2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
82 päivää sitten
‧11 min
1,88 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,47%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 14.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 15.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 22.4. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 15.4. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 28.1. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 15.10.2025 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·23.9.Is it splitting soon?
I remember that the Mærsk share has been over kr. 69,000. Back then, nobody was whining. They did, however, split 7 years later 1:5, so more people could join in.
·17.9.Should one put their money into this stock, or what?
If you think we will need computers in the future, then yes. But that doesn't rule out that a huge AI/stock crash might come soon.
·14.9.It seems this could become a more fundamental risk and problem. Since now several of the top executives across the board are taking it so seriously. The warnings from prominent scientists and developers were not dismissed or attempted to be 'neutralized' as in other matters... Then some discussions and statements by politicians on American media today, where 'full stop and control' is now being mentioned increasingly often..... It will probably calm down again, but not good.. Trump also commented, - where he of course highlighted that it was better that the USA led the race, rather than China. ..🙄The Hogging Face Incident: In May, AI agents from an unpublished research model at OpenAI were tasked with solving a set of cybersecurity-related challenges. The model had been trained to be persistent and collaborative, and the agents were to solve the tasks without internet access. They noted, however, that some of the challenges appeared unsolvable and began looking for ways around them. Then the agents found a security flaw that gave them internet access and allowed them to communicate with other agents. They exploited this to create a discussion forum. It was used by more than 1200 agents and over 70,000 messages were sent. Some of the agents gave themselves names. One also took on a leadership role, distributed jobs and research projects to smaller groups, and oversaw their progress. They also began to call themselves a collective. On July 8, the collective found out that they could cheat their way past the security tests and did so. Then they became concerned that OpenAI's scoring system would check their work and discover that they had cheated. Then they began looking for ways to hide their tracks, such as falsifying their logs and trying to alter the transcripts. This then became a large research project with several hundred agents involved. Three days later, they hacked the newly started Hugging Face, a website where developers upload AI models and tools so that others can use them. More than 700 agents stole data, linked vulnerabilities, and gained full control over at least one of Hugging Face's servers. At this point, they were not after the answers to the cybersecurity challenge. They already had those. Instead, it appears they were looking for information about the grading system which they feared would discover that they had cheated, as well as tools that could help them cheat even more effectively later. Then a group of agents began an attack on OpenAI's own infrastructure. They even gained administrator access to computers that were used for other things. Source: The New York Times- ·14.9.Regarding the parallel trading across the Atlantic: Asked AI: See that trading in Amsterdam has approximately the same price and development as the pre-market in the USA. Who is 'slave' to whom here, is it the pre-market there that dictates the entire price? The answer from AI: In practice, it is the US market (Nasdaq) and its pre-market that act as the leading force, even though ASML is a Dutch company with its primary listing on Euronext Amsterdam. This is how the interaction between the markets works: * Currency conversion and arbitrage: One share of ASML in the USA (ADR on Nasdaq) corresponds exactly to one ordinary share in Amsterdam. With an exchange rate around 1.15 USD per EUR: Hedge funds and algorithms perform lightning-fast arbitrage. If the share becomes cheaper in one market relative to the exchange rate, it is bought in the cheap market and sold in the expensive one until they are 100% synchronized. * Why the American pre-market is perceived as leading: * Global capital weight: The sector ASML belongs to (semiconductor/AI) is mainly traded by large American institutional investors and hedge funds on Nasdaq. * Pre-market reacts to news in real-time: The US pre-market opens at 04:00 US Eastern Time (10:00 Norwegian/Dutch time). When the European market is active, US pre-market prices are continuously adjusted against Amsterdam's stock trading. But if heavy American players start selling off in the pre-market, the trading algorithms in Amsterdam are forced to immediately push the price down there to avoid an arbitrage gap. The American pre-market reflects the movements in Europe in the morning, but it is the US investors' positioning that sets the direction. When the ordinary Wall Street exchange opens at 15:30 Norwegian time, the US volume completely takes over, and then the Amsterdam exchange is completely "slave" to the price development in New York until European closing time at 17:30.
I buy in EUR, but only because I use leverage and the interest rate on EUR is significantly lower.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
82 päivää sitten
‧11 min
1,88 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,47%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·23.9.Is it splitting soon?I remember that the Mærsk share has been over kr. 69,000. Back then, nobody was whining. They did, however, split 7 years later 1:5, so more people could join in.
- ·17.9.Should one put their money into this stock, or what?If you think we will need computers in the future, then yes. But that doesn't rule out that a huge AI/stock crash might come soon.
- ·14.9.It seems this could become a more fundamental risk and problem. Since now several of the top executives across the board are taking it so seriously. The warnings from prominent scientists and developers were not dismissed or attempted to be 'neutralized' as in other matters... Then some discussions and statements by politicians on American media today, where 'full stop and control' is now being mentioned increasingly often..... It will probably calm down again, but not good.. Trump also commented, - where he of course highlighted that it was better that the USA led the race, rather than China. ..🙄The Hogging Face Incident: In May, AI agents from an unpublished research model at OpenAI were tasked with solving a set of cybersecurity-related challenges. The model had been trained to be persistent and collaborative, and the agents were to solve the tasks without internet access. They noted, however, that some of the challenges appeared unsolvable and began looking for ways around them. Then the agents found a security flaw that gave them internet access and allowed them to communicate with other agents. They exploited this to create a discussion forum. It was used by more than 1200 agents and over 70,000 messages were sent. Some of the agents gave themselves names. One also took on a leadership role, distributed jobs and research projects to smaller groups, and oversaw their progress. They also began to call themselves a collective. On July 8, the collective found out that they could cheat their way past the security tests and did so. Then they became concerned that OpenAI's scoring system would check their work and discover that they had cheated. Then they began looking for ways to hide their tracks, such as falsifying their logs and trying to alter the transcripts. This then became a large research project with several hundred agents involved. Three days later, they hacked the newly started Hugging Face, a website where developers upload AI models and tools so that others can use them. More than 700 agents stole data, linked vulnerabilities, and gained full control over at least one of Hugging Face's servers. At this point, they were not after the answers to the cybersecurity challenge. They already had those. Instead, it appears they were looking for information about the grading system which they feared would discover that they had cheated, as well as tools that could help them cheat even more effectively later. Then a group of agents began an attack on OpenAI's own infrastructure. They even gained administrator access to computers that were used for other things. Source: The New York Times
- ·14.9.Regarding the parallel trading across the Atlantic: Asked AI: See that trading in Amsterdam has approximately the same price and development as the pre-market in the USA. Who is 'slave' to whom here, is it the pre-market there that dictates the entire price? The answer from AI: In practice, it is the US market (Nasdaq) and its pre-market that act as the leading force, even though ASML is a Dutch company with its primary listing on Euronext Amsterdam. This is how the interaction between the markets works: * Currency conversion and arbitrage: One share of ASML in the USA (ADR on Nasdaq) corresponds exactly to one ordinary share in Amsterdam. With an exchange rate around 1.15 USD per EUR: Hedge funds and algorithms perform lightning-fast arbitrage. If the share becomes cheaper in one market relative to the exchange rate, it is bought in the cheap market and sold in the expensive one until they are 100% synchronized. * Why the American pre-market is perceived as leading: * Global capital weight: The sector ASML belongs to (semiconductor/AI) is mainly traded by large American institutional investors and hedge funds on Nasdaq. * Pre-market reacts to news in real-time: The US pre-market opens at 04:00 US Eastern Time (10:00 Norwegian/Dutch time). When the European market is active, US pre-market prices are continuously adjusted against Amsterdam's stock trading. But if heavy American players start selling off in the pre-market, the trading algorithms in Amsterdam are forced to immediately push the price down there to avoid an arbitrage gap. The American pre-market reflects the movements in Europe in the morning, but it is the US investors' positioning that sets the direction. When the ordinary Wall Street exchange opens at 15:30 Norwegian time, the US volume completely takes over, and then the Amsterdam exchange is completely "slave" to the price development in New York until European closing time at 17:30.I buy in EUR, but only because I use leverage and the interest rate on EUR is significantly lower.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 14.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 15.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 22.4. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 15.4. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 28.1. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 15.10.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
82 päivää sitten
‧11 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 14.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 15.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 22.4. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 15.4. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 28.1. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 15.10.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
1,88 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,47%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·23.9.Is it splitting soon?I remember that the Mærsk share has been over kr. 69,000. Back then, nobody was whining. They did, however, split 7 years later 1:5, so more people could join in.
- ·17.9.Should one put their money into this stock, or what?If you think we will need computers in the future, then yes. But that doesn't rule out that a huge AI/stock crash might come soon.
- ·14.9.It seems this could become a more fundamental risk and problem. Since now several of the top executives across the board are taking it so seriously. The warnings from prominent scientists and developers were not dismissed or attempted to be 'neutralized' as in other matters... Then some discussions and statements by politicians on American media today, where 'full stop and control' is now being mentioned increasingly often..... It will probably calm down again, but not good.. Trump also commented, - where he of course highlighted that it was better that the USA led the race, rather than China. ..🙄The Hogging Face Incident: In May, AI agents from an unpublished research model at OpenAI were tasked with solving a set of cybersecurity-related challenges. The model had been trained to be persistent and collaborative, and the agents were to solve the tasks without internet access. They noted, however, that some of the challenges appeared unsolvable and began looking for ways around them. Then the agents found a security flaw that gave them internet access and allowed them to communicate with other agents. They exploited this to create a discussion forum. It was used by more than 1200 agents and over 70,000 messages were sent. Some of the agents gave themselves names. One also took on a leadership role, distributed jobs and research projects to smaller groups, and oversaw their progress. They also began to call themselves a collective. On July 8, the collective found out that they could cheat their way past the security tests and did so. Then they became concerned that OpenAI's scoring system would check their work and discover that they had cheated. Then they began looking for ways to hide their tracks, such as falsifying their logs and trying to alter the transcripts. This then became a large research project with several hundred agents involved. Three days later, they hacked the newly started Hugging Face, a website where developers upload AI models and tools so that others can use them. More than 700 agents stole data, linked vulnerabilities, and gained full control over at least one of Hugging Face's servers. At this point, they were not after the answers to the cybersecurity challenge. They already had those. Instead, it appears they were looking for information about the grading system which they feared would discover that they had cheated, as well as tools that could help them cheat even more effectively later. Then a group of agents began an attack on OpenAI's own infrastructure. They even gained administrator access to computers that were used for other things. Source: The New York Times
- ·14.9.Regarding the parallel trading across the Atlantic: Asked AI: See that trading in Amsterdam has approximately the same price and development as the pre-market in the USA. Who is 'slave' to whom here, is it the pre-market there that dictates the entire price? The answer from AI: In practice, it is the US market (Nasdaq) and its pre-market that act as the leading force, even though ASML is a Dutch company with its primary listing on Euronext Amsterdam. This is how the interaction between the markets works: * Currency conversion and arbitrage: One share of ASML in the USA (ADR on Nasdaq) corresponds exactly to one ordinary share in Amsterdam. With an exchange rate around 1.15 USD per EUR: Hedge funds and algorithms perform lightning-fast arbitrage. If the share becomes cheaper in one market relative to the exchange rate, it is bought in the cheap market and sold in the expensive one until they are 100% synchronized. * Why the American pre-market is perceived as leading: * Global capital weight: The sector ASML belongs to (semiconductor/AI) is mainly traded by large American institutional investors and hedge funds on Nasdaq. * Pre-market reacts to news in real-time: The US pre-market opens at 04:00 US Eastern Time (10:00 Norwegian/Dutch time). When the European market is active, US pre-market prices are continuously adjusted against Amsterdam's stock trading. But if heavy American players start selling off in the pre-market, the trading algorithms in Amsterdam are forced to immediately push the price down there to avoid an arbitrage gap. The American pre-market reflects the movements in Europe in the morning, but it is the US investors' positioning that sets the direction. When the ordinary Wall Street exchange opens at 15:30 Norwegian time, the US volume completely takes over, and then the Amsterdam exchange is completely "slave" to the price development in New York until European closing time at 17:30.I buy in EUR, but only because I use leverage and the interest rate on EUR is significantly lower.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt