
Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF - (USD) Accumulating
Tarjoustasot
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,07%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaMaailma suuryhtiöt sekatyyli osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
This Fund seeks to track the performance of the Index.In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Fund aims to provide a return which, before the application of fees and expenses, is similar to the return of the Index. The Fund employs a “passive management” – or indexing – investment approach, through physical acquisition of securities, designed to track the performance of the Index.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Omistukset
Jakauma
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
- 8 t sittenJenkkimarkkina ajaa etf alaspäin. Sopii hyvin. $4 vois ottaa taas satsin.No, it is not this ETF that is being pushed down. It is the entire index that this ETF and many other ETFs follow.
- ·2 päivää sittenConsidering that this ETF should take over from iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS), where I have invested a significant amount. Vanguard ETF is interesting with lower costs and a coverage of the entire world market low, mid, large. But is this change a wise choice? I will keep my iShares holding.I don't know if you Danes are as unlucky as Norwegians here on Nordnet and get high currency exchange fees (since DKK is pegged to EUR?). EUNL/IWDA.AS But switching costs 0.5%, so you must have a minimum 4-year horizon for break even (fee-wise). The bigger question is whether you should go with FTSE Global All-Cap (9000ish global companies in both developed and emerging markets) vs MSCI World (1300ish companies in developed markets). I believe both ETFs are good, but that in the future one should at least look at ETFs with the lowest possible annual fee. Xtrackers MSCI World ETF 1C could be an alternative (0.12%), for future investment.
- 2 päivää sittenHyvä, että löysin tämän etf. Nyt vaan maltilla 500€/kk tänne. Eipä tarvii muuta.2 päivää sittenKannattaa ehkä odottaa, että tulee kk-säästöön. 500e/kk summasta joutuu kuitenkin maksamaan 3 % kulun, joten pienemmillä summilla ei välttämättä ole järkeä tehdä erillistä ostoa.
- ·3 päivää sittenANNUAL costs: 0.07%+0,02%=0,09% per FACT SHEET3 päivää sittenAn estimate of trading costs from portfolio changes, not a fixed fee. The methodology is a known weak point of EU rules: it can't cleanly separate real trading cost from normal market movement, and can produce negative values. EU rules floor these at zero, so a 0.00% figure may just mean flooring, not genuinely low cost. This mainly affects physically replicated funds; swap-based funds tend to score low here because the fund only trades a substitute basket (often lower-turnover, not required to match the index), while the actual index return comes through a derivative that doesn't count as a portfolio transaction under PRIIPs. The KID's itemized table (ongoing, transaction, incidental costs as separate rows) is reliable read at that level. Be wary of any bundled total, in the KID's "Annual Cost Impact" or on a provider's website, since it mixes one stable figure with one volatile estimate. Don't add it to another fund's plain TER. Once a fund has a few years of history, Tracking Difference is a better real-world measure of trading impact than any of these disclosures.
Uutiset
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,07%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaMaailma suuryhtiöt sekatyyli osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
This Fund seeks to track the performance of the Index.In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Fund aims to provide a return which, before the application of fees and expenses, is similar to the return of the Index. The Fund employs a “passive management” – or indexing – investment approach, through physical acquisition of securities, designed to track the performance of the Index.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Tarjoustasot
Omistukset
Jakauma
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
- 8 t sittenJenkkimarkkina ajaa etf alaspäin. Sopii hyvin. $4 vois ottaa taas satsin.No, it is not this ETF that is being pushed down. It is the entire index that this ETF and many other ETFs follow.
- ·2 päivää sittenConsidering that this ETF should take over from iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS), where I have invested a significant amount. Vanguard ETF is interesting with lower costs and a coverage of the entire world market low, mid, large. But is this change a wise choice? I will keep my iShares holding.I don't know if you Danes are as unlucky as Norwegians here on Nordnet and get high currency exchange fees (since DKK is pegged to EUR?). EUNL/IWDA.AS But switching costs 0.5%, so you must have a minimum 4-year horizon for break even (fee-wise). The bigger question is whether you should go with FTSE Global All-Cap (9000ish global companies in both developed and emerging markets) vs MSCI World (1300ish companies in developed markets). I believe both ETFs are good, but that in the future one should at least look at ETFs with the lowest possible annual fee. Xtrackers MSCI World ETF 1C could be an alternative (0.12%), for future investment.
- 2 päivää sittenHyvä, että löysin tämän etf. Nyt vaan maltilla 500€/kk tänne. Eipä tarvii muuta.2 päivää sittenKannattaa ehkä odottaa, että tulee kk-säästöön. 500e/kk summasta joutuu kuitenkin maksamaan 3 % kulun, joten pienemmillä summilla ei välttämättä ole järkeä tehdä erillistä ostoa.
- ·3 päivää sittenANNUAL costs: 0.07%+0,02%=0,09% per FACT SHEET3 päivää sittenAn estimate of trading costs from portfolio changes, not a fixed fee. The methodology is a known weak point of EU rules: it can't cleanly separate real trading cost from normal market movement, and can produce negative values. EU rules floor these at zero, so a 0.00% figure may just mean flooring, not genuinely low cost. This mainly affects physically replicated funds; swap-based funds tend to score low here because the fund only trades a substitute basket (often lower-turnover, not required to match the index), while the actual index return comes through a derivative that doesn't count as a portfolio transaction under PRIIPs. The KID's itemized table (ongoing, transaction, incidental costs as separate rows) is reliable read at that level. Be wary of any bundled total, in the KID's "Annual Cost Impact" or on a provider's website, since it mixes one stable figure with one volatile estimate. Don't add it to another fund's plain TER. Once a fund has a few years of history, Tracking Difference is a better real-world measure of trading impact than any of these disclosures.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut0,07%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaMaailma suuryhtiöt sekatyyli osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- OsinkopolitiikkaKasvuosuudet
- Avaintietoasiakirja
This Fund seeks to track the performance of the Index.In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Fund aims to provide a return which, before the application of fees and expenses, is similar to the return of the Index. The Fund employs a “passive management” – or indexing – investment approach, through physical acquisition of securities, designed to track the performance of the Index.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Foorumi
- 8 t sittenJenkkimarkkina ajaa etf alaspäin. Sopii hyvin. $4 vois ottaa taas satsin.No, it is not this ETF that is being pushed down. It is the entire index that this ETF and many other ETFs follow.
- ·2 päivää sittenConsidering that this ETF should take over from iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS), where I have invested a significant amount. Vanguard ETF is interesting with lower costs and a coverage of the entire world market low, mid, large. But is this change a wise choice? I will keep my iShares holding.I don't know if you Danes are as unlucky as Norwegians here on Nordnet and get high currency exchange fees (since DKK is pegged to EUR?). EUNL/IWDA.AS But switching costs 0.5%, so you must have a minimum 4-year horizon for break even (fee-wise). The bigger question is whether you should go with FTSE Global All-Cap (9000ish global companies in both developed and emerging markets) vs MSCI World (1300ish companies in developed markets). I believe both ETFs are good, but that in the future one should at least look at ETFs with the lowest possible annual fee. Xtrackers MSCI World ETF 1C could be an alternative (0.12%), for future investment.
- 2 päivää sittenHyvä, että löysin tämän etf. Nyt vaan maltilla 500€/kk tänne. Eipä tarvii muuta.2 päivää sittenKannattaa ehkä odottaa, että tulee kk-säästöön. 500e/kk summasta joutuu kuitenkin maksamaan 3 % kulun, joten pienemmillä summilla ei välttämättä ole järkeä tehdä erillistä ostoa.
- ·3 päivää sittenANNUAL costs: 0.07%+0,02%=0,09% per FACT SHEET3 päivää sittenAn estimate of trading costs from portfolio changes, not a fixed fee. The methodology is a known weak point of EU rules: it can't cleanly separate real trading cost from normal market movement, and can produce negative values. EU rules floor these at zero, so a 0.00% figure may just mean flooring, not genuinely low cost. This mainly affects physically replicated funds; swap-based funds tend to score low here because the fund only trades a substitute basket (often lower-turnover, not required to match the index), while the actual index return comes through a derivative that doesn't count as a portfolio transaction under PRIIPs. The KID's itemized table (ongoing, transaction, incidental costs as separate rows) is reliable read at that level. Be wary of any bundled total, in the KID's "Annual Cost Impact" or on a provider's website, since it mixes one stable figure with one volatile estimate. Don't add it to another fund's plain TER. Once a fund has a few years of history, Tracking Difference is a better real-world measure of trading impact than any of these disclosures.



