2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
30 päivää sitten
‧42 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 3.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 3.6. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 2.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 3.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 4.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
14 t sitten · Muokattu14 t sitten · Muokattu“Palantir's valuation is moving lower today amid a broader pullback in artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, spurred by a new executive order signed by President Donald Trump. As of this writing, the stock is now down roughly 14% year to date.” What the actual F is this? Does anyone have any insight or more information about this?
6 t sitten6 t sittenI miss the days when investing wasn't determined by one president needing a diaper change
·1 päivä sittenPalantir's UK-troubles – a symptom of something bigger? The contract losses in Europe are starting to form a pattern worth discussing. The concrete facts: In a short time, we have seen the London Mayor block a £50m-deal with the Met Police, Switzerland say no after seven years of lobbying, and increasing political pressure on the NHS contract. Individually, these are small sums for a company guiding $7,65 billion for 2026. But together, they tell a story. My hypothesis: I believe the underlying driver is something deeper than procurement rules and privacy – namely, declining trust in American authorities. When European states consider placing sensitive data (police intelligence, health information, defense info) into American-controlled systems, it's about who they trust in Washington. Switzerland said no precisely because they feared American intelligence could gain access. The Trump connection: Palantir's leadership, and Alex Karp in particular, have positioned themselves closely with the current American administration. That can be a strength in the USA – where the explosive growth lies – but it is potentially a burden in Europe. The more Palantir appears as an extension of American state power under Trump, the more hesitant European allies become who are currently uncertain about the transatlantic relationship. Why this is a real risk: This is not just reputation. If the mindset «American technology = geopolitical risk» takes hold in European procurement departments, we are talking about a structural ceiling on Palantir's European growth – regardless of how good the software is. And that is difficult to price in beforehand. The other side: At the same time, the USA segment doubled last quarter, and the Middle East is filling parts of the void. Karp himself has said that Europe hesitates while Arab states and Israel buy. So the case is not dependent on Europe – but European resistance is a temperature gauge for a risk that can spread.
4 t sitten4 t sittenI think/ agree this all has happened due to the trust issues with the present US administration, all the threaths and volatility in Trump’s actions has shown US is no longer a reliable partner. Therefore , european authorities are also stepping up efforts to distance themselves from reliance on American tech giants such as Google, Microsoft, and Amazon when handling sensitive government and corporate data . And , european banking leaders and policymakers are working on reducing dependence on U.S. card companies, like Visa and Mastercard, because their dominance is seen as a stratetic dependency.- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenAgain today I heard another analysis comparing the dot com bubble to what is happening today with AI. But here’s where the analogy fails, atleast for PLTR, companies back then over spent on scaling up and scaled beyond their customer base. They used the mantra “if we build it they will come”. In other other words: “Before the dot-com bubble popped, company revenues grew at explosive rates, though often disconnected from profitability. Key examples include: Cisco: Revenue surged 850% from 1995 to 2000, rising from $2 billion to $19 billion. Amazon: Revenue jumped from $7 million in 1998 to $151 million in 1999 and $166 million in 2000, despite operating at massive losses. DoubleClick: Served approximately 50 billion ads monthly by late 1999, with ad volume growing by an order of magnitude from 1998 to 2000. eBay: Hosted auctions grew from 250,000 in 1996 to two million in the first month of 1997. Despite this rapid top-line growth, many of these companies operated with negative unit economics or significant losses, relying on "get big fast" strategies rather than sustainable profit models.” PLTR is growing whilst growing its profit margins, it is positioning itself that if a pop does occur it’s not going anywhere! If I am to compare one company to the scenario of the dot com companies it would be Anthropic! It fits the narrative of the companies before the dot com bubble. So I trust the PLTR leadership and believe they have the best interests and strategy to weather what may come. Have a good week everyone!
·1 päivä sittenWhat a splendid Monday
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
30 päivää sitten
‧42 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 14 t sitten · Muokattu14 t sitten · Muokattu“Palantir's valuation is moving lower today amid a broader pullback in artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, spurred by a new executive order signed by President Donald Trump. As of this writing, the stock is now down roughly 14% year to date.” What the actual F is this? Does anyone have any insight or more information about this?6 t sitten6 t sittenI miss the days when investing wasn't determined by one president needing a diaper change
- ·1 päivä sittenPalantir's UK-troubles – a symptom of something bigger? The contract losses in Europe are starting to form a pattern worth discussing. The concrete facts: In a short time, we have seen the London Mayor block a £50m-deal with the Met Police, Switzerland say no after seven years of lobbying, and increasing political pressure on the NHS contract. Individually, these are small sums for a company guiding $7,65 billion for 2026. But together, they tell a story. My hypothesis: I believe the underlying driver is something deeper than procurement rules and privacy – namely, declining trust in American authorities. When European states consider placing sensitive data (police intelligence, health information, defense info) into American-controlled systems, it's about who they trust in Washington. Switzerland said no precisely because they feared American intelligence could gain access. The Trump connection: Palantir's leadership, and Alex Karp in particular, have positioned themselves closely with the current American administration. That can be a strength in the USA – where the explosive growth lies – but it is potentially a burden in Europe. The more Palantir appears as an extension of American state power under Trump, the more hesitant European allies become who are currently uncertain about the transatlantic relationship. Why this is a real risk: This is not just reputation. If the mindset «American technology = geopolitical risk» takes hold in European procurement departments, we are talking about a structural ceiling on Palantir's European growth – regardless of how good the software is. And that is difficult to price in beforehand. The other side: At the same time, the USA segment doubled last quarter, and the Middle East is filling parts of the void. Karp himself has said that Europe hesitates while Arab states and Israel buy. So the case is not dependent on Europe – but European resistance is a temperature gauge for a risk that can spread.4 t sitten4 t sittenI think/ agree this all has happened due to the trust issues with the present US administration, all the threaths and volatility in Trump’s actions has shown US is no longer a reliable partner. Therefore , european authorities are also stepping up efforts to distance themselves from reliance on American tech giants such as Google, Microsoft, and Amazon when handling sensitive government and corporate data . And , european banking leaders and policymakers are working on reducing dependence on U.S. card companies, like Visa and Mastercard, because their dominance is seen as a stratetic dependency.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenAgain today I heard another analysis comparing the dot com bubble to what is happening today with AI. But here’s where the analogy fails, atleast for PLTR, companies back then over spent on scaling up and scaled beyond their customer base. They used the mantra “if we build it they will come”. In other other words: “Before the dot-com bubble popped, company revenues grew at explosive rates, though often disconnected from profitability. Key examples include: Cisco: Revenue surged 850% from 1995 to 2000, rising from $2 billion to $19 billion. Amazon: Revenue jumped from $7 million in 1998 to $151 million in 1999 and $166 million in 2000, despite operating at massive losses. DoubleClick: Served approximately 50 billion ads monthly by late 1999, with ad volume growing by an order of magnitude from 1998 to 2000. eBay: Hosted auctions grew from 250,000 in 1996 to two million in the first month of 1997. Despite this rapid top-line growth, many of these companies operated with negative unit economics or significant losses, relying on "get big fast" strategies rather than sustainable profit models.” PLTR is growing whilst growing its profit margins, it is positioning itself that if a pop does occur it’s not going anywhere! If I am to compare one company to the scenario of the dot com companies it would be Anthropic! It fits the narrative of the companies before the dot com bubble. So I trust the PLTR leadership and believe they have the best interests and strategy to weather what may come. Have a good week everyone!
- ·1 päivä sittenWhat a splendid Monday
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 3.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 3.6. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 2.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 3.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 4.8.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
30 päivää sitten
‧42 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 3.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 3.6. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 2.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 3.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 4.8.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 14 t sitten · Muokattu14 t sitten · Muokattu“Palantir's valuation is moving lower today amid a broader pullback in artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, spurred by a new executive order signed by President Donald Trump. As of this writing, the stock is now down roughly 14% year to date.” What the actual F is this? Does anyone have any insight or more information about this?6 t sitten6 t sittenI miss the days when investing wasn't determined by one president needing a diaper change
- ·1 päivä sittenPalantir's UK-troubles – a symptom of something bigger? The contract losses in Europe are starting to form a pattern worth discussing. The concrete facts: In a short time, we have seen the London Mayor block a £50m-deal with the Met Police, Switzerland say no after seven years of lobbying, and increasing political pressure on the NHS contract. Individually, these are small sums for a company guiding $7,65 billion for 2026. But together, they tell a story. My hypothesis: I believe the underlying driver is something deeper than procurement rules and privacy – namely, declining trust in American authorities. When European states consider placing sensitive data (police intelligence, health information, defense info) into American-controlled systems, it's about who they trust in Washington. Switzerland said no precisely because they feared American intelligence could gain access. The Trump connection: Palantir's leadership, and Alex Karp in particular, have positioned themselves closely with the current American administration. That can be a strength in the USA – where the explosive growth lies – but it is potentially a burden in Europe. The more Palantir appears as an extension of American state power under Trump, the more hesitant European allies become who are currently uncertain about the transatlantic relationship. Why this is a real risk: This is not just reputation. If the mindset «American technology = geopolitical risk» takes hold in European procurement departments, we are talking about a structural ceiling on Palantir's European growth – regardless of how good the software is. And that is difficult to price in beforehand. The other side: At the same time, the USA segment doubled last quarter, and the Middle East is filling parts of the void. Karp himself has said that Europe hesitates while Arab states and Israel buy. So the case is not dependent on Europe – but European resistance is a temperature gauge for a risk that can spread.4 t sitten4 t sittenI think/ agree this all has happened due to the trust issues with the present US administration, all the threaths and volatility in Trump’s actions has shown US is no longer a reliable partner. Therefore , european authorities are also stepping up efforts to distance themselves from reliance on American tech giants such as Google, Microsoft, and Amazon when handling sensitive government and corporate data . And , european banking leaders and policymakers are working on reducing dependence on U.S. card companies, like Visa and Mastercard, because their dominance is seen as a stratetic dependency.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenAgain today I heard another analysis comparing the dot com bubble to what is happening today with AI. But here’s where the analogy fails, atleast for PLTR, companies back then over spent on scaling up and scaled beyond their customer base. They used the mantra “if we build it they will come”. In other other words: “Before the dot-com bubble popped, company revenues grew at explosive rates, though often disconnected from profitability. Key examples include: Cisco: Revenue surged 850% from 1995 to 2000, rising from $2 billion to $19 billion. Amazon: Revenue jumped from $7 million in 1998 to $151 million in 1999 and $166 million in 2000, despite operating at massive losses. DoubleClick: Served approximately 50 billion ads monthly by late 1999, with ad volume growing by an order of magnitude from 1998 to 2000. eBay: Hosted auctions grew from 250,000 in 1996 to two million in the first month of 1997. Despite this rapid top-line growth, many of these companies operated with negative unit economics or significant losses, relying on "get big fast" strategies rather than sustainable profit models.” PLTR is growing whilst growing its profit margins, it is positioning itself that if a pop does occur it’s not going anywhere! If I am to compare one company to the scenario of the dot com companies it would be Anthropic! It fits the narrative of the companies before the dot com bubble. So I trust the PLTR leadership and believe they have the best interests and strategy to weather what may come. Have a good week everyone!
- ·1 päivä sittenWhat a splendid Monday
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt