2026 Q3 -tulosraportti
84 päivää sitten
‧1 t 2 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
52,18VWAP
Alin
50,12VaihtoMäärä
57,4 2 032 650
VWAP
Ylin
52,18Alin
50,12VaihtoMäärä
57,4 2 032 650
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.12.2025 | ||
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.9.2025 | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 25.6.2025 | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 5.6.2025 | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.3.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenHuman oversight: Claude Code Security suggests fixes, but no changes are applied without a human developer or analyst approving it. Holistic security: Claude primarily focuses on code (AppSec). It does not replace the need for security around networks, identity management (IAM), cloud infrastructure, SOC work (Security Operations Center), or threat monitoring. AI hallucinations: Although AI is powerful, Anthropic itself has admitted that the model can hallucinate (make things up) and exaggerate findings during autonomous operations. New attack surfaces: The use of AI agents that have access to run commands (bash) and modify files creates new security risks that must be monitored by humans. Conclusion: Change, not obsolescence Traditional security firms that rely solely on simple, rule-based scans may become obsolete. But the security industry as a whole will rather experience a transformation, where AI tools like Claude become part of the arsenal to handle the enormous amounts of vulnerabilities, while humans focus on strategy, complex threats, and verification. The market's reaction (falling stock prices) reflects the fear that AI could "eat" parts of the market, rather than an immediate eradication of the security industry.
2 päivää sitten2 päivää sittenDont worry.. just hold coolth, aim and when person comes to the away tree, then shoot :)
·1 päivä sitten;-) Hooray! Almost an alpine experience...
·21.2.Interesting how the market interprets how Rubrik is affected by new AI solutions like Claude Code Security. While the stock market reacts with fear that Claude Code Security will make Rubrik redundant, Rubrik's strategy is the opposite. The more autonomy and power one gives to AI agents like Anthropic's tools, the more one needs Rubrik to keep an eye on things. Rubrik will rather be able to leverage this AI agent wave to sell "insurance and governance" to help companies ensure control when AI scales. Does anyone interpret the situation differently?
·3 päivää sittenI think you are absolutely right, and that this stock is being unfairly punished👍😘
3.2.3.2.Almost every other vendor is an application running inside an enterprise org’s stack. If you ransomware their storage vendor, like say NetApp (and this is happening a lot more often) or you ransomware their IDP, or their hypervisor, both of which are becoming common, those other backup vendors are “in the blast radius”. IOW Commvault or Veeam is running inside a VM on a VMware ESXi server, using NetAPP storage. If that VMware server, or NetAPP San has just been ransomwared it means Commvault or Veeam is now dead and inaccessible. The backup application just got encrypted itself. You have to recover your backup solution before you can begin to recover your environment. Rubrik is deployed and runs outside of the traditional application stacks on its own hardened, airgapped, appliances. Beyond that you can’t delete backups without a quorum of approvals and sometimes support has to be involved. Data written to a Rubrik appliance is, functionally, read only. You can’t just connect to the SAN management interface and delete the volume Rubrik runs on. These features mean Rubrik has to have its own hardware and is an island into itself in the enterprise Datacenter. Other vendors can get to a similar posture, but it’s dependent on services and very significant configuration modifications and highly specialized people to ensure those config changes are done correctly and applied continuously over time. Rubrik it’s all like that by default. Also, Rubrik has its own monatomic clock that ensures attackers can’t just trick the backup apps that it’s 7 years in the future and the backups can be deleted now. A common attack. These were liabilities to Rubrik 10 years ago. It meant very high cost for backups and at the time the mentality was backups should be lowest cost option per TB. Ransomware completely changed that dynamic. Immutability used to be an expensive novelty, now it’s table stakes. -Reddit post from RBRK channel
·2.2.Does anyone have an idea why cybersecurity stocks have had a tough start this year, and especially Rubirk? 24 recommend buy 1 hold It damn well must make a rocket turnaround at some point 😅
7.2.7.2.Well, my logic says that even if there would be an AI bubble burst, the technology is still there and cyber attackers are not dependent on stock prices. Even if all entities cannot harness AI to their full potential, one hostile entity can still harness it to harm all. Then again, the market is not always behaving logically. I wouldn't be surprised if at somepoint there is a surge for protection after a major cyber security incident.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti
84 päivää sitten
‧1 t 2 min
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenHuman oversight: Claude Code Security suggests fixes, but no changes are applied without a human developer or analyst approving it. Holistic security: Claude primarily focuses on code (AppSec). It does not replace the need for security around networks, identity management (IAM), cloud infrastructure, SOC work (Security Operations Center), or threat monitoring. AI hallucinations: Although AI is powerful, Anthropic itself has admitted that the model can hallucinate (make things up) and exaggerate findings during autonomous operations. New attack surfaces: The use of AI agents that have access to run commands (bash) and modify files creates new security risks that must be monitored by humans. Conclusion: Change, not obsolescence Traditional security firms that rely solely on simple, rule-based scans may become obsolete. But the security industry as a whole will rather experience a transformation, where AI tools like Claude become part of the arsenal to handle the enormous amounts of vulnerabilities, while humans focus on strategy, complex threats, and verification. The market's reaction (falling stock prices) reflects the fear that AI could "eat" parts of the market, rather than an immediate eradication of the security industry.
- 2 päivää sitten2 päivää sittenDont worry.. just hold coolth, aim and when person comes to the away tree, then shoot :)·1 päivä sitten;-) Hooray! Almost an alpine experience...
- ·21.2.Interesting how the market interprets how Rubrik is affected by new AI solutions like Claude Code Security. While the stock market reacts with fear that Claude Code Security will make Rubrik redundant, Rubrik's strategy is the opposite. The more autonomy and power one gives to AI agents like Anthropic's tools, the more one needs Rubrik to keep an eye on things. Rubrik will rather be able to leverage this AI agent wave to sell "insurance and governance" to help companies ensure control when AI scales. Does anyone interpret the situation differently?·3 päivää sittenI think you are absolutely right, and that this stock is being unfairly punished👍😘
- 3.2.3.2.Almost every other vendor is an application running inside an enterprise org’s stack. If you ransomware their storage vendor, like say NetApp (and this is happening a lot more often) or you ransomware their IDP, or their hypervisor, both of which are becoming common, those other backup vendors are “in the blast radius”. IOW Commvault or Veeam is running inside a VM on a VMware ESXi server, using NetAPP storage. If that VMware server, or NetAPP San has just been ransomwared it means Commvault or Veeam is now dead and inaccessible. The backup application just got encrypted itself. You have to recover your backup solution before you can begin to recover your environment. Rubrik is deployed and runs outside of the traditional application stacks on its own hardened, airgapped, appliances. Beyond that you can’t delete backups without a quorum of approvals and sometimes support has to be involved. Data written to a Rubrik appliance is, functionally, read only. You can’t just connect to the SAN management interface and delete the volume Rubrik runs on. These features mean Rubrik has to have its own hardware and is an island into itself in the enterprise Datacenter. Other vendors can get to a similar posture, but it’s dependent on services and very significant configuration modifications and highly specialized people to ensure those config changes are done correctly and applied continuously over time. Rubrik it’s all like that by default. Also, Rubrik has its own monatomic clock that ensures attackers can’t just trick the backup apps that it’s 7 years in the future and the backups can be deleted now. A common attack. These were liabilities to Rubrik 10 years ago. It meant very high cost for backups and at the time the mentality was backups should be lowest cost option per TB. Ransomware completely changed that dynamic. Immutability used to be an expensive novelty, now it’s table stakes. -Reddit post from RBRK channel
- ·2.2.Does anyone have an idea why cybersecurity stocks have had a tough start this year, and especially Rubirk? 24 recommend buy 1 hold It damn well must make a rocket turnaround at some point 😅7.2.7.2.Well, my logic says that even if there would be an AI bubble burst, the technology is still there and cyber attackers are not dependent on stock prices. Even if all entities cannot harness AI to their full potential, one hostile entity can still harness it to harm all. Then again, the market is not always behaving logically. I wouldn't be surprised if at somepoint there is a surge for protection after a major cyber security incident.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
52,18VWAP
Alin
50,12VaihtoMäärä
57,4 2 032 650
VWAP
Ylin
52,18Alin
50,12VaihtoMäärä
57,4 2 032 650
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.12.2025 | ||
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.9.2025 | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 25.6.2025 | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 5.6.2025 | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.3.2025 |
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti
84 päivää sitten
‧1 t 2 min
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.12.2025 | ||
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.9.2025 | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 25.6.2025 | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 5.6.2025 | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.3.2025 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenHuman oversight: Claude Code Security suggests fixes, but no changes are applied without a human developer or analyst approving it. Holistic security: Claude primarily focuses on code (AppSec). It does not replace the need for security around networks, identity management (IAM), cloud infrastructure, SOC work (Security Operations Center), or threat monitoring. AI hallucinations: Although AI is powerful, Anthropic itself has admitted that the model can hallucinate (make things up) and exaggerate findings during autonomous operations. New attack surfaces: The use of AI agents that have access to run commands (bash) and modify files creates new security risks that must be monitored by humans. Conclusion: Change, not obsolescence Traditional security firms that rely solely on simple, rule-based scans may become obsolete. But the security industry as a whole will rather experience a transformation, where AI tools like Claude become part of the arsenal to handle the enormous amounts of vulnerabilities, while humans focus on strategy, complex threats, and verification. The market's reaction (falling stock prices) reflects the fear that AI could "eat" parts of the market, rather than an immediate eradication of the security industry.
- 2 päivää sitten2 päivää sittenDont worry.. just hold coolth, aim and when person comes to the away tree, then shoot :)·1 päivä sitten;-) Hooray! Almost an alpine experience...
- ·21.2.Interesting how the market interprets how Rubrik is affected by new AI solutions like Claude Code Security. While the stock market reacts with fear that Claude Code Security will make Rubrik redundant, Rubrik's strategy is the opposite. The more autonomy and power one gives to AI agents like Anthropic's tools, the more one needs Rubrik to keep an eye on things. Rubrik will rather be able to leverage this AI agent wave to sell "insurance and governance" to help companies ensure control when AI scales. Does anyone interpret the situation differently?·3 päivää sittenI think you are absolutely right, and that this stock is being unfairly punished👍😘
- 3.2.3.2.Almost every other vendor is an application running inside an enterprise org’s stack. If you ransomware their storage vendor, like say NetApp (and this is happening a lot more often) or you ransomware their IDP, or their hypervisor, both of which are becoming common, those other backup vendors are “in the blast radius”. IOW Commvault or Veeam is running inside a VM on a VMware ESXi server, using NetAPP storage. If that VMware server, or NetAPP San has just been ransomwared it means Commvault or Veeam is now dead and inaccessible. The backup application just got encrypted itself. You have to recover your backup solution before you can begin to recover your environment. Rubrik is deployed and runs outside of the traditional application stacks on its own hardened, airgapped, appliances. Beyond that you can’t delete backups without a quorum of approvals and sometimes support has to be involved. Data written to a Rubrik appliance is, functionally, read only. You can’t just connect to the SAN management interface and delete the volume Rubrik runs on. These features mean Rubrik has to have its own hardware and is an island into itself in the enterprise Datacenter. Other vendors can get to a similar posture, but it’s dependent on services and very significant configuration modifications and highly specialized people to ensure those config changes are done correctly and applied continuously over time. Rubrik it’s all like that by default. Also, Rubrik has its own monatomic clock that ensures attackers can’t just trick the backup apps that it’s 7 years in the future and the backups can be deleted now. A common attack. These were liabilities to Rubrik 10 years ago. It meant very high cost for backups and at the time the mentality was backups should be lowest cost option per TB. Ransomware completely changed that dynamic. Immutability used to be an expensive novelty, now it’s table stakes. -Reddit post from RBRK channel
- ·2.2.Does anyone have an idea why cybersecurity stocks have had a tough start this year, and especially Rubirk? 24 recommend buy 1 hold It damn well must make a rocket turnaround at some point 😅7.2.7.2.Well, my logic says that even if there would be an AI bubble burst, the technology is still there and cyber attackers are not dependent on stock prices. Even if all entities cannot harness AI to their full potential, one hostile entity can still harness it to harm all. Then again, the market is not always behaving logically. I wouldn't be surprised if at somepoint there is a surge for protection after a major cyber security incident.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
52,18VWAP
Alin
50,12VaihtoMäärä
57,4 2 032 650
VWAP
Ylin
52,18Alin
50,12VaihtoMäärä
57,4 2 032 650
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt