2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten
‧1 t 6 min
0,41 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,66%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 387 | - | - | ||
| 1 038 | - | - | ||
| 110 | - | - | ||
| 1 869 | - | - | ||
| 1 518 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 22.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·15 t sittenThe shorters in Ambu actually pay money every single day to keep their positions open. They have borrowed the shares and still hope for a decline, but when the share is stable or rises, time starts to work against them. At the same time, Ambu has carried out large share buybacks, which means fewer free shares in the market. Therefore, some shorters may at some point choose to close their positions and buy back the shares to limit risk and costs. My personal opinion is that I would rather have the money invested in a good company than standing passively in the bank without keeping up with inflation. If one believes in the case, it can well be worth waiting 2-4 years for a larger gain that really makes a difference. Have a good weekend.- ·20 t sittenIf one puts the pieces together right now in Ambu, it's actually a quite interesting technical situation that has arisen. We fundamentally have three forces that can start working against the shorts simultaneously: 1. Ambu itself is buying back shares 2. Long-term investors are holding on 3. The shorts will at some point have to buy back shares to close their positions And that is precisely where the dynamics can change very quickly. Let's look at the numbers first: * Short positions: approximately 19-20 million shares * Ambu's buyback: approximately 4.8 million * The buyback thus corresponds to approximately 24-25 % of the entire current short volume In practice, this means: The company now becomes a large, constant buyer in the market. Not for one day — but over a longer period. If the market simultaneously starts to believe in: * stable growth, * better margins, * stronger endoscopy sales, * or simply that the worst is over, then some short funds might start to reduce risk. The problem for the shorts is that they all ultimately have to buy back the same shares. And if: * the supply of free shares decreases, * the company itself buys millions of shares, * and private investors hold on, then the price can start to rise faster than the shorts expect. That is what is called a possible “short squeeze” mechanism. Not necessarily a violent GameStop scenario — but more of a slow, uncomfortable upward trend, where: * the price rises, * the losses for the shorts grow, * and more funds eventually choose to close positions to limit risk. This can create a self-reinforcing effect: * more purchases → higher price → more short coverings → even more purchases. This is especially important in Ambu, because historically the stock can move very quickly on relatively small volume.
·18 t sittenI just asked AI to calculate what the stock should cost if they succeed in achieving their plan 29/30, i.e., 4 years from now. Based on the assumption that they buy back shares for half of the profit and PE is set to 30, the price will be 180-230, the growth is set to 11-13 percent. 
·1 päivä sittenA smart TA wrote that a spinning top and beginning SAR below was often a sign of a price reversal. https://invst.ly/1h8ai4- ·1 päivä sittenWhen a shorter shorts a stock, they borrow shares and sell them with the hope of being able to buy them back cheaper later. But the borrowed shares must eventually be returned. Therefore, a short position is always temporary. * A shorter has a time-limited position. * A long-term investor can theoretically wait much longer. * And if the company develops positively over time, the shorters can end up being squeezed out. That is also why large short positions can sometimes become fuel for price increases later.·19 t sittenIt may well be that shorts are time-limited to some extent, but they can, as can be seen in e.g. Gn, nevertheless be held for a very very long time. And if a stock is fundamentally weak and with little chance of explosively good news, then a short squeeze can be quite far off.·17 t sittenI believe it's more or less the same actors/hedge funds that drive stocks up to then short them. Perhaps some of these big actors have several trading platforms in different companies; they then have the possibility to cover themselves, just in another company.
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen I buy shares, I see myself as a small co-owner of the company. I don't invest for quick gains or to be swayed by daily fluctuations on the stock exchange. I believe in patience and that good companies over time create value for their shareholders. I don't sell at a loss just because the price is pushed down by short sellers or nervous markets. I stay calm and don't let myself be affected by short-term noise. I calmly follow the development, perhaps check once a week, and let time do its work. My stance is simple: When the company develops well, shareholders are rewarded in the long run. The day I choose to sell with a reasonable profit, I say thank you for the cooperation — and thank you to the company for having rewarded me as a long-term shareholder.·1 päivä sittenThat sounds really great with 200,000 kr. in profit 👍 Just remember to also think a bit about the tax before you sell too much at once. On stock gains, there is both the low and the high tax rate, so it can often pay off to plan the sales a bit over several years. Some therefore choose to withdraw a little at a time each year to utilize the low rate as best as possible and avoid unnecessarily high taxation. It is of course different from person to person, but it is worth keeping in mind 😊
·1 päivä sittenThanks. I mostly think about optimizing my return, and then I pay the tax that comes with it. I also pay tax on my salary income, after all. I have become much better at trading in the ups and downs that Trump especially causes. It's no secret that I have greatly benefited from being short-term this year and otherwise struck at the right times. But you can believe that I can also take losses of, for example, 30-40.000 on some relatively short positions. Take losses and wins with the same mindset. Losses are part of the game.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten
‧1 t 6 min
0,41 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,66%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·15 t sittenThe shorters in Ambu actually pay money every single day to keep their positions open. They have borrowed the shares and still hope for a decline, but when the share is stable or rises, time starts to work against them. At the same time, Ambu has carried out large share buybacks, which means fewer free shares in the market. Therefore, some shorters may at some point choose to close their positions and buy back the shares to limit risk and costs. My personal opinion is that I would rather have the money invested in a good company than standing passively in the bank without keeping up with inflation. If one believes in the case, it can well be worth waiting 2-4 years for a larger gain that really makes a difference. Have a good weekend.
- ·20 t sittenIf one puts the pieces together right now in Ambu, it's actually a quite interesting technical situation that has arisen. We fundamentally have three forces that can start working against the shorts simultaneously: 1. Ambu itself is buying back shares 2. Long-term investors are holding on 3. The shorts will at some point have to buy back shares to close their positions And that is precisely where the dynamics can change very quickly. Let's look at the numbers first: * Short positions: approximately 19-20 million shares * Ambu's buyback: approximately 4.8 million * The buyback thus corresponds to approximately 24-25 % of the entire current short volume In practice, this means: The company now becomes a large, constant buyer in the market. Not for one day — but over a longer period. If the market simultaneously starts to believe in: * stable growth, * better margins, * stronger endoscopy sales, * or simply that the worst is over, then some short funds might start to reduce risk. The problem for the shorts is that they all ultimately have to buy back the same shares. And if: * the supply of free shares decreases, * the company itself buys millions of shares, * and private investors hold on, then the price can start to rise faster than the shorts expect. That is what is called a possible “short squeeze” mechanism. Not necessarily a violent GameStop scenario — but more of a slow, uncomfortable upward trend, where: * the price rises, * the losses for the shorts grow, * and more funds eventually choose to close positions to limit risk. This can create a self-reinforcing effect: * more purchases → higher price → more short coverings → even more purchases. This is especially important in Ambu, because historically the stock can move very quickly on relatively small volume.·18 t sittenI just asked AI to calculate what the stock should cost if they succeed in achieving their plan 29/30, i.e., 4 years from now. Based on the assumption that they buy back shares for half of the profit and PE is set to 30, the price will be 180-230, the growth is set to 11-13 percent.
- ·1 päivä sittenA smart TA wrote that a spinning top and beginning SAR below was often a sign of a price reversal. https://invst.ly/1h8ai4
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen a shorter shorts a stock, they borrow shares and sell them with the hope of being able to buy them back cheaper later. But the borrowed shares must eventually be returned. Therefore, a short position is always temporary. * A shorter has a time-limited position. * A long-term investor can theoretically wait much longer. * And if the company develops positively over time, the shorters can end up being squeezed out. That is also why large short positions can sometimes become fuel for price increases later.·19 t sittenIt may well be that shorts are time-limited to some extent, but they can, as can be seen in e.g. Gn, nevertheless be held for a very very long time. And if a stock is fundamentally weak and with little chance of explosively good news, then a short squeeze can be quite far off.·17 t sittenI believe it's more or less the same actors/hedge funds that drive stocks up to then short them. Perhaps some of these big actors have several trading platforms in different companies; they then have the possibility to cover themselves, just in another company.
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen I buy shares, I see myself as a small co-owner of the company. I don't invest for quick gains or to be swayed by daily fluctuations on the stock exchange. I believe in patience and that good companies over time create value for their shareholders. I don't sell at a loss just because the price is pushed down by short sellers or nervous markets. I stay calm and don't let myself be affected by short-term noise. I calmly follow the development, perhaps check once a week, and let time do its work. My stance is simple: When the company develops well, shareholders are rewarded in the long run. The day I choose to sell with a reasonable profit, I say thank you for the cooperation — and thank you to the company for having rewarded me as a long-term shareholder.·1 päivä sittenThat sounds really great with 200,000 kr. in profit 👍 Just remember to also think a bit about the tax before you sell too much at once. On stock gains, there is both the low and the high tax rate, so it can often pay off to plan the sales a bit over several years. Some therefore choose to withdraw a little at a time each year to utilize the low rate as best as possible and avoid unnecessarily high taxation. It is of course different from person to person, but it is worth keeping in mind 😊·1 päivä sittenThanks. I mostly think about optimizing my return, and then I pay the tax that comes with it. I also pay tax on my salary income, after all. I have become much better at trading in the ups and downs that Trump especially causes. It's no secret that I have greatly benefited from being short-term this year and otherwise struck at the right times. But you can believe that I can also take losses of, for example, 30-40.000 on some relatively short positions. Take losses and wins with the same mindset. Losses are part of the game.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 387 | - | - | ||
| 1 038 | - | - | ||
| 110 | - | - | ||
| 1 869 | - | - | ||
| 1 518 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 22.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten
‧1 t 6 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 6.5. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 22.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 |
0,41 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,66%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·15 t sittenThe shorters in Ambu actually pay money every single day to keep their positions open. They have borrowed the shares and still hope for a decline, but when the share is stable or rises, time starts to work against them. At the same time, Ambu has carried out large share buybacks, which means fewer free shares in the market. Therefore, some shorters may at some point choose to close their positions and buy back the shares to limit risk and costs. My personal opinion is that I would rather have the money invested in a good company than standing passively in the bank without keeping up with inflation. If one believes in the case, it can well be worth waiting 2-4 years for a larger gain that really makes a difference. Have a good weekend.
- ·20 t sittenIf one puts the pieces together right now in Ambu, it's actually a quite interesting technical situation that has arisen. We fundamentally have three forces that can start working against the shorts simultaneously: 1. Ambu itself is buying back shares 2. Long-term investors are holding on 3. The shorts will at some point have to buy back shares to close their positions And that is precisely where the dynamics can change very quickly. Let's look at the numbers first: * Short positions: approximately 19-20 million shares * Ambu's buyback: approximately 4.8 million * The buyback thus corresponds to approximately 24-25 % of the entire current short volume In practice, this means: The company now becomes a large, constant buyer in the market. Not for one day — but over a longer period. If the market simultaneously starts to believe in: * stable growth, * better margins, * stronger endoscopy sales, * or simply that the worst is over, then some short funds might start to reduce risk. The problem for the shorts is that they all ultimately have to buy back the same shares. And if: * the supply of free shares decreases, * the company itself buys millions of shares, * and private investors hold on, then the price can start to rise faster than the shorts expect. That is what is called a possible “short squeeze” mechanism. Not necessarily a violent GameStop scenario — but more of a slow, uncomfortable upward trend, where: * the price rises, * the losses for the shorts grow, * and more funds eventually choose to close positions to limit risk. This can create a self-reinforcing effect: * more purchases → higher price → more short coverings → even more purchases. This is especially important in Ambu, because historically the stock can move very quickly on relatively small volume.·18 t sittenI just asked AI to calculate what the stock should cost if they succeed in achieving their plan 29/30, i.e., 4 years from now. Based on the assumption that they buy back shares for half of the profit and PE is set to 30, the price will be 180-230, the growth is set to 11-13 percent.
- ·1 päivä sittenA smart TA wrote that a spinning top and beginning SAR below was often a sign of a price reversal. https://invst.ly/1h8ai4
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen a shorter shorts a stock, they borrow shares and sell them with the hope of being able to buy them back cheaper later. But the borrowed shares must eventually be returned. Therefore, a short position is always temporary. * A shorter has a time-limited position. * A long-term investor can theoretically wait much longer. * And if the company develops positively over time, the shorters can end up being squeezed out. That is also why large short positions can sometimes become fuel for price increases later.·19 t sittenIt may well be that shorts are time-limited to some extent, but they can, as can be seen in e.g. Gn, nevertheless be held for a very very long time. And if a stock is fundamentally weak and with little chance of explosively good news, then a short squeeze can be quite far off.·17 t sittenI believe it's more or less the same actors/hedge funds that drive stocks up to then short them. Perhaps some of these big actors have several trading platforms in different companies; they then have the possibility to cover themselves, just in another company.
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen I buy shares, I see myself as a small co-owner of the company. I don't invest for quick gains or to be swayed by daily fluctuations on the stock exchange. I believe in patience and that good companies over time create value for their shareholders. I don't sell at a loss just because the price is pushed down by short sellers or nervous markets. I stay calm and don't let myself be affected by short-term noise. I calmly follow the development, perhaps check once a week, and let time do its work. My stance is simple: When the company develops well, shareholders are rewarded in the long run. The day I choose to sell with a reasonable profit, I say thank you for the cooperation — and thank you to the company for having rewarded me as a long-term shareholder.·1 päivä sittenThat sounds really great with 200,000 kr. in profit 👍 Just remember to also think a bit about the tax before you sell too much at once. On stock gains, there is both the low and the high tax rate, so it can often pay off to plan the sales a bit over several years. Some therefore choose to withdraw a little at a time each year to utilize the low rate as best as possible and avoid unnecessarily high taxation. It is of course different from person to person, but it is worth keeping in mind 😊·1 päivä sittenThanks. I mostly think about optimizing my return, and then I pay the tax that comes with it. I also pay tax on my salary income, after all. I have become much better at trading in the ups and downs that Trump especially causes. It's no secret that I have greatly benefited from being short-term this year and otherwise struck at the right times. But you can believe that I can also take losses of, for example, 30-40.000 on some relatively short positions. Take losses and wins with the same mindset. Losses are part of the game.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 387 | - | - | ||
| 1 038 | - | - | ||
| 110 | - | - | ||
| 1 869 | - | - | ||
| 1 518 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt