Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti

Vain PDF

4 päivää sitten

Tarjoustasot

SwedenFirst North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
32 556--
918 500--
5 000--
12 720--
14 000--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Ostaneet eniten

Ostaneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi17 788 38317 788 38300

Myyneet eniten

Myyneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi17 788 38317 788 38300

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
24.7.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
27.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
19.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
19.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
14.5.2025

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 14 min sitten
    ·
    14 min sitten
    ·
    Alright, now we just have to continue to squeeze the shorters 😎
    5 min sitten
    ·
    5 min sitten
    ·
    Please elaborate on this further, as I'm not entirely clear on how these shorted shares are traded.. So here you mean that someone who has shorted is forced to buy back? But who sells then 🤔
    1 min sitten
    ·
    1 min sitten
    ·
    Yes, when we buy their large positions (without the price going down again), they are forced to buy back the borrowed shares at a higher price👍🏻 when the sell order of 1 mill was swallowed, they will have to buy it back (at a higher or lower price).
  • 20 min sitten
    20 min sitten
    What is the requirement for SES to rise back to 1 nok?
  • 2 t sitten
    ·
    2 t sitten
    ·
    A lot on the buy side 🚀
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    Found this in a Swedish forum and had AI translate it: A technology worth gold – and it's being built in the midst of the storm. On Placeras' forum, the bears are working hard. Posts are raining down about how Enviro is a failed project, how the technology is overrated, and how Infiniteria's demands will bury the company once and for all. It's a well-known pattern – in any restructuring, there are voices interested in amplifying pessimism. But if one lifts their gaze from the noise of the forum threads and looks at what is actually happening, the picture points in another direction. We can start with the simplest measure of a technology's value: how hard someone else is fighting to retain the rights to it. Infiniteria has put forward compensation claims of up to 138 million euro, is pursuing parallel processes in court and arbitration, and publishes press releases on the same day Enviro submits an environmental permit application. This is not the behavior of an unaffected party. This is the behavior of a party that knows they risk losing access to something they cannot replace. And that is precisely what the case is about. Enviro's CFC-technology (patented in 19 countries, capable of producing recycled carbon black with up to 93 percent lower CO₂ emissions than virgin carbon black) is not just a proof-of-concept. It is a proven industrial process in a sector that is under heavy regulatory pressure and desperately seeking circular solutions. Without Enviro's patents, Infiniteria's construction plans in Uddevalla are just a property and a dream scenario. With the patents, it's a business – and that's why they are fighting. In the midst of the storm, construction is underway. While Infiniteria is busy with press releases and legal threats, Enviro is submitting an environmental permit application for its own wholly-owned facility with a planned capacity of over 70,000 tons of end-of-life tires per year, while also securing an option on the property. This is not the behavior of a company that gives up. This is the behavior of a company that knows exactly what it has. The legal basis for terminating the Infiniteria agreements is not weak. The Corporate Restructuring Act gives a debtor undergoing restructuring the right to terminate agreements that are detrimental to its survival. The Gothenburg District Court granted the restructuring, which in itself implies an assessment that the situation qualifies. Infiniteria's compensation claims are large in size and thin in substance: their own words describe them as preliminary, not finally calculated, and partially overlapping with claims already being tried in arbitration. And then there's a player who doesn't appear in the forum threads, but who says more than a thousand posts: Michelin. The world's leading tire manufacturer and Enviro's major shareholder with 20 percent of the capital has not sold. No flagging notifications, no press releases about an exit – nothing. An industrial heavyweight who sits still in the boat when the sea is rough and the stock fluctuates is not indifferent. It's a strong signal. Michelin has set ambitious goals for the circular economy and recycled materials, and Enviro's technology is one of the few processes in the world that can deliver this on an industrial scale. One does not abandon that position because a restructuring is difficult. Risk exists, and it should not be denied. The legal processes are uncertain, financing is pressured, and the path through restructuring requires shareholders to continue supporting the company. But the fundamental prerequisites are strong: the patent is real, the demand for the technology is global, and the owner with the greatest industrial interest remains. This is not the profile of a company that is about to disappear – honestly, it sounds more like the profile of a company that is about to find its right form.
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Did you have to use AI to translate from Swedish?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Oh yes, I certainly do, but it's not a given that you'll appreciate it. It takes me about 0.35 seconds to recognize Swedish text. That probably also applies to most others. Most people don't need to translate it either.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    Where did rosendal1 go?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Some saw through them.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2026 Q1 -tulosraportti

Vain PDF

4 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 14 min sitten
    ·
    14 min sitten
    ·
    Alright, now we just have to continue to squeeze the shorters 😎
    5 min sitten
    ·
    5 min sitten
    ·
    Please elaborate on this further, as I'm not entirely clear on how these shorted shares are traded.. So here you mean that someone who has shorted is forced to buy back? But who sells then 🤔
    1 min sitten
    ·
    1 min sitten
    ·
    Yes, when we buy their large positions (without the price going down again), they are forced to buy back the borrowed shares at a higher price👍🏻 when the sell order of 1 mill was swallowed, they will have to buy it back (at a higher or lower price).
  • 20 min sitten
    20 min sitten
    What is the requirement for SES to rise back to 1 nok?
  • 2 t sitten
    ·
    2 t sitten
    ·
    A lot on the buy side 🚀
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    Found this in a Swedish forum and had AI translate it: A technology worth gold – and it's being built in the midst of the storm. On Placeras' forum, the bears are working hard. Posts are raining down about how Enviro is a failed project, how the technology is overrated, and how Infiniteria's demands will bury the company once and for all. It's a well-known pattern – in any restructuring, there are voices interested in amplifying pessimism. But if one lifts their gaze from the noise of the forum threads and looks at what is actually happening, the picture points in another direction. We can start with the simplest measure of a technology's value: how hard someone else is fighting to retain the rights to it. Infiniteria has put forward compensation claims of up to 138 million euro, is pursuing parallel processes in court and arbitration, and publishes press releases on the same day Enviro submits an environmental permit application. This is not the behavior of an unaffected party. This is the behavior of a party that knows they risk losing access to something they cannot replace. And that is precisely what the case is about. Enviro's CFC-technology (patented in 19 countries, capable of producing recycled carbon black with up to 93 percent lower CO₂ emissions than virgin carbon black) is not just a proof-of-concept. It is a proven industrial process in a sector that is under heavy regulatory pressure and desperately seeking circular solutions. Without Enviro's patents, Infiniteria's construction plans in Uddevalla are just a property and a dream scenario. With the patents, it's a business – and that's why they are fighting. In the midst of the storm, construction is underway. While Infiniteria is busy with press releases and legal threats, Enviro is submitting an environmental permit application for its own wholly-owned facility with a planned capacity of over 70,000 tons of end-of-life tires per year, while also securing an option on the property. This is not the behavior of a company that gives up. This is the behavior of a company that knows exactly what it has. The legal basis for terminating the Infiniteria agreements is not weak. The Corporate Restructuring Act gives a debtor undergoing restructuring the right to terminate agreements that are detrimental to its survival. The Gothenburg District Court granted the restructuring, which in itself implies an assessment that the situation qualifies. Infiniteria's compensation claims are large in size and thin in substance: their own words describe them as preliminary, not finally calculated, and partially overlapping with claims already being tried in arbitration. And then there's a player who doesn't appear in the forum threads, but who says more than a thousand posts: Michelin. The world's leading tire manufacturer and Enviro's major shareholder with 20 percent of the capital has not sold. No flagging notifications, no press releases about an exit – nothing. An industrial heavyweight who sits still in the boat when the sea is rough and the stock fluctuates is not indifferent. It's a strong signal. Michelin has set ambitious goals for the circular economy and recycled materials, and Enviro's technology is one of the few processes in the world that can deliver this on an industrial scale. One does not abandon that position because a restructuring is difficult. Risk exists, and it should not be denied. The legal processes are uncertain, financing is pressured, and the path through restructuring requires shareholders to continue supporting the company. But the fundamental prerequisites are strong: the patent is real, the demand for the technology is global, and the owner with the greatest industrial interest remains. This is not the profile of a company that is about to disappear – honestly, it sounds more like the profile of a company that is about to find its right form.
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Did you have to use AI to translate from Swedish?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Oh yes, I certainly do, but it's not a given that you'll appreciate it. It takes me about 0.35 seconds to recognize Swedish text. That probably also applies to most others. Most people don't need to translate it either.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    Where did rosendal1 go?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Some saw through them.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

SwedenFirst North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
32 556--
918 500--
5 000--
12 720--
14 000--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Ostaneet eniten

Ostaneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi17 788 38317 788 38300

Myyneet eniten

Myyneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi17 788 38317 788 38300

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
24.7.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
27.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
19.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
19.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
14.5.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2026 Q1 -tulosraportti

Vain PDF

4 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
24.7.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
27.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
19.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
19.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
14.5.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 14 min sitten
    ·
    14 min sitten
    ·
    Alright, now we just have to continue to squeeze the shorters 😎
    5 min sitten
    ·
    5 min sitten
    ·
    Please elaborate on this further, as I'm not entirely clear on how these shorted shares are traded.. So here you mean that someone who has shorted is forced to buy back? But who sells then 🤔
    1 min sitten
    ·
    1 min sitten
    ·
    Yes, when we buy their large positions (without the price going down again), they are forced to buy back the borrowed shares at a higher price👍🏻 when the sell order of 1 mill was swallowed, they will have to buy it back (at a higher or lower price).
  • 20 min sitten
    20 min sitten
    What is the requirement for SES to rise back to 1 nok?
  • 2 t sitten
    ·
    2 t sitten
    ·
    A lot on the buy side 🚀
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    Found this in a Swedish forum and had AI translate it: A technology worth gold – and it's being built in the midst of the storm. On Placeras' forum, the bears are working hard. Posts are raining down about how Enviro is a failed project, how the technology is overrated, and how Infiniteria's demands will bury the company once and for all. It's a well-known pattern – in any restructuring, there are voices interested in amplifying pessimism. But if one lifts their gaze from the noise of the forum threads and looks at what is actually happening, the picture points in another direction. We can start with the simplest measure of a technology's value: how hard someone else is fighting to retain the rights to it. Infiniteria has put forward compensation claims of up to 138 million euro, is pursuing parallel processes in court and arbitration, and publishes press releases on the same day Enviro submits an environmental permit application. This is not the behavior of an unaffected party. This is the behavior of a party that knows they risk losing access to something they cannot replace. And that is precisely what the case is about. Enviro's CFC-technology (patented in 19 countries, capable of producing recycled carbon black with up to 93 percent lower CO₂ emissions than virgin carbon black) is not just a proof-of-concept. It is a proven industrial process in a sector that is under heavy regulatory pressure and desperately seeking circular solutions. Without Enviro's patents, Infiniteria's construction plans in Uddevalla are just a property and a dream scenario. With the patents, it's a business – and that's why they are fighting. In the midst of the storm, construction is underway. While Infiniteria is busy with press releases and legal threats, Enviro is submitting an environmental permit application for its own wholly-owned facility with a planned capacity of over 70,000 tons of end-of-life tires per year, while also securing an option on the property. This is not the behavior of a company that gives up. This is the behavior of a company that knows exactly what it has. The legal basis for terminating the Infiniteria agreements is not weak. The Corporate Restructuring Act gives a debtor undergoing restructuring the right to terminate agreements that are detrimental to its survival. The Gothenburg District Court granted the restructuring, which in itself implies an assessment that the situation qualifies. Infiniteria's compensation claims are large in size and thin in substance: their own words describe them as preliminary, not finally calculated, and partially overlapping with claims already being tried in arbitration. And then there's a player who doesn't appear in the forum threads, but who says more than a thousand posts: Michelin. The world's leading tire manufacturer and Enviro's major shareholder with 20 percent of the capital has not sold. No flagging notifications, no press releases about an exit – nothing. An industrial heavyweight who sits still in the boat when the sea is rough and the stock fluctuates is not indifferent. It's a strong signal. Michelin has set ambitious goals for the circular economy and recycled materials, and Enviro's technology is one of the few processes in the world that can deliver this on an industrial scale. One does not abandon that position because a restructuring is difficult. Risk exists, and it should not be denied. The legal processes are uncertain, financing is pressured, and the path through restructuring requires shareholders to continue supporting the company. But the fundamental prerequisites are strong: the patent is real, the demand for the technology is global, and the owner with the greatest industrial interest remains. This is not the profile of a company that is about to disappear – honestly, it sounds more like the profile of a company that is about to find its right form.
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Did you have to use AI to translate from Swedish?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Oh yes, I certainly do, but it's not a given that you'll appreciate it. It takes me about 0.35 seconds to recognize Swedish text. That probably also applies to most others. Most people don't need to translate it either.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    Where did rosendal1 go?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Some saw through them.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

SwedenFirst North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
32 556--
918 500--
5 000--
12 720--
14 000--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Ostaneet eniten

Ostaneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi17 788 38317 788 38300

Myyneet eniten

Myyneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi17 788 38317 788 38300