6

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD Distributing
Tarjoustasot
Tunnusluvut
Juoksevat kulut
0,45%Omaisuusluokka
OsakeKategoria
Yhdysvallat osinko-osakkeetPerusvaluutta
EUROsinkopolitiikka
Tuotto-osuudetAvaintietoasiakirja
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the price and yield performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100® BuyWrite V2 UCITS Index (the “Index”).
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Omistukset
Jakauma
- Muut100%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
- HANetf YieldMax Semiconductor Option Income UCITS ETF - Dist

- HANetf YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF

- JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD (dist)

- HANetf REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF

- HANetf REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF - Dist

- Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist

Foorumi
- ·19.1. · MuokattuDividend again today then. A little over 1% of the value. And with a 3.51% value appreciation since I bought on June 30, 2025, I'm quite satisfied. As I understand it, this ETF sells at the money CC, which places a stronger limitation on value appreciation. But I choose to keep this as an experiment. I also have some that sell CC out of the money with 5-10%, but there the dividend is possibly a bit lower. Fun to see going forward.17.3.Correct me if I'm wrong, but QYLE has actually been performing quite well (for what it's designed) for the last 12 months. Total gain for me in abt. 11 months is 14% and It's sibling XY7D has performed even better. The performance difference between QYLE and US-based QYLD is mainly currency based (USD weakening against EUR). I'm not a fan of UCITS rules either, but when it comes to "socialist shithole", QYLE is domiciled in Ireland, so 0% taxes at the source vs, 15% from US-based QYLD (at least in Nordnet Finland).
- ·2.10.2025Before investing in Covered Calls strategies, I recommend watching this Youtube video from Ben Felix: https://youtu.be/ygVObRx9X68?si=5cuWDJiSZqy_fduU Unfortunately, I fell into the trap myself before I saw this - was attracted by a high dividend yield, but overlooked that you lose the upside potential on the stock uptrend. I can quite clearly see from the performance of this ETF in 2025 that you have participated in the downtrend in March, April, May, while the uptrend in subsequent months was capped/limited - due to the strategy's methodology. You should consider whether this is an optimal strategy for yourself - especially if you are a long-term investor. Sell my investment in this ETF now and put the money in something better - e.g. just a "regular" index ETF.
Uutiset
Tunnusluvut
Juoksevat kulut
0,45%Omaisuusluokka
OsakeKategoria
Yhdysvallat osinko-osakkeetPerusvaluutta
EUROsinkopolitiikka
Tuotto-osuudetAvaintietoasiakirja
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the price and yield performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100® BuyWrite V2 UCITS Index (the “Index”).
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Tarjoustasot
Omistukset
Jakauma
- Muut100%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
- HANetf YieldMax Semiconductor Option Income UCITS ETF - Dist

- HANetf YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF

- JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD (dist)

- HANetf REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF

- HANetf REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF - Dist

- Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist

Foorumi
- ·19.1. · MuokattuDividend again today then. A little over 1% of the value. And with a 3.51% value appreciation since I bought on June 30, 2025, I'm quite satisfied. As I understand it, this ETF sells at the money CC, which places a stronger limitation on value appreciation. But I choose to keep this as an experiment. I also have some that sell CC out of the money with 5-10%, but there the dividend is possibly a bit lower. Fun to see going forward.17.3.Correct me if I'm wrong, but QYLE has actually been performing quite well (for what it's designed) for the last 12 months. Total gain for me in abt. 11 months is 14% and It's sibling XY7D has performed even better. The performance difference between QYLE and US-based QYLD is mainly currency based (USD weakening against EUR). I'm not a fan of UCITS rules either, but when it comes to "socialist shithole", QYLE is domiciled in Ireland, so 0% taxes at the source vs, 15% from US-based QYLD (at least in Nordnet Finland).
- ·2.10.2025Before investing in Covered Calls strategies, I recommend watching this Youtube video from Ben Felix: https://youtu.be/ygVObRx9X68?si=5cuWDJiSZqy_fduU Unfortunately, I fell into the trap myself before I saw this - was attracted by a high dividend yield, but overlooked that you lose the upside potential on the stock uptrend. I can quite clearly see from the performance of this ETF in 2025 that you have participated in the downtrend in March, April, May, while the uptrend in subsequent months was capped/limited - due to the strategy's methodology. You should consider whether this is an optimal strategy for yourself - especially if you are a long-term investor. Sell my investment in this ETF now and put the money in something better - e.g. just a "regular" index ETF.
Tunnusluvut
Juoksevat kulut
0,45%Omaisuusluokka
OsakeKategoria
Yhdysvallat osinko-osakkeetPerusvaluutta
EUROsinkopolitiikka
Tuotto-osuudetAvaintietoasiakirja
The investment objective of the Fund is to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the price and yield performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100® BuyWrite V2 UCITS Index (the “Index”).
Vastaavan tyyppisiä ETF:iä
Uutiset
Foorumi
- ·19.1. · MuokattuDividend again today then. A little over 1% of the value. And with a 3.51% value appreciation since I bought on June 30, 2025, I'm quite satisfied. As I understand it, this ETF sells at the money CC, which places a stronger limitation on value appreciation. But I choose to keep this as an experiment. I also have some that sell CC out of the money with 5-10%, but there the dividend is possibly a bit lower. Fun to see going forward.17.3.Correct me if I'm wrong, but QYLE has actually been performing quite well (for what it's designed) for the last 12 months. Total gain for me in abt. 11 months is 14% and It's sibling XY7D has performed even better. The performance difference between QYLE and US-based QYLD is mainly currency based (USD weakening against EUR). I'm not a fan of UCITS rules either, but when it comes to "socialist shithole", QYLE is domiciled in Ireland, so 0% taxes at the source vs, 15% from US-based QYLD (at least in Nordnet Finland).
- ·2.10.2025Before investing in Covered Calls strategies, I recommend watching this Youtube video from Ben Felix: https://youtu.be/ygVObRx9X68?si=5cuWDJiSZqy_fduU Unfortunately, I fell into the trap myself before I saw this - was attracted by a high dividend yield, but overlooked that you lose the upside potential on the stock uptrend. I can quite clearly see from the performance of this ETF in 2025 that you have participated in the downtrend in March, April, May, while the uptrend in subsequent months was capped/limited - due to the strategy's methodology. You should consider whether this is an optimal strategy for yourself - especially if you are a long-term investor. Sell my investment in this ETF now and put the money in something better - e.g. just a "regular" index ETF.
Tarjoustasot
Omistukset
Jakauma
- Muut100%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
- HANetf YieldMax Semiconductor Option Income UCITS ETF - Dist

- HANetf YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF

- JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD (dist)

- HANetf REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF

- HANetf REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF - Dist

- Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist


