Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti

Äänite tulossa

2 päivää sitten

Tarjoustasot

SwedenFirst North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
71--
8 634--
12 259--
29 411--
10 000--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
24.7.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
27.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
19.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
19.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
14.5.2025

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    3 t sitten
    ·
    Found this in a Swedish forum and had AI translate it: A technology worth gold – and it's being built in the midst of the storm. On Placeras' forum, the bears are working hard. Posts are raining down about how Enviro is a failed project, how the technology is overrated, and how Infiniteria's demands will bury the company once and for all. It's a well-known pattern – in any restructuring, there are voices interested in amplifying pessimism. But if one lifts their gaze from the noise of the forum threads and looks at what is actually happening, the picture points in another direction. We can start with the simplest measure of a technology's value: how hard someone else is fighting to retain the rights to it. Infiniteria has put forward compensation claims of up to 138 million euro, is pursuing parallel processes in court and arbitration, and publishes press releases on the same day Enviro submits an environmental permit application. This is not the behavior of an unaffected party. This is the behavior of a party that knows they risk losing access to something they cannot replace. And that is precisely what the case is about. Enviro's CFC-technology (patented in 19 countries, capable of producing recycled carbon black with up to 93 percent lower CO₂ emissions than virgin carbon black) is not just a proof-of-concept. It is a proven industrial process in a sector that is under heavy regulatory pressure and desperately seeking circular solutions. Without Enviro's patents, Infiniteria's construction plans in Uddevalla are just a property and a dream scenario. With the patents, it's a business – and that's why they are fighting. In the midst of the storm, construction is underway. While Infiniteria is busy with press releases and legal threats, Enviro is submitting an environmental permit application for its own wholly-owned facility with a planned capacity of over 70,000 tons of end-of-life tires per year, while also securing an option on the property. This is not the behavior of a company that gives up. This is the behavior of a company that knows exactly what it has. The legal basis for terminating the Infiniteria agreements is not weak. The Corporate Restructuring Act gives a debtor undergoing restructuring the right to terminate agreements that are detrimental to its survival. The Gothenburg District Court granted the restructuring, which in itself implies an assessment that the situation qualifies. Infiniteria's compensation claims are large in size and thin in substance: their own words describe them as preliminary, not finally calculated, and partially overlapping with claims already being tried in arbitration. And then there's a player who doesn't appear in the forum threads, but who says more than a thousand posts: Michelin. The world's leading tire manufacturer and Enviro's major shareholder with 20 percent of the capital has not sold. No flagging notifications, no press releases about an exit – nothing. An industrial heavyweight who sits still in the boat when the sea is rough and the stock fluctuates is not indifferent. It's a strong signal. Michelin has set ambitious goals for the circular economy and recycled materials, and Enviro's technology is one of the few processes in the world that can deliver this on an industrial scale. One does not abandon that position because a restructuring is difficult. Risk exists, and it should not be denied. The legal processes are uncertain, financing is pressured, and the path through restructuring requires shareholders to continue supporting the company. But the fundamental prerequisites are strong: the patent is real, the demand for the technology is global, and the owner with the greatest industrial interest remains. This is not the profile of a company that is about to disappear – honestly, it sounds more like the profile of a company that is about to find its right form.
  • 4 t sitten
    ·
    4 t sitten
    ·
    Where did rosendal1 go?
  • 20 t sitten
    ·
    20 t sitten
    ·
    So, news came this afternoon. Equity-line The company initially receives 25 MSEK. In addition, Alumni Capital has warrants to buy shares for an additional 25 MSEK I think this is important money to get in considering the restructuring the company is undergoing. They definitely need funds to keep operations going. I believe this is very positive. What do the rest of you think?
    4 t sitten
    ·
    4 t sitten
    ·
    I don't give a shit about this, but one would think so.
  • 22 t sitten
    ·
    22 t sitten
    ·
    🔥🔥🔥
  • 23 t sitten
    ·
    23 t sitten
    ·
    Directed New Issue at 18 öre congratulations
    22 t sitten
    ·
    22 t sitten
    ·
    Incredibly good news 🤩
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2026 Q1 -tulosraportti

Äänite tulossa

2 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    3 t sitten
    ·
    Found this in a Swedish forum and had AI translate it: A technology worth gold – and it's being built in the midst of the storm. On Placeras' forum, the bears are working hard. Posts are raining down about how Enviro is a failed project, how the technology is overrated, and how Infiniteria's demands will bury the company once and for all. It's a well-known pattern – in any restructuring, there are voices interested in amplifying pessimism. But if one lifts their gaze from the noise of the forum threads and looks at what is actually happening, the picture points in another direction. We can start with the simplest measure of a technology's value: how hard someone else is fighting to retain the rights to it. Infiniteria has put forward compensation claims of up to 138 million euro, is pursuing parallel processes in court and arbitration, and publishes press releases on the same day Enviro submits an environmental permit application. This is not the behavior of an unaffected party. This is the behavior of a party that knows they risk losing access to something they cannot replace. And that is precisely what the case is about. Enviro's CFC-technology (patented in 19 countries, capable of producing recycled carbon black with up to 93 percent lower CO₂ emissions than virgin carbon black) is not just a proof-of-concept. It is a proven industrial process in a sector that is under heavy regulatory pressure and desperately seeking circular solutions. Without Enviro's patents, Infiniteria's construction plans in Uddevalla are just a property and a dream scenario. With the patents, it's a business – and that's why they are fighting. In the midst of the storm, construction is underway. While Infiniteria is busy with press releases and legal threats, Enviro is submitting an environmental permit application for its own wholly-owned facility with a planned capacity of over 70,000 tons of end-of-life tires per year, while also securing an option on the property. This is not the behavior of a company that gives up. This is the behavior of a company that knows exactly what it has. The legal basis for terminating the Infiniteria agreements is not weak. The Corporate Restructuring Act gives a debtor undergoing restructuring the right to terminate agreements that are detrimental to its survival. The Gothenburg District Court granted the restructuring, which in itself implies an assessment that the situation qualifies. Infiniteria's compensation claims are large in size and thin in substance: their own words describe them as preliminary, not finally calculated, and partially overlapping with claims already being tried in arbitration. And then there's a player who doesn't appear in the forum threads, but who says more than a thousand posts: Michelin. The world's leading tire manufacturer and Enviro's major shareholder with 20 percent of the capital has not sold. No flagging notifications, no press releases about an exit – nothing. An industrial heavyweight who sits still in the boat when the sea is rough and the stock fluctuates is not indifferent. It's a strong signal. Michelin has set ambitious goals for the circular economy and recycled materials, and Enviro's technology is one of the few processes in the world that can deliver this on an industrial scale. One does not abandon that position because a restructuring is difficult. Risk exists, and it should not be denied. The legal processes are uncertain, financing is pressured, and the path through restructuring requires shareholders to continue supporting the company. But the fundamental prerequisites are strong: the patent is real, the demand for the technology is global, and the owner with the greatest industrial interest remains. This is not the profile of a company that is about to disappear – honestly, it sounds more like the profile of a company that is about to find its right form.
  • 4 t sitten
    ·
    4 t sitten
    ·
    Where did rosendal1 go?
  • 20 t sitten
    ·
    20 t sitten
    ·
    So, news came this afternoon. Equity-line The company initially receives 25 MSEK. In addition, Alumni Capital has warrants to buy shares for an additional 25 MSEK I think this is important money to get in considering the restructuring the company is undergoing. They definitely need funds to keep operations going. I believe this is very positive. What do the rest of you think?
    4 t sitten
    ·
    4 t sitten
    ·
    I don't give a shit about this, but one would think so.
  • 22 t sitten
    ·
    22 t sitten
    ·
    🔥🔥🔥
  • 23 t sitten
    ·
    23 t sitten
    ·
    Directed New Issue at 18 öre congratulations
    22 t sitten
    ·
    22 t sitten
    ·
    Incredibly good news 🤩
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

SwedenFirst North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
71--
8 634--
12 259--
29 411--
10 000--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
24.7.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
27.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
19.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
19.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
14.5.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2026 Q1 -tulosraportti

Äänite tulossa

2 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
24.7.
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
27.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
19.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
19.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
14.5.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    3 t sitten
    ·
    Found this in a Swedish forum and had AI translate it: A technology worth gold – and it's being built in the midst of the storm. On Placeras' forum, the bears are working hard. Posts are raining down about how Enviro is a failed project, how the technology is overrated, and how Infiniteria's demands will bury the company once and for all. It's a well-known pattern – in any restructuring, there are voices interested in amplifying pessimism. But if one lifts their gaze from the noise of the forum threads and looks at what is actually happening, the picture points in another direction. We can start with the simplest measure of a technology's value: how hard someone else is fighting to retain the rights to it. Infiniteria has put forward compensation claims of up to 138 million euro, is pursuing parallel processes in court and arbitration, and publishes press releases on the same day Enviro submits an environmental permit application. This is not the behavior of an unaffected party. This is the behavior of a party that knows they risk losing access to something they cannot replace. And that is precisely what the case is about. Enviro's CFC-technology (patented in 19 countries, capable of producing recycled carbon black with up to 93 percent lower CO₂ emissions than virgin carbon black) is not just a proof-of-concept. It is a proven industrial process in a sector that is under heavy regulatory pressure and desperately seeking circular solutions. Without Enviro's patents, Infiniteria's construction plans in Uddevalla are just a property and a dream scenario. With the patents, it's a business – and that's why they are fighting. In the midst of the storm, construction is underway. While Infiniteria is busy with press releases and legal threats, Enviro is submitting an environmental permit application for its own wholly-owned facility with a planned capacity of over 70,000 tons of end-of-life tires per year, while also securing an option on the property. This is not the behavior of a company that gives up. This is the behavior of a company that knows exactly what it has. The legal basis for terminating the Infiniteria agreements is not weak. The Corporate Restructuring Act gives a debtor undergoing restructuring the right to terminate agreements that are detrimental to its survival. The Gothenburg District Court granted the restructuring, which in itself implies an assessment that the situation qualifies. Infiniteria's compensation claims are large in size and thin in substance: their own words describe them as preliminary, not finally calculated, and partially overlapping with claims already being tried in arbitration. And then there's a player who doesn't appear in the forum threads, but who says more than a thousand posts: Michelin. The world's leading tire manufacturer and Enviro's major shareholder with 20 percent of the capital has not sold. No flagging notifications, no press releases about an exit – nothing. An industrial heavyweight who sits still in the boat when the sea is rough and the stock fluctuates is not indifferent. It's a strong signal. Michelin has set ambitious goals for the circular economy and recycled materials, and Enviro's technology is one of the few processes in the world that can deliver this on an industrial scale. One does not abandon that position because a restructuring is difficult. Risk exists, and it should not be denied. The legal processes are uncertain, financing is pressured, and the path through restructuring requires shareholders to continue supporting the company. But the fundamental prerequisites are strong: the patent is real, the demand for the technology is global, and the owner with the greatest industrial interest remains. This is not the profile of a company that is about to disappear – honestly, it sounds more like the profile of a company that is about to find its right form.
  • 4 t sitten
    ·
    4 t sitten
    ·
    Where did rosendal1 go?
  • 20 t sitten
    ·
    20 t sitten
    ·
    So, news came this afternoon. Equity-line The company initially receives 25 MSEK. In addition, Alumni Capital has warrants to buy shares for an additional 25 MSEK I think this is important money to get in considering the restructuring the company is undergoing. They definitely need funds to keep operations going. I believe this is very positive. What do the rest of you think?
    4 t sitten
    ·
    4 t sitten
    ·
    I don't give a shit about this, but one would think so.
  • 22 t sitten
    ·
    22 t sitten
    ·
    🔥🔥🔥
  • 23 t sitten
    ·
    23 t sitten
    ·
    Directed New Issue at 18 öre congratulations
    22 t sitten
    ·
    22 t sitten
    ·
    Incredibly good news 🤩
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

SwedenFirst North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
71--
8 634--
12 259--
29 411--
10 000--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt