Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
42 päivää sitten
480,00 DKK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 26.3.
6,19%Tuotto/v

Tarjoustasot

DenmarkNasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
2--
2--
1--
2--
2--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Ostaneet eniten

Ostaneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi6 7926 79200

Myyneet eniten

Myyneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi6 7926 79200

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
7.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
5.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
6.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
8.5.2025
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025
18.3.2025

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 50 min sitten
    ·
    50 min sitten
    ·
    The war in the Middle East is sending shockwaves through the energy markets, and logistics giant Maersk is now taking steps aimed at the Nordic market. As a result of a sharp increase in fuel prices, the company is introducing a temporary emergency surcharge on transport in the Nordics and Baltics. The «Emergency Inland Fuel/Energy Surcharge» applies to all inland shipments in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania. The fee came into effect on Wednesday, March 18, and varies between countries – from 1.5 percent in Norway to 15.5 percent in Estonia. The surcharge affects all so-called «Store Door» shipments. These are assignments where Maersk is responsible for the entire chain, from «loading point to export port, and/or from discharge port to final delivery address». Maersk specifies that the rates will be updated on a weekly basis going forward, given the highly volatile situation. Furthermore, it is stated that customers using the company's green solutions are currently exempt from the surcharge. «Solutions with electric trucks and rail are currently not affected, but we will continue to monitor the situation closely,» the company writes.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    The escalating conflict in the Middle East is causing full disruption in container shipping – and the bill is sent directly to customers. Shipping companies are introducing hefty surcharges, canceling bookings, and offloading containers in completely different ports than agreed. "Right now, it's the Wild West," says an industry player to Financial Times. Ships turn back – containers dumped Following Iranian attacks and increased risk in the Strait of Hormuz, several of the world's largest shipping companies – such as MSC, Maersk and CMA CGM – have begun to reroute ships or stop traffic entirely. The result is that containers no longer reach their original destination. Instead, they are unloaded in alternative ports – often far away – and customers must pay for further transport, storage, and customs themselves. This creates unpredictable extra costs. "If we don't pay, our accounts will be frozen. We are practically held hostage," says an industry player to the newspaper. Quadrupling of prices A standard container from Europe to the United Arab Emirates that previously cost around 1,500 dollars, is now closer to 6,000 dollars. In addition, there is war insurance, fuel surcharges, port fees, and extra land transport. In total, the additional cost can quickly amount to several thousand dollars per container. Globally, however, the price increase is more moderate. Shipping companies defend the surcharges with increased costs for fuel, insurance, and security. At the same time, they point to logistical challenges that could last a long time. Oligopoly with power Industrial companies are reacting strongly to the shipping companies' handling. "This is practically an oligopoly acting opportunistically," says the CEO of a larger European industrial company. Long-term contracts temporarily protect some players, but the ripple effects will spread quickly in global value chains. Worse than the pandemic? Around 90 percent of world trade goes by sea, of which about 5 percent goes through the Strait of Hormuz. Around 3,200 ships are now stuck in the Gulf as a result of the attacks, according to Financial Times. Several in the industry believe the situation on some routes is more chaotic than during the pandemic. At the same time, analysts point out that global freight rates are still far below pandemic peaks – which indicates that the crisis is currently regional, but with the potential to spread.
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    https://www.nordnet.dk/markedet/nyheder/fa2b7e9f-0c27-4ce0-8554-32211db75b58 One chokes on their coffee when one reads this hopeless price target from DB. It is only 4 years since the stock was over 20,000.
    3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Back then, it was due to an extra ordinary large income because of very high freight rates (during COVID) - so it cannot be compared. What is at stake now, is APM's own buybacks, APM's belief that the company is worth much more than the market. Price/Book value is approx. 0.7 and then a good 4% shorts, which have been in for a long time, and have probably bet on a fall in the range of 12-15k - among other things, driven by Danske and others' pessimism about the future. All analysts almost agree that everything will fall due to overcapacity - but they have been talking about that for many years. APM has recently ordered 8 new ships and has another 25 in the pipeline, so APM fundamentally views the future differently than the analysts. The short sellers have been tempted by APM having fluctuated up and down for a long time in the interval 10-14k, so 12-15k seemed like a good entry for short posistions - but APM's buyback of own shares, as well as divestment from critical investors means that fewer and fewer see APM as a 250mia company, but probably closer to 300mia - in all its simplicity, because profits in the range of 20-40mia give/take etc. are delivered. So the market has been after APM, the short sellers have followed suit, and are still in the stock, but are currently losing. The remaining private [investors] are more steadfast, and then there are the delisting rumors, which APM itself will not comment on. It is free to go out and say that there is no truth to those rumors - if it is true that there isn't. So all in all, the arrow continues to point upwards... Wars, detours, oil price (which is passed on to customer/consumer) and supply problems are, all else being equal, contributing to pushing freight prices up, and SCFI is also accelerating upwards for now. So APM as a stock has momentum....I am long in APM and the above are just my own observations, and not advice - there are no fortune tellers... fortune tellers :) good day
    23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Agreed - most skeptics have long since sold - and then there are the 4% who have shorted the stock... the overcapacity must surely take effect soon!!! Or something - one thinks that they think. I think a company that makes 20-40bn in profit annually is fairly valued at least at 300bn, but for years pessimists have set the agenda, and it's as if APM with its buyback programs is getting tired of it, so now they are buying in at a price/book value of 0.7. And the remaining shareholders can lean back and wait for APM and their agreement on what the company should be worth, to meet... But it will be interesting to see how the 4% who have shorted the stock react to this - I expect a big "sell out-attentat" soon - pump/dumb, to see if they can make others shake in their boots - there's just the detail that most "doubters" have long since sold, and those who remain won't sell out until APM reaches a more fair target... so if there were to be a pump & dump, it will be interesting to see how far it drops, and how much the short positions increase. We have passed 18k - I believe it can be hammered down to 14k relatively quickly - but let APM's buyback program chew its way through, and then we'll be back after a month, now with even more shorts and even more illiquidity - then it's not far to a squeeze and what have we... Rarely do short sellers lie down and surrender. It will be some exciting weeks leading up to Q1
  • 10.3.
    10.3.
    Tämä julkaisu on poistettu.
    3.3.
    ·
    3.3.
    ·
    Well, a rather large part of the free float is probably still short. So that hurts. At some point they have to exit, so if disturbances continue or get worse, we might get a melt-up in the price. Buybacks are indeed a party for a cashflow positive stock with buybacks :)
  • 14.2.
    ·
    14.2.
    ·
    Why is the sentiment among analysts so negative (24 sell recommendations)? How far must the stock fall before it is interesting?
    13.3.
    ·
    13.3.
    ·
    They might just represent investors who are short in the market…keep in mind that most analysts are paid to provide estimates….why else would they publish their expectations
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
42 päivää sitten
480,00 DKK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 26.3.
6,19%Tuotto/v

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 50 min sitten
    ·
    50 min sitten
    ·
    The war in the Middle East is sending shockwaves through the energy markets, and logistics giant Maersk is now taking steps aimed at the Nordic market. As a result of a sharp increase in fuel prices, the company is introducing a temporary emergency surcharge on transport in the Nordics and Baltics. The «Emergency Inland Fuel/Energy Surcharge» applies to all inland shipments in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania. The fee came into effect on Wednesday, March 18, and varies between countries – from 1.5 percent in Norway to 15.5 percent in Estonia. The surcharge affects all so-called «Store Door» shipments. These are assignments where Maersk is responsible for the entire chain, from «loading point to export port, and/or from discharge port to final delivery address». Maersk specifies that the rates will be updated on a weekly basis going forward, given the highly volatile situation. Furthermore, it is stated that customers using the company's green solutions are currently exempt from the surcharge. «Solutions with electric trucks and rail are currently not affected, but we will continue to monitor the situation closely,» the company writes.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    The escalating conflict in the Middle East is causing full disruption in container shipping – and the bill is sent directly to customers. Shipping companies are introducing hefty surcharges, canceling bookings, and offloading containers in completely different ports than agreed. "Right now, it's the Wild West," says an industry player to Financial Times. Ships turn back – containers dumped Following Iranian attacks and increased risk in the Strait of Hormuz, several of the world's largest shipping companies – such as MSC, Maersk and CMA CGM – have begun to reroute ships or stop traffic entirely. The result is that containers no longer reach their original destination. Instead, they are unloaded in alternative ports – often far away – and customers must pay for further transport, storage, and customs themselves. This creates unpredictable extra costs. "If we don't pay, our accounts will be frozen. We are practically held hostage," says an industry player to the newspaper. Quadrupling of prices A standard container from Europe to the United Arab Emirates that previously cost around 1,500 dollars, is now closer to 6,000 dollars. In addition, there is war insurance, fuel surcharges, port fees, and extra land transport. In total, the additional cost can quickly amount to several thousand dollars per container. Globally, however, the price increase is more moderate. Shipping companies defend the surcharges with increased costs for fuel, insurance, and security. At the same time, they point to logistical challenges that could last a long time. Oligopoly with power Industrial companies are reacting strongly to the shipping companies' handling. "This is practically an oligopoly acting opportunistically," says the CEO of a larger European industrial company. Long-term contracts temporarily protect some players, but the ripple effects will spread quickly in global value chains. Worse than the pandemic? Around 90 percent of world trade goes by sea, of which about 5 percent goes through the Strait of Hormuz. Around 3,200 ships are now stuck in the Gulf as a result of the attacks, according to Financial Times. Several in the industry believe the situation on some routes is more chaotic than during the pandemic. At the same time, analysts point out that global freight rates are still far below pandemic peaks – which indicates that the crisis is currently regional, but with the potential to spread.
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    https://www.nordnet.dk/markedet/nyheder/fa2b7e9f-0c27-4ce0-8554-32211db75b58 One chokes on their coffee when one reads this hopeless price target from DB. It is only 4 years since the stock was over 20,000.
    3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Back then, it was due to an extra ordinary large income because of very high freight rates (during COVID) - so it cannot be compared. What is at stake now, is APM's own buybacks, APM's belief that the company is worth much more than the market. Price/Book value is approx. 0.7 and then a good 4% shorts, which have been in for a long time, and have probably bet on a fall in the range of 12-15k - among other things, driven by Danske and others' pessimism about the future. All analysts almost agree that everything will fall due to overcapacity - but they have been talking about that for many years. APM has recently ordered 8 new ships and has another 25 in the pipeline, so APM fundamentally views the future differently than the analysts. The short sellers have been tempted by APM having fluctuated up and down for a long time in the interval 10-14k, so 12-15k seemed like a good entry for short posistions - but APM's buyback of own shares, as well as divestment from critical investors means that fewer and fewer see APM as a 250mia company, but probably closer to 300mia - in all its simplicity, because profits in the range of 20-40mia give/take etc. are delivered. So the market has been after APM, the short sellers have followed suit, and are still in the stock, but are currently losing. The remaining private [investors] are more steadfast, and then there are the delisting rumors, which APM itself will not comment on. It is free to go out and say that there is no truth to those rumors - if it is true that there isn't. So all in all, the arrow continues to point upwards... Wars, detours, oil price (which is passed on to customer/consumer) and supply problems are, all else being equal, contributing to pushing freight prices up, and SCFI is also accelerating upwards for now. So APM as a stock has momentum....I am long in APM and the above are just my own observations, and not advice - there are no fortune tellers... fortune tellers :) good day
    23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Agreed - most skeptics have long since sold - and then there are the 4% who have shorted the stock... the overcapacity must surely take effect soon!!! Or something - one thinks that they think. I think a company that makes 20-40bn in profit annually is fairly valued at least at 300bn, but for years pessimists have set the agenda, and it's as if APM with its buyback programs is getting tired of it, so now they are buying in at a price/book value of 0.7. And the remaining shareholders can lean back and wait for APM and their agreement on what the company should be worth, to meet... But it will be interesting to see how the 4% who have shorted the stock react to this - I expect a big "sell out-attentat" soon - pump/dumb, to see if they can make others shake in their boots - there's just the detail that most "doubters" have long since sold, and those who remain won't sell out until APM reaches a more fair target... so if there were to be a pump & dump, it will be interesting to see how far it drops, and how much the short positions increase. We have passed 18k - I believe it can be hammered down to 14k relatively quickly - but let APM's buyback program chew its way through, and then we'll be back after a month, now with even more shorts and even more illiquidity - then it's not far to a squeeze and what have we... Rarely do short sellers lie down and surrender. It will be some exciting weeks leading up to Q1
  • 10.3.
    10.3.
    Tämä julkaisu on poistettu.
    3.3.
    ·
    3.3.
    ·
    Well, a rather large part of the free float is probably still short. So that hurts. At some point they have to exit, so if disturbances continue or get worse, we might get a melt-up in the price. Buybacks are indeed a party for a cashflow positive stock with buybacks :)
  • 14.2.
    ·
    14.2.
    ·
    Why is the sentiment among analysts so negative (24 sell recommendations)? How far must the stock fall before it is interesting?
    13.3.
    ·
    13.3.
    ·
    They might just represent investors who are short in the market…keep in mind that most analysts are paid to provide estimates….why else would they publish their expectations
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

DenmarkNasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
2--
2--
1--
2--
2--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Ostaneet eniten

Ostaneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi6 7926 79200

Myyneet eniten

Myyneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi6 7926 79200

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
7.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
5.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
6.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
8.5.2025
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025
18.3.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
42 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
7.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
5.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
6.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
8.5.2025
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025
18.3.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

480,00 DKK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 26.3.
6,19%Tuotto/v

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 50 min sitten
    ·
    50 min sitten
    ·
    The war in the Middle East is sending shockwaves through the energy markets, and logistics giant Maersk is now taking steps aimed at the Nordic market. As a result of a sharp increase in fuel prices, the company is introducing a temporary emergency surcharge on transport in the Nordics and Baltics. The «Emergency Inland Fuel/Energy Surcharge» applies to all inland shipments in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania. The fee came into effect on Wednesday, March 18, and varies between countries – from 1.5 percent in Norway to 15.5 percent in Estonia. The surcharge affects all so-called «Store Door» shipments. These are assignments where Maersk is responsible for the entire chain, from «loading point to export port, and/or from discharge port to final delivery address». Maersk specifies that the rates will be updated on a weekly basis going forward, given the highly volatile situation. Furthermore, it is stated that customers using the company's green solutions are currently exempt from the surcharge. «Solutions with electric trucks and rail are currently not affected, but we will continue to monitor the situation closely,» the company writes.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    The escalating conflict in the Middle East is causing full disruption in container shipping – and the bill is sent directly to customers. Shipping companies are introducing hefty surcharges, canceling bookings, and offloading containers in completely different ports than agreed. "Right now, it's the Wild West," says an industry player to Financial Times. Ships turn back – containers dumped Following Iranian attacks and increased risk in the Strait of Hormuz, several of the world's largest shipping companies – such as MSC, Maersk and CMA CGM – have begun to reroute ships or stop traffic entirely. The result is that containers no longer reach their original destination. Instead, they are unloaded in alternative ports – often far away – and customers must pay for further transport, storage, and customs themselves. This creates unpredictable extra costs. "If we don't pay, our accounts will be frozen. We are practically held hostage," says an industry player to the newspaper. Quadrupling of prices A standard container from Europe to the United Arab Emirates that previously cost around 1,500 dollars, is now closer to 6,000 dollars. In addition, there is war insurance, fuel surcharges, port fees, and extra land transport. In total, the additional cost can quickly amount to several thousand dollars per container. Globally, however, the price increase is more moderate. Shipping companies defend the surcharges with increased costs for fuel, insurance, and security. At the same time, they point to logistical challenges that could last a long time. Oligopoly with power Industrial companies are reacting strongly to the shipping companies' handling. "This is practically an oligopoly acting opportunistically," says the CEO of a larger European industrial company. Long-term contracts temporarily protect some players, but the ripple effects will spread quickly in global value chains. Worse than the pandemic? Around 90 percent of world trade goes by sea, of which about 5 percent goes through the Strait of Hormuz. Around 3,200 ships are now stuck in the Gulf as a result of the attacks, according to Financial Times. Several in the industry believe the situation on some routes is more chaotic than during the pandemic. At the same time, analysts point out that global freight rates are still far below pandemic peaks – which indicates that the crisis is currently regional, but with the potential to spread.
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    https://www.nordnet.dk/markedet/nyheder/fa2b7e9f-0c27-4ce0-8554-32211db75b58 One chokes on their coffee when one reads this hopeless price target from DB. It is only 4 years since the stock was over 20,000.
    3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    3 päivää sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Back then, it was due to an extra ordinary large income because of very high freight rates (during COVID) - so it cannot be compared. What is at stake now, is APM's own buybacks, APM's belief that the company is worth much more than the market. Price/Book value is approx. 0.7 and then a good 4% shorts, which have been in for a long time, and have probably bet on a fall in the range of 12-15k - among other things, driven by Danske and others' pessimism about the future. All analysts almost agree that everything will fall due to overcapacity - but they have been talking about that for many years. APM has recently ordered 8 new ships and has another 25 in the pipeline, so APM fundamentally views the future differently than the analysts. The short sellers have been tempted by APM having fluctuated up and down for a long time in the interval 10-14k, so 12-15k seemed like a good entry for short posistions - but APM's buyback of own shares, as well as divestment from critical investors means that fewer and fewer see APM as a 250mia company, but probably closer to 300mia - in all its simplicity, because profits in the range of 20-40mia give/take etc. are delivered. So the market has been after APM, the short sellers have followed suit, and are still in the stock, but are currently losing. The remaining private [investors] are more steadfast, and then there are the delisting rumors, which APM itself will not comment on. It is free to go out and say that there is no truth to those rumors - if it is true that there isn't. So all in all, the arrow continues to point upwards... Wars, detours, oil price (which is passed on to customer/consumer) and supply problems are, all else being equal, contributing to pushing freight prices up, and SCFI is also accelerating upwards for now. So APM as a stock has momentum....I am long in APM and the above are just my own observations, and not advice - there are no fortune tellers... fortune tellers :) good day
    23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    23 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Agreed - most skeptics have long since sold - and then there are the 4% who have shorted the stock... the overcapacity must surely take effect soon!!! Or something - one thinks that they think. I think a company that makes 20-40bn in profit annually is fairly valued at least at 300bn, but for years pessimists have set the agenda, and it's as if APM with its buyback programs is getting tired of it, so now they are buying in at a price/book value of 0.7. And the remaining shareholders can lean back and wait for APM and their agreement on what the company should be worth, to meet... But it will be interesting to see how the 4% who have shorted the stock react to this - I expect a big "sell out-attentat" soon - pump/dumb, to see if they can make others shake in their boots - there's just the detail that most "doubters" have long since sold, and those who remain won't sell out until APM reaches a more fair target... so if there were to be a pump & dump, it will be interesting to see how far it drops, and how much the short positions increase. We have passed 18k - I believe it can be hammered down to 14k relatively quickly - but let APM's buyback program chew its way through, and then we'll be back after a month, now with even more shorts and even more illiquidity - then it's not far to a squeeze and what have we... Rarely do short sellers lie down and surrender. It will be some exciting weeks leading up to Q1
  • 10.3.
    10.3.
    Tämä julkaisu on poistettu.
    3.3.
    ·
    3.3.
    ·
    Well, a rather large part of the free float is probably still short. So that hurts. At some point they have to exit, so if disturbances continue or get worse, we might get a melt-up in the price. Buybacks are indeed a party for a cashflow positive stock with buybacks :)
  • 14.2.
    ·
    14.2.
    ·
    Why is the sentiment among analysts so negative (24 sell recommendations)? How far must the stock fall before it is interesting?
    13.3.
    ·
    13.3.
    ·
    They might just represent investors who are short in the market…keep in mind that most analysts are paid to provide estimates….why else would they publish their expectations
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

DenmarkNasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
2--
2--
1--
2--
2--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Ostaneet eniten

Ostaneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi6 7926 79200

Myyneet eniten

Myyneet eniten
VälittäjäOstettuMyytyNettoSisäinen
Anonyymi6 7926 79200
© 2026 Nordnet Bank AB.
Nordnet | Alvar Aallon katu 5 C, 3. krs | FI-00100 Helsinki