2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
49 päivää sitten
‧55 min
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·15 min sittenGreet Skogman that I admire his boldness ,,, and agree with those who think that the "Sivers" case has not changed and that is why the stock goes back to exactly 3 kr where the case was unchanged for a longer time with a small difference that there are many more shares after the latest NE and approx 12000 new shareholders with red holdings and a few kronor poorer and a lesson richer.
·41 min sittenHi. Yes, now it has come down quite a bit. Soon under 20. A piece of advice for those of you who are stuck in the bull theory... 1: When a company goes down, do NOT start hoping it will go up . This is a situation where one must be afraid of further falls. 2: If one is in an uptrend, one can stay in. 3: Check the company, is the company making good profits or not, if not BE AFRAID instead of blindly hoping. Good luck. Now time for a swim on the warmest day of the year.
I don't blindly hope, I have rules I've set up and follow. If it goes down, trim the holding, taking some profit always beats losing everything or a lot. Blindly hoping is also different from what I believe will happen and what the company has indicated it is working on. Have a good one in the heat, don't forget your hydration breaks!- ·2 t sitten · MuokattuThe thesis on sivers is not broken for my part, nothing has changed, except for speculations. Then that the entire AI sector is going down which actually has nothing to do with sivers but is related technology (and sivers is not alone in this) We will see if they sell or not. Sivers' name has become more strengthened as it has been mentioned in 3 reports that laser will be needed, which sivers among others provides. This does not mean that the money will come directly, but all reports also point to volume starting in the second half of 2026 or 2027. Then that it temporarily goes down is not the end of the world. People look too much at the news and stock price and panic. But that's just my opinion, everyone gets to follow their own and hope that they made good decisions that only the future can decide. Still in profit on sivers.
I would, however, like to point out that your thesis, too, is very much built on speculation. What strengthens your thesis, then, are reports where Sivers is mentioned in passing - as one of several potential distributors (and where the other two today have a large and growing production - while Sivers, as is well known, has extremely low production and sales). In one of the reports (by Morgan Stanley) it is also mentioned that the companies in Sivers' sector are valued higher than justifiable from an investment decision. Finally, nothing appears in any report about actual productions or won orders. These are reports stating that Sivers is part of a test production line, where Sivers, then, perhaps, could be included as a sub-component as part of a potential sale. Is this what are the driving points behind Sivers surging from 3-100kr? And what makes you not feel concern now that it has crashed almost straight down by approx. 66%? Do you feel that experts, analysts, and economists commenting in various media weigh less and have less impact than, for example, these three reports where Sivers is mentioned a little in passing? I am honestly trying to understand how you, despite what has happened in recent weeks, do not feel that your long-term thesis has been significantly affected? 
·2 t sittenThe smartest of them all was "He" who sold his 1.4 million shares and took home 100 million in profit. Before all the shit came to light, "he" probably has the cleanest conscience of all the "insiders"... Harish Krishnaswamy...the name is quite familiar, isn't it? Talk about this company having managed its obligations to shareholders like hell, even a delayed report so several other insiders could sell off their "lock up"...We'll see where we end up, sivers and other names are affected quite a bit when adjacent sectors move a lot. However, the CEO also bought with their own money, or am I wrong? 😊 A lot of speculation about negative or positive before we know or see what has been sold or not.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
49 päivää sitten
‧55 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·15 min sittenGreet Skogman that I admire his boldness ,,, and agree with those who think that the "Sivers" case has not changed and that is why the stock goes back to exactly 3 kr where the case was unchanged for a longer time with a small difference that there are many more shares after the latest NE and approx 12000 new shareholders with red holdings and a few kronor poorer and a lesson richer.
- ·41 min sittenHi. Yes, now it has come down quite a bit. Soon under 20. A piece of advice for those of you who are stuck in the bull theory... 1: When a company goes down, do NOT start hoping it will go up . This is a situation where one must be afraid of further falls. 2: If one is in an uptrend, one can stay in. 3: Check the company, is the company making good profits or not, if not BE AFRAID instead of blindly hoping. Good luck. Now time for a swim on the warmest day of the year.I don't blindly hope, I have rules I've set up and follow. If it goes down, trim the holding, taking some profit always beats losing everything or a lot. Blindly hoping is also different from what I believe will happen and what the company has indicated it is working on. Have a good one in the heat, don't forget your hydration breaks!
- ·2 t sitten · MuokattuThe thesis on sivers is not broken for my part, nothing has changed, except for speculations. Then that the entire AI sector is going down which actually has nothing to do with sivers but is related technology (and sivers is not alone in this) We will see if they sell or not. Sivers' name has become more strengthened as it has been mentioned in 3 reports that laser will be needed, which sivers among others provides. This does not mean that the money will come directly, but all reports also point to volume starting in the second half of 2026 or 2027. Then that it temporarily goes down is not the end of the world. People look too much at the news and stock price and panic. But that's just my opinion, everyone gets to follow their own and hope that they made good decisions that only the future can decide. Still in profit on sivers.I would, however, like to point out that your thesis, too, is very much built on speculation. What strengthens your thesis, then, are reports where Sivers is mentioned in passing - as one of several potential distributors (and where the other two today have a large and growing production - while Sivers, as is well known, has extremely low production and sales). In one of the reports (by Morgan Stanley) it is also mentioned that the companies in Sivers' sector are valued higher than justifiable from an investment decision. Finally, nothing appears in any report about actual productions or won orders. These are reports stating that Sivers is part of a test production line, where Sivers, then, perhaps, could be included as a sub-component as part of a potential sale. Is this what are the driving points behind Sivers surging from 3-100kr? And what makes you not feel concern now that it has crashed almost straight down by approx. 66%? Do you feel that experts, analysts, and economists commenting in various media weigh less and have less impact than, for example, these three reports where Sivers is mentioned a little in passing? I am honestly trying to understand how you, despite what has happened in recent weeks, do not feel that your long-term thesis has been significantly affected?
- ·2 t sittenThe smartest of them all was "He" who sold his 1.4 million shares and took home 100 million in profit. Before all the shit came to light, "he" probably has the cleanest conscience of all the "insiders"... Harish Krishnaswamy...the name is quite familiar, isn't it? Talk about this company having managed its obligations to shareholders like hell, even a delayed report so several other insiders could sell off their "lock up"...We'll see where we end up, sivers and other names are affected quite a bit when adjacent sectors move a lot. However, the CEO also bought with their own money, or am I wrong? 😊 A lot of speculation about negative or positive before we know or see what has been sold or not.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
49 päivää sitten
‧55 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 8.5.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·15 min sittenGreet Skogman that I admire his boldness ,,, and agree with those who think that the "Sivers" case has not changed and that is why the stock goes back to exactly 3 kr where the case was unchanged for a longer time with a small difference that there are many more shares after the latest NE and approx 12000 new shareholders with red holdings and a few kronor poorer and a lesson richer.
- ·41 min sittenHi. Yes, now it has come down quite a bit. Soon under 20. A piece of advice for those of you who are stuck in the bull theory... 1: When a company goes down, do NOT start hoping it will go up . This is a situation where one must be afraid of further falls. 2: If one is in an uptrend, one can stay in. 3: Check the company, is the company making good profits or not, if not BE AFRAID instead of blindly hoping. Good luck. Now time for a swim on the warmest day of the year.I don't blindly hope, I have rules I've set up and follow. If it goes down, trim the holding, taking some profit always beats losing everything or a lot. Blindly hoping is also different from what I believe will happen and what the company has indicated it is working on. Have a good one in the heat, don't forget your hydration breaks!
- ·2 t sitten · MuokattuThe thesis on sivers is not broken for my part, nothing has changed, except for speculations. Then that the entire AI sector is going down which actually has nothing to do with sivers but is related technology (and sivers is not alone in this) We will see if they sell or not. Sivers' name has become more strengthened as it has been mentioned in 3 reports that laser will be needed, which sivers among others provides. This does not mean that the money will come directly, but all reports also point to volume starting in the second half of 2026 or 2027. Then that it temporarily goes down is not the end of the world. People look too much at the news and stock price and panic. But that's just my opinion, everyone gets to follow their own and hope that they made good decisions that only the future can decide. Still in profit on sivers.I would, however, like to point out that your thesis, too, is very much built on speculation. What strengthens your thesis, then, are reports where Sivers is mentioned in passing - as one of several potential distributors (and where the other two today have a large and growing production - while Sivers, as is well known, has extremely low production and sales). In one of the reports (by Morgan Stanley) it is also mentioned that the companies in Sivers' sector are valued higher than justifiable from an investment decision. Finally, nothing appears in any report about actual productions or won orders. These are reports stating that Sivers is part of a test production line, where Sivers, then, perhaps, could be included as a sub-component as part of a potential sale. Is this what are the driving points behind Sivers surging from 3-100kr? And what makes you not feel concern now that it has crashed almost straight down by approx. 66%? Do you feel that experts, analysts, and economists commenting in various media weigh less and have less impact than, for example, these three reports where Sivers is mentioned a little in passing? I am honestly trying to understand how you, despite what has happened in recent weeks, do not feel that your long-term thesis has been significantly affected?
- ·2 t sittenThe smartest of them all was "He" who sold his 1.4 million shares and took home 100 million in profit. Before all the shit came to light, "he" probably has the cleanest conscience of all the "insiders"... Harish Krishnaswamy...the name is quite familiar, isn't it? Talk about this company having managed its obligations to shareholders like hell, even a delayed report so several other insiders could sell off their "lock up"...We'll see where we end up, sivers and other names are affected quite a bit when adjacent sectors move a lot. However, the CEO also bought with their own money, or am I wrong? 😊 A lot of speculation about negative or positive before we know or see what has been sold or not.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt