the finance and leasing arm Mobilize which contributes over one billion euro annually. The Nissan collaboration has gone from being a source of constant headache and value destruction to becoming a potential value driver. Previously, the ownership structure was locked and characterized by political noise, but after a major cleanup and divestment, Renault has, the connection is now more flexible and purely business-oriented, where they collaborate on common car models and platforms to cut costs without unnecessary drama. If you add strategic collaborations in defense equipment and drones, including with Thales, the downside is well protected by the cash on hand and stable operations. The biggest risk is that the stock may remain low-priced for a long time due to skepticism towards the European automotive industry and some political meddling with the French state on the ownership side. The market may therefore refuse to price up the company anytime soon – even if the calculation today looks extremely cheap.
Renault alone cannot do much about the significantly higher labor and energy costs in Europe, beyond moving production to low-cost countries on the continent. The question ultimately becomes whether Europe wants to have an industry and production capacity for motorized vehicles. Subsidized Chinese production is a threat that will likely lead to practically closed regional markets where most of the production takes place, and Renault is well positioned for this. In addition, there is the split between fossil and electric cars where manufacturers must make assumptions about uncertain demand and then build capacity accordingly, where a significant miscalculation can have large negative economic consequences. That being said, Renault is priced below net cash on the automotive division. In addition, the book value of equity for the financial division is above the market value alone. The cash balance is enough to cover just under 2 financial crises or 2 covid-19, or potentially a global financial crisis + global pandemic in a row. Just the cash balance and book value of equity are 2x the market value, then there's the automotive operation itself, Nissan shares, HORSE, Alpine, defense etc. NB. Has a significant position in Renault
·18.7.Renault is not cheap compared to Stellantis and Stellantis is not cheap compared to Renault. 🙄- ·10.7. · MuokattuAfter several years of litigation, thousands of pages of evidence and months in court, the High Court has dismissed all claims against Renault. A potential billion-risk is practically gone, and Renault even announces that they will claim back the legal costs from those who financed the lawsuit. This removes a major uncertainty that has hung over the stock for a long time.These cases of cheating with emissions tests are scary as a shareholder in, among others, Renault. Viewed in isolation, this case is positive, but as a precedent, it should significantly lower the risk for ongoing and future cases. I think.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
16 päivää sitten
‧1 t 22 min
2,20 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,68%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2.8.Not only Renault that notices Chinese competition. https://www.finansavisen.no/samfunn/2026/08/02/8369628/dumper-hundrevis-av-direktorer
- ·22.7. · MuokattuRenault is solidly profitable and pays good dividends to its owners, while also sitting on over seven billion euro in net cash. This means that the stock market practically values their car factories and new EV initiative at zero – you get the entire car business almost for free with the purchase. In addition, they have the finance and leasing arm Mobilize which contributes over one billion euro annually. The Nissan collaboration has gone from being a source of constant headache and value destruction to becoming a potential value driver. Previously, the ownership structure was locked and characterized by political noise, but after a major cleanup and divestment, Renault has, the connection is now more flexible and purely business-oriented, where they collaborate on common car models and platforms to cut costs without unnecessary drama. If you add strategic collaborations in defense equipment and drones, including with Thales, the downside is well protected by the cash on hand and stable operations. The biggest risk is that the stock may remain low-priced for a long time due to skepticism towards the European automotive industry and some political meddling with the French state on the ownership side. The market may therefore refuse to price up the company anytime soon – even if the calculation today looks extremely cheap.Renault alone cannot do much about the significantly higher labor and energy costs in Europe, beyond moving production to low-cost countries on the continent. The question ultimately becomes whether Europe wants to have an industry and production capacity for motorized vehicles. Subsidized Chinese production is a threat that will likely lead to practically closed regional markets where most of the production takes place, and Renault is well positioned for this. In addition, there is the split between fossil and electric cars where manufacturers must make assumptions about uncertain demand and then build capacity accordingly, where a significant miscalculation can have large negative economic consequences. That being said, Renault is priced below net cash on the automotive division. In addition, the book value of equity for the financial division is above the market value alone. The cash balance is enough to cover just under 2 financial crises or 2 covid-19, or potentially a global financial crisis + global pandemic in a row. Just the cash balance and book value of equity are 2x the market value, then there's the automotive operation itself, Nissan shares, HORSE, Alpine, defense etc. NB. Has a significant position in Renault
- ·18.7.Renault is not cheap compared to Stellantis and Stellantis is not cheap compared to Renault. 🙄
- ·10.7. · MuokattuAfter several years of litigation, thousands of pages of evidence and months in court, the High Court has dismissed all claims against Renault. A potential billion-risk is practically gone, and Renault even announces that they will claim back the legal costs from those who financed the lawsuit. This removes a major uncertainty that has hung over the stock for a long time.These cases of cheating with emissions tests are scary as a shareholder in, among others, Renault. Viewed in isolation, this case is positive, but as a precedent, it should significantly lower the risk for ongoing and future cases. I think.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 30.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 30.4. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 23.10.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
16 päivää sitten
‧1 t 22 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 30.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 30.4. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 23.10.2025 |
2,20 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,68%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2.8.Not only Renault that notices Chinese competition. https://www.finansavisen.no/samfunn/2026/08/02/8369628/dumper-hundrevis-av-direktorer
- ·22.7. · MuokattuRenault is solidly profitable and pays good dividends to its owners, while also sitting on over seven billion euro in net cash. This means that the stock market practically values their car factories and new EV initiative at zero – you get the entire car business almost for free with the purchase. In addition, they have the finance and leasing arm Mobilize which contributes over one billion euro annually. The Nissan collaboration has gone from being a source of constant headache and value destruction to becoming a potential value driver. Previously, the ownership structure was locked and characterized by political noise, but after a major cleanup and divestment, Renault has, the connection is now more flexible and purely business-oriented, where they collaborate on common car models and platforms to cut costs without unnecessary drama. If you add strategic collaborations in defense equipment and drones, including with Thales, the downside is well protected by the cash on hand and stable operations. The biggest risk is that the stock may remain low-priced for a long time due to skepticism towards the European automotive industry and some political meddling with the French state on the ownership side. The market may therefore refuse to price up the company anytime soon – even if the calculation today looks extremely cheap.Renault alone cannot do much about the significantly higher labor and energy costs in Europe, beyond moving production to low-cost countries on the continent. The question ultimately becomes whether Europe wants to have an industry and production capacity for motorized vehicles. Subsidized Chinese production is a threat that will likely lead to practically closed regional markets where most of the production takes place, and Renault is well positioned for this. In addition, there is the split between fossil and electric cars where manufacturers must make assumptions about uncertain demand and then build capacity accordingly, where a significant miscalculation can have large negative economic consequences. That being said, Renault is priced below net cash on the automotive division. In addition, the book value of equity for the financial division is above the market value alone. The cash balance is enough to cover just under 2 financial crises or 2 covid-19, or potentially a global financial crisis + global pandemic in a row. Just the cash balance and book value of equity are 2x the market value, then there's the automotive operation itself, Nissan shares, HORSE, Alpine, defense etc. NB. Has a significant position in Renault
- ·18.7.Renault is not cheap compared to Stellantis and Stellantis is not cheap compared to Renault. 🙄
- ·10.7. · MuokattuAfter several years of litigation, thousands of pages of evidence and months in court, the High Court has dismissed all claims against Renault. A potential billion-risk is practically gone, and Renault even announces that they will claim back the legal costs from those who financed the lawsuit. This removes a major uncertainty that has hung over the stock for a long time.These cases of cheating with emissions tests are scary as a shareholder in, among others, Renault. Viewed in isolation, this case is positive, but as a precedent, it should significantly lower the risk for ongoing and future cases. I think.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt